Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Featured in Physics
  • Editors' Suggestion
  • Open Access

One-Positron Quantum Cyclotron

T. G. Myers, L. Soucy, B. A. D. Sukra, B. Sinha, and G. Gabrielse*

  • Center for Fundamental Physics, Department of Physics and Astronomy, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois 60208, USA

  • *Contact author: gerald.gabrielse@northwestern.edu

Phys. Rev. Lett. 137, 173001 – Published 21 October, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/gbkc-6nlj

Abstract

A one-positron quantum cyclotron is realized with a single positron suspended indefinitely in the magnetic field of a Penning trap. This opens the possibility of quantum measurements of the positron magnetic moment at a precision much higher than attained with classical cyclotron motion. Comparing the magnetic moments measured using positron and electron quantum cyclotrons should provide the most stringent test of the fundamental CPT invariance of the standard model of particle physics in the lepton sector.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Viewpoint

A Quantum Cyclotron for Antimatter

Published 21 October, 2026

A device that stores a single positron and controls its quantum states could measure its magnetic moment with unprecedented precision, testing a symmetry principle central to quantum field theory.

See more in Physics

Article Text

References (18)

  1. S. Peil and G. Gabrielse, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 1287 (1999).
  2. G. Gabrielse, X. Fei, L. A. Orozco, R. L. Tjoelker, J. Haas, H. Kalinowsky, T. A. Trainor, and W. Kells, Phys. Rev. Lett. 65, 1317 (1990).
  3. G. Gabrielse and H. Dehmelt, Phys. Rev. Lett. 55, 67 (1985).
  4. R. S. Van Dyck, Jr., P. B. Schwinberg, and H. G. Dehmelt, Phys. Rev. Lett. 59, 26 (1987).
  5. X. Fan, T. G. Myers, B. A. D. Sukra, and G. Gabrielse, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 071801 (2023).
  6. R. Aliberti et al., Phys. Rep. 1143, 1 (2025).
  7. J. DiSciacca, M. Marshall, K. Marable, G. Gabrielse, S. Ettenauer, E. Tardiff, R. Kalra, D. W. Fitzakerley, M. C. George, E. A. Hessels, C. H. Storry, M. Weel, D. Grzonka, W. Oelert, and T. Sefzick, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 130801 (2013).
  8. C. Smorra et al., Nature (London) 550, 371 (2017).
  9. E. Czerwiński, Proc. Sci. ICHEP2022 (2022) 711.
  10. X. Fan, S. E. Fayer, and G. Gabrielse, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 90, 083107 (2019).
  11. L. S. Brown and G. Gabrielse, Rev. Mod. Phys. 58, 233 (1986).
  12. G. Gabrielse and F. C. MacKintosh, Int. J. Mass Spectrom. Ion Process. 57, 1 (1984).
  13. J. Tan and G. Gabrielse, Appl. Phys. Lett. 55, 2144 (1989).
  14. S. Fogwell Hoogerheide, J. C. Dorr, E. Novitski, and G. Gabrielse, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 86, 053301 (2015).
  15. J. Estrada, T. Roach, J. N. Tan, P. Yesley, and G. Gabrielse, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 859 (2000).
  16. P. B. Schwinberg, R. S. Van Dyck, Jr., and H. G. Dehmelt, Phys. Lett. 81A, 119 (1981).
  17. P. J. Schultz and K. G. Lynn, Rev. Mod. Phys. 60, 701 (1988).
  18. B. D’Urso, R. Van Handel, B. Odom, D. Hanneke, and G. Gabrielse, Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 113002 (2005).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation