- Open Access
Holography for the Ishibashi-Kawai-Kitazawa-Tsuchiya Matrix Model
Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 061601 – Published 4 August, 2025
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/fb8g-b8fd
Abstract
Holographic dualities that relate type II strings on near-horizon brane geometries to super Yang-Mills theories with sixteen supercharges in dimensions provide nonconformal generalizations of the famous AdS/CFT correspondence. For the extremal case , this suggests a holographic duality for the Ishibashi-Kawai-Kitazawa-Tsuchiya (IKKT) matrix model—super Yang-Mills theory reduced to zero dimensions. Despite intriguing and highly nontrivial results in the IKKT model, this duality has remained largely unexplored so far. In this Letter, we consider the lowest supermultiplet of gauge invariant operators of the model and identify its states with the lowest Kaluza-Klein fluctuations of (Euclidean) IIB supergravity on the instanton background. We construct its holographic bulk realization as a one-dimensional maximal supergravity with 32 supercharges and local SO(10) invariance, capturing the full nonlinear dynamics. Analyzing the bulk Killing spinor equations, we construct the most general half-supersymmetric solutions, which typically break SO(10). We present their uplifts to IIB supergravity, and furthermore to waves in twelve dimensions. These results provide the minimal setup for conducting precision tests of holography involving Einstein gravity.
Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)
Article Text
References (38)
- N. Itzhaki, J. M. Maldacena, J. Sonnenschein, and S. Yankielowicz, Phys. Rev. D 58, 046004 (1998).
- H. J. Boonstra, K. Skenderis, and P. K. Townsend, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (1999) 003.
- N. Ishibashi, H. Kawai, Y. Kitazawa, and A. Tsuchiya, Nucl. Phys. B498, 467 (1997).
- G. W. Gibbons, M. B. Green, and M. J. Perry, Phys. Lett. B 370, 37 (1996).
- S. S. Gubser, A. Hashimoto, I. R. Klebanov, and J. M. Maldacena, Nucl. Phys. B472, 231 (1996).
- E. Bergshoeff and K. Behrndt, Classical Quantum Gravity 15, 1801 (1998).
- H. Ooguri and K. Skenderis, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (1998) 013.
- M. B. Green and M. Gutperle, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (1998) 005.
- W. Krauth, H. Nicolai, and M. Staudacher, Phys. Lett. B 431, 31 (1998).
- G. W. Moore, N. Nekrasov, and S. Shatashvili, Commun. Math. Phys. 209, 77 (2000).
- J. Ambjørn, K. N. Anagnostopoulos, W. Bietenholz, T. Hotta, and J. Nishimura, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2000) 011.
- S. A. Hartnoll and J. Liu, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2025) 060.
- S. Komatsu, A. Martina, J. Penedones, A. Vuignier, and X. Zhao, arXiv:2410.18173.
- S. Komatsu, A. Martina, J. Penedones, A. Vuignier, and X. Zhao, arXiv:2411.18678.
- G. Bonelli, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2002) 022.
- I. Kanitscheider, K. Skenderis, and M. Taylor, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2008) 094.
Our charge conjugation matrix is related to that of [14] by .
Although all these transformations are global symmetries in zero dimensions, we still refer to as “gauge symmetries” in accordance with their higher-dimensional origin.
- J. F. Morales and H. Samtleben, Phys. Lett. B 607, 286 (2005).
Up to a boundary term, which does not affect our analysis that only relies on the field equations.
In principle, the fields in the Euclidean IIB theory and in the one-dimensional supergravity (29) are complex, as SO(10) Majorana spinors do not exist. However, the supersymmetric Lagrangians are holomorphic functions of these fields, and the supersymmetry variations act holomorphically. As argued in [9, 12, 22], this structure allows one to choose a real section and consistently treat all fields as real.
- H. Nicolai, Nucl. Phys. B140, 294 (1978).
- M. Cvetic, H. Lu, and C. N. Pope, Phys. Rev. D 62, 064028 (2000).
- F. Ciceri and H. Samtleben, Phys. Rev. D 108, 106007 (2023).
- F. Ciceri and H. Samtleben (to be published).
To be precise, to this order in the fermions, maximal supersymmetry admits a second extension of (24) with, in particular, an opposite sign in the kinetic and the potential term for the axion fields , and additional matrices in the axion-fermion couplings.
- D. Z. Freedman, S. S. Gubser, K. Pilch, and N. P. Warner, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2000) 038.
- A. A. Tseytlin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 1864 (1997).
- A. A. Tseytlin, Nucl. Phys. B, Proc. Suppl. 68, 99 (1998).
- B. Julia, in Applications of Group Theory in Physics and Mathematical Physics, Lectures in Applied Mathematics, Volume 21, edited by M. Flato, P. Sally, and G. Zuckerman (American Mathematical Society, Providence, Rhode Island, 1985), p. 355.
- S. Mizoguchi, Nucl. Phys. B528, 238 (1998).
- T. Damour, M. Henneaux, and H. Nicolai, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 221601 (2002).
- Y. Asano, J. Nishimura, W. Piensuk, and N. Yamamori, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 041603 (2025).
- C.-Y. Chou, J. Nishimura, and A. Tripathi, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 211601 (2025).
- N. Bobev, P. Bomans, and F. F. Gautason, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2018) 029.
- N. Bobev, P. Bomans, and F. F. Gautason, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2025) 170.
- M. Billò, M. Frau, F. Fucito, L. Gallot, A. Lerda, and J. F. Morales, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2021) 096.
- S. E. Aguilar-Gutierrez, K. Parmentier, and T. Van Riet, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2022) 249.