- Physical Review Journals
All JournalsPhysics Magazine

Physical Review Letters

Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Cosmic Censorship in a Dual Collider

Marc Aragonès Fontboté1,*, David Mateos2,3,4,†, Guillem Pérez Martín1,‡, Wilke van der Schee1,5,6,§, and Javier G. Subils1,∥

  • *Contact author: m.aragonesfontbote@students.uu.nl
  • †Contact author: dmateos@fqa.ub.edu
  • ‡Contact author: g.perezmartin@students.uu.nl
  • §Contact author: w.vanderschee@uu.nl
  • ∥Contact author: j.gomezsubils@uu.nl
PDF

Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 031501 – Published 15 July, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/dsrc-4yp2

Abstract

We investigate cosmic censorship in anti–de Sitter space in holographic models in which the ground state is described by a good singularity. These include supersymmetric truncations of string/M theory, for which a positive-energy theorem holds. At the boundary, our solutions describe a boost-invariant fluid in which the temperature decreases monotonically with time. On the gravity side, they correspond to black-brane spacetimes with a receding horizon. In classical gravity, curvature invariants at the horizon grow without bound. In the full theory this regime may or may not be reached. In some cases it is avoided by a phase transition to a regular geometry. In others it is reached but the boundary hydrodynamic evolution can be continued, provided the equation of state at parametrically small energies is known. Both cases require the inclusion of finite-N or finite-coupling effects.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (80)

  1. R. Penrose, Riv. Nuovo Cimento 1, 252 (1969).
  2. M. W. Choptuik, Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 9 (1993).
  3. R. Gregory and R. Laflamme, Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 2837 (1993).
  4. L. Lehner and F. Pretorius, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 101102 (2010).
  5. P. Figueras, T. França, C. Gu, and T. Andrade, Phys. Rev. D 107, 044028 (2023).
  6. P. Figueras, M. Kunesch, and S. Tunyasuvunakool, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 071102 (2016).
  7. T. Andrade, R. Emparan, D. Licht, and R. Luna, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2019) 121.
  8. T. Andrade, R. Emparan, D. Licht, and R. Luna, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2019) 099.
  9. T. Andrade, P. Figueras, and U. Sperhake, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2022) 111.
  10. F. C. Eperon, B. Ganchev, and J. E. Santos, Phys. Rev. D 101, 041502(R) (2020).
  11. R. Emparan, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 29, 2043021 (2020).
  12. G. T. Horowitz, J. E. Santos, and B. Way, Classical Quantum Gravity 33, 195007 (2016).
  13. T. Crisford and J. E. Santos, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 181101 (2017).
  14. G. W. Gibbons, C. M. Hull, and N. P. Warner, Nucl. Phys. B218, 173 (1983).
  15. P. Breitenlohner and D. Z. Freedman, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 144, 249 (1982).
  16. P. Breitenlohner and D. Z. Freedman, Phys. Lett. 115B, 197 (1982).
  17. P. K. Townsend, Phys. Lett. 148B, 55 (1984).
  18. K. Skenderis and P. K. Townsend, Phys. Lett. B 468, 46 (1999).
  19. A. J. Amsel, T. Hertog, S. Hollands, and D. Marolf, Phys. Rev. D 75, 084008 (2007); 77, 049903(E) (2008).
  20. S. S. Gubser, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 4, 679 (2000).
  21. J. D. Bjorken, Phys. Rev. D 27, 140 (1983).
  22. R. A. Janik and R. B. Peschanski, Phys. Rev. D 73, 045013 (2006).
  23. U. Gursoy, M. Jarvinen, and G. Policastro, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2016) 134.

  24. W is of the “P−” type in the language of [19].

  25. This is outside the double-quantization region −4≤m2L2<−3 [26].

  26. I. R. Klebanov and E. Witten, Nucl. Phys. B556, 89 (1999).
  27. M. J. Duff and J. T. Liu, Nucl. Phys. B554, 237 (1999).
  28. A. F. Faedo, D. Mateos, D. Pravos, and J. G. Subils, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2017) 153.
  29. D. Elander, A. F. Faedo, D. Mateos, and J. G. Subils, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2020) 131.
  30. M. Cvetic, G. W. Gibbons, H. Lu, and C. N. Pope, Commun. Math. Phys. 232, 457 (2003).
  31. I. R. Klebanov and S. S. Pufu, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2011) 035.
  32. O. J. C. Dias, G. S. Hartnett, B. E. Niehoff, and J. E. Santos, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2017) 105.
  33. J. P. Gauntlett, S. Kim, O. Varela, and D. Waldram, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2009) 102.
  34. J. P. Gauntlett, J. Sonner, and T. Wiseman, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2010) 060.
  35. A. Donos, J. P. Gauntlett, J. Sonner, and B. Withers, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2013) 108.
  36. T. Hertog and G. T. Horowitz, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2004) 073.
  37. D. Z. Freedman, S. S. Gubser, K. Pilch, and N. P. Warner, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2000) 038.
  38. D. Z. Freedman, S. S. Gubser, K. Pilch, and N. P. Warner, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 3, 363 (1999).
  39. L. Girardello, M. Petrini, M. Porrati, and A. Zaffaroni, Nucl. Phys. B569, 451 (2000).
  40. M. Petrini, H. Samtleben, S. Schmidt, and K. Skenderis, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2018) 026.
  41. N. Bobev, F. F. Gautason, B. E. Niehoff, and J. van Muiden, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2018) 058.
  42. K. Pilch and N. P. Warner, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 4, 627 (2002).
  43. A. Baguet, O. Hohm, and H. Samtleben, Phys. Rev. D 92, 065004 (2015).
  44. I. Bena, G. Giecold, M. Grana, N. Halmagyi, and F. Orsi, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2011) 021.
  45. D. Cassani and A. F. Faedo, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2011) 013.
  46. A. Buchel, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2019) 207.
  47. I. R. Klebanov and M. J. Strassler, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2000) 052.

  48. In general dimensions γc=1/2(D−2) [49].

  49. U. Gursoy, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2011) 086.
  50. See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/dsrc-4yp2 and references therein [51–61] for the technical details on holographic renormalization, transport and the quasinormal modes.
  51. Y. Bea, O. J. C. Dias, T. Giannakopoulos, D. Mateos, M. Sanchez-Garitaonandia, J. E. Santos, and M. Zilhao, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2021) 061.
  52. G. Policastro, D. T. Son, and A. O. Starinets, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 081601 (2001).
  53. C. Eling and Y. Oz, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2011) 007.
  54. R. Baier, P. Romatschke, D. T. Son, A. O. Starinets, and M. A. Stephanov, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2008) 100.
  55. A. Jansen, Eur. Phys. J. Plus 132, 546 (2017).
  56. M. Kaminski, K. Landsteiner, J. Mas, J. P. Shock, and J. Tarrio, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2010) 021.
  57. P. Betzios, U. Gürsoy, M. Järvinen, and G. Policastro, Phys. Rev. D 97, 081901 (2018).
  58. P. Betzios, U. Gürsoy, M. Järvinen, and G. Policastro, Phys. Rev. D 101, 086026 (2020).
  59. S. Grozdanov, P. K. Kovtun, A. O. Starinets, and P. Tadić, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2019) 097.
  60. P. K. Kovtun and A. O. Starinets, Phys. Rev. D 72, 086009 (2005).
  61. C. Ecker, W. van der Schee, D. Mateos, and J. Casalderrey-Solana, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2022) 137.
  62. P. M. Chesler and L. G. Yaffe, Phys. Rev. D 82, 026006 (2010).
  63. P. M. Chesler and L. G. Yaffe, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 211601 (2009).
  64. P. M. Chesler and L. G. Yaffe, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2014) 086.
  65. W. van der Schee, arXiv:1407.1849.
  66. M. P. Heller, D. Mateos, W. van der Schee, and D. Trancanelli, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 191601 (2012).
  67. M. P. Heller, R. A. Janik, and P. Witaszczyk, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 201602 (2012).
  68. R. Critelli, R. Rougemont, and J. Noronha, Phys. Rev. D 99, 066004 (2019).
  69. M. Bianchi, D. Z. Freedman, and K. Skenderis, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2001) 041.
  70. M. Bianchi, D. Z. Freedman, and K. Skenderis, Nucl. Phys. B631, 159 (2002).
  71. S. de Haro, S. N. Solodukhin, and K. Skenderis, Commun. Math. Phys. 217, 595 (2001).
  72. S. Bhattacharyya, V. E. Hubeny, S. Minwalla, and M. Rangamani, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2008) 045.
  73. J. Casalderrey-Solana, J. G. Milhano, D. Pablos, K. Rajagopal, and X. Yao, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2021) 230.

  74. At late times other effects may appear. For instance, O(N−2) equilibrium velocity fluctuations introduce power-law tails [75].

  75. P. Kovtun and L. G. Yaffe, Phys. Rev. D 68, 025007 (2003).

  76. More precisely, a gapped phase; see [28].

  77. P. Bosch, A. Buchel, and L. Lehner, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2017) 135.
  78. U. Gürsoy, A. Jansen, and W. van der Schee, Phys. Rev. D 94, 061901(R) (2016).
  79. L. Bellantuono, R. A. Janik, J. Jankowski, and H. Soltanpanahi, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2019) 146.
  80. M. Aragonès Fontboté, D. Mateos, G. Pérez Martín, W. van der Schee, and J. G. Subils, Cosmic censorship in a (dual) collider—code and data release, Zenodo v2 (2025), 10.5281/zenodo.15596189.

Outline

Information

Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 031501– Published 15 July, 2025
  • Received 9 January 2025
  • Accepted 23 June 2025
Crossmark - Check for updates button
Creative Commons Logo

Published by the American Physical Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. Further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the published article’s title, journal citation, and DOI. Funded by SCOAP3.

Published by the American Physical Society

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation