Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Results from the T2K Experiment on Neutrino Mixing Including a New Far Detector μ-like Sample

K. Abe61, S. Abe60, R. Akutsu16, H. Alarakia-Charles34, Y. I. Alj Hakim55, S. Alonso Monsalve9, L. Anthony21, S. Aoki32, K. A. Apte21 et al. (T2K Collaboration)

K. A. Apte21, T. Arai60, T. Arihara64, S. Arimoto33, Y. Ashida70, E. T. Atkin21, N. Babu38, V. Baranov39, G. J. Barker71, G. Barr47, D. Barrow47, P. Bates37, L. Bathe-Peters47, M. Batkiewicz-Kwasniak15, N. Baudis47, V. Berardi22, L. Berns70, S. Bhattacharjee38, A. Blanchet11, A. Blondel58,12, P. M. M. Boistier5, S. Bolognesi5, S. Bordoni12, S. B. Boyd71, C. Bronner73, A. Bubak56, M. Buizza Avanzini36, J. A. Caballero54, F. Cadoux12, N. F. Calabria22, S. Cao20, S. Cap12, D. Carabadjac36,*, S. L. Cartwright55, M. P. Casado18,†, M. G. Catanesi22, J. Chakrani35, A. Chalumeau58, D. Cherdack17, A. Chvirova26, J. Coleman37, G. Collazuol24, F. Cormier66, A. A. L. Craplet21, A. Cudd6, D. D’Ago24, C. Dalmazzone58, T. Daret5, P. Dasgupta8, C. Davis48, Yu. I. Davydov39, P. de Perio29, G. De Rosa23, T. Dealtry34, C. Densham44, A. Dergacheva26, R. Dharmapal Banerjee72, F. Di Lodovico31, G. Diaz Lopez58, S. Dolan11, D. Douqa12, T. A. Doyle47, O. Drapier36, K. E. Duffy47, J. Dumarchez58, P. Dunne21, K. Dygnarowicz69, A. Eguchi60, J. Elias50, S. Emery-Schrenk5, G. Erofeev26, A. Ershova36, G. Eurin5, D. Fedorova26, S. Fedotov26, M. Feltre24, L. Feng33, D. Ferlewicz58, A. J. Finch34, M. D. Fitton44, C. Forza24, M. Friend16,‡, Y. Fujii16,‡, Y. Fukuda41, Y. Furui64, J. García-Marcos14, A. C. Germer48, L. Giannessi12, C. Giganti58, M. Girgus68, V. Glagolev39, M. Gonin28, R. González Jiménez54, J. González Rosa54, E. A. G. Goodman13, K. Gorshanov26, P. Govindaraj68, M. Grassi24, M. Guigue58, F. Y. Guo43, D. R. Hadley71, S. Han33,62, D. A. Harris74, R. J. Harris34,44, T. Hasegawa16,‡, C. M. Hasnip11, S. Hassani5, N. C. Hastings16, Y. Hayato61,29, I. Heitkamp70, D. Henaff5, Y. Hino16, J. Holeczek56, A. Holin44, T. Holvey47, N. T. Hong Van27, T. Honjo46, M. C. F. Hooft14, K. Hosokawa61, J. Hu33, A. K. Ichikawa70, K. Ieki61, M. Ikeda61, T. H. Ishida70, T. Ishida16,‡, M. Ishitsuka65, H. Ito32, S. Ito73, A. Izmaylov26, N. Jachowicz14, S. J. Jenkins37, C. Jesús-Valls11, M. Jia43, J. J. Jiang43, J. Y. Ji43, T. P. Jones34, P. Jonsson21, S. Joshi43, C. K. Jung43,§, M. Kabirnezhad21, A. C. Kaboth51, H. Kakuno64, J. Kameda61, S. Karpova12, V. S. Kasturi12, Y. Kataoka61, T. Katori31, A. Kawabata30, Y. Kawamura46, M. Kawaue33, E. Kearns2,§, M. Khabibullin26, A. Khotjantsev26, T. Kikawa33, S. King31, V. Kiseeva39, J. Kisiel56, A. Klustová21, L. Kneale55, H. Kobayashi60, Sota. R. Kobayashi70, L. Koch19, S. Kodama60, M. Kolupanova26, A. Konaka66, L. L. Kormos34, Y. Koshio45,§, K. Kowalik42, Y. Kudenko26,∥, Y. Kudo73, A. Kumar Jha14, R. Kurjata69, V. Kurochka26, T. Kutter38, L. Labarga1, M. Lachat50, K. Lachner9, J. Lagoda42, S. M. Lakshmi56, M. Lamers James71, A. Langella23, D. H. Langridge51, J.-F. Laporte5, D. Last50, N. Latham31, M. Laveder24, L. Lavitola23, M. Lawe34, D. Leon Silverio59, S. Levorato24, S. V. Lewis31, B. Li9, C. Lin21, R. P. Litchfield13, S. L. Liu43, W. Li47, A. Longhin24, A. Lopez Moreno31, L. Ludovici25, X. Lu71, T. Lux18, L. N. Machado13, L. Magaletti22, K. Mahn40, K. K. Mahtani43, M. Mandal42, S. Manly50, A. D. Marino6, D. G. R. Martin21, D. A. Martinez Caicedo59, L. Martinez18, M. Martini58,¶, T. Matsubara16, R. Matsumoto63, V. Matveev26, C. Mauger48, K. Mavrokoridis37, N. McCauley37, K. S. McFarland50, C. McGrew43, J. McKean21, A. Mefodiev26, G. D. Megias54, L. Mellet40, C. Metelko37, M. Mezzetto24, S. Miki61, V. Mikola13, E. W. Miller21, A. Minamino73, O. Mineev26, S. Mine61,4, J. Mirabito2, M. Miura61,§, S. Moriyama61,§, S. Moriyama73, P. Morrison13, Th. A. Mueller36, D. Munford17, A. Muñoz36,28, L. Munteanu11, Y. Nagai8, T. Nakadaira16,‡, K. Nakagiri61, M. Nakahata61,29, Y. Nakajima60, K. D. Nakamura70, A. Nakano70, Y. Nakano67, S. Nakayama61,29, T. Nakaya33,29, K. Nakayoshi16,‡, C. E. R. Naseby21, D. T. Nguyen10, V. Q. Nguyen36, K. Niewczas14, S. Nishimori16, Y. Nishimura30, Y. Noguchi61, T. Nosek42, F. Nova44, J. C. Nugent21, H. M. O’Keeffe34, L. O’Sullivan19, R. Okazaki30, W. Okinaga60, K. Okumura62,29, T. Okusawa46, N. Onda33, N. Ospina22, L. Osu36, N. Otani33, Y. Oyama16,‡, V. Paolone49, J. Pasternak21, D. Payne37, T. P. D. Peacock55, M. Pfaff21, L. Pickering44, B. Popov58,**, A. J. Portocarrero Yrey16, M. Posiadala-Zezula68, Y. S. Prabhu68, H. Prasad72, F. Pupilli24, B. Quilain28,36, P. T. Quyen20,††, E. Radicioni22, B. Radics74, M. A. Ramirez Delgado48, R. Ramsden31, P. N. Ratoff34, M. Reh6, G. Reina19, C. Riccio43, D. W. Riley13, E. Rondio42, S. Roth52, N. Roy74, A. Rubbia9, L. Russo58, A. Rychter69, W. Saenz58, K. Sakashita16,‡, S. Samani12, F. Sánchez12, E. M. Sandford37, Y. Sato65, T. Schefke38, C. M. Schloesser12, K. Scholberg7,§, M. Scott21, Y. Seiya46,‡‡, T. Sekiguchi16,‡, H. Sekiya61,29,§, T. Sekiya64, D. Seppala40, D. Sgalaberna9, A. Shaikhiev26, M. Shiozawa61,29, Y. Shiraishi45, A. Shvartsman26, N. Skrobova26, K. Skwarczynski51, D. Smyczek52, M. Smy4, J. T. Sobczyk72, H. Sobel4,29, F. J. P. Soler13, A. J. Speers34, R. Spina22, A. Srivastava19, P. Stowell55, Y. Stroke26, I. A. Suslov39, A. Suzuki32, S. Y. Suzuki16,‡, M. Tada16,‡, S. Tairafune70, A. Takeda61, Y. Takeuchi32,29, K. Takeya45, H. K. Tanaka61,§, H. Tanigawa16, A. Teklu43, V. V. Tereshchenko39, N. Thamm52, C. Touramanis37, N. Tran33, T. Tsukamoto16,‡, M. Tzanov38, Y. Uchida21, M. Vagins29,4, M. Varghese18, I. Vasilyev39, G. Vasseur5, E. Villa11,12, U. Virginet58, T. Vladisavljevic44, T. Wachala15, S.-i. Wada32, D. Wakabayashi70, H. T. Wallace55, J. G. Walsh40, L. Wan2, D. Wark44,47, M. O. Wascko47,44, A. Weber19, R. Wendell33, M. J. Wilking53, C. Wilkinson35, J. R. Wilson31, K. Wood35, C. Wret21, J. Xia57, K. Yamamoto46,‡‡, T. Yamamoto46, C. Yanagisawa43,§§, Y. Yang47, T. Yano61, K. Yasutome33, N. Yershov26, U. Yevarouskaya43, M. Yokoyama60,§, Y. Yoshimoto60, N. Yoshimura33, R. Zaki74, A. Zalewska15, J. Zalipska42, G. Zarnecki15, J. Zhang66,3, X. Y. Zhao9, H. Zheng43, H. Zhong32, T. Zhu21, M. Ziembicki69, E. D. Zimmerman6, M. Zito58, and S. Zsoldos31 (T2K Collaboration)

  • 1University Autonoma Madrid, Department of Theoretical Physics, 28049 Madrid, Spain
  • 2Boston University, Department of Physics, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
  • 3University of British Columbia, Department of Physics and Astronomy, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
  • 4University of California, Irvine, Department of Physics and Astronomy, Irvine, California, USA
  • 5IRFU, CEA, Université Paris-Saclay, F-91191 Gif-sur-Yvette, France
  • 6University of Colorado at Boulder, Department of Physics, Boulder, Colorado, USA
  • 7Duke University, Department of Physics, Durham, North Carolina, USA
  • 8Eötvös Loránd University, Department of Atomic Physics, Budapest, Hungary
  • 9ETH Zurich, Institute for Particle Physics and Astrophysics, Zurich, Switzerland
  • 10VNU University of Science, Vietnam National University, Hanoi, Vietnam
  • 11CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research, CH-1211 Genéve 23, Switzerland
  • 12University of Geneva, Section de Physique, DPNC, Geneva, Switzerland
  • 13University of Glasgow, School of Physics and Astronomy, Glasgow, United Kingdom
  • 14Ghent University, Department of Physics and Astronomy, Proeftuinstraat 86, B-9000 Gent, Belgium
  • 15H. Niewodniczanski Institute of Nuclear Physics PAN, Cracow, Poland
  • 16High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK), Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan
  • 17University of Houston, Department of Physics, Houston, Texas, USA
  • 18Institut de Fisica d’Altes Energies (IFAE)—The Barcelona Institute of Science and Technology, Campus UAB, Bellaterra (Barcelona) Spain
  • 19Institut für Physik, Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz, Staudingerweg 7, 55128 Mainz, Germany
  • 20Institute For Interdisciplinary Research in Science and Education (IFIRSE), ICISE, Quy Nhon, Vietnam
  • 21Imperial College London, Department of Physics, London, United Kingdom
  • 22INFN Sezione di Bari and Università e Politecnico di Bari, Dipartimento Interuniversitario di Fisica, Bari, Italy
  • 23INFN Sezione di Napoli and Università di Napoli, Dipartimento di Fisica, Napoli, Italy
  • 24INFN Sezione di Padova and Università di Padova, Dipartimento di Fisica, Padova, Italy
  • 25INFN Sezione di Roma and Università di Roma “La Sapienza”, Roma, Italy
  • 26Institute for Nuclear Research of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia
  • 27International Centre of Physics, Institute of Physics (IOP), Vietnam Academy of Science and Technology (VAST), 10 Dao Tan, Ba Dinh, Hanoi, Vietnam
  • 28ILANCE, CNRS—University of Tokyo International Research Laboratory, Kashiwa, Chiba 277-8582, Japan
  • 29Kavli Institute for the Physics and Mathematics of the Universe (WPI), The University of Tokyo Institutes for Advanced Study, University of Tokyo, Kashiwa, Chiba, Japan
  • 30Keio University, Department of Physics, Kanagawa, Japan
  • 31King’s College London, Department of Physics, Strand, London WC2R 2LS, United Kingdom
  • 32Kobe University, Kobe, Japan
  • 33Kyoto University, Department of Physics, Kyoto, Japan
  • 34Lancaster University, Physics Department, Lancaster, United Kingdom
  • 35Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California, USA
  • 36Ecole Polytechnique, IN2P3-CNRS, Laboratoire Leprince-Ringuet, Palaiseau, France
  • 37University of Liverpool, Department of Physics, Liverpool, United Kingdom
  • 38Louisiana State University, Department of Physics and Astronomy, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, USA
  • 39Joint Institute for Nuclear Research, Dubna, Moscow Region, Russia
  • 40Michigan State University, Department of Physics and Astronomy, East Lansing, Michigan, USA
  • 41Miyagi University of Education, Department of Physics, Sendai, Japan
  • 42National Centre for Nuclear Research, Warsaw, Poland
  • 43State University of New York at Stony Brook, Department of Physics and Astronomy, Stony Brook, New York, USA
  • 44STFC, Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, Harwell Oxford, and Daresbury Laboratory, Warrington, United Kingdom
  • 45Okayama University, Department of Physics, Okayama, Japan
  • 46Osaka Metropolitan University, Department of Physics, Osaka, Japan
  • 47Oxford University, Department of Physics, Oxford, United Kingdom
  • 48University of Pennsylvania, Department of Physics and Astronomy, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
  • 49University of Pittsburgh, Department of Physics and Astronomy, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
  • 50University of Rochester, Department of Physics and Astronomy, Rochester, New York, USA
  • 51Royal Holloway University of London, Department of Physics, Egham, Surrey, United Kingdom
  • 52RWTH Aachen University, III. Physikalisches Institut, Aachen, Germany
  • 53School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
  • 54Departamento de Física Atómica, Molecular y Nuclear, Universidad de Sevilla, 41080 Sevilla, Spain
  • 55University of Sheffield, School of Mathematical and Physical Sciences, Sheffield, United Kingdom
  • 56University of Silesia, Institute of Physics, Katowice, Poland
  • 57SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory, Stanford University, Menlo Park, California, USA
  • 58Sorbonne Université, CNRS/IN2P3, Laboratoire de Physique Nucléaire et de Hautes Energies (LPNHE), Paris, France
  • 59South Dakota School of Mines and Technology, 501 East Saint Joseph Street, Rapid City, South Dakota 57701, USA
  • 60University of Tokyo, Department of Physics, Tokyo, Japan
  • 61University of Tokyo, Institute for Cosmic Ray Research, Kamioka Observatory, Kamioka, Japan
  • 62University of Tokyo, Institute for Cosmic Ray Research, Research Center for Cosmic Neutrinos, Kashiwa, Japan
  • 63Institute of Science Tokyo, Department of Physics, Tokyo, Japan
  • 64Tokyo Metropolitan University, Department of Physics, Tokyo, Japan
  • 65Tokyo University of Science, Faculty of Science and Technology, Department of Physics, Noda, Chiba, Japan
  • 66TRIUMF, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
  • 67University of Toyama, Department of Physics, Toyama, Japan
  • 68University of Warsaw, Faculty of Physics, Warsaw, Poland
  • 69Warsaw University of Technology, Institute of Radioelectronics and Multimedia Technology, Warsaw, Poland
  • 70Tohoku University, Faculty of Science, Department of Physics, Miyagi, Japan
  • 71University of Warwick, Department of Physics, Coventry, United Kingdom
  • 72Wroclaw University, Faculty of Physics and Astronomy, Wroclaw, Poland
  • 73Yokohama National University, Department of Physics, Yokohama, Japan
  • 74York University, Department of Physics and Astronomy, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

  • *Also at Université Paris-Saclay, Orsay, France.
  • †Also at Departament de Fisica de la Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
  • ‡Also at J-PARC, Tokai, Japan.
  • §Also at Kavli IPMU (WPI), the University of Tokyo, Japan.
  • ∥Also at Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology (MIPT), Moscow region, Russia and National Research Nuclear University “MEPhI,” Moscow, Russia.
  • Also at IPSA-DRII, France.
  • **Also at JINR, Dubna, Russia.
  • ††Also at the Graduate University of Science and Technology, Vietnam Academy of Science and Technology, Hanoi, Vietnam.
  • ‡‡Also at Nambu Yoichiro Institute of Theoretical and Experimental Physics (NITEP), Osaka-shi, Japan.
  • §§Also at BMCC/CUNY, Science Department, New York, New York, USA.

Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 261801 – Published 29 December, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/gh5j-5cwv

Abstract

We have made improved measurements of three-flavor neutrino mixing with 19.7(16.3)×1020 protons on target in (anti-)neutrino-enhanced beam modes. A new sample of muon-neutrino events with tagged pions has been added at the far detector, as well as new proton and photon-tagged samples at the near detector. Significant improvements have been made to the flux and neutrino interaction modeling. T2K data continue to prefer the normal mass ordering and upper octant of sin2θ23 with a near-maximal value of the charge-parity violating phase with best-fit values in the normal ordering of δCP=−2.18−0.47+1.22, sin2θ23=0.559−0.078+0.018 and Δm322=(+2.506−0.052+0.039)×10−3  eV2.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (68)

  1. K. Abe et al. (The T2K Collaboration), The T2K experiment, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 659, 106 (2011).
  2. K. Abe et al. (The T2K Collaboration), Measurements of neutrino oscillation parameters from the T2K experiment using 3.6×1021 protons on target, Eur. Phys. J. C 83, 782 (2023).
  3. M. A. Acero et al. (NOvA Collaboration), Improved measurement of neutrino oscillation parameters by the NOvA experiment, Phys. Rev. D 106, 032004 (2022).
  4. K. Abe et al. (Hyper-Kamiokande Collaboration), Hyper-Kamiokande design report, arXiv:1805.04163.
  5. B. Abi et al. (DUNE Collaboration), Deep underground neutrino experiment (DUNE), far detector technical design report, volume II: DUNE physics, arXiv:2002.03005.
  6. K. Abe et al., Measurements of the T2K neutrino beam properties using the INGRID on-axis near detector, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 694, 211 (2012).
  7. S. Fukuda et al., The Super-Kamiokande detector, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 501, 418 (2003).
  8. C. Ahdida et al., New capabilities of the FLUKA multi-purpose code, Front. Phys. 9, 788253 (2022).
  9. G. Battistoni et al., Overview of the FLUKA code, Ann. Nucl. Energy 82, 10 (2015).
  10. R. Brun, F. Bruyant, F. Carminati, S. Giani, M. Maire, A. McPherson, G. Patrick, and L. Urban, GEANT Detector Description and Simulation Tool (1994), 10.17181/CERN.MUHF.DMJ1.
  11. N. Abgrall et al. (NA61/SHINE Collaboration), Measurements of π±, K±, KS0, Λ and proton production in proton–carbon interactions at 31  GeV/c with the NA61/SHINE spectrometer at the CERN SPS, Eur. Phys. J. C 76, 84 (2016).
  12. N. Abgrall et al. (NA61/SHINE Collaboration), Measurements of π± differential yields from the surface of the T2K replica target for incoming 31  GeV/c protons with the NA61/SHINE spectrometer at the CERN SPS, Eur. Phys. J. C 76, 617 (2016).
  13. N. Abgrall et al. (NA61/SHINE Collaboration), Measurements of π±, K± and proton double differential yields from the surface of the T2K replica target for incoming 31  GeV/c protons with the NA61/SHINE spectrometer at the CERN SPS, Eur. Phys. J. C 79, 100 (2019).
  14. K. Abe et al. (The T2K Collaboration), T2K neutrino flux prediction, Phys. Rev. D 87, 012001 (2013); K. Abe et al. (The T2K Collaboration)Phys. Rev. D87, 019902(A) (2013).
  15. Y. Hayato and L. Pickering, The NEUT neutrino interaction simulation program library, Eur. Phys. J. Spec. Top. 230, 4469 (2021).
  16. T. Golan, J. Sobczyk, and J. Żmuda, Nuwro: The Wrocław Monte Carlo generator of neutrino interactions, Nucl. Phys. B, Proc. Suppl. 229–232, 499 (2012).
  17. C. Juszczak, Running NuWro, Acta Phys. Pol. B 40, 2507 (2009).
  18. A. M. Ankowski, O. Benhar, and M. Sakuda, Improving the accuracy of neutrino energy reconstruction in charged-current quasielastic scattering off nuclear targets, Phys. Rev. D 91, 033005 (2015).
  19. P. Stowell et al., NUISANCE: A neutrino cross-section generator tuning and comparison framework, J. Instrum. 12, P01016 (2017).
  20. J. Chakrani et al., Parametrized uncertainties in the spectral function model of neutrino charged-current quasielastic interactions for oscillation analyses, Phys. Rev. D 109, 072006 (2024).
  21. O. Benhar and A. Fabrocini, Two nucleon spectral function in infinite nuclear matter, Phys. Rev. C 62, 034304 (2000).
  22. A. Bodek and T. Cai, Removal energies and final state interaction in lepton nucleus scattering, Eur. Phys. J. C 79, 293 (2019).
  23. S. Dolan et al., Electron–nucleus scattering in the NEUT event generator, Phys. Sci. Forum 8, 5 (2023).
  24. D. Rein and L. M. Sehgal, Neutrino excitation of baryon resonances and single pion production, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 133, 79 (1981).
  25. C. Wilkinson, P. Rodrigues, S. Cartwright, L. Thompson, and K. McFarland, Reanalysis of bubble chamber measurements of muon-neutrino induced single pion production, Phys. Rev. D 90, 112017 (2014).
  26. P. Rodrigues, C. Wilkinson, and K. McFarland, Constraining the GENIE model of neutrino-induced single pion production using reanalyzed bubble chamber data, Eur. Phys. J. C 76, 474 (2016).
  27. M. Derrick et al., Study of single-pion production by weak neutral currents in low-energy νd interactions, Phys. Rev. D 23, 569 (1981).
  28. G. M. Radecky et al., Study of single-pion production by weak charged currents in low-energy νd interactions, Phys. Rev. D 25, 1161 (1982).
  29. N. J. Baker, A. M. Cnops, P. L. Connolly, S. A. Kahn, M. J. Murtagh, R. B. Palmer, N. P. Samios, and M. Tanaka, Study of the isospin structure of single-pion production in charged-current neutrino interactions, Phys. Rev. D 23, 2495 (1981).
  30. T. Kitagaki et al., Charged-current exclusive pion production in neutrino-deuterium interactions, Phys. Rev. D 34, 2554 (1986).
  31. K. Furuno, A. Suzuki, T. Kitagaki, M. Etou, H. Sagawa, K. B. McConnel Mahn, E. J. Jeon, and M. Sakuda, BNL 7-foot bubble chamber experiment: Neutrino deuterium interactions, in Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Neutrino-Nucleus Interactions in the Few GeV Region (2003), https://inspirehep.net/literature/629585.
  32. A. A. Aguilar-Arevalo et al. (MiniBooNE Collaboration), Measurement of neutrino-induced charged-current charged pion production cross sections on mineral oil at Eν∼1  GeV, Phys. Rev. D 83, 052007 (2011).
  33. A. A. Aguilar-Arevalo et al. (MiniBooNE Collaboration), Measurement of νμ and ν¯μ induced neutral current single π0 production cross sections on mineral oil at Eν∼O(1  GeV), Phys. Rev. D 81, 013005 (2010).
  34. A. A. Aguilar-Arevalo et al. (MiniBooNE Collaboration), Measurement of νμ-induced charged-current neutral pion production cross sections on mineral oil at Eν∈0.5–2.0  GeV, Phys. Rev. D 83, 052009 (2011).
  35. B. Eberly et al. (MINERvA Collaboration), Charged pion production in νμ interactions on hydrocarbon at ⟨Eν⟩=4.0  GeV, Phys. Rev. D 92, 092008 (2015).
  36. T. Le et al. (MINERvA Collaboration), Single neutral pion production by charged-current ν¯μ interactions on hydrocarbon at ⟨Eν⟩=3.6  GeV, Phys. Lett. B 749, 130 (2015).
  37. O. Altinok et al. (MINERvA Collaboration), Measurement of νμ charged-current single π0 production on hydrocarbon in the few-GeV region using MINERvA, Phys. Rev. D 96, 072003 (2017).
  38. C. L. McGivern et al. (MINERvA Collaboration), Cross sections for νμ and ν¯μ induced pion production on hydrocarbon in the few-GeV region using MINERvA, Phys. Rev. D 94, 052005 (2016).
  39. K. Abe et al. (T2K Collaboration), Measurement of the muon neutrino charged-current single π+ production on hydrocarbon using the T2K off-axis near detector ND280, Phys. Rev. D 101, 012007 (2020).
  40. P. Stowell et al. (MINERvA Collaboration), Tuning the GENIE pion production model with MINERνA data, Phys. Rev. D 100, 072005 (2019).
  41. A. Bodek, U. K. Yang, and Y. Xu, Inelastic axial and vector structure functions for lepton-nucleon scattering 2021 update, arXiv:2108.09240.
  42. A. Bodek and U. K. Yang, Modeling neutrino and electron scattering cross-sections in the few GeV region with effective LO PDFs, AIP Conf. Proc. 670, 110 (2003).
  43. T. Yang, C. Andreopoulos, H. Gallagher, K. Hoffmann, and P. Kehayias, A hadronization model for few-GeV neutrino interactions, Eur. Phys. J. C 63, 1 (2009).
  44. E. S. Pinzon Guerra et al., Using world charged π±− nucleus scattering data to constrain an intranuclear cascade model, Phys. Rev. D 99, 052007 (2019).
  45. K. Niewczas and J. T. Sobczyk, Nuclear transparency in monte carlo neutrino event generators, Phys. Rev. C 100, 015505 (2019).
  46. N. Abgrall et al. (T2K ND280 TPC Collaboration), Time projection chambers for the T2K near detectors, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 637, 25 (2011).
  47. P. A. Amaudruz et al. (T2K ND280 FGD Collaboration), The T2K fine-grained detectors, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 696, 1 (2012).
  48. K. Abe et al. (The T2K Collaboration), Measurement of neutrino and antineutrino oscillations by the T2K experiment including a new additional sample of νe interactions at the far detector, Phys. Rev. D 96, 092006 (2017).
  49. J. S. Conway, Incorporating nuisance parameters in likelihoods for multisource spectra, in PHYSTAT 2011 (2011), pp. 115–120, , 10.5170/CERN-2011-006.115.
  50. P. A. Zyla et al. (Particle Data Group), Review of particle physics, Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2020, 083C01 (2020), and (2021) update.
  51. Y. Abe et al. (Double Chooz Collaboration), Improved measurements of the neutrino mixing angle θ13 with the double chooz detector, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2014) 086; 02 (2015) 74.
  52. G. Bak et al. (RENO Collaboration), Measurement of reactor antineutrino oscillation amplitude and frequency at reno, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 201801 (2018).
  53. D. Adey et al. (Daya Bay Collaboration), Measurement of the electron antineutrino oscillation with 1958 days of operation at Daya Bay, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 241805 (2018).
  54. K. Abe et al. (T2K Collaboration), Testing T2K’s Bayesian constraints with priors in alternate parameterisations, arXiv:2507.02101.
  55. N. Metropolis, A. W. Rosenbluth, M. N. Rosenbluth, A. H. Teller, and E. Teller, Equation of state calculations by fast computing machines, J. Chem. Phys. 21, 1087 (1970).
  56. W. K. Hastings, Monte Carlo sampling methods using Markov chains and their applications, Biometrika 57, 97 (1970).
  57. G. J. Feldman and R. D. Cousins, A unified approach to the classical statistical analysis of small signals, Phys. Rev. D 57, 3873 (1998).
  58. A. Gelman, X.-L. Meng, and H. Stern, Posterior predictive assessment of model fitness via realized discrepancies, Statistica Sinica 6, 733 (1996).
  59. A. Gelman, Y. Goegebeur, F. Tuerlinckx, and I. V. Mechelen, Diagnostic checks for discrete data regression models using posterior predictive simulations, Appl. Stat. 49, 247 (2000).
  60. A. Gelman, Understanding posterior p-values, Electron. J. Stat. 7, 2595 (2013).
  61. A. E. Bayer and U. Seljak, The look-elsewhere effect from a unified Bayesian and frequentist perspective, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 10 (2020) 009.
  62. M. Martini, M. Ericson, G. Chanfray, and J. Marteau, A unified approach for nucleon knock-out, coherent and incoherent pion production in neutrino interactions with nuclei, Phys. Rev. C 80, 065501 (2009).
  63. M. Martini and M. Ericson, Inclusive and pion production neutrino-nucleus cross sections, Phys. Rev. C 90, 025501 (2014).
  64. N. Jachowicz, K. Heyde, J. Ryckebusch, and S. Rombouts, Continuum random phase approximation approach to charged current neutrino nucleus scattering, Phys. Rev. C 65, 025501 (2002).
  65. V. Pandey, N. Jachowicz, T. Van Cuyck, J. Ryckebusch, and M. Martini, Low-energy excitations and quasielastic contribution to electron-nucleus and neutrino-nucleus scattering in the continuum random-phase approximation, Phys. Rev. C 92, 024606 (2015).
  66. C. Jarlskog, Commutator of the quark mass matrices in the standard electroweak model and a measure of maximal CP nonconservation, Phys. Rev. Lett. 55, 1039 (1985).
  67. P. I. Krastev and S. T. Petcov, Resonance amplification and T-violation effects in three neutrino oscillations in the earth, Phys. Lett. B 205, 84 (1988).
  68. K. Abe et al. (The T2K Collaboration), Markov chain Monte Carlo chain release for “results from the T2K experiment on neutrino mixing including a new far detector muon-like sample,” 10.5281/zenodo.17312780 (2025).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation