- Featured in Physics
- Editors' Suggestion
- Open Access
Black Hole Spectroscopy and Tests of General Relativity with GW250114
Phys. Rev. Lett. 136, 041403 – Published 29 January, 2026
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/6c61-fm1n
Abstract
The binary black hole signal GW250114, the loudest gravitational wave detected to date, offers a unique opportunity to test Einstein’s general relativity (GR) in the high-velocity, strong-gravity regime and probe whether the remnant conforms to the Kerr metric. Upon perturbation, black holes emit a spectrum of damped sinusoids with specific, complex frequencies. Our analysis of the postmerger signal shows that at least two quasinormal modes are required to explain the data, with the most damped remaining statistically significant for about one cycle. We probe the remnant’s Kerr nature by constraining the spectroscopic pattern of the dominant quadrupolar () mode and its first overtone to match the Kerr prediction to tens of percent at multiple postpeak times. The measured mode amplitudes and phases agree with a numerical-relativity simulation having parameters close to GW250114. By fitting a parametrized waveform that incorporates the full inspiral-merger-ringdown sequence, we constrain the fundamental mode to tens of percent and bound the quadrupolar frequency to within a few percent of the GR prediction. We perform a suite of tests—spanning inspiral, merger, and ringdown—finding constraints that are comparable to, and in some cases 2–3 times more stringent than those obtained by combining dozens of events in the fourth Gravitational-Wave Transient Catalog. These results constitute the most stringent single-event verification of GR and the Kerr nature of black holes to date, and outline the power of black-hole spectroscopy for future gravitational-wave observations.
Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)
synopsis
General Relativity Survives a Tough Trial
An analysis of a record-breaking gravitational-wave detection tests whether general relativity holds under extreme conditions.
See more in Physics
Article Text
Supplemental Material
References (222)
- J. Aasi et al. (LIGO Scientific Collaboration), Advanced LIGO, Classical Quantum Gravity 32, 074001 (2015).
- A. G. Abac et al., GW250114: Testing Hawking’s area law and the Kerr nature of black holes, arXiv:2509.0000.
- F. Acernese et al. (Virgo Collaboration), Advanced Virgo: A second-generation interferometric gravitational wave detector, Classical Quantum Gravity 32, 024001 (2015).
- T. Akutsu et al. (KAGRA Collaboration), Overview of KAGRA: Detector design and construction history, Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2021, 05A101 (2021).
- A. Einstein, On the general thoery of relativity, Sitzungsber. K. Preuss. Akad. Wiss. 49, 778 (1915), https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1915SPAW.......778E/abstract.
- R. P. Kerr, Gravitational field of a spinning mass as an example of algebraically special metrics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 11, 237 (1963).
- R. L. Arnowitt, S. Deser, and C. W. Misner, The dynamics of general relativity, Gen. Relativ. Gravit. 40, 1997 (2008).
- Y. Foures-Bruhat, Theoreme d’existence pour certains systemes derivees partielles non lineaires, Acta Math. 88, 141 (1952).
- K. Schwarzschild, On the gravitational field of a mass point according to Einstein’s theory, Sitzungsber. Preuss. Akad. Wiss. Berlin (Math. Phys.) 1916, 189 (1916).
- E. T. Newman, E. Couch, K. Chinnapared, A. Exton, A. Prakash, and R. Torrence, Metric of a rotating, charged mass, J. Math. Phys. (N.Y.) 6, 918 (1965).
- W. Israel, Event horizons in static electrovac space-times, Commun. Math. Phys. 8, 245 (1968).
- B. Carter, Axisymmetric black hole has only two degrees of freedom, Phys. Rev. Lett. 26, 331 (1971).
- S. W. Hawking, Black holes in general relativity, Commun. Math. Phys. 25, 152 (1972).
- D. C. Robinson, Uniqueness of the Kerr black hole, Phys. Rev. Lett. 34, 905 (1975).
- P. O. Mazur, Proof of uniqueness of the Kerr-Newman black hole solution, J. Phys. A 15, 3173 (1982).
- B. Carter, Global structure of the Kerr family of gravitational fields, Phys. Rev. 174, 1559 (1968).
- R. Penrose, Gravitational collapse: The role of general relativity, Riv. Nuovo Cimento 1, 252 (1969).
- R. Penrose and R. M. Floyd, Extraction of rotational energy from a black hole, Nat. Phys. Sci. 229, 177 (1971).
- J. M. Bardeen, B. Carter, and S. W. Hawking, The four laws of black hole mechanics, Commun. Math. Phys. 31, 161 (1973).
- M. Schmidt, 3C 273: A star-like object with large red-shift, Nature (London) 197, 1040 (1963).
- M. Dafermos, G. Holzegel, and I. Rodnianski, The linear stability of the Schwarzschild solution to gravitational perturbations, Acta Math. 222, 1 (2019).
- R. Teixeira da Costa, Mode stability for the Teukolsky equation on extremal and subextremal Kerr spacetimes, Commun. Math. Phys. 378, 705 (2020).
- S. Klainerman and J. Szeftel, Kerr stability for small angular momentum, Pure Appl. Math. Q. 19, 791 (2023).
- M. Dafermos, G. Holzegel, I. Rodnianski, and M. Taylor, The non-linear stability of the Schwarzschild family of black holes, arXiv:2104.08222.
- S. W. Hawking and R. Penrose, The singularities of gravitational collapse and cosmology, Proc. R. Soc. A 314, 529 (1970).
- A. Almheiri, T. Hartman, J. Maldacena, E. Shaghoulian, and A. Tajdini, The entropy of Hawking radiation, Rev. Mod. Phys. 93, 035002 (2021).
- S. Raju, Lessons from the information paradox, Phys. Rep. 943, 1 (2022).
- C. M. Will, The confrontation between general relativity and experiment, Living Rev. Relativity 17, 4 (2014).
- E. Berti et al., Testing general relativity with present and future astrophysical observations, Classical Quantum Gravity 32, 243001 (2015).
- N. Yunes, X. Siemens, and K. Yagi, Gravitational-wave tests of general relativity with ground-based detectors and pulsar-timing arrays, Living Rev. Relativity 28, 3 (2025).
- A. G. Abac et al. (LIGO Scientific, Virgo, and KAGRA Collaborations), GWTC-4.0: An introduction to version 4.0 of the gravitational-wave transient catalog, arXiv:2508.18080.
- A. G. Abac et al. (LIGO Scientific, Virgo, and KAGRA Collaborations), GWTC-4.0: Updating the gravitational-wave transient catalog with observations from the first part of the fourth LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA observing run, arXiv:2508.18082.
- L. Blanchet and B. S. Sathyaprakash, Detecting a tail effect in gravitational-wave experiments, Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 1067 (1995).
- B. P. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific and Virgo Collaborations), Observation of gravitational waves from a binary black hole merger, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 061102 (2016).
- B. P. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific and Virgo Collaborations), Tests of general relativity with GW150914, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 221101 (2016); 121, 129902(E) (2018).
- B. P. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific and Virgo Collaborations), GWTC-1: A gravitational-wave transient catalog of compact binary mergers observed by LIGO and Virgo during the first and second observing runs, Phys. Rev. X 9, 031040 (2019).
- R. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific and Virgo Collaborations), GWTC-2: Compact binary coalescences observed by LIGO and Virgo during the first half of the third observing run, Phys. Rev. X 11, 021053 (2021).
- R. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific and Virgo Collaborations), GWTC-2.1: Deep extended catalog of compact binary coalescences observed by LIGO and Virgo during the first half of the third observing run, Phys. Rev. D 109, 022001 (2024).
- R. Abbott et al. (KAGRA, Virgo, and LIGO Scientific Collaborations), GWTC-3: Compact binary coalescences observed by LIGO and Virgo during the second part of the third observing run, Phys. Rev. X 13, 041039 (2023).
- B. P. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific and Virgo Collaborations), Tests of general relativity with GW170817, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 011102 (2019).
- B. P. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific and Virgo Collaborations), Tests of general relativity with the binary black hole signals from the LIGO-Virgo catalog GWTC-1, Phys. Rev. D 100, 104036 (2019).
- R. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific and Virgo Collaborations), Tests of general relativity with binary black holes from the second LIGO-Virgo gravitational-wave transient catalog, Phys. Rev. D 103, 122002 (2021).
- R. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific,, and KAGRA Collaborations), Tests of general relativity with GWTC-3, Phys. Rev. D 112, 084080 (2025).
- P. C. C. Freire, N. Wex, G. Esposito-Farese, J. P. W. Verbiest, M. Bailes, B. A. Jacoby, M. Kramer, I. H. Stairs, J. Antoniadis, and G. H. Janssen, The relativistic pulsar-white dwarf binary PSR II. The most stringent test of scalar-tensor gravity, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 423, 3328 (2012).
- M. Kramer et al., Strong-field gravity tests with the double pulsar, Phys. Rev. X 11, 041050 (2021).
- R. Abuter et al. (GRAVITY Collaboration), Detection of the gravitational redshift in the orbit of the star S2 near the Galactic centre massive black hole, Astron. Astrophys. 615, L15 (2018).
- T. Do et al., Relativistic redshift of the star S0-2 orbiting the Galactic center supermassive black hole, Science 365, 664 (2019).
- K. Akiyama et al. (Event Horizon Telescope Collaboration), First M87 Event Horizon Telescope results. I. The shadow of the supermassive black hole, Astrophys. J. Lett. 875, L1 (2019).
- T. Clifton, P. G. Ferreira, A. Padilla, and C. Skordis, Modified gravity and cosmology, Phys. Rep. 513, 1 (2012).
- A. Einstein, Über Gravitationswellen, Sitzungsber. Preuss. Akad. Wiss. Berlin (Math. Phys.) 1918, 154 (1918), https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1918SPAW.......154E/abstract.
- F. Pretorius, Evolution of binary black hole spacetimes, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 121101 (2005).
- M. Campanelli, C. O. Lousto, Y. Zlochower, B. Krishnan, and D. Merritt, Spin flips and precession in black-hole-binary mergers, Phys. Rev. D 75, 064030 (2007).
- J. G. Baker, J. Centrella, D.-I. Choi, M. Koppitz, and J. van Meter, Gravitational wave extraction from an inspiraling configuration of merging black holes, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 111102 (2006).
- C. V. Vishveshwara, Scattering of gravitational radiation by a Schwarzschild black-hole, Nature (London) 227, 936 (1970).
- W. H. Press, Long wave trains of gravitational waves from a vibrating black hole, Astrophys. J. 170, L105 (1971).
- T. Regge, Stability of a Schwarzschild singularity, Phys. Rev. 108, 1063 (1957).
- F. J. Zerilli, Effective potential for even parity Regge-Wheeler gravitational perturbation equations, Phys. Rev. Lett. 24, 737 (1970).
- S. A. Teukolsky, Perturbations of a rotating black hole. 1. Fundamental equations for gravitational electromagnetic and neutrino field perturbations, Astrophys. J. 185, 635 (1973).
- S. Chandrasekhar and S. L. Detweiler, The quasi-normal modes of the Schwarzschild black hole, Proc. R. Soc. A 344, 441 (1975).
- S. L. Detweiler, Resonant oscillations of a rapidly rotating black hole, Proc. R. Soc. A 352, 381 (1977).
- S. L. Detweiler, Black holes and gravitational waves. III. The resonant frequencies of rotating holes, Astrophys. J. 239, 292 (1980).
- E. W. Leaver, An analytic representation for the quasi-normal modes of Kerr black holes, Proc. R. Soc. A 402, 285 (1985).
- R. H. Price, Nonspherical perturbations of relativistic gravitational collapse. 1. Scalar and gravitational perturbations, Phys. Rev. D 5, 2419 (1972).
- R. H. Price, Nonspherical perturbations of relativistic gravitational collapse. II. Integer-spin, zero-rest-mass fields, Phys. Rev. D 5, 2439 (1972).
- H.-P. Nollert, Topical review: Quasinormal modes: The characteristic “sound” of black holes and neutron stars, Classical Quantum Gravity 16, R159 (1999).
- K. D. Kokkotas and B. G. Schmidt, Quasinormal modes of stars and black holes, Living Rev. Relativity 2, 2 (1999).
- O. Dreyer, B. J. Kelly, B. Krishnan, L. S. Finn, D. Garrison, and R. Lopez-Aleman, Black hole spectroscopy: Testing general relativity through gravitational wave observations, Classical Quantum Gravity 21, 787 (2004).
- E. Berti, V. Cardoso, and C. M. Will, On gravitational-wave spectroscopy of massive black holes with the space interferometer LISA, Phys. Rev. D 73, 064030 (2006).
- E. Berti, V. Cardoso, and A. O. Starinets, Quasinormal modes of black holes and black branes, Classical Quantum Gravity 26, 163001 (2009).
- S. Gossan, J. Veitch, and B. S. Sathyaprakash, Bayesian model selection for testing the no-hair theorem with black hole ringdowns, Phys. Rev. D 85, 124056 (2012).
- J. Meidam, M. Agathos, C. Van Den Broeck, J. Veitch, and B. S. Sathyaprakash, Testing the no-hair theorem with black hole ringdowns using TIGER, Phys. Rev. D 90, 064009 (2014).
- E. Berti, V. Cardoso, G. Carullo et al., Black hole spectroscopy: From theory to experiment, arXiv:2505.23895.
- R. Penrose, “Golden Oldie”: Gravitational collapse: The role of general relativity, Gen. Relativ. Gravit. 34, 1141 (2002).
- S. Klainerman, Mathematical challenges of general relativity, in The Ninth Marcel Grossmann Meeting, edited by V. G. Gurzadyan, R. T. Jantzen, and R. Ruffini (2002), pp. 28–43.
- P. T. Chruściel, J. Lopes Costa, and M. Heusler, Stationary black holes: Uniqueness and beyond, Living Rev. Relativity 15, 7 (2012).
- G. W. Gibbons, Vacuum polarization and the spontaneous loss of charge by black holes, Commun. Math. Phys. 44, 245 (1975).
- R. D. Blandford and R. L. Znajek, Electromagnetic extractions of energy from Kerr black holes, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 179, 433 (1977).
- R. S. Hanni, Limits on the charge of a collapsed object, Phys. Rev. D 25, 2509 (1982).
- G. Carullo, D. Laghi, N. K. Johnson-McDaniel, W. Del Pozzo, O. J. C. Dias, M. Godazgar, and J. E. Santos, Constraints on Kerr-Newman black holes from merger-ringdown gravitational-wave observations, Phys. Rev. D 105, 062009 (2022).
- G. Carullo, W. Del Pozzo, and J. Veitch, Observational black hole spectroscopy: A time-domain multimode analysis of GW150914, Phys. Rev. D 99, 123029 (2019); 100, 089903(E) (2019).
- M. Isi, M. Giesler, W. M. Farr, M. A. Scheel, and S. A. Teukolsky, Testing the no-hair theorem with GW150914, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 111102 (2019).
- C. D. Capano, M. Cabero, J. Westerweck, J. Abedi, S. Kastha, A. H. Nitz, A. B. Nielsen, and B. Krishnan, Observation of a multimode quasi-normal spectrum from a perturbed black hole, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 221402 (2023).
- R. Cotesta, G. Carullo, E. Berti, and V. Cardoso, Analysis of ringdown overtones in GW150914, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 111102 (2022).
- H. Siegel, M. Isi, and W. M. Farr, Ringdown of GW190521: Hints of multiple quasinormal modes with a precessional interpretation, Phys. Rev. D 108, 064008 (2023).
- V. Gennari, G. Carullo, and W. Del Pozzo, Searching for ringdown higher modes with a numerical relativity-informed post-merger model, Eur. Phys. J. C 84, 233 (2024).
- V. Varma, S. E. Field, M. A. Scheel, J. Blackman, D. Gerosa, L. C. Stein, L. E. Kidder, and H. P. Pfeiffer, Surrogate models for precessing binary black hole simulations with unequal masses, Phys. Rev. Res. 1, 033015 (2019).
- A. Gamboa et al., Accurate waveforms for eccentric, aligned-spin binary black holes: The multipolar effective-one-body model seobnrv5ehm, Phys. Rev. D 112, 044038 (2025).
- A. Nagar, R. Gamba, P. Rettegno, V. Fantini, and S. Bernuzzi, Effective-one-body waveform model for noncircularized, planar, coalescing black hole binaries: The importance of radiation reaction, Phys. Rev. D 110, 084001 (2024).
- E. W. Leaver, Spectral decomposition of the perturbation response of the Schwarzschild geometry, Phys. Rev. D 34, 384 (1986).
- N. Andersson, Evolving test fields in a black hole geometry, Phys. Rev. D 55, 468 (1997).
- H. Zhu et al., Imprints of changing mass and spin on black hole ringdown, Phys. Rev. D 110, 124028 (2024).
- A. Chavda, M. Lagos, and L. Hui, The impact of initial conditions on quasi-normal modes, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 07 (2025) 084.
- M. De Amicis, E. Cannizzaro, G. Carullo, and L. Sberna, Dynamical quasinormal mode excitation, arXiv:2506.21668.
- L. London, D. Shoemaker, and J. Healy, Modeling ringdown: Beyond the fundamental quasinormal modes, Phys. Rev. D 90, 124032 (2014); 94, 069902(E) (2016).
- K. Mitman et al., Nonlinearities in black hole ringdowns, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 081402 (2023).
- M. H.-Y. Cheung et al., Nonlinear effects in black hole ringdown, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 081401 (2023).
- S. Ma and H. Yang, Excitation of quadratic quasinormal modes for Kerr black holes, Phys. Rev. D 109, 104070 (2024).
- A. Buonanno, G. B. Cook, and F. Pretorius, Inspiral, merger and ring-down of equal-mass black-hole binaries, Phys. Rev. D 75, 124018 (2007).
- E. Berti, V. Cardoso, J. A. Gonzalez, U. Sperhake, M. Hannam, S. Husa, and B. Brügmann, Inspiral, merger and ringdown of unequal mass black hole binaries: A multipolar analysis, Phys. Rev. D 76, 064034 (2007).
- E. S. C. Ching, P. T. Leung, W. M. Suen, and K. Young, Wave propagation in gravitational systems: Late time behavior, Phys. Rev. D 52, 2118 (1995).
- S. Ma, M. A. Scheel, J. Moxon, K. C. Nelli, N. Deppe, L. E. Kidder, W. Throwe, and N. L. Vu, Merging black holes with Cauchy-characteristic matching: Computation of late-time tails, Phys. Rev. D 112, 024003 (2025).
- M. De Amicis, S. Albanesi, and G. Carullo, Inspiral-inherited ringdown tails, Phys. Rev. D 110, 104005 (2024).
- M. De Amicis et al., Late-time tails in nonlinear evolutions of merging black holes, Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 171401 (2025).
- I. Kamaretsos, M. Hannam, and B. Sathyaprakash, Is black-hole ringdown a memory of its progenitor?, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 141102 (2012).
- L. T. London, Modeling ringdown. II. Aligned-spin binary black holes, implications for data analysis and fundamental theory, Phys. Rev. D 102, 084052 (2020).
- X. Jiménez Forteza, S. Bhagwat, P. Pani, and V. Ferrari, Spectroscopy of binary black hole ringdown using overtones and angular modes, Phys. Rev. D 102, 044053 (2020).
- M. H.-Y. Cheung, E. Berti, V. Baibhav, and R. Cotesta, Extracting linear and nonlinear quasinormal modes from black hole merger simulations, Phys. Rev. D 109, 044069 (2024); 110, 049902(E) (2024).
- L. Magaña Zertuche et al., High-precision ringdown surrogate model for non-precessing binary black holes, Phys. Rev. D 112, 024077 (2025).
- F. Nobili, S. Bhagwat, C. Pacilio, and D. Gerosa, Ringdown mode amplitudes of precessing binary black holes, Phys. Rev. D 112, 044058 (2025).
- M. Isi and W. M. Farr, Analyzing black-hole ringdowns, arXiv:2107.05609.
- A. Dhani, Importance of mirror modes in binary black hole ringdown waveform, Phys. Rev. D 103, 104048 (2021).
- X. Li, L. Sun, R. K. L. Lo, E. Payne, and Y. Chen, Angular emission patterns of remnant black holes, Phys. Rev. D 105, 024016 (2022).
- G. Carullo, W. Del Pozzo, and J. Veitch, pyring: A time-domain ringdown analysis python package, https://git.ligo.org/lscsoft/pyring (2023).
- G. Carullo et al., Empirical tests of the black hole no-hair conjecture using gravitational-wave observations, Phys. Rev. D 98, 104020 (2018).
- See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/6c61-fm1n for additional details regarding the assumptions and analyses that have been presented.
- M. Giesler et al., Overtones and nonlinearities in binary black hole ringdowns, Phys. Rev. D 111, 084041 (2025).
- M. Isi, K. Chatziioannou, and W. M. Farr, Hierarchical test of general relativity with gravitational waves, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 121101 (2019).
- S. Ma, K. Mitman, L. Sun, N. Deppe, F. Hébert, L. E. Kidder, J. Moxon, W. Throwe, N. L. Vu, and Y. Chen, Quasinormal-mode filters: A new approach to analyze the gravitational-wave ringdown of binary black-hole mergers, Phys. Rev. D 106, 084036 (2022).
- S. Ma, L. Sun, and Y. Chen, Black hole spectroscopy by mode cleaning, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 141401 (2023).
- S. Ma, L. Sun, and Y. Chen, Using rational filters to uncover the first ringdown overtone in GW150914, Phys. Rev. D 107, 084010 (2023).
- N. Lu, S. Ma, O. J. Piccinni, L. Sun, and E. Finch, Statistical identification of ringdown modes with rational filters, Phys. Rev. D 112, 064047 (2025).
- R. Brito, A. Buonanno, and V. Raymond, Black-hole spectroscopy by making full use of gravitational-wave modeling, Phys. Rev. D 98, 084038 (2018).
- L. Pompili, E. Maggio, H. O. Silva, and A. Buonanno, Parametrized spin-precessing inspiral-merger-ringdown waveform model for tests of general relativity, Phys. Rev. D 111, 124040 (2025).
- E. Maggio, H. O. Silva, A. Buonanno, and A. Ghosh, Tests of general relativity in the nonlinear regime: A parametrized plunge-merger-ringdown gravitational waveform model, Phys. Rev. D 108, 024043 (2023).
- A. Ghosh, R. Brito, and A. Buonanno, Constraints on quasinormal-mode frequencies with LIGO-Virgo binary–black-hole observations, Phys. Rev. D 103, 124041 (2021).
- A. Ramos-Buades, A. Buonanno, H. Estellés, M. Khalil, D. P. Mihaylov, S. Ossokine, L. Pompili, and M. Shiferaw, Next generation of accurate and efficient multipolar precessing-spin effective-one-body waveforms for binary black holes, Phys. Rev. D 108, 124037 (2023).
- L. Pompili et al., Laying the foundation of the effective-one-body waveform models seobnrv5: Improved accuracy and efficiency for spinning nonprecessing binary black holes, Phys. Rev. D 108, 124035 (2023).
- X. Jiménez-Forteza, D. Keitel, S. Husa, M. Hannam, S. Khan, and M. Pürrer, Hierarchical data-driven approach to fitting numerical relativity data for nonprecessing binary black holes with an application to final spin and radiated energy, Phys. Rev. D 95, 064024 (2017).
- F. Hofmann, E. Barausse, and L. Rezzolla, The final spin from binary black holes in quasi-circular orbits, Astrophys. J. Lett. 825, L19 (2016).
- J. G. Baker, W. D. Boggs, J. Centrella, B. J. Kelly, S. T. McWilliams, and J. R. van Meter, Mergers of non-spinning black-hole binaries: Gravitational radiation characteristics, Phys. Rev. D 78, 044046 (2008).
- T. Damour and A. Nagar, A new analytic representation of the ringdown waveform of coalescing spinning black hole binaries, Phys. Rev. D 90, 024054 (2014).
- L. Blanchet, Post-Newtonian theory for gravitational waves, Living Rev. Relativity 27, 4 (2024).
- R. Cotesta, A. Buonanno, A. Bohé, A. Taracchini, I. Hinder, and S. Ossokine, Enriching the symphony of gravitational waves from binary black holes by tuning higher harmonics, Phys. Rev. D 98, 084028 (2018).
- C. Mills and S. Fairhurst, Measuring gravitational-wave higher-order multipoles, Phys. Rev. D 103, 024042 (2021).
- H. Zhong, M. Isi, K. Chatziioannou, and W. M. Farr, Multidimensional hierarchical tests of general relativity with gravitational waves, Phys. Rev. D 110, 044053 (2024).
- A. G. Abac et al., GWTC-4.0: Tests of general relativity, arXiv:2509.0000.
- E. Payne, M. Isi, K. Chatziioannou, and W. M. Farr, Fortifying gravitational-wave tests of general relativity against astrophysical assumptions, Phys. Rev. D 108, 124060 (2023).
- C. Pacilio, D. Gerosa, and S. Bhagwat, Catalog variance of testing general relativity with gravitational-wave data, Phys. Rev. D 109, L081302 (2024).
- W. Del Pozzo and A. Nagar, Analytic family of post-merger template waveforms, Phys. Rev. D 95, 124034 (2017).
- A. Nagar, G. Riemenschneider, G. Pratten, P. Rettegno, and F. Messina, Multipolar effective one body waveform model for spin-aligned black hole binaries, Phys. Rev. D 102, 024077 (2020).
- N. Yunes, K. Yagi, and F. Pretorius, Theoretical physics implications of the binary black-hole mergers GW150914 and GW151226, Phys. Rev. D 94, 084002 (2016).
- A. Maselli, P. Pani, L. Gualtieri, and E. Berti, Parametrized ringdown spin expansion coefficients: A data-analysis framework for black-hole spectroscopy with multiple events, Phys. Rev. D 101, 024043 (2020).
- H. O. Silva, A. Ghosh, and A. Buonanno, Black-hole ringdown as a probe of higher-curvature gravity theories, Phys. Rev. D 107, 044030 (2023).
- E. M. Sänger et al., Tests of general relativity with GW230529: A neutron star merging with a lower mass-gap compact object, arXiv:2406.03568.
- A. K.-W. Chung and N. Yunes, Probing quadratic gravity with black-hole ringdown gravitational waves measured by LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA detectors, arXiv:2506.14695.
- V. Cardoso, S. Hopper, C. F. B. Macedo, C. Palenzuela, and P. Pani, Gravitational-wave signatures of exotic compact objects and of quantum corrections at the horizon scale, Phys. Rev. D 94, 084031 (2016).
- E. Maggio, L. Buoninfante, A. Mazumdar, and P. Pani, How does a dark compact object ringdown?, Phys. Rev. D 102, 064053 (2020).
- S. Alexander and N. Yunes, Chern-Simons modified general relativity, Phys. Rep. 480, 1 (2009).
- A. K.-W. Chung, K. K.-H. Lam, and N. Yunes, Quasinormal mode frequencies and gravitational perturbations of spinning black holes in modified gravity through METRICS: The dynamical Chern-Simons gravity case, Phys. Rev. D 111, 124052 (2025).
- L. Blanchet, Gravitational radiation from post-Newtonian sources and inspiralling compact binaries, Living Rev. Relativity 17, 2 (2014).
- L. Blanchet and B. S. Sathyaprakash, Detecting the tail effect in gravitational wave experiments, Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 1067 (1995).
- L. Blanchet and B. S. Sathyaprakash, Signal analysis of gravitational wave tails, Classical Quantum Gravity 11, 2807 (1994).
- K. G. Arun, B. R. Iyer, M. S. S. Qusailah, and B. S. Sathyaprakash, Probing the non-linear structure of general relativity with black hole binaries, Phys. Rev. D 74, 024006 (2006).
- N. Yunes and F. Pretorius, Fundamental theoretical bias in gravitational wave astrophysics and the parameterized post-Einsteinian framework, Phys. Rev. D 80, 122003 (2009).
- C. K. Mishra, K. G. Arun, B. R. Iyer, and B. S. Sathyaprakash, Parametrized tests of post-Newtonian theory using Advanced LIGO and Einstein Telescope, Phys. Rev. D 82, 064010 (2010).
- T. G. F. Li, W. Del Pozzo, S. Vitale, C. Van Den Broeck, M. Agathos, J. Veitch, K. Grover, T. Sidery, R. Sturani, and A. Vecchio, Towards a generic test of the strong field dynamics of general relativity using compact binary coalescence, Phys. Rev. D 85, 082003 (2012).
- M. Agathos, W. Del Pozzo, T. G. F. Li, C. Van Den Broeck, J. Veitch, and S. Vitale, TIGER: A data analysis pipeline for testing the strong-field dynamics of general relativity with gravitational wave signals from coalescing compact binaries, Phys. Rev. D 89, 082001 (2014).
- A. K. Mehta, A. Buonanno, R. Cotesta, A. Ghosh, N. Sennett, and J. Steinhoff, Tests of general relativity with gravitational-wave observations using a flexible theory-independent method, Phys. Rev. D 107, 044020 (2023).
- M. Agathos, W. Del Pozzo, T. G. F. Li, C. Van Den Broeck, J. Veitch, and S. Vitale, TIGER: A data analysis pipeline for testing the strong-field dynamics of general relativity with gravitational wave signals from coalescing compact binaries, Phys. Rev. D 89, 082001 (2014).
- J. Meidam et al., Parametrized tests of the strong-field dynamics of general relativity using gravitational wave signals from coalescing binary black holes: Fast likelihood calculations and sensitivity of the method, Phys. Rev. D 97, 044033 (2018).
- S. Roy, M. Haney, G. Pratten, P. T. H. Pang, and C. Van Den Broeck, An improved parametrized test of general relativity using the imrphenomx waveform family: Including higher harmonics and precession, arXiv:2504.21147.
- G. Pratten et al., Computationally efficient models for the dominant and subdominant harmonic modes of precessing binary black holes, Phys. Rev. D 103, 104056 (2021).
- M. Colleoni, F. A. R. Vidal, C. García-Quirós, S. Akçay, and S. Bera, Fast frequency-domain gravitational waveforms for precessing binaries with a new twist, Phys. Rev. D 111, 104019 (2025).
- A. Pai and K. G. Arun, Singular value decomposition in parametrised tests of post-Newtonian theory, Classical Quantum Gravity 30, 025011 (2013).
- A. A. Shoom, P. K. Gupta, B. Krishnan, A. B. Nielsen, and C. D. Capano, Testing the post-Newtonian expansion with GW170817, Gen. Relativ. Gravit. 55, 55 (2023).
- M. Saleem, S. Datta, K. G. Arun, and B. S. Sathyaprakash, Parametrized tests of post-Newtonian theory using principal component analysis, Phys. Rev. D 105, 084062 (2022).
- P. Mahapatra et al., Confronting general relativity with principal component analysis: Simulations and results from GWTC-3 events, Phys. Rev. D 112, 104007 (2025).
- S. A. Hughes and K. Menou, Golden binaries for LISA: Robust probes of strong-field gravity, Astrophys. J. 623, 689 (2005).
- A. Ghosh et al., Testing general relativity using golden black-hole binaries, Phys. Rev. D 94, 021101(R) (2016).
- A. Ghosh, N. K. Johnson-McDaniel, A. Ghosh, C. K. Mishra, P. Ajith, W. Del Pozzo, C. P. L. Berry, A. B. Nielsen, and L. London, Testing general relativity using gravitational wave signals from the inspiral, merger and ringdown of binary black holes, Classical Quantum Gravity 35, 014002 (2018).
- J. M. Bardeen, W. H. Press, and S. A. Teukolsky, Rotating black holes: Locally nonrotating frames, energy extraction, and scalar synchrotron radiation, Astrophys. J. 178, 347 (1972).
- J. Healy and C. O. Lousto, Remnant of binary black-hole mergers: New simulations and peak luminosity studies, Phys. Rev. D 95, 024037 (2017).
- X. Jiménez-Forteza, D. Keitel, S. Husa, M. Hannam, S. Khan, and M. Pürrer, Hierarchical data-driven approach to fitting numerical relativity data for nonprecessing binary black holes with an application to final spin and radiated energy, Phys. Rev. D 95, 064024 (2017).
- S. W. Hawking, Gravitational radiation from colliding black holes, Phys. Rev. Lett. 26, 1344 (1971).
- N. Cornish, L. Sampson, N. Yunes, and F. Pretorius, Gravitational wave tests of general relativity with the parameterized post-Einsteinian framework, Phys. Rev. D 84, 062003 (2011).
- M. Vallisneri, Testing general relativity with gravitational waves: A reality check, Phys. Rev. D 86, 082001 (2012).
- W. Jia et al. (Members of the LIGO Scientific Collaboration), Squeezing the quantum noise of a gravitational-wave detector below the standard quantum limit, Science 385, 1318 (2024).
- D. Ganapathy, V. Xu, W. Jia, C. Whittle, M. Tse, L. Barsotti, M. Evans, and L. McCuller, Probing squeezing for gravitational-wave detectors with an audio-band field, Phys. Rev. D 105, 122005 (2022).
- E. Capote et al., Advanced LIGO detector performance in the fourth observing run, Phys. Rev. D 111, 062002 (2025).
- LIGO Scientific, Virgo, and KAGRA Collaborations, GWTC-4.0: Population properties of merging compact binaries, arXiv:2508.18083.
- B. P. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific and Virgo Collaborations), Observation of gravitational waves from a binary black hole merger, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 061102 (2016).
- B. P. Abbott et al. (KAGRA, LIGO Scientific, and Virgo Collaborations), Prospects for observing and localizing gravitational-wave transients with Advanced LIGO, Advanced Virgo and KAGRA, Living Rev. Relativity 23, 3 (2020).
- LIGO Scientific, Virgo, and KAGRA Collaborations, GW250114 GWOSC page (2025), https://gwosc.org/eventapi/html/O4_Discovery_Papers/GW250114_082203/v1/.
- LIGO Scientific, Virgo, and KAGRA Collaborations, Black hole spectroscopy and tests of general relativity with GW250114: Data release (2025), https://zenodo.org/records/17018009.
- R. Kumar, C. Carroll, A. Hartikainen, and O. Martin, arviz a unified library for exploratory analysis of Bayesian models in python, J. Open Source Software 4, 1143 (2019).
- D. Williams, J. Veitch, M. L. Chiofalo, P. Schmidt, R. P. Udall, A. Vajpeji, and C. Hoy, asimov: A framework for coordinating parameter estimation workflows, J. Open Source Software 8, 4170 (2023).
- T. P. Robitaille et al. (Astropy Collaboration), astropy: A community python package for astronomy, Astron. Astrophys. 558, A33 (2013).
- A. M. Price-Whelan et al. (Astropy Collaboration), The astropy project: Building an open-science project and status of the v2.0 core package, Astron. J. 156, 123 (2018).
- A. M. Price-Whelan et al. (Astropy Collaboration), The astropy project: Sustaining and growing a community-oriented open-source project and the latest major release (v5.0) of the core package, Astrophys. J. 935, 167 (2022).
- N. J. Cornish, T. B. Littenberg, B. Bécsy, K. Chatziioannou, J. A. Clark, S. Ghonge, and M. Millhouse, bayeswave analysis pipeline in the era of gravitational wave observations, Phys. Rev. D 103, 044006 (2021).
- G. Ashton et al., bilby: A user-friendly Bayesian inference library for gravitational-wave astronomy, Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 241, 27 (2019).
- I. M. Romero-Shaw et al., Bayesian inference for compact binary coalescences with bilby: Validation and application to the first LIGO–Virgo gravitational-wave transient catalogue, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 499, 3295 (2020).
- G. Ashton, C. Talbot, S. Roy, G. Pratten, T.-H. Pang, M. Agathos, T. Baka, E. Sänger, A. Mehta, J. Steinhoff, E. Maggio, A. Ghosh, A. Vijaykumar, R. Enficiaud, and L. Pompili, bilby_tgr (2025), https://zenodo.org/records/15676285.
- W. Del Pozzo and J. Veitch, cpnest: An efficient python parallelizable nested sampling algorithm, https://github.com/johnveitch/cpnest (2025).
- J. S. Speagle, dynesty: A dynamic nested sampling package for estimating Bayesian posteriors and evidences, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 493, 3132 (2020).
- D. M. Macleod, J. S. Areeda, S. B. Coughlin, T. J. Massinger, and A. L. Urban, gwpy: A python package for gravitational-wave astrophysics, SoftwareX 13, 100657 (2021).
- D. Macleod, S. Coughlin, A. Southgate, D. Davis, M. Pitkin, J. Areeda, R. N. George, P. Altin, P. Godwin, L. Singer et al., gwpy/gwpy: gwpy 3.0.9 (2024), https://zenodo.org/records/12734623.
- A. Collette, python and hdf5 (O’Reilly, 2013), https://www.oreilly.com/library/view/python-and-hdf5/9781491944981/.
- F. Perez and B. E. Granger, ipython: A system for interactive scientific computing, Comput. Sci. Eng. 9, 21 (2007).
- T. Kluyver et al. (Jupyter Development Team), jupyter notebooks—A Publishing Format for Reproducible Computational Workflows (IOS Press, 2016), pp. 87–90, https://ebooks.iospress.nl/publication/42900.
- M. Beg, J. Taka, T. Kluyver, A. Konovalov, M. Ragan-Kelley, N. M. Thiéry, and H. Fangohr, Using jupyter for reproducible scientific workflows, Comput. Sci. Eng. 23, 36 (2021).
- LIGO Scientific, Virgo, and KAGRA Collaborations, LVK Algorithm Library—lalsuite, Free software (GPL) (2018), https://git.ligo.org/lscsoft/lalsuite.
- K. Wette, swiglal: python and octave interfaces to the lalsuite gravitational-wave data analysis libraries, SoftwareX 12, 100634 (2020).
- T. A. Caswell, E. S. de Andrade, A. Lee, M. Droettboom, T. Hoffmann, J. Klymak, J. Hunter, E. Firing, D. Stansby, N. Varoquaux et al., matplotlib/matplotlib: Rel: v3.7.3 (2023), https://zenodo.org/records/8336761.
- J. D. Hunter, matplotlib: A 2d graphics environment, Comput. Sci. Eng. 9, 90 (2007).
- C. R. Harris, K. J. Millman, S. J. van der Walt, R. Gommers, P. Virtanen, D. Cournapeau, E. Wieser, J. Taylor, S. Berg, N. J. Smith et al., Array programming with numpy, Nature (London) 585, 357 (2020).
- W. McKinney, Data structures for statistical computing in python, in Proceedings of the 9th python in Science Conference, edited by Stéfan van der Walt and Jarrod Millman (2010), pp. 56–61.
- The Pandas Development Team, pandas-dev/pandas: pandas (2024), https://zenodo.org/records/13819579.
- C. Hoy and V. Raymond, pesummary: The code agnostic parameter estimation summary page builder, SoftwareX 15, 100765 (2021).
- D. P. Mihaylov, S. Ossokine, A. Buonanno, H. Estelles, L. Pompili, M. Pürrer, and A. Ramos-Buades, pyseobnr: A software package for the next generation of effective-one-body multipolar waveform models, SoftwareX 30, 102080 (2025).
- G. Van Rossum and F. L. Drake, python 3 Reference Manual (CreateSpace, Scotts Valley, CA, 2009).
- L. C. Stein, qnm: A python package for calculating Kerr quasinormal modes, separation constants, and spherical-spheroidal mixing coefficients, J. Open Source Software 4, 1683 (2019).
- M. Isi and W. M. Farr, ringdown package, https://ringdown.readthedocs.io/en/latest/ (2024).
- P. Virtanen et al. (SciPy 1.0 Contributors), scipy 1.0: Fundamental algorithms for scientific computing in python, Nat. Methods 17, 261 (2020).
- R. Gommers, P. Virtanen, M. Haberland, E. Burovski, W. Weckesser, T. Reddy, T. E. Oliphant, D. Cournapeau, A. Nelson et al., scipy/scipy: scipy 1.12.0 (2024), https://zenodo.org/records/10543017.
- M. L. Waskom, seaborn: Statistical data visualization, J. Open Source Software 6, 3021 (2021).
- M. Khalil, A. Buonanno, H. Estelles, D. P. Mihaylov, S. Ossokine, L. Pompili, and A. Ramos-Buades, Theoretical groundwork supporting the precessing-spin two-body dynamics of the effective-one-body waveform models seobnrv5, Phys. Rev. D 108, 124036 (2023).
- M. van de Meent, A. Buonanno, D. P. Mihaylov, S. Ossokine, L. Pompili, N. Warburton, A. Pound, B. Wardell, L. Durkan, and J. Miller, Enhancing the seobnrv5 effective-one-body waveform model with second-order gravitational self-force fluxes, Phys. Rev. D 108, 124038 (2023).
- M. Boyle, K. Mitman, M. Scheel, and L. Stein, The sxs package (2025), https://zenodo.org/records/16277847.
- C. da Costa-Luis, S. K. Larroque, K. Altendorf, H. Mary, R. Sheridan, M. Korobov, N. Yorav-Raphael, I. Ivanov, M. Bargull, N. Rodrigues et al., tqdm: A fast, extensible progress bar for python and cli (2024), https://zenodo.org/records/14002015.
- C. Talbot et al., Inference with finite time series II: The window strikes back, arXiv:2508.11091.
- A. G. Abac et al. (LIGO Scientific, Virgo, and KAGRA Collaborations), GWTC-4.0: Methods for identifying and characterizing gravitational-wave transients, arXiv:2508.18081.