Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Revisiting Scattering Enhancement from the Aharonov-Bohm Effect

T. Daniel Brennan, Jaipratap Singh Grewal, and Eric Y. Yang

Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 021601 – Published 8 July, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/cdns-8bw7

Abstract

We revisit the problem of a charged particle scattering off of an Aharonov-Bohm cosmic string. A classic computation gave an infinite total scattering cross section, leading to a Callan-Rubakov-like enhancement which can have important implications on baryon number asymmetry in the early Universe. However, unlike the Callan-Rubakov effect, the Aharonov-Bohm interaction is topological and thus it is surprising that it leads to such a dramatic dynamical effect for single particle scattering. We reexamine this old problem through the modern lens of generalized global symmetries by embedding Aharanov-Bohm strings in a discrete gauge theory. We show that the scattering cross section is suppressed by the core size and there is thus no Callan-Rubakov-like enhancement.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (31)

  1. G. ’t Hooft, On the phase transition towards permanent quark confinement, Nucl. Phys. B138, 1 (1978).
  2. C. G. Callan, Jr., Dyon-fermion dynamics, Phys. Rev. D 26, 2058 (1982).
  3. C. G. Callan, Jr., Disappearing dyons, Phys. Rev. D 25, 2141 (1982).
  4. V. A. Rubakov, Adler-Bell-Jackiw anomaly and fermion number breaking in the presence of a magnetic monopole, Nucl. Phys. B203, 311 (1982).
  5. J. Polchinski, Monopole catalysis: The fermion rotor system, Nucl. Phys. B242, 345 (1984).
  6. R. Kitano and R. Matsudo, Missing final state puzzle in the monopole-fermion scattering, Phys. Lett. B 832, 137271 (2022).
  7. C. Csáki, Y. Shirman, O. Telem, and J. Terning, Monopoles entangle fermions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 181601 (2022).
  8. Y. Hamada, T. Kitahara, and Y. Sato, Monopole-fermion scattering and varying Fock space, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2022) 116.
  9. T. D. Brennan, A new solution to the Callan Rubakov effect, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2024) 170.
  10. T. D. Brennan, Callan-Rubakov effect and higher charge monopoles, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2023) 159.
  11. M. van Beest, P. Boyle Smith, D. Delmastro, Z. Komargodski, and D. Tong, Monopoles, scattering, and generalized symmetries, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2025) 014.
  12. C. Csáki, Y. Shirman, O. Telem, and J. Terning, Pairwise multiparticle states and the monopole unitarity puzzle, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 181601 (2022).
  13. T. D. Brennan, L.-T. Wang, and H. Xiao, Monopole catalyzed baryogenesis with a θ angle, arXiv:2412.14239.
  14. R. H. Brandenberger, A.-C. Davis, and A. M. Matheson, Callan-Rubakov effect for strings, Nucl. Phys. B307, 909 (1988).
  15. R. H. Brandenberger, A.-C. Davis, and A. M. Matheson, Cosmic strings and baryogenesis, Phys. Lett. B 218, 304 (1989).
  16. J. M. Cline, J. R. Espinosa, G. D. Moore, and A. Riotto, String mediated electroweak baryogenesis: A critical analysis, Phys. Rev. D 59, 065014 (1999).
  17. J. R. Espinosa, Electroweak baryogenesis with cosmic strings?, in Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Strong and Electroweak Matter, 1999, pp. 304–308, arXiv:hep-ph/9901310.
  18. M. G. Alford, J. March-Russell, and F. Wilczek, Enhanced baryon number violation due to cosmic strings, Nucl. Phys. B328, 140 (1989).
  19. S. Koren, Cosmological lithium solution from discrete gauged B-L, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 091003 (2023).
  20. E. J. Copeland, R. C. Myers, and J. Polchinski, Cosmic F and D strings, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2004) 013.
  21. J. Polchinski, Open heterotic strings, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2006) 082.
  22. M. G. Alford and F. Wilczek, Aharonov-Bohm interaction of cosmic strings with matter, Phys. Rev. Lett. 62, 1071 (1989).
  23. S. Schafer-Nameki, ICTP lectures on (non-)invertible generalized symmetries, Phys. Rep. 1063, 1 (2024).
  24. S.-H. Shao, What’s done cannot be undone: TASI lectures on non-invertible symmetry, arXiv:2308.00747.
  25. L. Bhardwaj, L. E. Bottini, L. Fraser-Taliente, L. Gladden, D. S. W. Gould, A. Platschorre, and H. Tillim, Lectures on generalized symmetries, Phys. Rep. 1051, 1 (2024).
  26. T. D. Brennan and S. Hong, Introduction to generalized global symmetries in QFT and particle physics, arXiv:2306.00912.
  27. T. D. Brennan and C. Cordova, Axions, higher-groups, and emergent symmetry, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2022) 145.
  28. T. D. Brennan, S. Hong, and L.-T. Wang, Coupling a cosmic string to a TQFT, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2024) 145.
  29. Y. Choi, H. T. Lam, and S.-H. Shao, Non-invertible Gauss law and axions, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2023) 067.
  30. T. Banks and N. Seiberg, Symmetries and strings in field theory and gravity, Phys. Rev. D 83, 084019 (2011).
  31. A. E. Everett, Cosmic strings in unified gauge theories, Phys. Rev. D 24, 858 (1981).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation