Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Beam-Normal Single-Spin Asymmetry in Pb208 at Low Energy: Discrepancy Resolved or New Kinematic Puzzle?

A. Esser1, N. Kozyrev1, K. Aulenbacher1,2,3, S. Baunack1, M. Dehn1, A. Del Vincio1,4, L. Doria1, M. Hoek1, F. Keil1 et al.

F. Maas1,2,3, H. Merkel1,3, M. Mihovilovič5,6, U. Müller1, J. Pochodzalla1,2, B. S. Schlimme1, T. Shao1, S. Stengel1, M. Thiel1, L. Wilhelm1, and C. Sfienti1,2,3

Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 232502 – Published 2 December, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/fd61-xxk6

Abstract

A long-standing discrepancy between measured and predicted beam-normal single-spin asymmetries An in elastic electron scattering off Pb208 has challenged our understanding of two-photon exchange (TPE) in heavy nuclei. We report a new measurement at 570 MeV and Q2=0.04  GeV2/c2, yielding An=[−9.1±2.1(stat)±0.7(syst)]  ppm. This nonzero value contrasts with previous results at higher energies and suggests a kinematic dependence of TPE effects not captured by current theory, prompting a reevaluation of earlier interpretations.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (24)

  1. A. Sirlin, Phys. Rev. D 22, 971 (1980).
  2. C. E. Carlson and M. Vanderhaeghen, Annu. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 57, 171 (2007).
  3. P. G. Blunden, W. Melnitchouk, and J. A. Tjon, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 142304 (2003).
  4. M. Gorchtein and C. J. Horowitz, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 091806 (2009).
  5. R. Pohl, A. Antognini, and F. Nez, Annu. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 63, 175 (2013).
  6. A. De Rújula, J. Kaplan, and E. de Rafael, Nucl. Phys. B35, 365 (1971).
  7. B. Pasquini and M. Vanderhaeghen, Eur. Phys. J. A 24, 29 (2005).
  8. A. Afanasev and N. P. Merenkov, Phys. Rev. D 70, 073002 (2004).
  9. E. D. Cooper and C. J. Horowitz, Phys. Rev. C 72, 034602 (2005).
  10. M. Gorchtein and C. J. Horowitz, Phys. Rev. C 77, 044606 (2008).
  11. S. Abrahamyan et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 192501 (2012).
  12. D. Adhikari et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 142501 (2022).
  13. K. Blomqvist et al., Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 403, 263 (1998).
  14. A. Jankowiak, Eur. Phys. J. A 28, 149 (2006).
  15. A. Esser et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 022503 (2018).
  16. A. Esser et al., Phys. Lett. B 808, 135664 (2020).
  17. A. Esser et al., Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 1072, 170187 (2025).
  18. N. G. de Bruijn, Nederl. Akad. Wetensch. 49, 758 (1946), https://pure.tue.nl/ws/files/4442708/597473.pdf.
  19. F. Anghinolfi, P. Jarron, A. N. Martemiyanov, E. Usenko, H. Wenninger, M. C. S. Williams, and A. Zichichi, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 533, 183 (2004).
  20. B. Schlimme et al., Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 850, 54 (2017).
  21. K. Aulenbacher, Eur. Phys. J. A 32, 543 (2007).
  22. O. Koshchii, M. Gorchtein, X. Roca-Maza, and H. Spiesberger, Phys. Rev. C 103, 064316 (2021).
  23. M. Gorchtein (private communication).
  24. C. Gal et al., arXiv:2411.10267.

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation