Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Featured in Physics
  • Editors' Suggestion
  • Open Access

Measurement of the Positive Muon Anomalous Magnetic Moment to 127 ppb

D. P. Aguillard33, T. Albahri30, D. Allspach7, J. Annala7, K. Badgley7, S. Baeßler35, I. Bailey16,a, L. Bailey27, E. Barlas-Yucel28,b et al. (Muon g−2 Collaboration)

E. Barlas-Yucel28,b, T. Barrett6, E. Barzi7, F. Bedeschi10, M. Berz17, M. Bhattacharya7, H. P. Binney36, P. Bloom18, J. Bono7, E. Bottalico30, T. Bowcock30, S. Braun36, M. Bressler32, G. Cantatore12,c, R. M. Carey2, B. C. K. Casey7, D. Cauz26,d, R. Chakraborty29, A. Chapelain6, S. Chappa7, S. Charity30, C. Chen22,21,e, M. Cheng28, R. Chislett27, Z. Chu21,e, T. E. Chupp33, C. Claessens36, F. Confortini9,f, M. E. Convery7, S. Corrodi1, L. Cotrozzi30, J. D. Crnkovic7, S. Dabagov8,g, P. T. Debevec28, S. Di Falco10, G. Di Sciascio11, S. Donati10,h, B. Drendel7, A. Driutti10,29, M. Eads19, A. Edmonds2,37, J. Esquivel7, M. Farooq33, R. Fatemi29, K. Ferraby30, C. Ferrari10,i, M. Fertl14, A. T. Fienberg36, A. Fioretti10,i, D. Flay32, S. B. Foster29,2, H. Friedsam7, N. S. Froemming19, C. Gabbanini10,i, I. Gaines7, S. Ganguly7, J. George32,j, L. K. Gibbons6, A. Gioiosa25,k, K. L. Giovanetti13, P. Girotti10,l, W. Gohn29, L. Goodenough7, T. Gorringe29, J. Grange33, S. Grant1,27, F. Gray20, S. Haciomeroglu5,m, T. Halewood-Leagas30, D. Hampai8, F. Han29, J. Hempstead36, D. W. Hertzog36, G. Hesketh27, E. Hess10, A. Hibbert30, Z. Hodge36, S. Y. Hoh22,21,e, K. W. Hong35, R. Hong1,29, T. Hu22,21,e, Y. Hu21,e, M. Iacovacci9,f, M. Incagli10, S. Israel2,32, P. Kammel36, M. Kargiantoulakis7, M. Karuza12,n, J. Kaspar36, D. Kawall32, L. Kelton29,23, A. Keshavarzi31, D. S. Kessler32, K. S. Khaw22,21,e, Z. Khechadoorian6, B. Kiburg7, M. Kiburg7,18, O. Kim34, N. Kinnaird2, E. Kraegeloh33, K. R. Labe6, J. LaBounty36, M. Lancaster31, S. Lee5, B. Li21,o, D. Li21,p, L. Li21,e, I. Logashenko4,q, A. Lorente Campos29, Z. Lu21,e, A. Lucà7, G. Lukicov27, A. Lusiani10,r, A. L. Lyon7, B. MacCoy36, R. Madrak7, K. Makino17, S. Mastroianni9, R. McCarthy2,s, J. P. Miller2, S. Miozzi11, B. Mitra34, J. P. Morgan7, W. M. Morse3, J. Mott7, A. Nath9,f, J. K. Ng22,21,e, H. Nguyen7, Y. Oksuzian1, Z. Omarov15,5, W. Osar6, R. Osofsky36, S. Park5, G. Pauletta26,*,d, J. Peck29, G. M. Piacentino25,k, R. N. Pilato30, K. T. Pitts28,b, B. Plaster29, D. Počanić35, N. Pohlman19, C. C. Polly7, J. Price30, B. Quinn34, M. U. H. Qureshi14, G. Rakness7, S. Ramachandran1,j, E. Ramberg7, R. Reimann14, B. L. Roberts2, D. L. Rubin6, M. Sakurai27, L. Santi26,*,d, C. Schlesier28,t, A. Schreckenberger7, Y. K. Semertzidis5,15, A. K. Soha7, M. Sorbara11,u, J. Stapleton7, D. Still7, D. Stöckinger24, C. Stoughton7, D. Stratakis7, H. E. Swanson36, G. Sweetmore31, D. A. Sweigart6, M. J. Syphers19, Y. Takeuchi22,21,e, D. A. Tarazona6, T. Teubner30, A. E. Tewsley-Booth29,33, V. Tishchenko3, N. H. Tran2,v, W. Turner30, E. Valetov17, D. Vasilkova30, G. Venanzoni30,w, T. Walton7, A. Weisskopf17, L. Welty-Rieger7, P. Winter1, Y. Wu1, B. Yu34, M. Yucel7, E. Zaid30, Y. Zeng22,21,e, and C. Zhang30 (Muon g−2 Collaboration)

  • *Deceased.
  • aAlso at The Cockcroft Institute of Accelerator Science and Technology, Daresbury, United Kingdom.
  • bPresent address: Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia, USA.
  • cAlso at Università di Trieste, Trieste, Italy.
  • dAlso at INFN Gruppo Collegato di Udine, Sezione di Trieste, Udine, Italy.
  • eAlso at State Key Laboratory of Dark Matter Physics, Shanghai, China; also at Key Laboratory for Particle Astrophysics and Cosmology (MOE); and also at Shanghai Key Laboratory for Particle Physics and Cosmology, Shanghai, China.
  • fAlso at Università di Napoli, Naples, Italy.
  • gAlso at Lebedev Physical Institute and NRNU MEPhI, Moscow, Russia.
  • hAlso at Università di Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
  • iAlso at Istituto Nazionale di Ottica—Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Pisa, Italy.
  • jPresent address: Alliance University, Bangalore, India.
  • kAlso at INFN, Sezione di Roma Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy.
  • lPresent address: INFN, Laboratori Nazionali di Frascati, Frascati, Italy.
  • mPresent address: Istinye University, Istanbul, Türkiye.
  • nAlso at University of Rijeka, Rijeka, Croatia.
  • oAlso at Zhejiang Lab, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
  • pAlso at Shenzhen Technology University, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China.
  • qAlso at Novosibirsk State University, Novosibirsk, Russia.
  • rAlso at Scuola Normale Superiore, Pisa, Italy.
  • sAlso at Northeastern University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
  • tPresent address: Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, USA.
  • uAlso at Università di Roma Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy.
  • vPresent address: Institute for Interdisciplinary Research in Science and Education (ICISE), Quy Nhon, Binh Dinh, Vietnam.
  • wAlso at INFN, Sezione di Pisa, Pisa, Italy.

Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 101802 – Published 2 September, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/7clf-sm2v

Abstract

A new measurement of the magnetic anomaly aμ of the positive muon is presented based on data taken from 2020 to 2023 by the Muon g−2 Experiment at Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory (FNAL). This dataset contains over 2.5 times the total statistics of our previous results. From the ratio of the precession frequencies for muons and protons in our storage ring magnetic field, together with precisely known ratios of fundamental constants, we determine aμ=1 165 920 710(162)×10−12 (139 ppb) for the new datasets, and aμ=1 165 920 705(148)×10−12 (127 ppb) when combined with our previous results. The new experimental world average, dominated by the measurements at FNAL, is aμ(exp)=1 165 920 715(145)×10−12 (124 ppb). The measurements at FNAL have improved the precision on the world average by over a factor of 4.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Collections

This article appears in the following collection:

PRL Collection of the Year 2025

For the second year in a row, our editors have curated a set of some of the best papers from the wide range of topics PRL covers in fundamental and applied physical science. Congratulations to all the authors in this collection!

Research News

Muon Experiment Calls It a Wrap

Published 2 September, 2025

The final results from the Muon g − 2 experiment agree with the latest predictions of the muon’s magnetic properties—letting down hopes that the particle would upset the standard model’s applecart.

See more in Physics

Article Text

References (107)

  1. P. A. M. Dirac, The quantum theory of the Electron. Part II, Proc. R. Soc. A 118, 351 (1928).
  2. J. S. Schwinger, On quantum electrodynamics and the magnetic moment of the electron, Phys. Rev. 73, 416 (1948).
  3. P. Kusch and H. M. Foley, Precision measurement of the ratio of the atomic ‘g values’ in the p322 and p122 states of gallium, Phys. Rev. 72, 1256 (1947).
  4. P. Kusch and H. M. Foley, The magnetic moment of the electron, Phys. Rev. 74, 250 (1948).
  5. The magnetic anomaly a is often also called the anomalous magnetic moment.

  6. X. Fan, T. G. Myers, B. A. D. Sukra, and G. Gabrielse, Measurement of the electron magnetic moment, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 071801 (2023).
  7. T. Coffin, R. L. Garwin, S. Penman, L. M. Lederman, and A. M. Sachs, Magnetic moment of the free muon, Phys. Rev. 109, 973 (1958).
  8. R. L. Garwin, D. P. Hutchinson, S. Penman, and G. Shapiro, Accurate determination of the μ+ magnetic moment, Phys. Rev. 118, 271 (1960).
  9. J. M. Cassels, T. W. O’Keeffe, M. Rigby, A. M. Wetherell, and J. R. Wormald, Experiments with a polarized muon beam, Proc. Phys. Soc. London Sect. A 70, 543 (1957).
  10. G. Charpak, F. J. M. Farley, R. L. Garwin, T. Muller, J. C. Sens, and A. Zichichi, The anomalous magnetic moment of the muon: A world average value, Nuovo Cimento 37, 1241 (1965).
  11. J. Bailey, W. Bartl, G. Von Bochmann, R. Brown, F. Farley, H. Jöstlein, E. Picasso, and R. Williams, Precision measurement of the anomalous magnetic moment of the muon, Phys. Lett. 28B, 287 (1968).
  12. J. Bailey et al. (CERN-Mainz-Daresbury Collaboration), Final report on the CERN muon storage ring including the anomalous magnetic moment and the electric dipole moment of the muon, and a direct test of relativistic time dilation, Nucl. Phys. B150, 1 (1979).
  13. G. W. Bennett et al. (Muon g−2 Collaboration), Final report of the Muon E821 anomalous magnetic moment measurement at BNL, Phys. Rev. D 73, 072003 (2006).
  14. B. Abi et al. (Muon g−2 Collaboration), Measurement of the positive muon anomalous magnetic moment to 0.46 ppm, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 141801 (2021).
  15. D. P. Aguillard et al. (Muon g−2 Collaboration), Measurement of the Positive Muon Anomalous Magnetic Moment to 0.20 ppm, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 161802 (2023).
  16. J. Grange et al. (Muon g−2 Collaboration), Muon g−2 Technical Design Report (2015).
  17. T. Albahri et al. (Muon g−2 Collaboration), Measurement of the anomalous precession frequency of the muon in the Fermilab Muon g−2 Experiment, Phys. Rev. D 103, 072002 (2021).
  18. T. Albahri et al. (Muon g−2 Collaboration), Magnetic-field measurement and analysis for the Muon g−2 Experiment at Fermilab, Phys. Rev. A 103, 042208 (2021).
  19. T. Albahri et al. (Muon g−2 Collaboration), Beam dynamics corrections to the Run-1 measurement of the muon anomalous magnetic moment at Fermilab, Phys. Rev. Accel. Beams 24, 044002 (2021).
  20. D. P. Aguillard et al. (Muon g−2 Collaboration), Detailed report on the measurement of the positive muon anomalous magnetic moment to 0.20 ppm, Phys. Rev. D 110, 032009 (2024).
  21. G. T. Danby et al., The Brookhaven muon storage ring magnet, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 457, 151 (2001).
  22. A. P. Schreckenberger et al., The fast non-ferric kicker system for the Muon g−2 experiment at Fermilab, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 1011, 165597 (2021).
  23. Y. K. Semertzidis et al., The Brookhaven Muon (g−2) storage ring high voltage quadrupoles, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 503, 458 (2003).
  24. J. Kaspar et al., Design and performance of SiPM-based readout of PbF2 crystals for high-rate, precision timing applications, J. Instrum. 12, P01009 (2017).
  25. K. Khaw et al., Performance of the Muon g−2 calorimeter and readout systems measured with test beam data, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 945, 162558 (2019).
  26. A. Anastasi et al., Electron beam test of key elements of the laser-based calibration system for the Muon g−2 experiment, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 842, 86 (2017).
  27. A. Anastasi et al., The laser-based gain monitoring system of the calorimeters in the Muon g−2 experiment at Fermilab, J. Instrum. 14, P11025 (2019).
  28. S. Corrodi, P. D. Lurgio, D. Flay, J. Grange, R. Hong, D. Kawall, M. Oberling, S. Ramachandran, and P. Winter, Design and performance of an in-vacuum, magnetic field mapping system for the Muon g−2 Experiment, J. Instrum. 15, P11008 (2020).
  29. D. Flay et al., High-accuracy absolute magnetometry with application to the fermilab Muon g−2 experiment, J. Instrum. 16, P12041 (2021).
  30. E. Swanson, M. Fertl, A. Garcia, C. Helling, R. Ortez, R. Osofsky, D. Peterson, R. Reimann, M. Smith, and T. Van Wechel, The fixed probe storage ring magnetometer for the Muon g−2 Experiment at Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 1075, 170338 (2025).
  31. B. T. King et al., The straw tracking detector for the Fermilab Muon g−2 Experiment, J. Instrum. 17, P02035 (2022).
  32. O. Kim et al., Reduction of coherent betatron oscillations in a Muon g−2 storage ring experiment using RF fields, New J. Phys. 22, 063002 (2020).
  33. μp′/μB=1.520 993 155 1(62)×10−3; mμ/me=206.768 2827(46), both from [107].

  34. G. W. Bennett et al. (Muon g−2 Collaboration), Statistical equations and methods applied to the precision Muon g−2 Experiment at BNL, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 579, 1096 (2007).
  35. S. Agostinelli et al., Geant4–A simulation toolkit, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 506, 250 (2003).
  36. J. Allison et al., Geant4 developments and applications, IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 53, 270 (2006).
  37. J. Allison et al., Recent developments in Geant4, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 835, 186 (2016).
  38. K. Makino and M. Berz, cosy infinity Version 9, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 558, 346 (2006).
  39. D. Sagan, Bmad: A relativistic charged particle simulation library, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 558, 356 (2006).
  40. The calibration after Run-6 is only used as a cross-check and doesn’t enter the average.

  41. M. Farooq, T. Chupp, J. Grange, A. Tewsley-Booth, D. Flay, D. Kawall, N. Sachdeva, and P. Winter, Absolute magnetometry with He3, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 223001 (2020).
  42. H. Yamaguchi et al., Development of a CW-NMR probe for precise measurement of absolute magnetic field, IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond. 29, 1 (2019).
  43. The adjusted Rμ′(BNL)=0.00370730154(172)stat(102)syst contributes 5.1% to the new experimental average.

  44. R. Aliberti et al., The anomalous magnetic moment of the muon in the standard model: An update, arXiv:2505.21476.
  45. T. Aoyama, M. Hayakawa, T. Kinoshita, and M. Nio, Complete tenth-order QED contribution to the Muon g−2, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 111808 (2012).
  46. S. Volkov, Calculating the five-loop QED contribution to the electron anomalous magnetic moment: Graphs without lepton loops, Phys. Rev. D 100, 096004 (2019).
  47. S. Volkov, Calculation of the total 10th order QED contribution to the electron magnetic moment, Phys. Rev. D 110, 036001 (2024).
  48. T. Aoyama, M. Hayakawa, A. Hirayama, and M. Nio, Verification of the tenth-order QED contribution to the anomalous magnetic moment of the electron from diagrams without fermion loops, Phys. Rev. D 111, L031902 (2025).
  49. R. H. Parker, C. Yu, W. Zhong, B. Estey, and H. Müller, Measurement of the fine-structure constant as a test of the standard model, Science 360, 191 (2018).
  50. L. Morel, Z. Yao, P. Cladé, and S. Guellati-Khélifa, Determination of the fine-structure constant with an accuracy of 81 parts per trillion, Nature (London) 588, 61 (2020).
  51. A. Czarnecki, W. J. Marciano, and A. Vainshtein, Refinements in electroweak contributions to the muon anomalous magnetic moment, Phys. Rev. D 67, 073006 (2003); 73, 119901(E) (2006).
  52. C. Gnendiger, D. Stöckinger, and H. Stöckinger-Kim, The electroweak contributions to (g−2)μ after the Higgs boson mass measurement, Phys. Rev. D 88, 053005 (2013).
  53. J. Lüdtke, M. Procura, and P. Stoffer, Dispersion relations for the hadronic VVA correlator, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2025) 130.
  54. M. Hoferichter, J. Lüdtke, L. Naterop, M. Procura, and P. Stoffer, Improved evaluation of the electroweak contribution to muon g−2, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 201801 (2025).
  55. T. Blum, P. A. Boyle, V. Gülpers, T. Izubuchi, L. Jin, C. Jung, A. Jüttner, C. Lehner, A. Portelli, and J. T. Tsang (RBC Collaboration and UKQCD Collaboration), Calculation of the hadronic vacuum polarization contribution to the muon anomalous magnetic moment, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 022003 (2018).
  56. D. Giusti, V. Lubicz, G. Martinelli, F. Sanfilippo, and S. Simula (ETM Collaboration), Electromagnetic and strong isospin-breaking corrections to the Muon g−2 from Lattice QCD+QED, Phys. Rev. D 99, 114502 (2019).
  57. S. Borsányi et al., Leading hadronic contribution to the muon magnetic moment from lattice QCD, Nature (London) 593, 51 (2021).
  58. C. Lehner and A. S. Meyer, Consistency of hadronic vacuum polarization between lattice QCD and the R-ratio, Phys. Rev. D 101, 074515 (2020).
  59. G. Wang, T. Draper, K.-F. Liu, and Y.-B. Yang (χQCD Collaboration), Muon g−2 with overlap valence fermions, Phys. Rev. D 107, 034513 (2023).
  60. C. Aubin, T. Blum, M. Golterman, and S. Peris, Muon anomalous magnetic moment with staggered fermions: Is the lattice spacing small enough?, Phys. Rev. D 106, 054503 (2022).
  61. M. Cè et al., Window observable for the hadronic vacuum polarization contribution to the muon g−2 from lattice QCD, Phys. Rev. D 106, 114502 (2022).
  62. C. Alexandrou et al. (ETM Collaboration), Lattice calculation of the short and intermediate time-distance hadronic vacuum polarization contributions to the muon magnetic moment using twisted-mass fermions, Phys. Rev. D 107, 074506 (2023).
  63. T. Blum et al. (RBC Collaboration and UKQCD Collaboration), Update of Euclidean windows of the hadronic vacuum polarization, Phys. Rev. D 108, 054507 (2023).
  64. S. Kuberski, M. Cè, G. von Hippel, H. B. Meyer, K. Ottnad, A. Risch, and H. Wittig, Hadronic vacuum polarization in the muon g−2: The short-distance contribution from lattice QCD, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2024) 172.
  65. A. Boccaletti et al., High precision calculation of the hadronic vacuum polarisation contribution to the muon anomaly, arXiv:2407.10913.
  66. S. Spiegel and C. Lehner, A high-precision continuum limit study of the HVP short-distance window, Phys. Rev. D 111, 114517 (2025).
  67. T. Blum et al. (RBC Collaboration and UKQCD Collaboration), The long-distance window of the hadronic vacuum polarization for the muon g−2, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 201901 (2025).
  68. D. Djukanovic, G. von Hippel, S. Kuberski, H. B. Meyer, N. Miller, K. Ottnad, J. Parrino, A. Risch, and H. Wittig, The hadronic vacuum polarization contribution to the muon g−2 at long distances, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2025) 098.
  69. C. Alexandrou et al. (ETM Collaboration), Strange and charm quark contributions to the muon anomalous magnetic moment in lattice QCD with twisted-mass fermions, Phys. Rev. D 111, 054502 (2025).
  70. A. Bazavov et al. (Fermilab Lattice Collaboration, HPQCD Collaboration, and MILC Collaboration), Hadronic vacuum polarization for the muon g−2 from lattice QCD: Complete short and intermediate windows, Phys. Rev. D 111, 094508 (2025).
  71. A. Bazavov et al., Hadronic vacuum polarization for the muon g−2 from lattice QCD: Long-distance and full light-quark connected contribution, Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 011901 (2025).
  72. A. Keshavarzi, D. Nomura, and T. Teubner, The g−2 of charged leptons, α(MZ2) and the hyperfine splitting of muonium, Phys. Rev. D 101, 014029 (2020).
  73. L. Di Luzio, A. Keshavarzi, A. Masiero, and P. Paradisi, Model-independent tests of the hadronic vacuum polarization contribution to the muon g−2, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 011902 (2025).
  74. A. Kurz, T. Liu, P. Marquard, and M. Steinhauser, Hadronic contribution to the muon anomalous magnetic moment to next-to-next-to-leading order, Phys. Lett. B 734, 144 (2014).
  75. G. Colangelo, M. Hoferichter, M. Procura, and P. Stoffer, Dispersion relation for hadronic light-by-light scattering: theoretical foundations, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2015) 074.
  76. P. Masjuan and P. Sánchez-Puertas, Pseudoscalar-pole contribution to the (gμ−2): a rational approach, Phys. Rev. D 95, 054026 (2017).
  77. G. Colangelo, M. Hoferichter, M. Procura, and P. Stoffer, Dispersion relation for hadronic light-by-light scattering: two-pion contributions, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2017) 161.
  78. M. Hoferichter, B.-L. Hoid, B. Kubis, S. Leupold, and S. P. Schneider, Dispersion relation for hadronic light-by-light scattering: pion pole, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2018) 141.
  79. G. Eichmann, C. S. Fischer, E. Weil, and R. Williams, Single pseudoscalar meson pole and pion box contributions to the anomalous magnetic moment of the muon, Phys. Lett. B 797, 134855 (2019); 799, 135029(E) (2019).
  80. J. Bijnens, N. Hermansson-Truedsson, and A. Rodríguez-Sánchez, Short-distance constraints for the HLbL contribution to the muon anomalous magnetic moment, Phys. Lett. B 798, 134994 (2019).
  81. J. Leutgeb and A. Rebhan, Axial vector transition form factors in holographic QCD and their contribution to the anomalous magnetic moment of the muon, Phys. Rev. D 101, 114015 (2020).
  82. L. Cappiello, O. Catà, G. D’Ambrosio, D. Greynat, and A. Iyer, Axial-vector and pseudoscalar mesons in the hadronic light-by-light contribution to the muon (g−2), Phys. Rev. D 102, 016009 (2020).
  83. P. Masjuan, P. Roig, and P. Sánchez-Puertas, The interplay of transverse degrees of freedom and axial-vector mesons with short-distance constraints in g−2, J. Phys. G 49, 015002 (2022).
  84. J. Bijnens, N. Hermansson-Truedsson, L. Laub, and A. Rodríguez-Sánchez, Short-distance HLbL contributions to the muon anomalous magnetic moment beyond perturbation theory, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2020) 203.
  85. J. Bijnens, N. Hermansson-Truedsson, L. Laub, and A. Rodríguez-Sánchez, The two-loop perturbative correction to the (g−2)μ HLbL at short distances, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2021) 240.
  86. I. Danilkin, M. Hoferichter, and P. Stoffer, A dispersive estimate of scalar contributions to hadronic light-by-light scattering, Phys. Lett. B 820, 136502 (2021).
  87. D. Stamen, D. Hariharan, M. Hoferichter, B. Kubis, and P. Stoffer, Kaon electromagnetic form factors in dispersion theory, Eur. Phys. J. C 82, 432 (2022).
  88. J. Leutgeb, J. Mager, and A. Rebhan, Hadronic light-by-light contribution to the muon g−2 from holographic QCD with solved U(1)A problem, Phys. Rev. D 107, 054021 (2023).
  89. M. Hoferichter, B. Kubis, and M. Zanke, Axial-vector transition form factors and e+e−→f1π+π−, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2023) 209.
  90. M. Hoferichter, P. Stoffer, and M. Zillinger, An optimized basis for hadronic light-by-light scattering, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2024) 092.
  91. E. J. Estrada, S. Gonzàlez-Solís, A. Guevara, and P. Roig, Improved π0, η, η’ transition form factors in resonance chiral theory and their aμHLbL contribution, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2024) 203.
  92. O. Deineka, I. Danilkin, and M. Vanderhaeghen, Dispersive estimate of the a0(980) contribution to (g−2)μ, Phys. Rev. D 111, 034009 (2025).
  93. G. Eichmann, C. S. Fischer, T. Haeuser, and O. Regenfelder, Axial-vector and scalar contributions to hadronic light-by-light scattering, Eur. Phys. J. C 85, 445 (2025).
  94. J. Bijnens, N. Hermansson-Truedsson, and A. Rodríguez-Sánchez, Constraints on the hadronic light-by-light tensor in corner kinematics for the muon g−2, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2025) 094.
  95. M. Hoferichter, P. Stoffer, and M. Zillinger, Dispersion relation for hadronic light-by-light scattering: Subleading contributions, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2025) 121.
  96. S. Holz, M. Hoferichter, B.-L. Hoid, and B. Kubis, Dispersion relation for hadronic light-by-light scattering: η and η′ poles, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2025) 147.
  97. L. Cappiello, J. Leutgeb, J. Mager, and A. Rebhan, Tensor meson transition form factors in holographic QCD and the muon g−2, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2025) 033.
  98. G. Colangelo, M. Hoferichter, A. Nyffeler, M. Passera, and P. Stoffer, Remarks on higher-order hadronic corrections to the muon g−2, Phys. Lett. B 735, 90 (2014).
  99. T. Blum, N. Christ, M. Hayakawa, T. Izubuchi, L. Jin, C. Jung, and C. Lehner, The hadronic light-by-light scattering contribution to the muon anomalous magnetic moment from lattice QCD, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 132002 (2020).
  100. E.-H. Chao, R. J. Hudspith, A. Gérardin, J. R. Green, H. B. Meyer, and K. Ottnad, Hadronic light-by-light contribution to (g−2)μ from lattice QCD: A complete calculation, Eur. Phys. J. C 81, 651 (2021).
  101. E.-H. Chao, R. J. Hudspith, A. Gérardin, J. R. Green, and H. B. Meyer, The charm-quark contribution to light-by-light scattering in the muon (g−2) from lattice QCD, Eur. Phys. J. C 82, 664 (2022).
  102. T. Blum, N. Christ, M. Hayakawa, T. Izubuchi, L. Jin, C. Jung, C. Lehner, and C. Tu (RBC Collaboration and UKQCD Collaboration), Hadronic light-by-light contribution to the muon anomaly from lattice QCD with infinite volume QED at physical pion mass, Phys. Rev. D 111, 014501 (2025).
  103. Z. Fodor, A. Gérardin, L. Lellouch, K. K. Szabó, B. C. Toth, and C. Zimmermann, Hadronic light-by-light scattering contribution to the anomalous magnetic moment of the muon at the physical pion mass, Phys. Rev. D 111, 114509 (2025).
  104. T. Aoyama et al., The anomalous magnetic moment of the muon in the standard model, Phys. Rep. 887, 1 (2020).
  105. F. V. Ignatov et al. (CMD-3 Collaboration), Measurement of the e+e−→π+π− cross section from threshold to 1.2 GeV with the CMD-3 detector, Phys. Rev. D 109, 112002 (2024).
  106. F. V. Ignatov et al. (CMD-3 Collaboration), Measurement of the pion form factor with CMD-3 detector and its implication to the hadronic contribution to Muon (g−2), Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 231903 (2024).
  107. P. J. Mohr, E. Tiesinga, D. B. Newell, and B. N. Taylor, Codata internationally recommended 2022 values of the fundamental physical constants (2024).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation