Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Origin of Exponential Operator Growth in Hilbert Space

Vijay Ganesh Sadhasivam1,2,*, Jan M. Rost1,†, and Stuart C. Althorpe2,‡

  • *Contact author: vgs23@cam.ac.uk
  • †Contact author: rost@pks.mpg.de
  • ‡Contact author: sca10@cam.ac.uk

Phys. Rev. Lett. 137, 060404 – Published 6 August, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/81ws-xw2t

Abstract

The question of thermalization in quantum many-body systems has long been studied through the properties of matrix elements of operators corresponding to local observables. More recently, the focus has shifted to the dynamics of operators, which lead to seminal works proposing universal bounds on the rate of operator growth. In this Letter, we unify these two approaches: we show that exponential operator growth in Hilbert space, as measured by Krylov complexity, is governed by an exponential off-diagonal decay of the operator matrix elements in the system eigenbasis. When this decay is algebraic or slower, the growth rate saturates the universal bound, thereby establishing a microscopic origin of operator growth which is independent of chaos, dimensionality or the presence of many-body interactions.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (64)

  1. A. Polkovnikov, K. Sengupta, A. Silva, and M. Vengalattore, Rev. Mod. Phys. 83, 863 (2011).
  2. J. Eisert, M. Friesdorf, and C. Gogolin, Nat. Phys. 11, 124 (2015).
  3. S. Trotzky, Y.-A. Chen, A. Flesch, I. P. McCulloch, U. Schollwöck, J. Eisert, and I. Bloch, Nat. Phys. 8, 325 (2012).
  4. A. M. Kaufman, M. E. Tai, A. Lukin, M. Rispoli, R. Schittko, P. M. Preiss, and M. Greiner, Science 353, 794 (2016).
  5. M. Rigol, V. Dunjko, and M. Olshanii, Nature (London) 452, 854 (2008).
  6. L. D’Alessio, Y. Kafri, A. Polkovnikov, and M. Rigol, Adv. Phys. 65, 239 (2016).
  7. J. M. Deutsch, Rep. Prog. Phys. 81, 082001 (2018).
  8. M. Srednicki, Phys. Rev. E 50, 888 (1994).
  9. W. Beugeling, R. Moessner, and M. Haque, Phys. Rev. E 91, 012144 (2015).
  10. T. LeBlond, K. Mallayya, L. Vidmar, and M. Rigol, Phys. Rev. E 100, 062134 (2019).
  11. C. W. von Keyserlingk, T. Rakovszky, F. Pollmann, and S. L. Sondhi, Phys. Rev. X 8, 021013 (2018).
  12. A. Nahum, S. Vijay, and J. Haah, Phys. Rev. X 8, 021014 (2018).
  13. S. Xu and B. Swingle, Phys. Rev. X 9, 031048 (2019).
  14. S. H. Shenker and D. Stanford, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2014) 067.
  15. J. Maldacena, S. H. Shenker, and D. Stanford, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2016) 106.
  16. B. Swingle, Nat. Phys. 14, 988 (2018).
  17. D. E. Parker, X. Cao, A. Avdoshkin, T. Scaffidi, and E. Altman, Phys. Rev. X 9, 041017 (2019).
  18. P. Nandy, A. S. Matsoukas-Roubeas, P. Martínez-Azcona, A. Dymarsky, and A. del Campo, Phys. Rep. 1125, 1 (2025).
  19. H. A. Camargo, V. Jahnke, H.-S. Jeong, K.-Y. Kim, and M. Nishida, Phys. Rev. D 109, 046017 (2024).
  20. K.-B. Huh, H.-S. Jeong, and J. F. Pedraza, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2024) 137.
  21. E. Rabinovici, A. Sánchez-Garrido, R. Shir, and J. Sonner, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2022) 151.
  22. K. Hashimoto, K. Murata, N. Tanahashi, and R. Watanabe, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2023) 040.
  23. A. Dymarsky and M. Smolkin, Phys. Rev. D 104, L081702 (2021).
  24. A. Avdoshkin, A. Dymarsky, and M. Smolkin, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2024) 066.
  25. A. Avdoshkin and A. Dymarsky, Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 043234 (2020).
  26. P. H. Bento, A. del Campo, and L. C. Céleri, Phys. Rev. B 109, 224304 (2024).
  27. P. Suchsland, R. Moessner, and P. W. Claeys, Phys. Rev. B 111, 014309 (2025).
  28. C. Liu, H. Tang, and H. Zhai, Phys. Rev. Res. 5, 033085 (2023).
  29. A. Bhattacharya, P. Nandy, P. P. Nath, and H. Sahu, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2023) 066.
  30. T. Xu, T. Scaffidi, and X. Cao, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 140602 (2020).
  31. B. Bhattacharjee, X. Cao, P. Nandy, and T. Pathak, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2023) 054.
  32. R. A. Kidd, A. Safavi-Naini, and J. F. Corney, Phys. Rev. A 102, 023330 (2020).
  33. V. G. Sadhasivam, L. Meuser, D. R. Reichman, and S. C. Althorpe, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 120, e2312378120 (2023).
  34. T. R. Michel, J. D. Urbina, and P. Schlagheck, J. Phys. A 58, 275303 (2025).
  35. K. Hashimoto, K.-B. Huh, K.-Y. Kim, and R. Watanabe, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2020) 068.
  36. N. Hörnedal, N. Carabba, A. S. Matsoukas-Roubeas, and A. del Campo, Commun. Phys. 5, 207 (2022).
  37. Technically, the equivalence between (7) and (8) is valid only when the {bn} sequence depends smoothly on n, as pointed out in [24, 25]. In some cases, the Lanczos sequence can split into two bands with their own distinct slopes, and the Krylov complexity does not grow exponentially (and may even be bounded).

  38. See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/81ws-xw2t for derivations of the matrix-element decay for the harmonic oscillator [Eq. (19)] and for one-dimensional power-law potentials [Eqs. (24) and (25)], a discussion of Lanczos staggering from operator localization, and additional numerical details, which includes Refs. [6,39–51].
  39. L. D. Landau and E. M. Lifshitz, Quantum Mechanics: Non-Relativistic Theory (Elsevier, New York, 2013), Vol. 3.
  40. J. Cornwall and G. Tiktopoulos, Ann. Phys. (Berlin) 228, 365 (1993).
  41. M. Voloshin, Phys. Rev. D 43, 1726 (1991).
  42. P. W. Claeys, Introduction to the Eigenstate Thermalization Hypothesis, Lecture notes, Max Planck Institute for the Physics of Complex Systems (Max Planck Institute, Dresden, 2023).
  43. F. P. Simonotti, E. Vergini, and M. Saraceno, Phys. Rev. E 56, 3859 (1997).
  44. A. Bäcker, R. Schubert, and P. Stifter, J. Phys. A 30, 6783 (1997).
  45. E. J. Heller, Phys. Rev. Lett. 53, 1515 (1984).
  46. B. Li and B. Hu, J. Phys. A 31, 483 (1998).
  47. Q. Hu, W.-Y. Zhang, Y. Han, and W.-L. You, Phys. Rev. B 111, 165106 (2025).
  48. S. Nandy, B. Mukherjee, A. Bhattacharyya, and A. Banerjee, J. Phys. Condens. Matter 36, 155601 (2024).
  49. X. Zotos, F. Naef, and P. Prelovsek, Phys. Rev. B 55, 11029 (1997).
  50. R. Steinigeweg, J. Herbrych, and P. Prelovšek, Phys. Rev. E 87, 012118 (2013).
  51. A. Klümper and K. Sakai, J. Phys. A 35, 2173 (2002).
  52. H. Tang, arXiv:2312.17416.
  53. E. Khatami, G. Pupillo, M. Srednicki, and M. Rigol, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 050403 (2013).
  54. S. Pappalardi, L. Foini, and J. Kurchan, SciPost Phys. 12, 130 (2022).
  55. C. Murthy and M. Srednicki, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 230606 (2019).
  56. V. G. Sadhasivam, A. C. Hunt, L. Meuser, Y. Litman, and S. C. Althorpe, Phys. Rev. E 110, L012204 (2024).
  57. K. Kudo and T. Deguchi, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 74, 1992 (2005).
  58. P. Weinberg and M. Bukov, SciPost Phys. 2, 003 (2017).
  59. D. Jansen, J. Stolpp, L. Vidmar, and F. Heidrich-Meisner, Phys. Rev. B 99, 155130 (2019).
  60. K. Mallayya and M. Rigol, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 240603 (2019).
  61. K. Richter, J. D. Urbina, and S. Tomsovic, J. Phys. A 55, 453001 (2022).
  62. Y. Liao, A. Vikram, and V. Galitski, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 250601 (2020).
  63. S. Will, T. Best, U. Schneider, L. Hackermüller, D.-S. Lühmann, and I. Bloch, Nature (London) 465, 197 (2010).
  64. V. Sadhasivam, J. M. Rost, and S. C. Althorpe, Research data supporting “Origin of exponential operator growth in Hilbert space,” Dataset, 10.17863/CAM.123074 (2026).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation