- Open Access
Emergence of Unitarity and Locality from Hidden Zeros at One-Loop Order
Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 131601 – Published 22 September, 2025
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/7lwk-m5yb
Abstract
Recent investigations into the geometric structure of scattering amplitudes have revealed the surprising existence of “hidden zeros”: secret kinematic loci where tree-level amplitudes in theory, the nonlinear sigma model (NLSM), and Yang-Mills theory vanish. In this Letter, we propose the extension of hidden zeros to one-loop order in theory and the NLSM using the “surface integrand” technology introduced by Arkani-Hamed et al. We demonstrate that, under the assumption of locality, one-loop integrands in are unitary if and only if they satisfy these loop hidden zeros. We also present strong evidence that the hidden zeros themselves contain the constraints from locality, leading us to conjecture that the one-loop integrand can be fixed by hidden zeros from a generically nonlocal, nonunitary Ansatz. Near the one-loop zeros, we uncover a simple factorization behavior and conjecture that NLSM integrands are fixed by this property, also assuming neither locality nor unitarity. This Letter represents the first extension of such uniqueness results to loop integrands, demonstrating that locality and unitarity emerge from other principles even beyond leading order in perturbation theory.
Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)
Article Text
Supplemental Material
References (42)
- Z. Bern and J. Trnka, arXiv:2210.03146.
- G. Travaglini et al., J. Phys. A 55, 443001 (2022).
- N. Arkani-Hamed, L. Rodina, and J. Trnka, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 231602 (2018).
- J. J. M. Carrasco and L. Rodina, Phys. Rev. D 100, 125007 (2019).
- L. Rodina, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2019) 078.
- L. Rodina, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2019) 084.
- L. Rodina, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 071601 (2019).
- L. Rodina, Phys. Rev. D 102, 045012 (2020).
- L. Rodina, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 031601 (2025).
- N. Arkani-Hamed, Q. Cao, J. Dong, C. Figueiredo, and S. He, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2024) 231.
- A. D’Adda, S. Sciuto, R. D’Auria, and F. Gliozzi, Nuovo Cimento Soc. Ital. Fis. 5A, 421 (1971).
- K. Zhou, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2025) 154.
- Y. Li, T. Wang, T. Brauner, and D. Roest, arXiv:2412.14858.
- H. Huang, Y. Yang, and K. Zhou, Eur. Phys. J. C 85, 685 (2025).
- Y.-C. Chang, H.-Y. Chen, and Y.-t. Huang, arXiv:2506.15299.
- C. R. T. Jones and S. Paranjape, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2025) 251.
- H. Kawai, D. C. Lewellen, and S. H. H. Tye, Nucl. Phys. B269, 1 (1986).
- Z. Bern, John Joseph M. Carrasco, and H. Johansson, Phys. Rev. D 78, 085011 (2008).
- Z. Bern, John Joseph M. Carrasco, and H. Johansson, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 061602 (2010).
- C. Bartsch, T. V. Brown, K. Kampf, U. Oktem, S. Paranjape, and J. Trnka, Phys. Rev. D 111, 045019 (2025).
- Y. Li, D. Roest, and T. ter Veldhuis, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2025) 121.
- S. De, S. Paranjape, A. Pokraka, M. Spradlin, and A. Volovich, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2025) 174.
- N. Arkani-Hamed, H. Frost, G. Salvatori, P.-G. Plamondon, and H. Thomas, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2025) 194.
- N. Arkani-Hamed, Q. Cao, J. Dong, C. Figueiredo, and S. He, Phys. Rev. D 110, 065018 (2024).
- N. Arkani-Hamed and C. Figueiredo, arXiv:2403.04826.
- N. Arkani-Hamed and C. Figueiredo, arXiv:2405.09608.
- N. Arkani-Hamed, Q. Cao, J. Dong, C. Figueiredo, and S. He, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 171601 (2025).
- N. Arkani-Hamed, H. Frost, and G. Salvatori, arXiv:2412.21027.
- S. De, A. Pokraka, M. Skowronek, M. Spradlin, and A. Volovich, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2024) 160.
- G. Salvatori, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2019) 074.
- N. Arkani-Hamed, S. He, G. Salvatori, and H. Thomas, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2022) 049.
- F. Cachazo, N. Early, and B. Giménez Umbert, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2022) 252.
- Q. Cao, J. Dong, S. He, C. Shi, and F. Zhu, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2024) 049; 01 (2025) 126(E).
- Y. Zhang, Phys. Rev. D 111, 085004 (2025).
- Y. Zhang, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2025) 074.
- C. Bartsch, K. Kampf, and J. Trnka, Phys. Rev. D 106, 076008 (2022).
- C. Bartsch, K. Kampf, J. Novotny, and J. Trnka, Phys. Rev. D 110, 045009 (2024).
- See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/7lwk-m5yb for more proof details, and integrand examples.
While these definitions guarantee that the physical loop-integrated amplitude is consistent with locality and unitarity, they constitute strictly stronger requirements, as they include rules for dealing with tadpoles and external bubbles that do not appear post-loop-integration.
- S. Paranjape, M. Skowronek, M. Spradlin, and A. Volovich, arXiv:2504.11253.
For the purposes of constructing amplitudes, one practical solution to obtain a unique result is to allow only same-parity terms in the numerator, i.e., only , , and and (when, for example, assigning to be even or odd parity). This eliminates the trivial solutions and gives an efficient bootstrap procedure.
- J. V. Backus and C. Figueiredo, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2025) 069.