Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Editors' Suggestion
  • Open Access

Localized AdS3×S3× T4 Black Holes

Óscar J. C. Dias1,* and Jorge E. Santos2,†

  • 1STAG Research Centre and Mathematical Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton SO17 1BJ, United Kingdom
  • 2Department of Applied Mathematics and Theoretical Physics, University of Cambridge, Wilberforce Road, Cambridge CB3 0WA, United Kingdom

  • *Contact author: ojcd1r13@soton.ac.uk
  • †Contact author: jss55@cam.ac.uk

Phys. Rev. Lett. 136, 031501 – Published 20 January, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/f2rs-p1mq

Abstract

We numerically construct asymptotically global AdS3×S3×T4 black holes in type IIB supergravity, with Rt×SO(2)×SO(3)×U(1)4 symmetry, localized on the S3 and translationally invariant along the torus. These solutions, with horizons whose spatial cross sections have S4×T4 topology, dominate the microcanonical ensemble at low energies. At higher energies, a first-order phase transition occurs to BTZ×S3×T4 black holes—possessing Rt×SO(2)×SO(4)×U(1)4 symmetry and S1×S3×T4 horizon topology. By the AdS/CFT correspondence, this transition reflects the spontaneous breaking of the SO(4) R symmetry of the D1−D5 CFT2 to SO(3). We also compute the expectation value of the scalar operator with lowest conformal dimension in the low-energy phase. Our SO(3)-localized black holes—together with the U(1)2-localized solutions of Bena et al. [J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2025) 165.]—point to a rich landscape of novel black holes that may approach the CFT2 “sparseness bootstrap condition,” and shed light on how macroscopic entanglement in thermal phases encodes microscopic structure via internal directions.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (77)

  1. J. M. Maldacena, Int. J. Theor. Phys. 38, 1113 (1999) [Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 2, 231 (1998)].
  2. S. S. Gubser, I. R. Klebanov, and A. M. Polyakov, Phys. Lett. B 428, 105 (1998).
  3. E. Witten, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 2, 253 (1998).
  4. J. R. David, G. Mandal, and S. R. Wadia, Phys. Rep. 369, 549 (2002).
  5. L. Eberhardt, M. R. Gaberdiel, and R. Gopakumar, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2020) 136.
  6. We consider the low-energy limit with N→∞ and large ’t Hooft coupling.

  7. I. Bena, R. Dulac, P. Heidmann, and Z. Wei, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2025) 165.
  8. These solutions were first constructed in [9], and were recently analyzed in [10].

  9. I. Bah and P. Heidmann, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2023) 133.
  10. J.-i. Sakamoto and S. Tomizawa, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2025) 049.
  11. Although the topology is the same in both cases, the geometry of the S3 differs significantly. For the BTZ black hole, the S3 is simply the standard round sphere, whereas for the black poles the S3 incorporates the asymptotic S1 contained within global AdS3.

  12. O. J. C. Dias, J. E. Santos, and B. Way, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2015) 060.
  13. O. J. C. Dias, J. E. Santos, and B. Way, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 151101 (2016).
  14. O. J. C. Dias, J. E. Santos, and B. Way, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2017) 029.
  15. O. J. C. Dias and J. E. Santos, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 231402 (2025).
  16. R. Gregory and R. Laflamme, Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 2837 (1993).
  17. T. Harmark and N. A. Obers, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2002) 032.
  18. B. Kol, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2005) 049.
  19. H. Kudoh and T. Wiseman, Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 161102 (2005).
  20. T. Harmark, V. Niarchos, and N. A. Obers, Classical Quantum Gravity 24, R1 (2007).
  21. M. Headrick, S. Kitchen, and T. Wiseman, Classical Quantum Gravity 27, 035002 (2010).
  22. O. J. C. Dias, J. E. Santos, and B. Way, Classical Quantum Gravity 33, 133001 (2016).
  23. S. G. Avery, Ph.D. thesis, The Ohio State University, 2010.
  24. P. Figueras, J. Lucietti, and T. Wiseman, Classical Quantum Gravity 28, 215018 (2011).
  25. See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/f2rs-p1mq for details of the equations of motion, boundary conditions, numerical method, thermodynamic quantities and additional figures.
  26. Our reference metric limits ρ0<π, but our solutions are well within this bound.

  27. I. Kanitscheider, K. Skenderis, and M. Taylor, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2007) 023.
  28. I. Kanitscheider, K. Skenderis, and M. Taylor, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2007) 056.
  29. K. Skenderis and M. Taylor, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2006) 057.
  30. H. Kim, L. Romans, and P. van Nieuwenhuizen, Phys. Rev. D 32, 389 (1985).
  31. M. Gunaydin and N. Marcus, Classical Quantum Gravity 2, L11 (1985).
  32. S. Lee, S. Minwalla, M. Rangamani, and N. Seiberg, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 2, 697 (1998).
  33. S. Lee, Nucl. Phys. B563, 349 (1999).
  34. G. Arutyunov and S. Frolov, Phys. Rev. D 61, 064009 (2000).
  35. K. Skenderis and M. Taylor, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2006) 001.
  36. K. Skenderis and M. Taylor, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2007) 019.
  37. R. M. Wald, Phys. Rev. D 48, R3427 (1993).
  38. V. Iyer and R. M. Wald, Phys. Rev. D 50, 846 (1994).
  39. V. Iyer and R. M. Wald, Phys. Rev. D 52, 4430 (1995).
  40. R. M. Wald and A. Zoupas, Phys. Rev. D 61, 084027 (2000).
  41. I. Papadimitriou and K. Skenderis, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2005) 004.
  42. O. J. C. Dias, G. S. Hartnett, and J. E. Santos, Classical Quantum Gravity 38, 015003 (2021).
  43. V. E. Hubeny and M. Rangamani, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2002) 027.
  44. A. Buchel and L. Lehner, Classical Quantum Gravity 32, 145003 (2015).
  45. P. Bosch, A. Buchel, and L. Lehner, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2017) 135.
  46. S. Hawking and D. N. Page, Commun. Math. Phys. 87, 577 (1983).
  47. E. Witten, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 2, 505 (1998).
  48. S. Catterall and T. Wiseman, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2007) 104.
  49. K. N. Anagnostopoulos, M. Hanada, J. Nishimura, and S. Takeuchi, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 021601 (2008).
  50. S. Catterall and T. Wiseman, Phys. Rev. D 78, 041502 (2008).
  51. M. Hanada, Y. Hyakutake, J. Nishimura, and S. Takeuchi, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 191602 (2009).
  52. S. Catterall and T. Wiseman, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2010) 077.
  53. M. Hanada, J. Nishimura, Y. Sekino, and T. Yoneya, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2011) 020.
  54. M. Hanada, Y. Hyakutake, G. Ishiki, and J. Nishimura, Science 344, 882 (2014).
  55. B. A. Berg and T. Neuhaus, Phys. Rev. Lett. 68, 9 (1992).
  56. J. Lee, Phys. Rev. Lett. 71, 211 (1993).
  57. F. Wang and D. P. Landau, Phys. Rev. E 64, 056101 (2001).
  58. G. T. Horowitz, in Workshop on Conference on the Future of Theoretical Physics and Cosmology in Honor of Steven Hawking’s 60th Birthday (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2002), pp. 310–329.
  59. T. Harmark and N. A. Obers, Nucl. Phys. B684, 183 (2004).
  60. T. Harmark, Phys. Rev. D 69, 104015 (2004).
  61. O. J. Dias, T. Harmark, R. C. Myers, and N. A. Obers, Phys. Rev. D 76, 104025 (2007).
  62. T. Hartman, C. A. Keller, and B. Stoica, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2014) 118.
  63. O. J. C. Dias, J. E. Santos, and B. Way, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2018) 111.
  64. S. Ryu and T. Takayanagi, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 181602 (2006).
  65. V. E. Hubeny, M. Rangamani, and T. Takayanagi, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2007) 062.
  66. V. Balasubramanian, B. D. Chowdhury, B. Czech, and J. de Boer, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2015) 048.
  67. J. Caminiti, B. Friedman-Shaw, A. May, R. C. Myers, and O. Papadoulaki, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2024) 119.
  68. G. Arora, M. Headrick, A. Lawrence, M. Sasieta, and C. Wolfe, SciPost Phys. 16, 152 (2024).
  69. M. Srednicki, Phys. Rev. E 50, 888 (1994).
  70. J. M. Deutsch, Phys. Rev. A 43, 2046 (1991).
  71. H. Bernien et al., Nature (London) 551, 579 (2017).
  72. C. J. Turner, A. A. Michailidis, D. A. Abanin, M. Serbyn, and Z. Papić, Nat. Phys. 14, 745 (2018).
  73. A. Strominger and C. Vafa, Phys. Lett. B 379, 99 (1996).
  74. S. D. Mathur, Fortschr. Phys. 53, 793 (2005).
  75. K. Skenderis and M. Taylor, Phys. Rep. 467, 117 (2008).
  76. S. D. Mathur and M. Mehta, arXiv:2412.09495.
  77. J. C. Dias Oscar and E. Santos Jorge, Localised AdS3×S3×T4 Black Holes, arXiv:2508.16722.

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation