Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Editors' Suggestion
  • Open Access

Polarization-Driven Charge Frustration and Emergent Phases in the One-Dimensional Extended Hubbard Model

Sourabh Saha1, Jeroen van den Brink2,3,4, Manoranjan Kumar1,*,†, and Satoshi Nishimoto2,4,†,‡

  • *Contact author: manoranjan.kumar@bose.res.in
  • †These authors contributed equally to this work.
  • ‡Contact author: s.nishimoto@ifw-dresden.de

Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 206504 – Published 13 November, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/d5sw-qdfp

Abstract

Frustration is a key driver of exotic quantum phases, yet its role in charge dynamics remains largely unexplored. We show that charge frustration—induced by electronic polarization effects—stabilizes unconventional insulating states in the one-dimensional extended Hubbard model. Using exact diagonalization and density-matrix renormalization group, we uncover a charge-disordered phase that remains insulating despite lacking long-range order and possessing an effectively attractive on-site interaction—a behavior reminiscent of gapful spin liquids in frustrated spin systems. We also identify a fragile ferroelectric phase and a charge-density-wave state with emergent eight-site periodicity. These findings establish charge frustration, driven by charge-dipole interactions, as a robust mechanism for realizing exotic phases in low-dimensional correlated systems, with implications for organic conductors, transition-metal oxides, and ultracold polar molecules.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Corrections

4 February, 2026

Correction: A project number in the Acknowledgments contained a typographical error and has been fixed.

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (42)

  1. E. Dagotto, Complexity in strongly correlated electronic systems, Science 309, 257 (2005).
  2. P. A. Lee, N. Nagaosa, and X.-G. Wen, Doping a Mott insulator: Physics of high-temperature superconductivity, Rev. Mod. Phys. 78, 17 (2006).
  3. M. Qin, T. Schäfer, S. Andergassen, P. Corboz, and E. Gull, The Hubbard model: A computational perspective, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 13, 275 (2022).
  4. D. P. Arovas, E. Berg, S. A. Kivelson, and S. Raghu, The Hubbard model, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 13, 239 (2022).
  5. H. Mosadeq and R. Asgari, Quantum phases of a one-dimensional dipolar Fermi gas, Phys. Rev. B 91, 085126 (2015).
  6. A. H. Talebi and B. Davoudi, Spin and charge fluctuations in a one-dimensional lattice with long-range interactions, Physica (Amsterdam) 571B, 204 (2019).
  7. Y.-P. Huang and D.-W. Wang, Quantum phase diagrams of fermionic dipolar gases in a planar array of one-dimensional tubes, Phys. Rev. A 80, 053610 (2009).
  8. M. Lu, N. Q. Burdick, and B. L. Lev, Quantum degenerate dipolar Fermi gas, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 215301 (2012).
  9. C.-H. Wu, J. W. Park, P. Ahmadi, S. Will, and M. W. Zwierlein, Ultracold fermionic Feshbach molecules of N23a40K, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 085301 (2012).
  10. A. Chotia, B. Neyenhuis, S. A. Moses, B. Yan, J. P. Covey, M. Foss-Feig, A. M. Rey, D. S. Jin, and J. Ye, Long-lived dipolar molecules and Feshbach molecules in a 3D optical lattice, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 080405 (2012).
  11. K.-K. Ni, S. Ospelkaus, M. De Miranda, A. Pe’Er, B. Neyenhuis, J. Zirbel, S. Kotochigova, P. Julienne, D. Jin, and J. Ye, A high phase-space-density gas of polar molecules, Science 322, 231 (2008).
  12. M. Nakamura, Mechanism of CDW-SDW transition in one dimension, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 68, 3123 (1999).
  13. M. Nakamura, Tricritical behavior in the extended Hubbard chains, Phys. Rev. B 61, 16377 (2000).
  14. P. Sengupta, A. W. Sandvik, and D. K. Campbell, Bond-order-wave phase and quantum phase transitions in the one-dimensional extended Hubbard model, Phys. Rev. B 65, 155113 (2002).
  15. E. Jeckelmann, Ground-state phase diagram of a half-filled one-dimensional extended Hubbard model, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 236401 (2002).
  16. M. Tsuchiizu and A. Furusaki, Phase diagram of the one-dimensional extended Hubbard model at half filling, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 056402 (2002).
  17. A. Dhar, J. J. Kinnunen, and P. Törmä, Population imbalance in the extended Fermi-Hubbard model, Phys. Rev. B 94, 075116 (2016).
  18. M. Kumar, S. Ramasesha, and Z. G. Soos, Tuning the bond-order wave phase in the half-filled extended Hubbard model, Phys. Rev. B 79, 035102 (2009).
  19. M. Kumar and Z. G. Soos, Bond-order wave phase of the extended Hubbard model: Electronic solitons, paramagnetism, and coupling to Peierls and Holstein phonons, Phys. Rev. B 82, 155144 (2010).
  20. S. Ejima and S. Nishimoto, Phase diagram of the one-dimensional half-filled extended Hubbard model, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 216403 (2007).
  21. D.-W. Qu, B.-B. Chen, H.-C. Jiang, Y. Wang, and W. Li, Spin-triplet pairing induced by near-neighbor attraction in the extended Hubbard model for cuprate chain, Commun. Phys. 5, 257 (2022).
  22. J. van den Brink, M. B. J. Meinders, J. Lorenzana, R. Eder, and G. A. Sawatzky, New phases in an extended Hubbard model explicitly including atomic polarizabilities, Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 4658 (1995).
  23. M. B. J. Meinders, J. van den Brink, J. Lorenzana, and G. A. Sawatzky, Atomic screening and intersite Coulomb repulsion in strongly correlated systems, Phys. Rev. B 52, 2484 (1995).
  24. M. E. Torio, A. A. Aligia, K. Hallberg, and H. A. Ceccatto, Phase diagram of the extended Hubbard chain with charge-dipole interactions, Phys. Rev. B 62, 6991 (2000).
  25. S. R. White, Density matrix formulation for quantum renormalization groups, Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 2863 (1992).
  26. See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/d5sw-qdfp for I. Derivation of the polarization term in the Extended Hubbard model. II. Ground-state degeneracy at the atomic limit (t=0). III. Demonstration of level-crossing method. IV. Details of DMRG technique. V. Order parameters for the CDW I and CDW II states. VI. Spin gap in the CDW I and CDW II phases. VII. Properties of the SDW state. VIII. Finite-size effects appearing near the SDW-CDI transition. IX. Additional central-charge analysis of the CDI phase. X. Absence of charge and spin orders in the CDI state. XI. Mixed short-range charge orders in CDI states. XII. Confirmation of insulating behavior in the CDI phase via single-particle spectral analysis. XIII. Mapping of FE and CDW III states onto effective spin models. XIV. Order parameter for the BOW phase. XV. Additional information for the FE phase. XVI. Additional information for the CDW III phase. Supplemental Material includes Refs. [27–36].
  27. J. F. Annett, R. M. Martin, A. K. McMahan, and S. Satpathy, Electronic Hamiltonian and antiferromagnetic interactions in La2CuO4, Phys. Rev. B 40, 2620(R) (1989).
  28. M. S. Hybertsen, E. B. Stechel, M. Schluter, and D. R. Jennison, Renormalization from density-functional theory to strong-coupling models for electronic states in Cu-O materials, Phys. Rev. B 41, 11068 (1990).
  29. J. B. Grant and A. K. McMahan, Realistic electronic structure calculations for magnetic insulators like La2CuO4, Phys. Rev. Lett. 66, 488 (1991).
  30. C. Varma, Missing valence states, diamagnetic insulators, and superconductors, Phys. Rev. Lett. 61, 2713 (1988).
  31. E. Lieb, T. Schultz, and D. Mattis, Two soluble models of an antiferromagnetic chain, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 16, 407 (1961).
  32. M. Oshikawa, Commensurability, excitation gap, and topology in quantum many-particle systems on a periodic lattice, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 1535 (2000).
  33. B. Nachtergaele and R. Sims, A multi-dimensional Lieb-Schultz-Mattis theorem, Commun. Math. Phys. 276, 437 (2007).
  34. S. Ramasesha and Z. Soos, Diagrammatic valence-bond theory for finite model Hamiltonians, Int. J. Quantum Chem. 25, 1003 (1984).
  35. Z. G. Soos and S. Ramasesha, Valence-bond theory of linear Hubbard and Pariser-Parr-Pople models, Phys. Rev. B 29, 5410 (1984).
  36. U. Schollwöck, The density-matrix renormalization group, Rev. Mod. Phys. 77, 259 (2005).
  37. R. Jullien and F. Haldane, Finite-size scaling study of dimerisation in the frustrated 1D S=12 antiferromagnet, Bull. Am. Phys. Soc. 28, 344 (1983).
  38. K. Okamoto and K. Nomura, Fluid-dimer critical point in S=12 antiferromagnetic Heisenberg chain with next nearest neighbor interactions, Phys. Lett. A 169, 433 (1992).
  39. P. Calabrese and J. Cardy, Entanglement entropy and quantum field theory, J. Stat. Mech. (2004) P06002.
  40. S. Nishimoto, Tomonaga-luttinger-liquid criticality: Numerical entanglement entropy approach, Phys. Rev. B 84, 195108 (2011).
  41. S. Ejima, F. Gebhard, and S. Nishimoto, Tomonaga-Luttinger parameters for doped Mott insulators, Europhys. Lett. 70, 492 (2005).
  42. S. Saha, J. van den Brink, M. Kumar, and S. Nishimoto, Dataset of “polarization-driven charge frustration and emergent phases in the one-dimensional extended Hubbard model,” 10.5281/zenodo.17283260 (2025).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation