- Physical Review Journals
All JournalsPhysics Magazine

Physical Review Letters

Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Quantum Crosstalk Robust Quantum Control

Zeyuan Zhou1, Ryan Sitler2, Yasuo Oda1, Kevin Schultz2, and Gregory Quiroz1,2,*

  • 1William H. Miller III Department of Physics & Astronomy, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland 21218, USA
  • 2Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory, Laurel, Maryland 20723, USA

  • *Corresponding author: Gregory.Quiroz@jhuapl.edu
PDF

Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 210802 – Published 21 November, 2023

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.131.210802

Abstract

The prevalence of quantum crosstalk in current quantum devices poses challenges for achieving high-fidelity quantum logic operations and reliable quantum processing. Through quantum control theory, we develop an analytical condition for achieving crosstalk-robust single-qubit control of multiqubit systems. We examine the effects of quantum crosstalk via a cumulant expansion and develop a condition to suppress the leading order contributions to the dynamics. The efficacy of the condition is illustrated in the domains of quantum state preservation and noise characterization through the development of crosstalk-robust dynamical decoupling and quantum noise spectroscopy (QNS) protocols. Using the IBM Quantum Experience, crosstalk-robust state preservation is demonstrated on 27 qubits, where up to a 3.5× improvement in coherence decay is observed for single-qubit product and multipartite entangled states. Through the use of noise injection, we demonstrate crosstalk-robust dephasing QNS on a seven qubit processor, where a 104 improvement in reconstruction accuracy over alternative protocols is found. Together, these experiments highlight the significant impact the crosstalk suppression condition can have on improving multiqubit characterization and control on current quantum devices.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (74)

  1. J. Preskill, Quantum 2, 79 (2018).
  2. Y. Ding, P. Gokhale, S. F. Lin, R. Rines, T. Propson, and F. T. Chong, in Proceedings of the 2020 53rd Annual IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Microarchitecture (MICRO) (IEEE, New York, 2020).
  3. P. Murali, D. C. Mckay, M. Martonosi, and A. Javadi-Abhari, in Proceedings of the Twenty-Fifth International Conference on Architectural Support for Programming Languages and Operating Systems (2020), 10.1145/3373376.3378477.
  4. D. V. Babukhin and W. V. Pogosov, Quantum Inf. Process. 21, 7 (2022).
  5. Y. Ohkura, T. Satoh, and R. Van Meter, IEEE Trans. Quantum Eng. 3, 1 (2022).
  6. L. Xie, J. Zhai, Z. Zhang, J. Allcock, S. Zhang, and Y.-C. Zheng, in Proceedings of the 27th ACM International Conference on Architectural Support for Programming Languages and Operating Systems (2022), 10.1145/3503222.3507761.
  7. J. M. Gambetta, A. D. Córcoles, S. T. Merkel, B. R. Johnson, J. A. Smolin, J. M. Chow, C. A. Ryan, C. Rigetti, S. Poletto, T. A. Ohki, M. B. Ketchen, and M. Steffen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 240504 (2012).
  8. D. C. McKay, S. Sheldon, J. A. Smolin, J. M. Chow, and J. M. Gambetta, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 200502 (2019).
  9. M. Sarovar, T. Proctor, K. Rudinger, K. Young, E. Nielsen, and R. Blume-Kohout, Quantum 4, 321 (2020).
  10. K. Rudinger, C. W. Hogle, R. K. Naik, A. Hashim, D. Lobser, D. I. Santiago, M. D. Grace, E. Nielsen, T. Proctor, S. Seritan, S. M. Clark, R. Blume-Kohout, I. Siddiqi, and K. C. Young, PRX Quantum 2, 040338 (2021).
  11. Z. Chen, K. J. Satzinger, J. Atalaya, A. N. Korotkov, A. Dunsworth, D. Sank, C. Quintana, M. McEwen, R. Barends, P. V. Klimov et al., Nature (London) 595, 383 (2021).
  12. P. Parrado-Rodrí guez, C. Ryan-Anderson, A. Bermudez, and M. Müller, Quantum 5, 487 (2021).
  13. C. Ospelkaus, C. E. Langer, J. M. Amini, K. R. Brown, D. Leibfried, and D. J. Wineland, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 090502 (2008).
  14. E. Urban, T. A. Johnson, T. Henage, L. Isenhower, D. Yavuz, T. Walker, and M. Saffman, Nat. Phys. 5, 110 (2009).
  15. J. M. Auger, S. Bergamini, and D. E. Browne, Phys. Rev. A 96, 052320 (2017).
  16. H. Levine, A. Keesling, A. Omran, H. Bernien, S. Schwartz, A. S. Zibrov, M. Endres, M. Greiner, and V. Vuletić, and M. D. Lukin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 123603 (2018).
  17. C. Fang, Y. Wang, S. Huang, K. R. Brown, and J. Kim, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 240504 (2022).
  18. P. Krantz, M. Kjaergaard, F. Yan, T. P. Orlando, S. Gustavsson, and W. D. Oliver, Appl. Phys. Rev. 6, 021318 (2019).
  19. A. Ash-Saki, M. Alam, and S. Ghosh, IEEE Trans. Quantum Eng. 1, 1 (2020).
  20. A. Kandala, K. X. Wei, S. Srinivasan, E. Magesan, S. Carnevale, G. A. Keefe, D. Klaus, O. Dial, and D. C. McKay, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 130501 (2021).
  21. P. Zhao, K. Linghu, Z. Li, P. Xu, R. Wang, G. Xue, Y. Jin, and H. Yu, PRX Quantum 3, 020301 (2022).
  22. D. Buterakos, R. E. Throckmorton, and S. D. Sarma, Phys. Rev. B 97, 045431 (2018).
  23. I. Heinz and G. Burkard, Phys. Rev. B 105, 085414 (2022).
  24. R. E. Throckmorton and S. Das Sarma, Phys. Rev. B 105, 245413 (2022).
  25. P. Mundada, G. Zhang, T. Hazard, and A. Houck, Phys. Rev. Appl. 12, 054023 (2019).
  26. J. Ku, X. Xu, M. Brink, D. C. McKay, J. B. Hertzberg, M. H. Ansari, and B. L. T. Plourde, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 200504 (2020).
  27. P. Zhao, P. Xu, D. Lan, J. Chu, X. Tan, H. Yu, and Y. Yu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 200503 (2020).
  28. A. R. R. Carvalho, H. Ball, M. J. Biercuk, M. R. Hush, and F. Thomsen, Phys. Rev. Appl. 15, 064054 (2021).
  29. K. X. Wei, E. Magesan, I. Lauer, S. Srinivasan, D. F. Bogorin, S. Carnevale, G. A. Keefe, Y. Kim, D. Klaus, W. Landers et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 060501 (2022).
  30. V. Tripathi, H. Chen, M. Khezri, K.-W. Yip, E. M. Levenson-Falk, and D. A. Lidar, Phys. Rev. Appl. 18, 024068 (2022).
  31. C. Zhang, Y. Chen, Y. Jin, W. Ahn, Y. Zhang, and E. Z. Zhang, arXiv:2009.02346.
  32. B. Zhang, S. Majumder, P. H. Leung, S. Crain, Y. Wang, C. Fang, D. M. Debroy, J. Kim, and K. R. Brown, Phys. Rev. Appl. 17, 034074 (2022).
  33. D. Dong and I. R. Petersen, IET Control Theory Appl. 4, 2651 (2010).
  34. T. J. Green, J. Sastrawan, H. Uys, and M. J. Biercuk, New J. Phys. 15, 095004 (2013).
  35. H. Ball and M. J. Biercuk, Eur. Phys. J. Quantum Technol. 2, 11 (2015).
  36. F. K. Wilhelm, S. Kirchhoff, S. Machnes, N. Wittler, and D. Sugny, arXiv:2003.10132.
  37. D. d’Alessandro, Introduction to Quantum Control and Dynamics (Chapman and Hall/CRC, London, 2021), 10.1201/9781003051268.
  38. Y. Oda, D. Lucarelli, K. Schultz, B. D. Clader, and G. Quiroz, Phys. Rev. Applied 19, 014062 (2023).
  39. L. Viola, E. Knill, and S. Lloyd, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 2417 (1999).
  40. M. Biercuk, A. Doherty, and H. Uys, J. Phys. B 44, 154002 (2011).
  41. Daniel A. Lidar and Todd A. Brun, Quantum Error Correction (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 2013).
  42. B. Pokharel, N. Anand, B. Fortman, and D. A. Lidar, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 220502 (2018).
  43. G. A. Álvarez and D. Suter, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 230501 (2011).
  44. J. Bylander, S. Gustavsson, F. Yan, F. Yoshihara, K. Harrabi, G. Fitch, D. G. Cory, Y. Nakamura, J.-S. Tsai, and W. D. Oliver, Nat. Phys. 7, 565 (2011).
  45. L. Cywiński, Phys. Rev. A 90, 042307 (2014).
  46. L. M. Norris, G. A. Paz-Silva, and L. Viola, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 150503 (2016).
  47. G. A. Paz-Silva, L. M. Norris, and L. Viola, Phys. Rev. A 95, 022121 (2017).
  48. V. Frey, S. Mavadia, L. Norris, W. De Ferranti, D. Lucarelli, L. Viola, and M. Biercuk, Nat. Commun. 8, 2189 (2017).
  49. Y. Sung, F. Beaudoin, L. M. Norris, F. Yan, D. K. Kim, J. Y. Qiu, U. von Lüpke, J. L. Yoder, T. P. Orlando, S. Gustavsson et al., Nat. Commun. 10, 3715 (2019).
  50. V. Frey, L. M. Norris, L. Viola, and M. J. Biercuk, Phys. Rev. Appl. 14, 024021 (2020).
  51. U. von Lüpke, F. Beaudoin, L. M. Norris, Y. Sung, R. Winik, J. Y. Qiu, M. Kjaergaard, D. Kim, J. Yoder, S. Gustavsson, L. Viola, and W. D. Oliver, PRX Quantum 1, 010305 (2020).
  52. L. Cywiński, R. M. Lutchyn, C. P. Nave, and S. Das Sarma, Phys. Rev. B 77, 174509 (2008).
  53. L. M. Norris, D. Lucarelli, V. M. Frey, S. Mavadia, M. J. Biercuk, and L. Viola, Phys. Rev. A 98, 032315 (2018).
  54. T. Chalermpusitarak, B. Tonekaboni, Y. Wang, L. M. Norris, L. Viola, and G. A. Paz-Silva, PRX Quantum 2, 030315 (2021).
  55. See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/PhysRevLett.131.210802, which includes Refs. [57–61], for further details on CSC extensions and CR protocols and demonstrations.
  56. Matt McEwen et al., Nat. Phys. 18, 107 (2022).
  57. Robin Harper, Steven T Flammia, and Joel J Wallman, Nat. Phys. 16, 1184 (2020).
  58. Marcus Stollsteimer and Günter Mahler, Phys. Rev. A 64, 052301 (2001).
  59. Gregory Quiroz and Daniel A Lidar, Phys. Rev. A 88, 052306 (2013).
  60. Daniel A. Lidar, Adv. Chem. Phys. 154, 295 (2014).
  61. E. J. Connors, J. Nelson, L. F. Edge, and J. M. Nichol, Nat. Commun. 13, 940 (2022).
  62. W. Lawrie, M. Russ, F. van Riggelen, N. Hendrickx, S. de Snoo, A. Sammak, G. Scappucci, and M. Veldhorst, Nat. Commun. 14, 3617 (2023).
  63. J. He, Q. Liu, Z. Yang, Q. Niu, X. Ban, and J. Wang, Phys. Rev. A 104, 063120 (2021).
  64. G. Quiroz, P. Titum, P. Lotshaw, P. Lougovski, K. Schultz, E. Dumitrescu, and I. Hen, arXiv:2109.04482.
  65. J. Morris, F. A. Pollock, and K. Modi, Open Syst. Inf. Dyn. 29, 2250007 (2022).
  66. Y.-Q. Chen, K.-L. Ma, Y.-C. Zheng, J. Allcock, S. Zhang, and C.-Y. Hsieh, Phys. Rev. Appl. 13, 034045 (2020).
  67. G. A. White, C. D. Hill, F. A. Pollock, L. C. Hollenberg, and K. Modi, Nat. Commun. 11, 6301 (2020).
  68. H. Zhang, B. Pokharel, E. M. Levenson-Falk, and D. Lidar, Phys. Rev. Appl. 17, 054018 (2022).
  69. A. M. Souza, G. A. Álvarez, and D. Suter, Phys. Rev. A 85, 032306 (2012).
  70. P. Wocjan, Phys. Rev. A 73, 062317 (2006).
  71. R. Stine, Sociol. Methods Res. 18, 243 (1989).
  72. N. Ezzell, B. Pokharel, L. Tewala, G. Quiroz, and D. A. Lidar, arXiv:2207.03670.
  73. K. Schultz, G. Quiroz, P. Titum, and B. D. Clader, Phys. Rev. Res. 3, 033229 (2021).
  74. A. Murphy, J. Epstein, G. Quiroz, K. Schultz, L. Tewala, K. McElroy, C. Trout, B. Tien-Street, J. A. Hoffmann, B. D. Clader, J. Long, D. P. Pappas, and T. M. Sweeney, Phys. Rev. Res. 4, 013081 (2022).

Outline

Information

Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 210802– Published 21 November, 2023
  • Received 22 October 2022
  • Accepted 14 September 2023
Crossmark - Check for updates button
Creative Commons Logo

Published by the American Physical Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. Further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the published article’s title, journal citation, and DOI.

Published by the American Physical Society

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation