Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Vacuum Muon Decay and Interaction with Laser Pulses

B. King* and D. Liu†

  • *Contact author: b.king@plymouth.ac.uk
  • †Contact author: di.liu@plymouth.ac.uk

Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 251802 – Published 17 December, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/823w-2g4b

Abstract

Muons decay in vacuum mainly via the leptonic channel to an electron, a muon neutrino and an electron antineutrino. Previous investigations have concluded that muon decay can be significantly altered only in a strong electromagnetic field when the muonic strong-field parameter is of order unity, which is far beyond the reach of lab-based experiments at current and planned facilities. In this Letter, an alternative mechanism is presented in which a laser pulse affects the vacuum decay rate of a muon outside the pulse. Quantum interference between the muon decaying with or without interacting with the pulse generates fringes in the electron momentum spectra and can increase the muon lifetime by up to a factor 2. The required parameters to observe this effect are available in experiments today.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (38)

  1. J. W. Yoon, Y. G. Kim, I. W. Choi, J. H. Sung, H. W. Lee, S. K. Lee, and C. H. Nam, Realization of laser intensity over 1023  W/cm2, Optica 8, 630 (2021).
  2. C. N. Danson, C. Haefner, J. Bromage, T. Butcher, J.-C. F. Chanteloup, E. A. Chowdhury, A. Galvanauskas, L. A. Gizzi, J. Hein, D. I. Hillier et al., Petawatt and exawatt class lasers worldwide, High Power Laser Sci. Eng. 7, e54 (2019).
  3. V. I. Ritus, Quantum effects of the interaction of elementary particles with an intense electromagnetic field, J. Russ. Laser Res. 6, 497 (1985).
  4. J. Z. Kamiński, K. Krajewska, and F. Ehlotzky, Fundamental processes of quantum electrodynamics in laser fields of relativistic power, Rep. Prog. Phys. 72, 046401 (2009).
  5. A. Di Piazza, C. Muller, K. Z. Hatsagortsyan, and C. H. Keitel, Extremely high-intensity laser interactions with fundamental quantum systems, Rev. Mod. Phys. 84, 1177 (2012).
  6. N. B. Narozhny and A. M. Fedotov, Extreme light physics, Contemp. Phys. 56, 249 (2015).
  7. A. Gonoskov, T. G. Blackburn, M. Marklund, and S. S. Bulanov, Charged particle motion and radiation in strong electromagnetic fields, Rev. Mod. Phys. 94, 045001 (2022).
  8. A. Fedotov, A. Ilderton, F. Karbstein, B. King, D. Seipt, H. Taya, and G. Torgrimsson, Advances in QED with intense background fields, Phys. Rep. 1010, 1 (2023).
  9. G. Sarri et al., Input to the European strategy for particle physics: Strong-field quantum electrodynamics, arXiv:2504.02608.
  10. W. Schumaker et al., Making pions with laser light, New J. Phys. 20, 073008 (2018).
  11. F. Zhang et al., First proof of principle experiment for muon production with ultrashort high intensity laser, Nat. Phys. 21, 1050 (2025).
  12. L. Calvin et al., Experimental evidence of muon production from a laser-wakefield accelerator, arXiv:2503.20904.
  13. A. I. Titov, B. Kampfer, and H. Takabe, Dimuon production by laser-wakefield accelerated electrons, Phys. Rev. ST Accel. Beams 12, 111301 (2009).
  14. L. Holmlid and S. Olafsson, Decay of muons generated by laser-induced processes in ultra-dense hydrogen H(0), Heliyon 5, e01864 (2019).
  15. A. I. Nikishov and V. I. Ritus, Quantum processes in the field of a plane electromagnetic wave and in a constant field, Sov. Phys. JETP 19, 1191 (1964).
  16. V. I. Ritus, Effect of an electromagnetic field on decays of elementary particles, Sov. Phys. JETP 29, 532 (1969).
  17. A. I. Nikishov and V. I. Ritus, Quantum processes in the field of a plane electromagnetic wave and in a constant field I, Sov. Phys. JETP 19, 529 (1964).
  18. A. Di Piazza, M. Tamburini, S. Meuren, and C. H. Keitel, Implementing nonlinear Compton scattering beyond the local constant field approximation, Phys. Rev. A 98, 012134 (2018).
  19. A. Ilderton, B. King, and D. Seipt, Extended locally constant field approximation for nonlinear Compton scattering, Phys. Rev. A 99, 042121 (2019).
  20. D. Seipt and B. King, Spin- and polarization-dependent locally-constant-field-approximation rates for nonlinear Compton and Breit-Wheeler processes, Phys. Rev. A 102, 052805 (2020).
  21. W. Becker, G. Moore, R. Schlicher, and M. Scully, A note on total cross sections and decay rates in the presence of a laser field, Phys. Lett. A 94, 131 (1983).
  22. N. B. Narozhny and A. M. Fedotov, Comment on “laser-assisted muon decay,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 219101 (2008).
  23. D. A. Dicus, A. Farzinnia, W. W. Repko, and T. M. Tinsley, Muon decay in a laser field, Phys. Rev. D 79, 013004 (2009).
  24. A. Farzinnia, D. A. Dicus, W. W. Repko, and T. M. Tinsley, Muon decay in a linearly polarized laser field, Phys. Rev. D 80, 073004 (2009).
  25. B. King, A. Di Piazza, and C. H. Keitel, A matterless double slit, Nat. Photonics 4, 92 (2010).
  26. C. K. Dumlu and G. V. Dunne, Interference effects in Schwinger vacuum pair production for time-dependent laser pulses, Phys. Rev. D 83, 065028 (2011).
  27. E. Akkermans and G. V. Dunne, Ramsey fringes and time-domain multiple-slit interference from vacuum, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 030401 (2012).
  28. A. Ilderton, Coherent quantum enhancement of pair production in the null domain, Phys. Rev. D 101, 016006 (2020).
  29. A. Ilderton, B. King, and S. Tang, Toward the observation of interference effects in nonlinear Compton scattering, Phys. Lett. B 804, 135410 (2020).
  30. K. Krajewska, J. Z. Kamiński, and C. Müller, Pulse shape effects in high-field Bethe–Heitler pair production, New J. Phys. 23, 095012 (2021).
  31. S. Navas et al. (Particle Data Group), Review of particle physics, Phys. Rev. D 110, 030001 (2024).
  32. T. Heinzl, A. Ilderton, and M. Marklund, Finite size effects in stimulated laser pair production, Phys. Lett. B 692, 250 (2010).
  33. See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/823w-2g4b for detailed calculation and further analysis, which includes Refs. [34–36].
  34. W. Heitler, The Quantum Theory of Radiation (3rd edition) (Oxford University Press, Amen House, London E. C. 4, 1960).
  35. D. Griffiths, Introduction to Elementary Particles (2nd Edition) (Wiley, New York, 2008).
  36. I. A. Aleksandrov, D. A. Tumakov, A. Kudlis, V. M. Shabaev, and N. N. Rosanov, Relativistic electron spin dynamics in a strong unipolar laser field, Phys. Rev. A 102, 023102 (2020).
  37. T. Heinzl, B. King, and A. J. Macleod, The locally monochromatic approximation to QED in intense laser fields, Phys. Rev. A 102, 063110 (2020).
  38. A. Di Piazza, K. Z. Hatsagortsyan, and C. H. Keitel, Quantum radiation reaction effects in multiphoton Compton scattering, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 220403 (2010).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation