Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Theory of Reversed Ripening in Active Phase Separating Systems

Jonathan Bauermann1,*, Giacomo Bartolucci2, Christoph A. Weber3, and Frank Jülicher4,5,6,†

  • *Contact author: jbauermann@fas.harvard.edu
  • †Contact author: julicher@pks.mpg.de

Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 148201 – Published 1 October, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/f5x9-wp3g

Abstract

The ripening dynamics in passive systems is governed by the theory of Lifshitz-Slyosov-Wagner (LSW). Here, we present an analog theory for reversed ripening in active systems. To derive the dynamic theory for the droplet size distribution, we consider a minimal ternary emulsion with one active reaction, leading to one conserved quantity. Even for cases where single droplets constantly grow, coupling many droplets via the conserved density in the far field leads to a self-organized reversal of ripening and, thus, a monodisperse emulsion. For late times, we find a scaling ansatz leading to the collapse of the rescaled size distributions, different from the LSW theory. This scaling behavior arises from a stable fixed point in the single droplet dynamics and may capture the late-time behavior of many active matter systems exhibiting reversed ripening.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (54)

  1. W. Ostwald, Z. Phys. Chem. 22U, 289 (1897).
  2. P. W. Voorhees, J. Stat. Phys. 38, 231 (1985).
  3. T. Pollock and A. Argon, Acta Metall. Mater. 42, 1859 (1994).
  4. J. Bibette, F. L. Calderon, and P. Poulin, Rep. Prog. Phys. 62, 969 (1999).
  5. L. Ratke and P. W. Voorhees, Growth and Coarsening: Ostwald Ripening in Materials Processing, Engineering Materials (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2002).
  6. C. Wagner, Z. Elektrochem. Ber. Bunsen Ges. Phys. Chem. 65, 581 (1961).
  7. I. Lifshitz and V. Slyozov, J. Phys. Chem. Solids 19, 35 (1961).
  8. M. Cates and C. Nardini, Rep. Prog. Phys. 88, 056601 (2025).
  9. C. A. Weber, D. Zwicker, F. Jülicher, and C. F. Lee, Rep. Prog. Phys. 82, 064601 (2019).
  10. F. Brauns, H. Weyer, J. Halatek, J. Yoon, and E. Frey, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 104101 (2021).
  11. M. E. Cates and C. Nardini, Rep. Prog. Phys. 88, 056601 (2025).
  12. J. Stenhammar, D. Marenduzzo, R. J. Allen, and M. E. Cates, Soft Matter 10, 1489 (2014).
  13. A. Patch, D. M. Sussman, D. Yllanes, and M. C. Marchetti, Soft Matter 14, 7435 (2018).
  14. M. Yan, E. Frey, M. Müller, and S. Klumpp, arXiv:2501.11442.
  15. E. Tjhung, C. Nardini, and M. E. Cates, Phys. Rev. X 8, 031080 (2018).
  16. G. Fausti, M. E. Cates, and C. Nardini, Phys. Rev. E 110, L042103 (2024).
  17. R. Singh and M. E. Cates, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 148005 (2019).
  18. S. C. Glotzer, D. Stauffer, and N. Jan, Phys. Rev. Lett. 72, 4109 (1994).
  19. D. Zwicker, A. A. Hyman, and F. Jülicher, Phys. Rev. E 92, 012317 (2015).
  20. J. D. Wurtz and C. F. Lee, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 078102 (2018).
  21. C. F. Lee and J. D. Wurtz, J. Phys. D 52, 023001 (2018).
  22. D. Zwicker, arXiv:2407.09859.
  23. F. Jülicher and C. A. Weber, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 15, 237 (2024).
  24. A. A. Hyman, C. A. Weber, and F. Jülicher, Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 30, 39 (2014).
  25. Y. Shin and C. P. Brangwynne, Science 357, eaaf4382 (2017).
  26. S. F. Banani, H. O. Lee, A. A. Hyman, and M. K. Rosen, Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 18, 285 (2017).
  27. S. Boeynaems, S. Alberti, N. L. Fawzi, T. Mittag, M. Polymenidou, F. Rousseau, J. Schymkowitz, J. Shorter, B. Wolozin, L. Van Den Bosch, P. Tompa, and M. Fuxreiter, Trends Cell Biol. 28, 420 (2018).
  28. K. K. Nakashima, M. A. Vibhute, and E. Spruijt, Front. Mol. Biosci. 6, 21 (2019).
  29. C. A. Strulson, R. C. Molden, C. D. Keating, and P. C. Bevilacqua, Nat. Chem. 4, 941 (2012).
  30. B. Drobot, J. M. Iglesias-Artola, K. Le Vay, V. Mayr, M. Kar, M. Kreysing, H. Mutschler, and T.-Y. D. Tang, Nat. Commun. 9, 3643 (2018).
  31. C. Donau, F. Späth, M. Sosson, B. A. K. Kriebisch, F. Schnitter, M. Tena-Solsona, H.-S. Kang, E. Salibi, M. Sattler, H. Mutschler, and J. Boekhoven, Nat. Commun. 11, 5167 (2020).
  32. P. S. Schwarz, S. Laha, J. Janssen, T. Huss, J. Boekhoven, and C. A. Weber, Chem. Sci. 12, 7554 (2021).
  33. J. Heckel, F. Batti, R. T. Mathers, and A. Walther, Soft Matter 17, 5401 (2021).
  34. C. Donau, F. Späth, M. Stasi, A. M. Bergmann, and J. Boekhoven, Angew. Chem. 134, e202211905 (2022).
  35. J. Kirschbaum and D. Zwicker, J. R. Soc. Interface 18, 20210255 (2021).
  36. J. Bauermann, C. A. Weber, and F. Jülicher, Ann. Phys. (Berlin) 534, 2200132 (2022).
  37. A. Kumar and S. A. Safran, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 258401 (2023).
  38. Y. Cho and W. M. Jacobs, J. Chem. Phys. 159, 154101 (2023).
  39. L. Demarchi, A. Goychuk, I. Maryshev, and E. Frey, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 128401 (2023).
  40. G. Häfner and M. Müller, ACS Nano 8, 16530 (2024).
  41. J. Bauermann, G. Bartolucci, J. Boekhoven, F. Jülicher, and C. A. Weber, arXiv:2409.03629.
  42. P. W. Voorhees, Annu. Rev. Mater. Sci. 22, 197 (1992).
  43. J. H. Yao, K. R. Elder, H. Guo, and M. Grant, Phys. Rev. B 47, 14110 (1993).
  44. J. Bauermann, S. Laha, P. M. McCall, F. Jülicher, and C. A. Weber, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 144, 19294 (2022).
  45. S. Safran, Statistical Thermodynamics of Surfaces, Interfaces, and Membranes, Frontiers in Physics No. 90 (CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group, Boca Raton, London, New York, 2019).
  46. C. J. Kuehmann and P. W. Voorhees, Metall. Mater. Trans. A 27, 937 (1996).
  47. A. Bray, Adv. Phys. 43, 357 (1994).
  48. See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/f5x9-wp3g for a movie showing an example of arrested growth for different ratios of Di/Do.
  49. g(x)=x2(3+x)−7/3(3/2−x)−11/3exp[−x/(3/2−x)].

  50. S. F. Banani, A. Goychuk, P. Natarajan, M. M. Zheng, G. Dall’Agnese, J. E. Henninger, M. Kardar, R. A. Young, and A. K. Chakraborty, bioRxiv (2024), 10.1101/2024.10.12.614958.
  51. S. Saurabh, T. N. Chong, C. Bayas, P. D. Dahlberg, H. N. Cartwright, W. E. Moerner, and L. Shapiro, Sci. Adv. 8, eabm6570 (2022).
  52. K. K. Nakashima, M. H. I. van Haren, A. A. M. André, I. Robu, and E. Spruijt, Nat. Commun. 12, 3819 (2021).
  53. C. Donau, F. Späth, M. Stasi, A. M. Bergmann, and J. Boekhoven, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 61, e202211905 (2022).
  54. T. E. Woolley, R. E. Baker, P. K. Maini, J. L. Aragón, and R. A. Barrio, Phys. Rev. E 82, 051929 (2010).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation