Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

First Measurement of the Quadrupole Moment of the 21+ State in Sn110

J. Park1,2,*,†, R. A. Lopez1, J. Cederkall1,3,‡, C. Fahlander1, P. Golubev1, A. Knyazev1, E. Rickert1, J. Iwanicki4, K. Wrzosek-Lipska4 et al.

A. Blazhev5, P. Reiter5, D. Rosiak5, M. Seidlitz5, N. Warr5, P. A. Butler6, L. P. Gaffney6, T. Berry7, D. M. Cox8,9, J. Pakarinen8,9, Th. Kröll10, C. Henrich10, M. Schilling10, C. Stahl10, M. von Schmid10, G. Rainovski11, C. Berger12, C. Berner12, R. Gernhäuser12, A. Illana8,13,14,§, H. De Witte13, M. Górska15, T. Habermann15, S. Saha15, G. de Angelis14, M. J. G. Borge3,16, O. Tengblad16, T. Otsuka17,18, and Y. Tsunoda19

  • *Contact author: jcpark@ibs.re.kr
  • †Present address: Physics Department, Hope College, Holland, Michigan 49423, USA.
  • ‡Contact author: joakim.cederkall@fysik.lu.se
  • §Present address: Grupo de Física Nuclear, EMFTEL, and IPARCOS, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, 28040 Madrid, Spain.

Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 222502 – Published 25 November, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/7ysn-8y1w

Abstract

The Sn isotopic chain, exhibiting double shell closures at Sn100 and Sn132, is a key testing ground for theoretical models of the atomic nucleus. It was originally predicted that the transitional matrix elements between the first 2+ state and the 0+ ground state for the even-even isotopes in this chain should show a simple dependence on the neutron number. This prediction was, however, disproven experimentally in some of the first experiments with postaccelerated radioactive beams, a situation that has remained unresolved ever since. Subsequent theoretical work has suggested that the explanation can be found in proton excitations across the Z=50 shell gap, with an accompanying experimental signature that the first excited 2+ state in Sn110 should have a distinct oblate shape. In this Letter, we present the first measurements of the spectroscopic quadrupole moment of the 21+ state, B(E2;41+→21+) and B(E2;42+→21+) values for Sn110, as well as the B(E2;21+→01+) value with significantly improved precision compared to previous results. From the same experiment, half-lives of the 21+ and 41+ states were measured using the Doppler shift attenuation method. Our combined result, Q(21+)=20(8)  efm2 for Sn110, is the largest positive value known among the Sn isotopes, indicating an oblate shape of the state by more than 2σ. Comparison of the E2 transition strengths and quadrupole moments with recent shell model calculations are presented.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (96)

  1. J. Cederkäll et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 172501 (2007).
  2. C. Vaman et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 162501 (2007).
  3. A. Ekström et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 012502 (2008).
  4. G. Guastalla et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 172501 (2013).
  5. T. Togashi, Y. Tsunoda, T. Otsuka, and M. Honma, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 062501 (2018).
  6. A. M. Kleinfeld, R. Covello-Moro, H. Ogata, G. G. Seaman, S. G. Steadman, and J. De Boer, Nucl. Phys. A154, 499 (1970).
  7. P. H. Stelson, F. K. McGowan, R. L. Robinson, and W. T. Milner, Phys. Rev. C 2, 2015 (1970).
  8. R. Graetzer, S. M. Cohick, and J. X. Saladin, Phys. Rev. C 12, 1462 (1975).
  9. J. W. Lightbody, S. Penner, S. P. Fivozinsky, P. L. Hallowell, and H. Crannell, Phys. Rev. C 14, 952 (1976).
  10. M. Hass, C. Broude, Y. Niv, and A. Zemel, Phys. Rev. C 22, 97 (1980).
  11. N.-G. Jonsson, A. Bäcklin, J. Kantele, R. Julin, M. Luontama, and A. Passoja, Nucl. Phys. A371, 333 (1981).
  12. J. Gableske et al., Nucl. Phys. A691, 551 (2001).
  13. D. C. Radford et al., Nucl. Phys. A746, 83 (2004).
  14. D. C. Radford et al., Nucl. Phys. A752, 264 (2005).
  15. A. Banu et al., Phys. Rev. C 72, 061305(R) (2005).
  16. J. N. Orce, S. N. Choudry, B. Crider, E. Elhami, S. Mukhopadhyay, M. Scheck, M. T. McEllistrem, and S. W. Yates, Phys. Rev. C 76, 021302(R) (2007).
  17. J. N. Orce et al., Phys. Rev. C 77, 029902 (2008).
  18. P. Doornenbal et al., Phys. Rev. C 78, 031303(R) (2008).
  19. M. C. East, A. E. Stuchbery, A. N. Wilson, P. M. Davidson, T. Kibédi, and A. I. Levon, Phys. Lett. B 665, 147 (2008).
  20. R. Kumar et al., Phys. Rev. C 81, 024306 (2010).
  21. A. Jungclaus et al., Phys. Lett. B 695, 110 (2011).
  22. J. M. Allmond et al., Phys. Rev. C 84, 061303(R) (2011).
  23. J. Walker et al., Phys. Rev. C 84, 014319 (2011).
  24. G. J. Kumbartzki et al., Phys. Rev. C 86, 034319 (2012).
  25. J. M. Allmond et al., Phys. Rev. C 87, 054325 (2013).
  26. V. M. Bader et al., Phys. Rev. C 88, 051301(R) (2013).
  27. P. Doornenbal et al., Phys. Rev. C 90, 061302(R) (2014).
  28. A. Corsi et al., Phys. Lett. B 743, 451 (2015).
  29. J. M. Allmond et al., Phys. Rev. C 92, 041303(R) (2015).
  30. G. J. Kumbartzki et al., Phys. Rev. C 93, 044316 (2016).
  31. R. Kumar et al., Phys. Rev. C 96, 054318 (2017).
  32. M. Spieker, P. Petkov, E. Litvinova, C. Müller-Gatermann, S. G. Pickstone, S. Prill, P. Scholz, and A. Zilges, Phys. Rev. C 97, 054319 (2018).
  33. D. Rosiak et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 252501 (2018).
  34. A. Kundu, S. Santra, A. Pal, D. Chattopadhyay, R. Tripathi, B. J. Roy, T. N. Nag, B. K. Nayak, A. Saxena, and S. Kailas, Phys. Rev. C 99, 034609 (2019).
  35. A. Kundu et al., Phys. Rev. C 100, 034327 (2019).
  36. A. Kundu, S. Santra, A. Pal, D. Chattopadhyay, T. N. Nag, R. Gandhi, P. C. Rout, B. J. Roy, B. K. Nayak, and S. Kailas, Phys. Rev. C 100, 024614 (2019).
  37. M. Siciliano et al., Phys. Lett. B 806, 135474 (2020).
  38. A. Kundu et al., Phys. Rev. C 103, 034315 (2021).
  39. M. Piersa-Siłkowska et al., Phys. Rev. C 104, 044328 (2021).
  40. M. Beuschlein et al., Phys. Rev. C 110, 054304 (2024).
  41. I. Talmi, Nucl. Phys. A172, 1 (1971).
  42. B. A. Brown, N. J. Stone, J. R. Stone, I. S. Towner, and M. Hjorth-Jensen, Phys. Rev. C 71, 044317 (2005).
  43. A. Ansari, Phys. Lett. B 623, 37 (2005).
  44. A. Ansari and P. Ring, Phys. Lett. B 649, 128 (2007).
  45. L. Y. Jia, H. Zhang, and Y. M. Zhao, Phys. Rev. C 75, 034307 (2007).
  46. I. O. Morales, P. Van Isacker, and I. Talmi, Phys. Lett. B 703, 606 (2011).
  47. N. Lo Iudice, C. Stoyanov, and D. Tarpanov, Phys. Rev. C 84, 044314 (2011).
  48. D. Voitenkov, S. Kamerdzhiev, S. Krewald, E. E. Saperstein, and S. V. Tolokonnikov, Phys. Rev. C 85, 054319 (2012).
  49. H. Jiang et al., Phys. Rev. C 86, 054304 (2012).
  50. T. Bäck, C. Qi, B. Cederwall, R. Liotta, F. Ghazi Moradi, A. Johnson, R. Wyss, and R. Wadsworth, Phys. Rev. C 87, 031306(R) (2013).
  51. H. Jiang, Y. Lei, C. Qi, R. Liotta, R. Wyss, and Y. M. Zhao, Phys. Rev. C 89, 014320 (2014).
  52. L. Coraggio et al., Phys. Rev. C 91, 041301(R) (2015).
  53. A. P. Zuker, Phys. Rev. C 103, 024322 (2021).
  54. M. J. G. Borge and K. Riisager, Eur. Phys. J. A 52, 334 (2016).
  55. N. Warr et al., Eur. Phys. J. A 49, 40 (2013).
  56. V. Fedosseev, K. Chrysalidis, T. D. Goodacre, B. Marsh, S. Rothe, C. Seiffert, and K. Wendt, J. Phys. G 44, 084006 (2017).
  57. D. Cline, Annu. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 36, 683 (1986).
  58. A. N. Ostrowski, S. Cherubini, T. Davinson, D. Groombridge, A. M. Laird, A. Musumarra, A. Ninane, A. di Pietro, A. C. Shotter, and P. J. Woods, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 480, 448 (2002).
  59. T. Czosnyka, D. Cline, and C. Y. Wu, Bull. Am. Phys. Soc. 28, 745 (1983).
  60. K. Alder and A. Winther, Rev. Mod. Phys. 28, 432 (1956).
  61. K. Alder and A. Winther, Coulomb Excitation: A Collection of Reprints (Academic, New York, 1966).
  62. K. Alder and A. Winther, Electromagnetic Excitation: Theory of Coulomb Excitation with Heavy Ions (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1975).
  63. M. Zielińska, L. P. Gaffney, K. Wrzosek-Lipska, E. Clément, T. Grahn, N. Kesteloot, P. Napiorkowski, J. Pakarinen, P. Van Duppen, and N. Warr, Eur. Phys. J. A 52, 99 (2016).
  64. N. Kesteloot et al., Phys. Rev. C 92, 054301 (2015).
  65. M. Klintefjord et al., Phys. Rev. C 93, 054303 (2016).
  66. A. Illana et al., Phys. Rev. C 108, 044305 (2023).
  67. S. Agostinelli et al., Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 506, 250 (2003).
  68. J. Allison et al., IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 53, 270 (2006).
  69. J. Allison et al., Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 835, 186 (2016).
  70. Y. Tsunoda (private communication).
  71. A. Blazhev (private communication).
  72. D. T. Yordanov et al., Phys. Rev. C 98, 011303(R) (2018).
  73. B. J. Coombes et al., Phys. Rev. C 100, 024322 (2019).
  74. J. Park et al., Phys. Rev. C 102, 014304 (2020).
  75. H. Grawe et al., Phys. Lett. B 820, 136591 (2021).
  76. T. J. Gray et al., Phys. Lett. B 847, 138268 (2023).
  77. O. Kavatsyuk et al., Eur. Phys. J. A 31, 319 (2007).
  78. T. Faestermann, M. Górska, and H. Grawe, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 69, 85 (2013).
  79. S. Bogner, T. T. S. Kuo, and A. Schwenk, Phys. Rep. 386, 1 (2003).
  80. D. R. Entem and R. Machleidt, Phys. Lett. B 524, 93 (2002).
  81. J. Duflo and A. P. Zuker, Phys. Rev. C 59, R2347 (1999).
  82. M. Dufour and A. P. Zuker, Phys. Rev. C 54, 1641 (1996).
  83. E. Caurier, G. Martínez-Pinedo, F. Nowacki, A. Poves, and A. P. Zuker, Rev. Mod. Phys. 77, 427 (2005).
  84. T. Otsuka, M. Honma, T. Mizusaki, N. Shimizu, and Y. Utsuno, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 47, 319 (2001).
  85. N. Shimizu et al., Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2012, 01A205 (2012).
  86. M. Honma, T. Otsuka, T. Mizusaki, and M. Hjorth-Jensen, Phys. Rev. C 80, 064323 (2009).
  87. M. Honma et al., RIKEN Accel. Prog. Rep. 45, 35 (2012).
  88. B. Fogelberg, M. Hellström, D. Jerrestam, H. Mach, J. Blomqvist, A. Kerek, L. O. Norlin, and J. P. Omtvedt, Phys. Rev. Lett. 73, 2413 (1994).
  89. G. J. Feldman and R. D. Cousins, Phys. Rev. D 57, 3873 (1998).
  90. G. Bruge, J. C. Faivre, H. Faraggi, and A. Bussiere, Nucl. Phys. A146, 597 (1970).
  91. F. G. Kondev, Nucl. Data Sheets 109, 1527 (2008).
  92. J. L. Quebert, K. Nakai, R. M. Diamond, and F. S. Stephens, Nucl. Phys. A150, 68 (1970).
  93. D. Ralet et al., Phys. Lett. B 797, 134797 (2019).
  94. J. C. Hardy and I. S. Towner, Phys. Rev. C 71, 055501 (2005).
  95. A. M. R. Joye, A. M. Baxter, S. Hinds, D. C. Kean, and R. H. Spear, Phys. Lett. B 72, 307 (1978).
  96. J. F. Ziegler, M. D. Ziegler, and J. P. Biersack, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. B 268, 1818 (2010).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation