Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Probing Top-Quark–Electron Interactions at Future Colliders

Luigi Bellafronte1,*, Sally Dawson2,†, Pier Paolo Giardino3,‡, and Hongkai Liu2,§

  • *Contact author: lbellafronte@fsu.edu
  • †Contact author: dawson@bnl.gov
  • ‡Contact author: pier.giardino@uam.es
  • §Contact author: hliu6@bnl.gov

Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 251801 – Published 17 December, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/7z6x-ygqq

Abstract

Top quark interactions offer a window into possible new high scale physics and many models of new physics predict that the top quark interactions will deviate significantly from those predicted by the standard model. We present an analysis of the experimental restrictions on anomalous 4-fermion e+e−tt¯ operators that is accurate to next-to-leading order (NLO) in both the electroweak and QCD interactions within the standard model effective field theory framework. At NLO, there is sensitivity to an extended set of anomalous interactions beyond those probed at leading order. A comparison of current limits from electroweak precision observables, along with expected future limits from Drell-Yan and tt¯e+e− production at the high luminosity LHC, from deep inelastic scattering at the EIC, and from projected sensitivities at the future FCC-ee and CEPC machines demonstrates that each of these programs extends the precision understanding of the interactions of top quarks.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (55)

  1. R. Abdul Khalek et al., Nucl. Phys. A1026, 122447 (2022).
  2. M. Benedikt et al. (FCC Collaboration), Report No. CERN-FCC-PHYS-2025-0002, CERN, Geneva, 2025, 10.17181/CERN.9DKX.TDH9.
  3. S. Antusch et al., arXiv:2505.24810 [Chin. Phys. C (to be published)].
  4. J. Altmann et al., ECFA Higgs, electroweak, and top Factory Study, CERN, Yellow Reports: Monographs Vol. 5/2025 (2025), 10.23731/CYRM-2025-005.
  5. E. Celada, T. Giani, J. ter Hoeve, L. Mantani, J. Rojo, A. N. Rossia, M. O. A. Thomas, and E. Vryonidou, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2024) 091.
  6. We do not discuss the proposed ILC [7], as we have not optimized for polarization.

  7. D. Attié et al. (Linear Collider Vision Collaboration), arXiv:2503.19983.
  8. J. de Blas, M. Chala, and J. Santiago, Phys. Rev. D 88, 095011 (2013).
  9. A. Falkowski, M. González-Alonso, and K. Mimouni, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2017) 123.
  10. G. Durieux, M. Perelló, M. Vos, and C. Zhang, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2018) 168.
  11. G. Durieux, J. Gu, E. Vryonidou, and C. Zhang, Chin. Phys. C 42, 123107 (2018).
  12. G. Durieux, A. Irles, V. Miralles, A. Peñuelas, R. Pöschl, M. Perelló, and M. Vos, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2019) 098; 01 (2021) 195(E).
  13. Y. Liu, Y. Wang, C. Zhang, L. Zhang, and J. Gu, Chin. Phys. C 46, 113105 (2022).
  14. G. Durieux, A. G. Camacho, L. Mantani, V. Miralles, M. M. López, M. Llácer Moreno, R. Poncelet, E. Vryonidou, and M. Vos, in Snowmass 2021 (2022), arXiv:2205.02140.
  15. C. Severi and E. Vryonidou, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2023) 148.
  16. F. Cornet-Gomez, V. Miralles, M. Miralles López, M. Moreno Llácer, and M. Vos, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2025) 156.
  17. A. Hayrapetyan et al. (CMS Collaboration), J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2023) 068.
  18. G. Aad et al. (ATLAS Collaboration), arXiv:2504.05919.
  19. I. Brivio, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2021) 073.
  20. C. Degrande, G. Durieux, F. Maltoni, K. Mimasu, E. Vryonidou, and C. Zhang, Phys. Rev. D 103, 096024 (2021).
  21. G. Buchalla, G. Heinrich, C. Müller-Salditt, and F. Pandler, SciPost Phys. 15, 088 (2023).
  22. R. Alonso, E. E. Jenkins, A. V. Manohar, and M. Trott, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2014) 159.
  23. S. Dawson and P. P. Giardino, Phys. Rev. D 101, 013001 (2020).
  24. L. Bellafronte, S. Dawson, and P. P. Giardino, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2023) 208.
  25. A. Biekötter and B. D. Pecjak, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2025) 134.
  26. K. Asteriadis, S. Dawson, P. P. Giardino, and R. Szafron, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 231801 (2024).
  27. K. Asteriadis, S. Dawson, P. P. Giardino, and R. Szafron, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2025) 162.
  28. S. Dawson and P. P. Giardino, Phys. Rev. D 104, 073004 (2021).
  29. S. Dawson, P. P. Giardino, and A. Ismail, Phys. Rev. D 99, 035044 (2019).
  30. A. Alloul, N. D. Christensen, C. Degrande, C. Duhr, and B. Fuks, Comput. Phys. Commun. 185, 2250 (2014).
  31. A. Dedes, W. Materkowska, M. Paraskevas, J. Rosiek, and K. Suxho, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2017) 143.
  32. A. Dedes, J. Rosiek, M. Ryczkowski, K. Suxho, and L. Trifyllis, Comput. Phys. Commun. 294, 108943 (2024).
  33. T. Hahn, Comput. Phys. Commun. 140, 418 (2001).
  34. V. Shtabovenko, R. Mertig, and F. Orellana, Comput. Phys. Commun. 256, 107478 (2020).
  35. H. H. Patel, Comput. Phys. Commun. 197, 276 (2015).
  36. H. H. Patel, Comput. Phys. Commun. 218, 66 (2017).
  37. V. Shtabovenko, Comput. Phys. Commun. 218, 48 (2017).
  38. T. Hahn and M. Perez-Victoria, Comput. Phys. Commun. 118, 153 (1999).
  39. J. A. Aguilar-Saavedra, Nucl. Phys. B843, 638 (2011); B851, 443(E) (2011).
  40. B. Grzadkowski, M. Iskrzynski, M. Misiak, and J. Rosiek, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2010) 085.
  41. A. Vasquez, C. Degrande, A. Tonero, and R. Rosenfeld, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2019) 020.
  42. M. Farina, G. Panico, D. Pappadopulo, J. T. Ruderman, R. Torre, and A. Wulzer, Phys. Lett. B 772, 210 (2017).
  43. G. Panico, L. Ricci, and A. Wulzer, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2021) 086.
  44. R. Torre, L. Ricci, and A. Wulzer, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2021) 144.
  45. See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/7z6x-ygqq for Drell-Yan results including mℓℓ bins up to 4 TeV.
  46. A. Greljo, H. Tiblom, and A. Valenti, SciPost Phys. 18, 152 (2025).
  47. M. M. Defranchis, J. de Blas, A. Mehta, M. Selvaggi, and M. Vos, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2025) 020.
  48. L. Röehrig, Top-quark reconstruction at FCC-ee, https://indico.in2p3.fr/event/31324/contributions/135000/attachments/83956/125116/Top_LHC_France_LRoehrig.pdf.
  49. R. Bartocci, A. Biekötter, and T. Hurth, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2024) 074.
  50. V. Maura, B. A. Stefanek, and T. You, Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 141802 (2025).
  51. M. Selvaggi, A. Blondel, and J. Eysermans (FCC Collaboration), J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2025) 022.
  52. V. Maura, B. A. Stefanek, and T. You, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2025) 022.
  53. A. Greljo, S. Iranipour, Z. Kassabov, M. Madigan, J. Moore, J. Rojo, M. Ubiali, and C. Voisey, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2021) 122.
  54. A. Gutierrez Camacho, Effective QQ¯l+l− interactions to probe lepton flavour universality at the LHC and future colliders, Master’s thesis, University of Valencia, 2022.
  55. Luigi Bellafronte, Sally Dawson, Pier Paolo Giardino, and Hongkai Liu, ancillary files in arXiv:2507.02039.

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation