Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Properties of Heavy Cosmic Nuclei Phosphorus, Chlorine, Argon, Potassium, and Calcium: Results from the Alpha Magnetic Spectrometer

A. Aceituno29, M. Aguilar29, B. Alpat35, G. Ambrosi35, H. Anderson9, J. Antunes21,26, L. Arruda26, N. Attig23, C. Bagwell9 et al. (AMS Collaboration)

C. Bagwell9, F. Barao26,27, M. Barbanera35, L. Barrin13, A. Bartoloni39, R. Battiston46,47, A. Bayyari19, N. Belyaev9, B. Bertucci35,36, V. Bindi19, K. Bollweg20, J. Bolster9, M. Borchiellini16, B. Borgia39,40, M. J. Boschini31, M. Bourquin14, C. Brugnoni35,36, W. J. Burger46, H. Y. Cai5,6, X. D. Cai9, M. Capell9, J. Casaus29, J. Cassidy20, G. Castellini12, F. Cervelli37, Y. H. Chang44,45, G. M. Chen5,6, G. R. Chen22, H. Chen18, H. Chen5,6, H. S. Chen5,6, Y. Chen22, L. Cheng22, H. Y. Chou44, S. Chouridou1, V. Choutko9, C. H. Chung1, C. Clark20, G. Coignet3, C. Consolandi19, A. Contin7,8, C. Corti19, Y. X. Cui5,6, Z. Cui21,22, K. Dadzie9, F. D’Angelo7,8, A. Dass19, C. Delgado29, S. Della Torre31, M. B. Demirköz2, L. Derome15, S. Di Falco37, V. Di Felice41, C. Díaz29, F. Dimiccoli46,47, P. von Doetinchem19, F. Dong33, M. Dotson20, M. Duranti35, A. Egorov9, A. Ellison20, F. Faldi35,36, D. Fehr1, J. Feng17, E. Fiandrini35,36, P. Fisher9, V. Formato41, R. J. García-López25, A. Galdames9, C. Gargiulo13, H. Gast1, T. T. Ge17, M. Gervasi31,32, L. E. Ghezzer46,47, F. Giovacchini29, D. M. Gómez-Coral30, J. Gong33, D. Grandi31,32, M. Graziani35,36, R. Guidetti31,32, C. Guan21, Z. H. He17, B. Heber24, F. Hernández-Nicolás29, L. Höfer1, T. H. Hsieh9, J. Y. Hu35, B. W. Huang18, M. Ionica35, M. Incagli37, Yi Jia9, H. Jinchi28, T. Kappe1, E. Karadöller2, G. Karagöz2, J. Kastelic20, Th. Kirn1, O. Kounina9, A. Kounine9, V. Koutsenko9, D. Krasnopevtsev9, A. Kuhlman19, A. Kulemzin9, G. La Vacca31,32, E. Laudi13, G. Laurenti7, I. Lazzizzera46,47, H. T. Lee43, S. C. Lee44, H. L. Li22, J. H. Li17, J. Q. Li33, M. Li21, Q. Li33, Q. Li21, Q. Y. Li22, S. L. Li5, Z. H. Li5,6, P. Liao21, C. H. Lin44, T. Lippert23, P. C. Liu22, Z. Liu41, S. Q. Lu5,44, J. Z. Luo33, Q. Luo17, S. D. Luo18, Xi Luo22, C. Mañá29, J. Marín29, G. Martínez29, N. Masi7, D. Maurin15, T. Medvedeva9, A. Menchaca-Rocha30, Q. Meng33, V. V. Mikhailov22, M. Molero29, P. Mott20, L. Mussolin35,36, Y. Najafi Jozani1, R. Nicolaidis46,47, N. Nikonov19, F. Nozzoli46, J. Ocampo-Peleteiro7, A. Oliva7, M. Orcinha35,36, F. Palmonari7,8, M. Paniccia14, A. Pashnin9, M. Pauluzzi35,36, D. Pelosi35,36, S. Pensotti31,32, D. Perez9, P. Pietzcker24, V. Plyaskin9, S. Poluianov34, D. Pridöhl1, N. Puccetti46,47, Z. Y. Qu22, L. Quadrani7,8, M. M. Rafiei39, P. G. Rancoita31, D. Rapin14, E. Robyn7, I. Rodríguez-García29, L. Romaneehsen24, F. Rossi46,47, A. Rozhkov9, D. Rozza31,32, R. Sagdeev10, S. Schael1, A. Schultz von Dratzig1, G. Schwering1, E. S. Seo11, B. S. Shan4, A. Shukla19, T. Siedenburg1, A. Siemko9, G. Silvestre35, D. Schledewitz46,47, J. W. Song21, X. J. Song22, R. Sonnabend1, A. Strekalovsky9, L. Strigari39,*, A. Stuzhin21, T. Su22, Q. Sun21, Z. T. Sun5, L. Tabarroni41, M. Tacconi31,32, Z. C. Tang5, J. J. Teoh5,6, J. Tian41, Ye Tian5,6, Y. Tian18, Samuel C. C. Ting9,13, S. M. Ting9, N. Tomassetti35,36, J. Torsti48, A. Ubaldi35,36, I. Usoskin34, V. Vagelli38,35, R. Vainio48, P. Väisänen34, M. Valencia-Otero44, E. Valente39,40, E. Valtonen48, E. Van Hove9, M. Vázquez Acosta25, M. Vecchi16, M. Velasco29, J. C. Wang5, L. Q. Wang21, N. H. Wang21, S. Wang19, X. Wang9, Z. M. Wang22, M. Waqas41, Z. L. Weng9, H. Wu33, Z. B. Wu21, J. N. Xiao18, R. Q. Xiong33, Y. Z. Xiong18, W. Xu21,22, Q. Yan5,6, Z. X. Yan5,6, H. T. Yang5,6, Y. Yang42,44, H. Yi33, Y. H. You5,6, M. Yu21, Y. M. Yu9, Z. Q. Yu5, B. Q. Yuan22, C. Zhang5, F. Z. Zhang5, J. Zhang21, J. H. Zhang33, Z. Zhang9, P. W. Zhao17, Z. M. Zheng4, H. F. Zhou17, H. L. Zhuang5, V. Zhukov1, L. K. Zou22, M. Zuberi9, and P. Zuccon46,47 (AMS Collaboration)

  • 1I. Physics Institute and JARA-FAME, RWTH Aachen University, 52056 Aachen, Germany
  • 2Department of Physics, Middle East Technical University (METU), 06800 Ankara, Türkiye
  • 3Université Grenoble Alpes, Université Savoie Mont Blanc, CNRS, LAPP-IN2P3, 74000 Annecy, France
  • 4Beihang University (BUAA), Beijing, 100191, China
  • 5Institute of High Energy Physics (IHEP), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100049, China
  • 6University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (UCAS), Beijing, 100049, China
  • 7INFN Sezione di Bologna, 40126 Bologna, Italy
  • 8Università di Bologna, 40126 Bologna, Italy
  • 9Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, USA
  • 10East-West Center for Space Science, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland 20742, USA
  • 11IPST, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland 20742, USA
  • 12CNR–IROE, 50125 Firenze, Italy
  • 13European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN), 1211 Geneva 23, Switzerland
  • 14DPNC, Université de Genève, 1211 Genève 4, Switzerland
  • 15Université Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, Grenoble INP, LPSC-IN2P3, 38000 Grenoble, France
  • 16Kapteyn Astronomical Institute, University of Groningen, P.O. Box 800, 9700 AV Groningen, Netherlands
  • 17Sun Yat–sen University (SYSU), Guangzhou, 510275, China
  • 18Zhejiang University (ZJU), Hangzhou 310058, China
  • 19Physics and Astronomy Department, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, Hawaii 96822, USA
  • 20National Aeronautics and Space Administration Johnson Space Center (JSC), Houston, Texas 77058, USA and Goddard Space Flight Center (GSFC), Greenbelt, Maryland 20771, USA
  • 21Shandong University (SDU), Jinan, Shandong, 250100, China
  • 22Shandong Institute of Advanced Technology (SDIAT), Jinan, Shandong, 250100, China
  • 23Jülich Supercomputing Centre and JARA-FAME, Research Centre Jülich, 52425 Jülich, Germany
  • 24Institut für Experimentelle und Angewandte Physik, Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel, 24118 Kiel, Germany
  • 25Instituto de Astrofísica de Canarias (IAC), 38205 La Laguna, Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain and Departamento de Astrofísica, Universidad de La Laguna, 38206 La Laguna, Tenerife, Spain
  • 26Laboratório de Instrumentação e Física Experimental de Partículas (LIP), 1649-003 Lisboa, Portugal
  • 27Departamento de Física, Instituto Superior Técnico (IST), Universidade de Lisboa, 1049-001 Lisboa, Portugal
  • 28National Chung–Shan Institute of Science and Technology (NCSIST), Longtan, Tao Yuan, 32546, Taiwan
  • 29Centro de Investigaciones Energéticas, Medioambientales y Tecnológicas (CIEMAT), 28040 Madrid, Spain
  • 30Instituto de Física, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM), Ciudad de México, 01000 Mexico
  • 31INFN Sezione di Milano–Bicocca, 20126 Milano, Italy
  • 32Università di Milano–Bicocca, 20126 Milano, Italy
  • 33Southeast University (SEU), Nanjing, 210096, China
  • 34Sodankylä Geophysical Observatory and Space Physics and Astronomy Research Unit, University of Oulu, 90014 Oulu, Finland
  • 35INFN Sezione di Perugia, 06100 Perugia, Italy
  • 36Università di Perugia, 06100 Perugia, Italy
  • 37INFN Sezione di Pisa, 56100 Pisa, Italy
  • 38Agenzia Spaziale Italiana (ASI), 00133 Roma, Italy
  • 39INFN Sezione di Roma 1, 00185 Roma, Italy
  • 40Università di Roma La Sapienza, 00185 Roma, Italy
  • 41INFN Sezione di Roma Tor Vergata, 00133 Roma, Italy
  • 42National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, 70101, Taiwan
  • 43Academia Sinica Grid Center (ASGC), Nankang, Taipei, 11529, Taiwan
  • 44Institute of Physics, Academia Sinica, Nankang, Taipei, 11529, Taiwan
  • 45Physics Department and Center for High Energy and High Field Physics, National Central University (NCU), Tao Yuan, 32054, Taiwan
  • 46INFN TIFPA, 38123 Trento, Italy
  • 47Università di Trento, 38123 Trento, Italy
  • 48Space Research Laboratory, Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Turku, 20014 Turku, Finland

  • *Also at IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy.

Phys. Rev. Lett. 136, 241002 – Published 17 June, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/d2vf-fw3v

Abstract

We report the unique properties of cosmic phosphorus (P), chlorine (Cl), argon (Ar), potassium (K), and calcium (Ca) fluxes in the GV to TV rigidity range collected by the Alpha Magnetic Spectrometer (AMS) on the International Space Station. With a total of one million events collected over 13.5 years, we observed that the rigidity dependencies of the five fluxes are well described by the sums of a primary cosmic ray component and a secondary cosmic ray component. The abundance ratios of all five elements to Si at the source are accurately determined independent of cosmic ray propagation. The source abundance of Ar and Ca (even-Z elements) is larger than P, Cl, and K (odd-Z elements). The secondary components of the P and the Cl fluxes are each ∼1/3 of the F flux, and the secondary components of the Ar, K, and Ca fluxes are each ∼1/2 of the F flux. The twenty elements measured by AMS, from He to Ca and Fe, can be categorized into four classes, two primary and two secondary, based on their rigidity dependence.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (40)

  1. I. A. Grenier, J. H. Black, and A. W. Strong, The nine lives of cosmic rays in galaxies, Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 53, 199 (2015); P. Blasi, The origin of galactic cosmic rays, Astron. Astrophys. Rev. 21, 70 (2013); A. W. Strong, I. V. Moskalenko, and V. S. Ptuskin, Cosmic-ray propagation and interactions in the galaxy, Annu. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 57, 285 (2007); A. Castellina and F. Donato, Diffusion coefficient and acceleration spectrum from direct measurements of charged cosmic ray nuclei, Astropart. Phys. 24, 146 (2005); G. Jóhannesson et al., Bayesian Analysis of cosmic ray propagation: Evidence against homogeneous diffusion, Astrophys. J. 824, 16 (2016); M. A. Malkov and L. O’C Drury, Nonlinear theory of diffusive acceleration of particles by shock waves, Rep. Prog. Phys. 64, 429 (2001).
  2. M. Aguilar et al., Properties of a new group of cosmic nuclei: Results from the Alpha Magnetic Spectrometer on sodium, aluminum, and nitrogen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 021101 (2021). The measurements of the Na, Al, and N fluxes have been extended to cover same 13.5-year period.
  3. M. Aguilar et al., Properties of neon, magnesium, and silicon primary cosmic rays results from the Alpha Magnetic Spectrometer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 211102 (2020). The measurements of the Ne, and Mg fluxes have been extended to cover same 13.5-year period.
  4. M. Aguilar et al., Properties of heavy secondary fluorine cosmic rays: Results from the Alpha Magnetic Spectrometer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 081102 (2021).
  5. M. Aguilar et al., Properties of cosmic-ray sulfur and determination of the composition of primary cosmic-ray carbon, neon, magnesium, and sulfur: Ten-year results from the Alpha Magnetic Spectrometer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 211002 (2023).
  6. J. J. Engelmann et al., Charge composition and energy spectra of cosmic-ray nuclei for elements from Be to Ni—Results from HEAO-3-C2, Astron. Astrophys. 233, 96 (1990).
  7. M. Ave, P. J. Boyle, F. Gahbauer, C. Höppner, J. R. Hörandel, M. Ichimura, D. Müller, and A. Romero-Wolf, Composition of primary cosmic-ray nuclei at high energies, Astrophys. J. 678, 262 (2008).
  8. J. S. Young, P. S. Freier, C. J. Waddington, N. R. Brewster, and R. K. Fickle, The elemental and isotopic composition of cosmic rays—Silicon to nickel, Astrophys. J. 246, 1014 (1981).
  9. M. Ichimura et al., Observation of heavy cosmic-ray primaries over the wide energy range from 100  GeV/particle to 100  TeV/particle: Is the celebrated “knee” actually so prominent?, Phys. Rev. D 48, 1949 (1993).
  10. E. Juliusson, Charge composition and energy spectra of cosmic-ray nuclei at energies above 20 GeV per nucleon, Astrophys. J. 191, 331 (1974).
  11. J. Lezniak and W. Webber, The charge composition and energy spectra of cosmic-ray nuclei from 3000 MeV per nucleon to 50 GeV per nucleon, Astrophys. J. 223, 676 (1978).
  12. J. A. Esposito et al., The ALICE instrument and the measured cosmic ray elemental abundances, Astropart. Phys. 1, 33 (1992).
  13. E. Kamioka et al., Azimuthally controlled observation of heavy cosmic-ray primaries by means of the balloon-borne emulsion chamber, Astropart. Phys. 6, 155 (1997).
  14. K. Lave et al., Galactic cosmic-ray energy spectra and composition during the 2009–2010 solar minimum period, Astrophys. J. 770, 117 (2013).
  15. A. Kounine, The Alpha Magnetic Spectrometer on the International Space Station, Int. J. Mod. Phys. E 21, 1230005 (2012); S. Ting, The Alpha Magnetic Spectrometer on the International Space Station, Nucl. Phys. B, Proc. Suppl. 243–244, 12 (2013); B. Bertucci, The AMS-02 detector operation in space, Proc. Sci. EPS-HEP2011 (2011) 067; M. Incagli, Astroparticle physics with AMS02, AIP Conf. Proc. 1223, 43 (2010); R. Battiston, The antimatter spectrometer (AMS-02): A particle physics detector in space, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 588, 227 (2008).
  16. M. Aguilar et al., The Alpha Magnetic Spectrometer (AMS) on the International Space Station: Part II—Results from the first seven years, Phys. Rep. 894, 1 (2021).
  17. See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/d2vf-fw3v for the details of the detector description, event selection including backtracing [39] through the geomagnetic field [40], and data analysis. It also contains the tabulated, as functions of rigidity, P, Cl, Ar, K, Ca, Si, F, and S fluxes and P/S, Cl/Ar, and K/Ca flux ratios. In addition, the fitted parameters of Eqs. (2) and (3) are tabulated, as are the AMS C/O, N/O, Ne/Si, Na/Si, Mg/Si, Al/Si, P/Si, S/Si, Cl/Si, Ar/Si, K/Si and Ca/Si abundance ratios at the source together with previous results and the primary and secondary components of C, N, Ne, Na, Mg, and Al fluxes. Figures include the detector layout, the tracker coordinate resolution, the reconstructed event example, the charge selection, the AMS acceptance and efficiency corrections, the Ca break-up probability and Ar and Ca survival probability measurements, the AMS P, Cl, Ar, K, and Ca fluxes as a function of kinetic energy per nucleon together with other measurements, the AMS P/S, Cl/Ar, and K/Ca flux ratios compared with GALPROP-HELMOD, the fit of Eq. (3), and the AMS C, N, Ne, Na, Mg, and Al fluxes, each as the sum of a primary and a secondary component.
  18. J. Alcaraz et al., Leptons in near earth orbit, Phys. Lett. B 484, 10 (2000).
  19. C. C. Finlay et al., International geomagnetic reference field: The eleventh generation, Geophys. J. Int. 183, 1216 (2010); E. Thébault et al., Earth Planets Space 67, 79 (2015); P. Alken, E. Thébault, C. D. Beggan et al., International geomagnetic reference field: The thirteenth generation, 73, 49 (2021).
  20. K. Lübelsmeyer et al., Upgrade of the Alpha Magnetic Spectrometer (AMS-02) for long term operation on the International Space Station (ISS), Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 654, 639 (2011).
  21. B. Alpat et al., The internal alignment and position resolution of the AMS-02 silicon tracker determined with cosmic-ray muons, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 613, 207 (2010).
  22. Y. Jia, Q. Yan, V. Choutko, H. Liu, and A. Oliva, Nuclei charge measurement by the Alpha Magnetic Spectrometer silicon tracker, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 972 (2020).
  23. G. Ambrosi, V. Choutko, C. Delgado, A. Oliva, Q. Yan, and Y. Li, The spatial resolution of the silicon tracker of the Alpha Magnetic Spectrometer, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 869, 29 (2017).
  24. Q. Yan and V. Choutko, Alignment of the Alpha Magnetic Spectrometer (AMS) in space, Eur. Phys. J. C 83 (2023).
  25. V. Bindi et al., Calibration and performance of the AMS-02 time of flight detector in space, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 743, 22 (2014).
  26. M. Aguilar et al., Precision measurement of the helium flux in primary cosmic rays of rigidities 1.9 GV to 3 TV with the Alpha Magnetic Spectrometer on the International Space Station, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 211101 (2015).
  27. J. Allison et al., Recent developments in geant4, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 835, 186 (2016); geant4 developments and applications, IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 53, 270 (2006); S. Agostinelli et al., geant4—A simulation toolkit, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 506, 250 (2003).
  28. Q. Yan, V. Choutko, A. Oliva, and M. Paniccia, Measurements of nuclear interaction cross sections with the Alpha Magnetic Spectrometer on the International Space Station, Nucl. Phys. A996, 121712 (2020).
  29. M. Aguilar et al., Precision measurement of the proton flux in primary cosmic rays from rigidity 1 GV to 1.8 TV with the Alpha Magnetic Spectrometer on the International Space Station, Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 171103 (2015).
  30. M. Aguilar et al., Properties of iron primary cosmic rays: Results from the Alpha Magnetic Spectrometer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 041104 (2021). The measurement of the Fe flux has been extended to cover same 13.5-year period.
  31. M. Aguilar et al. (AMS Collaboration), Measurement of the heavy nuclei cosmic ray fluxes with the Alpha Magnetic Spectrometer (to be published).
  32. Note that the data can also be downloaded in different formats from the AMS website https://ams02.space/sites/default/files/publication/202601/table-s1.csv, https://ams02.space/sites/default/files/publication/202601/table-s2.csv, https://ams02.space/sites/default/files/publication/202601/table-s3.csv, https://ams02.space/sites/default/files/publication/202601/table-s4.csv, https://ams02.space/sites/default/files/publication/202601/table-s5.csv, https://ams02.space/sites/default/files/publication/202601/table-s6.csv, https://ams02.space/sites/default/files/publication/202601/table-s7.csv, https://ams02.space/sites/default/files/publication/202601/table-s8.csv, https://ams02.space/sites/default/files/publication/202601/table-s9.csv, https://ams02.space/sites/default/files/publication/202601/table-s10.csv, https://ams02.space/sites/default/files/publication/202601/table-s11.csv, the ASI cosmic-ray database at https://tools.ssdc.asi.it/CosmicRays, and the LPSC cosmic-ray database at https://lpsc.in2p3.fr/crdb/.

  33. M. J. Boschini et al., Inference of the local interstellar spectra of cosmic-ray nuclei Z≤28 with GalProp-HelMod framework, Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 250, 27 (2020).
  34. M. Aguilar et al., Observation of new properties of secondary cosmic rays lithium, beryllium, and boron by the Alpha Magnetic Spectrometer on the International Space Station, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 021101 (2018). The measurements of the Li, Be, and B fluxes have been extended to cover same 13.5-year period.
  35. G. D. Lafferty and T. R. Wyatt, Where to stick your data points: The treatment of measurements within wide bins, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 355, 541 (1995). We have used Eq. (6) with R˜≡xlw.
  36. M. A. DuVernois and M. R. Thayer, The elemental composition of the galactic cosmic-ray source: Ulysses high-energy telescope results, Astrophys. J. 465, 982 (1996).
  37. A. C. Cummings, E. C. Stone, B. C. Heikkila, N. Lal, W. R. Webber, G. Jóhannesson, I. V. Moskalenko, E. Orlando, and T. A. Porter, Galactic cosmic rays in the local interstellar medium: Voyager 1 observations and model results, Astrophys. J. 831, 18 (2016).
  38. M. H. Israel et al., Elemental composition at the cosmic-ray source derived from the ACE-CRIS instrument. I. C6 to Ni28, Astrophys. J. 865, 69 (2018).
  39. A. C. Cummings, I. V. Moskalenko, B. C. Heikkila, G. Jóhannesson, and T. A. Porter, Voyager 1 observations of galactic cosmic-ray isotopes in the very local interstellar medium: Evidence for primary H2 and B, Astrophys. J. 993, 81 (2025).
  40. M. Aguilar et al., Observation of the identical rigidity dependence of He, C, and O cosmic rays at high rigidities by the Alpha Magnetic Spectrometer on the International Space Station, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 251101 (2017). The measurements of the He, C, and O fluxes have been extended to cover same 13.5-year period.

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation