Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Tight and Self-Testing Multipartite Quantum Bell Inequalities from the Renormalization Group

Paolo Abiuso1, Julian Fischer2,3, and Miguel Navascués1

Phys. Rev. Lett. 137, 050204 – Published 29 July, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/993r-lzzm

Abstract

Attempts to understand multipartite quantum nonlocality are thwarted by the difficulty of devising quantum Bell inequalities (QBI) for systems composed of more than a few separate parties. In this Letter, we introduce the notion of tight connectors, a class of tensors which, if contracted according to some simple rules, result in tight QBIs. The new inequalities are saturated by tensor network states whose structure mimics the corresponding network of connectors. We further formulate the connector property of “full self-testing,” which singles out a subset of tight connectors whose associated QBIs can only be saturated (modulo local isometries) by probing the corresponding tensor network state with specific measurement operators. We provide large analytic families of tight, full self-testing connectors that allow for the generation, via contraction, of N-partite QBIs with a ratio between the maximum quantum and classical values that grows exponentially with N. In turn, our method provides a modular recipe for the generation of extremal quantum behaviors and associated tight bounds in arbitrarily large systems.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (36)

  1. J. S. Bell, On the Einstein Podolsky Rosen paradox, Phys. Phys. Fiz. 1, 195 (1964).
  2. B. Hensen, H. Bernien, A. E. Dréau, A. Reiserer, N. Kalb, M. S. Blok, J. Ruitenberg, R. F. L. Vermeulen, R. N. Schouten, C. Abellán, W. Amaya, V. Pruneri, M. W. Mitchell, M. Markham, D. J. Twitchen, D. Elkouss, S. Wehner, T. H. Taminiau, and R. Hanson, Loophole-free Bell inequality violation using electron spins separated by 1.3 kilometres, Nature (London) 526, 682 (2015).
  3. M. Giustina et al., Significant-loophole-free test of Bell’s theorem with entangled photons, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 250401 (2015).
  4. L. K. Shalm et al., Strong loophole-free test of local realism, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 250402 (2015).
  5. B. S. Cirel’son, Quantum generalizations of Bell’s inequality, Lett. Math. Phys. 4, 93 (1980).
  6. L. Khalfin and B. S. Tsirelson, Quantum and quasi-classical analogs of Bell inequalities, in Symposium on the Foundations of Modern Physics (World Science Publication, Singapore, 1985), pp. 441–460.
  7. S. Popescu and D. Rohrlich, Quantum nonlocality as an axiom, Found. Phys. 24, 379 (1994).
  8. T. Moroder, J.-D. Bancal, Y.-C. Liang, M. Hofmann, and O. Gühne, Device-independent entanglement quantification and related applications, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 030501 (2013).
  9. N. Brunner, S. Pironio, A. Acin, N. Gisin, A. A. Méthot, and V. Scarani, Testing the dimension of Hilbert spaces, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 210503 (2008).
  10. I. Šupić and J. Bowles, Self-testing of quantum systems: A review, Quantum 4, 337 (2020).
  11. I. Šupić, R. Augusiak, A. Salavrakos, and A. Acín, Self-testing protocols based on the chained bell inequalities, New J. Phys. 18, 035013 (2016).
  12. C. A. Miller and Y. Shi, Robust protocols for securely expanding randomness and distributing keys using untrusted quantum devices, J. ACM 63, 1 (2016).
  13. D. Mayers and A. Yao, Quantum Cryptography with Imperfect Apparatus, in Proceedings 39th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (Cat. No.98CB36280) (IEEE, Palo Alto, USA, 1998), pp. 503–509.
  14. D. Mayers and A. Yao, Self testing quantum apparatus, Quantum Inf. Comput. 4, 273 (2004).
  15. B. W. Reichardt, F. Unger, and U. Vazirani, Classical command of quantum systems, Nature (London) 496, 456 (2013).
  16. B. Tsirelson, Some results and problems on quantum Bell-type inequalities, Hadronic J. Suppl. 8, 329 (1993).
  17. S. Wehner, Tsirelson bounds for generalized Clauser-Horne-Shimony-Holt inequalities, Phys. Rev. A 73, 022110 (2006).
  18. M. Navascués, S. Pironio, and A. Acín, Bounding the set of quantum correlations, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 010401 (2007).
  19. M. Navascués, S. Pironio, and A. Acín, A convergent hierarchy of semidefinite programs characterizing the set of quantum correlations, New J. Phys. 10, 073013 (2008).
  20. M. Navascués, S. Singh, and A. Acín, Connector tensor networks: A renormalization-type approach to quantum certification, Phys. Rev. X 10, 021064 (2020).
  21. R. Orús, A practical introduction to tensor networks: Matrix product states and projected entangled pair states, Ann. Phys. (Amsterdam) 349, 117 (2014).
  22. Z. Ji, A. Natarajan, T. Vidick, J. Wright, and H. Yuen, MIP* = RE, arXiv:2001.04383.
  23. V. Scarani, Bell Nonlocality, Oxford Graduate Texts (Oxford University Press, New York, 2019).
  24. See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/993r-lzzm for complete technical derivations and additional analysis.
  25. A. Acín, S. Massar, and S. Pironio, Randomness versus nonlocality and entanglement, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 100402 (2012).
  26. C. Bamps and S. Pironio, Sum-of-squares decompositions for a family of Clauser-Horne-Shimony-Holt-like inequalities and their application to self-testing, Phys. Rev. A 91, 052111 (2015).
  27. L. Wooltorton, P. Brown, and R. Colbeck, Device-independent quantum key distribution with arbitrarily small nonlocality, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 210802 (2024).
  28. F. Baccari, R. Augusiak, I. Šupić, J. Tura, and A. Acín, Scalable bell inequalities for qubit graph states and robust self-testing, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 020402 (2020).
  29. R. Cleve, P. Hoyer, B. Toner, and J. Watrous, Consequences and limits of nonlocal strategies, in Proceedings of 19th IEEE Annual Conference on Computational Complexity (IEEE, Amherst, USA, 2004), pp. 236–249.
  30. A. Coladangelo, K. T. Goh, and V. Scarani, All pure bipartite entangled states can be self-tested, Nat. Commun. 8, 15485 (2017).
  31. R. Chen, L. Mančinska, and J. Volčič, All real projective measurements can be self-tested, Nat. Phys. 20, 1642 (2024).
  32. M. Balanzó-Juandó, A. Coladangelo, R. Augusiak, A. Acín, and I. Šupić, All pure multipartite entangled states of qubits can be self-tested up to complex conjugation, arXiv:2412.13266.
  33. M. McKague, Self-testing graph states, in Theory of Quantum Computation, Communication, and Cryptography, edited by D. Bacon, M. Martin-Delgado, and M. Roetteler (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2014), pp. 104–120.
  34. I. Kull, N. Schuch, B. Dive, and M. Navascués, Lower bounds on ground-state energies of local Hamiltonians through the renormalization group, Phys. Rev. X 14, 021008 (2024).
  35. D. Trillo, B. Dive, and M. Navascués, Translating uncontrolled systems in time, Quantum 4, 374 (2020).
  36. F. Huber and C. Procesi, Tensor polynomial identities, Isr. J. Math. 247, 125 (2021).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation