Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Editors' Suggestion
  • Open Access

Experimental Demonstration of Mode-Coupled and High-Brightness Self-Amplified Spontaneous Emission in an X-Ray Free-Electron Laser

Eduard Prat1,*, Wenxiang Hu1,2, Christopher Arrell1, Marco Calvi1, Philipp Dijkstal1, Rolf Follath1, and Sven Reiche1

  • *Contact author: eduard.prat@psi.ch

Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 205001 – Published 12 November, 2024

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.133.205001

Abstract

X-ray free-electron lasers (FELs) are modern research tools with applications in multiple scientific fields. Standard x-ray FEL pulses are produced by the self-amplified spontaneous emission (SASE) mechanism. SASE-FEL pulses have high power, short duration, and excellent transverse coherence but exhibit poor temporal coherence with power and spectral profiles consisting of multiple randomly distributed spikes. Here, we present the demonstration of two modes that enhance the temporal coherence of SASE-FEL radiation: mode-coupled and high-brightness SASE. Both schemes are based on delaying the electron beam with magnetic chicanes placed between the undulator modules of the FEL facility. First, we show the generation of frequency combs with tunable peak separation via the mode-coupled SASE scheme. Second, we present a proof-of-principle demonstration of the high-brightness SASE mechanism, producing FEL pulses with a bandwidth reduction up to a factor of 3 with respect to standard SASE pulses. The demonstration was done at Athos, the soft x-ray beamline of SwissFEL, for photon energies between 500 and 600 eV. Our work will benefit current applications and may open up new research areas requiring frequency combs or narrow bandwidths.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (40)

  1. B. W. J. McNeil and N. R. Thompson, Nat. Photonics 4, 814 (2010).
  2. C. Pellegrini, A. Marinelli, and S. Reiche, Rev. Mod. Phys. 88, 015006 (2016).
  3. C. Bostedt, S. Boutet, D. M. Fritz, Z. Huang, H. J. Lee, H. T. Lemke, A. Robert, W. F. Schlotter, J. J. Turner, and G. J. Williams, Rev. Mod. Phys. 88, 015007 (2016).
  4. W. Ackermann, G. Asova, V. Ayvazyan, A. Azima, N. Baboi, J. Bähr, V. Balandin, B. Beutner, A. Brandt, A. Bolzmann et al., Nat. Photonics 1, 336 (2007).
  5. P. Emma, R. Akre, J. Arthur, R. Bionta, C. Bostedt, J. Bozek, A. Brachmann, P. Bucksbaum, R. Coffee, F.-J. Decker et al., Nat. Photonics 4, 641 (2010).
  6. T. Ishikawa, H. Aoyagi, T. Asaka, Y. Asano, N. Azumi, T. Bizen, H. Ego, K. Fukami, T. Fukui, Y. Furukawa et al., Nat. Photonics 6, 540 (2012).
  7. E. Allaria, D. Castronovo, P. Cinquegrana, P. Craievich, M. D. Forno, M. B. Danailov, G. D’Auria, A. Demidovich, G. D. Ninno, S. D. Mitri et al., Nat. Photonics 7, 913 (2013).
  8. H.-S. Kang, C.-K. Min, H. Heo, C. Kim, H. Yang, G. Kim, I. Nam, S. Y. Baek, H.-J. Choi, G. Mun et al., Nat. Photonics 11, 708 (2017).
  9. W. Decking, S. Abeghyan, P. Abramian, A. Abramsky, A. Aguirre, C. Albrecht, P. Alou, M. Altarelli, P. Altmann, K. Amyan et al., Nat. Photonics 14, 391 (2020).
  10. E. Prat, R. Abela, M. Aiba, A. Alarcon, J. Alex, Y. Arbelo, C. Arrell, V. Arsov, C. Bacellar, C. Beard et al., Nat. Photonics 14, 748 (2020).
  11. A. M. Kondratenko and E. L. Saldin, Part. Accel. 10, 207 (1980), https://cds.cern.ch/record/1107977.
  12. R. Bonifacio, C. Pellegrini, and L. M. Narducci, Opt. Commun. 50, 373 (1984).
  13. S. Huang, Y. Ding, Y. Feng, E. Hemsing, Z. Huang, J. Krzywinski, A.  A. Lutman, A. Marinelli, T.  J. Maxwell, and D. Zhu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 154801 (2017).
  14. A. Marinelli, J. P. MacArthur, P. Emma, M. W. Guetg, C. Field, D. Kharakh, A. A. Lutman, Y. Ding, and Z. Huang, Appl. Phys. Lett. 111, 151101 (2017).
  15. A. Malyzhenkov, Y. P. Arbelo, P. Craievich, P. Dijkstal, E. Ferrari, S. Reiche, T. Schietinger, P. Juranić, and E. Prat, Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 042018(R) (2020).
  16. J. P. Duris, J. P. MacArthur, J. M. Glownia, S. Li, S. Vetter, A. Miahnahri, R. Coffee, P. Hering, A. Fry, M. E. Welch et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 104802 (2021).
  17. E. Prat, A. Malyzhenkov, C. Arrell, P. Craievich, S. Reiche, T. Schietinger, and G. Wang, APL Photonics 8, 111302 (2023).
  18. J. Amann, W. Berg, V. Blank, F.-J. Decker, Y. Ding, P. Emma, Y. Feng, J. Frisch, D. Fritz, J. Hastings et al., Nat. Photonics 6, 693 (2012).
  19. D. Ratner, R. Abela, J. Amann, C. Behrens, D. Bohler, G. Bouchard, C. Bostedt, M. Boyes, K. Chow, D. Cocco et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 054801 (2015).
  20. I. Nam, C.-K. Min, B. Oh, G. Kim, D. Na, Y. J. Suh, H. Yang, M. H. Cho, C. Kim, M.-J. Kim et al., Nat. Photonics 15, 435 (2021).
  21. P. R. Ribič, A. Abrami, L. Badano, M. Bossi, H.-H. Braun, N. Bruchon, F. Capotondi, D. Castronovo, M. Cautero, P. Cinquegrana et al., Nat. Photonics 13, 555 (2019).
  22. E. Saldin, E. Schneidmiller, and M. Yurkov, Opt. Commun. 202, 169 (2002).
  23. E. A. Schneidmiller, B. Faatz, M. Kuhlmann, J. Rönsch-Schulenburg, S. Schreiber, M. Tischer, and M. V. Yurkov, Phys. Rev. Accel. Beams 20, 020705 (2017).
  24. I. Nam, C.-K. Min, C. Kim, H. Yang, G. Kim, H. Heo, S. Kwon, S. H. Park, and H.-S. Kang, Appl. Phys. Lett. 112, 213506 (2018).
  25. N. R. Thompson and B. W. J. McNeil, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 203901 (2008).
  26. B. W. J. McNeil, N. R. Thompson, and D. J. Dunning, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 134802 (2013).
  27. E. Prat, A. A. Haddad, C. Arrell, S. Augustin, M. Boll, C. Bostedt, M. Calvi, A. L. Cavalieri, P. Craievich, A. Dax et al., Nat. Commun. 14, 5069 (2023).
  28. T. Schmidt and M. Calvi, Synchrotron Radiat. News 31, 35 (2018).
  29. E. Prat, E. Ferrari, M. Calvi, R. Ganter, S. Reiche, and T. Schmidt, Appl. Phys. Lett. 119, 151102 (2021).
  30. G. Wang, P. Dijkstal, S. Reiche, K. Schnorr, and E. Prat, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 035002 (2024).
  31. E. Prat, P. Dijkstal, E. Ferrari, R. Ganter, P. Juranić, A. Malyzhenkov, S. Reiche, T. Schietinger, G. Wang, A. A. Haddad, S. Augustin, C. Bostedt, G. Knopp, J. Knurr, A. S. Morillo-Candas, Z. Sun, and K. Schnorr, Phys. Rev. Res. 4, L022025 (2022).
  32. E. Prat, M. Calvi, R. Ganter, S. Reiche, T. Schietinger, and T. Schmidt, J. Synchrotron Radiat. 23, 861 (2016).
  33. E. Prat and S. Reiche, J. Synchrotron Radiat. 26, 1085 (2019).
  34. C. Arrell, V. Thominet, Y. Arbelo, U. Wagner, N. Gradwohl, E. Prat, L. Patthey, and R. Follath, in Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics (Optica Publishing Group, Washington, 2022).
  35. A. A. Sorokin, Y. Bican, S. Bonfigt, M. Brachmanski, M. Braune, U. F. Jastrow, A. Gottwald, H. Kaser, M. Richter, and K. Tiedtke, J. Synchrotron Radiat. 26, 1092 (2019).
  36. E. Prat, C. Kittel, M. Calvi, P. Craievich, P. Dijkstal, S. Reiche, T. Schietinger, and G. Wang, Phys. Rev. Accel. Beams 27, 030701 (2024).
  37. C. Kittel, M. Calvi, S. Reiche, N. Sammut, G. Wang, and E. Prat, J. Synchrotron Radiat. 31, 948 (2024).
  38. A. Kotani and S. Shin, Rev. Mod. Phys. 73, 203 (2001).
  39. T. Udem, R. Holzwarth, and T. W. Hänsch, Nature (London) 416, 233 (2002).
  40. S. T. Cundiff and J. Ye, Rev. Mod. Phys. 75, 325 (2003).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation