Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Editors' Suggestion
  • Open Access

Crossed Surface Flat Bands in Three-Dimensional Superconducting Altermagnets

Yuri Fukaya1, Bo Lu2, Keiji Yada3, Yukio Tanaka3, and Jorge Cayao4

  • 1Faculty of Environmental Life, Natural Science and Technology, Okayama University, 700-8530 Okayama, Japan
  • 2Center for Joint Quantum Studies, Tianjin Key Laboratory of Low Dimensional Materials Physics and Preparing Technology, Department of Physics, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300354, China
  • 3Department of Applied Physics, Nagoya University, 464-8603 Nagoya, Japan
  • 4Department of Physics and Astronomy, Uppsala University, Box 516, S-751 20 Uppsala, Sweden

Phys. Rev. Lett. 136, 226001 – Published 4 June, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/65q6-5wxl

Abstract

Superconducting altermagnets have proven to be a promising ground for emergent phenomena, but their study has involved two-dimensional systems. In this work, we investigate three-dimensional d- and g-wave altermagnets with spin-singlet chiral d-wave superconductivity and show the formation of crossed surface flat bands due to the interplay between superconducting and altermagnetic symmetries. We find that these crossed flat bands are topologically protected, appear at zero energy in the surface along z due to the superconducting nodal lines in the xy plane, and their number of corners is determined by the crystal symmetry of altermagnets. We also show that the superconducting nodal lines give rise to Bogoliubov-Fermi surfaces, which then affect the appearance of zero-energy arcs in the surface along x. Moreover, we demonstrate that the crossed flat bands or surface arcs, and Bogoliubov-Fermi surfaces give rise to the coexistence of three distinct dependences of the charge conductance on the normal transparency, hence offering a solid way for their detection and paving the way for realizing higher-dimensional topological phases using altermagnets.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (116)

  1. L. Bai, W. Feng, S. Liu, L. Šmejkal, Y. Mokrousov, and Y. Yao, Altermagnetism: Exploring new frontiers in magnetism and spintronics, Adv. Funct. Mater. 34, 2409327 (2024).
  2. I. Mazin, Editorial: Altermagnetism—a new punch line of fundamental magnetism, Phys. Rev. X 12, 040002 (2022).
  3. C. Song, H. Bai, Z. Zhou, L. Han, H. Reichlova, J. H. Dil, J. Liu, X. Chen, and F. Pan, Altermagnets as a new class of functional materials, Nat. Rev. Mater. 10, 473 (2025).
  4. Y. Fukaya, B. Lu, K. Yada, Y. Tanaka, and J. Cayao, Superconducting phenomena in systems with unconventional magnets, J. Phys. Condens. Matter 37, 313003 (2025).
  5. Y. Noda, K. Ohno, and S. Nakamura, Momentum-dependent band spin splitting in semiconducting MnO2: A density functional calculation, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 18, 13294 (2016).
  6. M. Naka, S. Hayami, H. Kusunose, Y. Yanagi, Y. Motome, and H. Seo, Spin current generation in organic antiferromagnets, Nat. Commun. 10, 4305 (2019).
  7. S. Hayami, Y. Yanagi, and H. Kusunose, Momentum-dependent spin splitting by collinear antiferromagnetic ordering, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 88, 123702 (2019).
  8. K.-H. Ahn, A. Hariki, K.-W. Lee, and J. Kuneš, Antiferromagnetism in RuO2 as d-wave Pomeranchuk instability, Phys. Rev. B 99, 184432 (2019).
  9. L.-D. Yuan, Z. Wang, J.-W. Luo, E. I. Rashba, and A. Zunger, Giant momentum-dependent spin splitting in centrosymmetric low-z antiferromagnets, Phys. Rev. B 102, 014422 (2020).
  10. L. Šmejkal, R. González-Hernández, T. Jungwirth, and J. Sinova, Crystal time-reversal symmetry breaking and spontaneous Hall effect in collinear antiferromagnets, Sci. Adv. 6, eaaz8809 (2020).
  11. M. Naka, S. Hayami, H. Kusunose, Y. Yanagi, Y. Motome, and H. Seo, Anomalous Hall effect in κ-type organic antiferromagnets, Phys. Rev. B 102, 075112 (2020).
  12. L.-D. Yuan, Z. Wang, J.-W. Luo, and A. Zunger, Prediction of low-z collinear and noncollinear antiferromagnetic compounds having momentum-dependent spin splitting even without spin-orbit coupling, Phys. Rev. Mater. 5, 014409 (2021).
  13. L. Šmejkal, J. Sinova, and T. Jungwirth, Beyond conventional ferromagnetism and antiferromagnetism: A phase with nonrelativistic spin and crystal rotation symmetry, Phys. Rev. X 12, 031042 (2022).
  14. L. Šmejkal, J. Sinova, and T. Jungwirth, Emerging research landscape of altermagnetism, Phys. Rev. X 12, 040501 (2022).
  15. Z. Liu, H. Hu, and X.-J. Liu, Altermagnetism and superconductivity: A short historical review, arXiv:2510.09170.
  16. S.-B. Zhang, L.-H. Hu, and T. Neupert, Finite-momentum Cooper pairing in proximitized altermagnets, Nat. Commun. 15, 1801 (2024).
  17. J. A. Ouassou, A. Brataas, and J. Linder, dc Josephson effect in altermagnets, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 076003 (2023).
  18. C. W. J. Beenakker and T. Vakhtel, Phase-shifted Andreev levels in an altermagnet Josephson junction, Phys. Rev. B 108, 075425 (2023).
  19. B. Lu, K. Maeda, H. Ito, K. Yada, and Y. Tanaka, φ Josephson junction induced by altermagnetism, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 226002 (2024).
  20. H.-P. Sun, S.-B. Zhang, C.-A. Li, and B. Trauzettel, Tunable second harmonic in altermagnetic Josephson junctions, Phys. Rev. B 111, 165406 (2025).
  21. Q. Cheng and Q.-F. Sun, Orientation-dependent Josephson effect in spin-singlet superconductor/altermagnet/spin-triplet superconductor junctions, Phys. Rev. B 109, 024517 (2024).
  22. Y. Fukaya, K. Maeda, K. Yada, J. Cayao, Y. Tanaka, and B. Lu, Josephson effect and odd-frequency pairing in superconducting junctions with unconventional magnets, Phys. Rev. B 111, 064502 (2025).
  23. C. Sun, A. Brataas, and J. Linder, Andreev reflection in altermagnets, Phys. Rev. B 108, 054511 (2019).
  24. M. Papaj, Andreev reflection at the altermagnet-superconductor interface, Phys. Rev. B 108, L060508 (2023).
  25. S. A. A. Ghorashi, T. L. Hughes, and J. Cano, Altermagnetic routes to Majorana modes in zero net magnetization, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 106601 (2024).
  26. D. Zhu, Z.-Y. Zhuang, Z. Wu, and Z. Yan, Topological superconductivity in two-dimensional altermagnetic metals, Phys. Rev. B 108, 184505 (2023).
  27. Y.-X. Li and C.-C. Liu, Majorana corner modes and tunable patterns in an altermagnet heterostructure, Phys. Rev. B 108, 205410 (2023).
  28. Y.-X. Li, Y. Liu, and C.-C. Liu, Creation and manipulation of higher-order topological states by altermagnets, Phys. Rev. B 109, L201109 (2024).
  29. D. Mondal, A. Pal, A. Saha, and T. Nag, Distinguishing between topological Majorana and trivial zero modes via transport and shot noise study in an altermagnet heterostructure, Phys. Rev. B 111, L121401 (2025).
  30. A. Hadjipaschalis, S. A. A. Ghorashi, and J. Cano, Majoranas with a twist: Tunable Majorana zero modes in altermagnetic heterostructures, Phys. Rev. B 112, 214430 (2025).
  31. T. Hodge, E. Mascot, and S. Rachel, Altermagnet-superconductor heterostructure: A scalable platform for braiding of Majorana modes, arXiv:2506.08095.
  32. G. McArdle, B. Kiraly, P. Wadley, and A. Gammon-Smith, Topological superconductivity in altermagnetic heterostructures on a honeycomb lattice, arXiv:2601.05662.
  33. P. Sharma and N. Mohanta, Double-peak Majorana bound states in altermagnet–superconductor heterostructures, arXiv:2603.25844.
  34. X. Wan, Z. Qin, F. Zhan, J. Zeng, D.-H. Xu, and R. Wang, Chiral superconductivity in periodically driven altermagnet/superconductor heterostructures, arXiv:2604.01596.
  35. K. Maeda, Y. Fukaya, K. Yada, B. Lu, Y. Tanaka, and J. Cayao, Classification of pair symmetries in superconductors with unconventional magnetism, Phys. Rev. B 111, 144508 (2025).
  36. D. Chakraborty and A. M. Black-Schaffer, Constraints on superconducting pairing in altermagnets, Phys. Rev. B 112, 014516 (2025).
  37. M. Khodas, S. Mu, I. I. Mazin, and K. D. Belashchenko, Tuning of altermagnetism by strain, Phys. Rev. B 113, 104422 (2026).
  38. X. Feng and Z. Zhang, Superconducting order parameters in spin space groups: Methodology and application, Phys. Rev. B 111, 054520 (2025).
  39. K. Parshukov and A. P. Schnyder, Exotic superconducting states in altermagnets, arXiv:2507.10700.
  40. I. I. Mazin, Notes on altermagnetism and superconductivity, AAPPS Bull. 35, 18 (2025).
  41. P.-H. Fu, S. Mondal, J.-F. Liu, and J. Cayao, Light-induced Floquet spin-triplet Cooper pairs in unconventional magnets, SciPost Phys. 20, 059 (2026).
  42. P.-H. Fu, S. Mondal, J.-F. Liu, Y. Tanaka, and J. Cayao, Floquet engineering spin triplet states in unconventional magnets, Phys. Rev. Lett. 136, 066703 (2026).
  43. T. Yokoyama, Floquet engineering triplet superconductivity in superconductors with spin-orbit coupling or altermagnetism, Phys. Rev. B 112, 024512 (2025).
  44. K. Mukasa and Y. Masaki, Finite-momentum superconductivity in two-dimensional altermagnets with a Rashba-type spin–orbit coupling, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 94, 064705 (2025).
  45. N. Heinsdorf and M. Franz, Proximitizing altermagnets with conventional superconductors, arXiv:2509.03774.
  46. K. Monkman, J. Weng, N. Heinsdorf, A. Nocera, and M. Franz, Persistent spin currents in superconducting altermagnets, arXiv:2507.22139.
  47. J. Chang, H. Lu, J. Zhao, H.-G. Luo, and Y. Ding, Energy dispersion, superconductivity, and magnetic fluctuations in stacked altermagnetic materials, Phys. Rev. B 111, 104432 (2025).
  48. S. Banerjee and M. S. Scheurer, Altermagnetic superconducting diode effect, Phys. Rev. B 110, 024503 (2024).
  49. Q. Cheng, Y. Mao, and Q.-F. Sun, Field-free Josephson diode effect in altermagnet/normal metal/altermagnet junctions, Phys. Rev. B 110, 014518 (2024).
  50. D. Chakraborty and A. M. Black-Schaffer, Perfect superconducting diode effect in altermagnets, Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 026001 (2025).
  51. L. Sharma and M. Thakurathi, Tunable Josephson diode effect in singlet superconductor-altermagnet-triplet superconductor junctions, Phys. Rev. B 112, 104506 (2025).
  52. L. Sharma, B. Ghimire, and M. Thakurathi, p-wave magnet driven field-free josephson diode effect, arXiv:2602.16677.
  53. B. Lu, P. Mercebach, P. Burset, K. Yada, J. Cayao, Y. Tanaka, and Y. Fukaya, Engineering subgap states in superconductors by the symmetry of altermagnetism, Phys. Rev. B 113, L180501 (2026).
  54. Z. Liu, H. Hu, and X. ji Liu, Fulde-Ferrell-Larkin-Ovchinnikov states and topological Bogoliubov Fermi surfaces in altermagnets: An analytical study, Phys. Rev. B 113, 024518 (2026).
  55. S. Kashiwaya and Y. Tanaka, Tunnelling effects on surface bound states in unconventional superconductors, Rep. Prog. Phys. 63, 1641 (2000).
  56. Y. Tanaka, M. Sato, and N. Nagaosa, Symmetry and topology in superconductors–odd-frequency pairing and edge states–, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 81, 011013 (2012).
  57. M. Sato and S. Fujimoto, Majorana fermions and topology in superconductors, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 85, 072001 (2016).
  58. M. Sato and Y. Ando, Topological superconductors: A review, Rep. Prog. Phys. 80, 076501 (2017).
  59. J. Cayao, C. Triola, and A. M. Black-Schaffer, Odd-frequency superconducting pairing in one-dimensional systems, Eur. Phys. J. Special Topics 229, 545 (2020).
  60. Y. Tanaka, S. Tamura, and J. Cayao, Theory of Majorana zero modes in unconventional superconductors, Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2024, 08C105 (2024).
  61. C. Autieri, G. Cuono, D. Chakraborty, P. Gentile, and A. M. Black-Schaffer, Conditions for orbital-selective altermagnetism in sr2ruo4: Tight-binding model, similarities with cuprates, and implications for superconductivity, Phys. Rev. B 112, 014412 (2025).
  62. A. Ramires, From pure to mixed: Altermagnets as intrinsic symmetry-breaking indicators, arXiv:2502.19162.
  63. A. Ramires and M. Sigrist, Superconducting order parameter of Sr2RuO4: A microscopic perspective, Phys. Rev. B 100, 104501 (2019).
  64. H. G. Suh, H. Menke, P. M. R. Brydon, C. Timm, A. Ramires, and D. F. Agterberg, Stabilizing even-parity chiral superconductivity in Sr2RuO4, Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 032023 (2020).
  65. Y. Maeno, A. Ikeda, and G. Mattoni, Thirty years of puzzling superconductivity in Sr2RuO4, Nat. Phys. 20, 1712 (2024).
  66. Y. Maeno, S. Yonezawa, and A. Ramires, Still mystery after all these years-unconventional superconductivity of Sr2RuO4-, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 93, 062001 (2024).
  67. G. Csire, Y. Fukaya, M. Cuoco, Y. Tanaka, R. K. Kremer, A. S. Gibbs, G. A. Ummarino, D. Daghero, and R. S. Gonnelli, Directional Andreev-reflection signatures of inter-orbital pairing in Sr2RuO4, arXiv:2604.06706.
  68. A. Pustogow, Y. Luo, A. Chronister, Y.-S. Su, D. Sokolov, F. Jerzembeck, A. P. Mackenzie, C. W. Hicks, N. Kikugawa, S. Raghu et al., Constraints on the superconducting order parameter in Sr2RuO4 from oxygen-17 nuclear magnetic resonance, Nature (London) 574, 72 (2019).
  69. K. Ishida, M. Manago, K. Kinjo, and Y. Maeno, Reduction of the 17o Knight shift in the superconducting state and the heat-up effect by NMR pulses on Sr2RuO4, J, Phys. Soc. Jpn. 89, 034712 (2020).
  70. C.-R. Hu, Midgap surface states as a novel signature for dxa2−xb2-wave superconductivity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 72, 1526 (1994).
  71. B. Lu, K. Yada, M. Sato, and Y. Tanaka, Crossed surface flat bands of Weyl semimetal superconductors, Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 096804 (2015).
  72. M. Sato, Y. Tanaka, K. Yada, and T. Yokoyama, Topology of Andreev bound states with flat dispersion, Phys. Rev. B 83, 224511 (2011).
  73. P. M. R. Brydon, A. P. Schnyder, and C. Timm, Topologically protected flat zero-energy surface bands in noncentrosymmetric superconductors, Phys. Rev. B 84, 020501(R) (2011).
  74. M. Ezawa, Third-order and fifth-order nonlinear spin-current generation in g-wave and i-wave altermagnets and perfectly nonreciprocal spin current in f-wave magnets, Phys. Rev. B 111, 125420 (2025).
  75. See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/65q6-5wxl for the details, which includes Refs. [76–80].
  76. M. Sigrist and K. Ueda, Phenomenological theory of unconventional superconductivity, Rev. Mod. Phys. 63, 239 (1991).
  77. H. Tsuchiura, Y. Tanaka, and Y. Ushijima, Stability of s+ id-wave pairing state in the 2-d extended Hubbard model, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 64, 922 (1995).
  78. R. Micnas, J. Ranninger, and S. Robaszkiewicz, Superconductivity in narrow-band systems with local nonretarded attractive interactions, Rev. Mod. Phys. 62, 113 (1990).
  79. J. B. Ketterson and S. N. Song, Superconductivity (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 1990).
  80. J. F. Annett, Superconductivity, superfluids and Condensates (Oxford University Press, New York, 2004), Vol. 5.
  81. The chosen values of the superconducting and altermagnetic amplitudes are obtained by ensuring the coexistence of altermagnetism and 3D chiral d-wave superconductivity in the self-consistent gap equation [75]. This allowed us to choose altermagnetic and superconducting amplitudes of the same order.

  82. D. Chakraborty and A. M. Black-Schaffer, Zero-field finite-momentum and field-induced superconductivity in altermagnets, Phys. Rev. B 110, L060508 (2024).
  83. S. Chourasia, A. Svetogorov, A. Kamra, and W. Belzig, Thermodynamic properties of a superconductor interfaced with an altermagnet, Phys. Rev. B 111, 224503 (2025).
  84. S. Kobayashi, Y. Tanaka, and M. Sato, Fragile surface zero-energy flat bands in three-dimensional chiral superconductors, Phys. Rev. B 92, 214514 (2015).
  85. K. Yada, M. Sato, Y. Tanaka, and T. Yokoyama, Surface density of states and topological edge states in noncentrosymmetric superconductors, Phys. Rev. B 83, 064505 (2011).
  86. P.-H. Fu, J.-F. Liu, and J. Wu, Transport properties of Majorana drumhead surface states in topological nodal-ring superconductors, Phys. Rev. B 102, 075430 (2020).
  87. This topological protection does not happen in the case when BFS exists because the winding number is ill-defined for the gapless dispersion. Thus, the surface arc state at kz∼0 is not expected to produce resonant states at zero energy.

  88. P. A. Lee and D. S. Fisher, Anderson localization in two dimensions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 47, 882 (1981).
  89. R. Ohashi, S. Kobayashi, S. Kanazawa, Y. Tanaka, and Y. Kawaguchi, Surface density of states and tunneling spectroscopy of a spin-32 superconductor with Bogoliubov-Fermi surfaces, Phys. Rev. B 110, 104515 (2024).
  90. Y. Fukaya, K. Yada, and Y. Tanaka, Tunneling conductance in superconducting junctions with p-wave unconventional magnets breaking time-reversal symmetry, J. Supercond. Novel Magn. 38, 228 (2025).
  91. A. Umerski, Closed-form solutions to surface Green’s functions, Phys. Rev. B 55, 5266 (1997).
  92. P. San-Jose, J. Cayao, E. Prada, and R. Aguado, Multiple Andreev reflection and critical current in topological superconducting nanowire junctions, New J. Phys. 15, 075019 (2013).
  93. D. Takagi, S. Tamura, and Y. Tanaka, Odd-frequency pairing and proximity effect in Kitaev chain systems including a topological critical point, Phys. Rev. B 101, 024509 (2020).
  94. The characteristic energy scale that determines the conductance profile originates from the relative amplitude of the altermagnetic strengths tα and the pair potential Δ.

  95. The BFS in our study is similar to that in the original multiorbital model of BFS studies [96, 97, 98] from the point of view of time-reversal symmetry breaking. However, in our case, we adopt a single-orbital model, and the time-reversal symmetry breaking is entirely due to altermagnetism, which produces a zero net magnetization, hence being different from conventional magnetism needed in initial studies of BFSs [96, 97, 98].

  96. P. M. R. Brydon, D. F. Agterberg, H. Menke, and C. Timm, Bogoliubov Fermi surfaces: General theory, magnetic order, and topology, Phys. Rev. B 98, 224509 (2018).
  97. D. F. Agterberg, P. M. R. Brydon, and C. Timm, Bogoliubov Fermi surfaces in superconductors with broken time-reversal symmetry, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 127001 (2017).
  98. C. Timm, A. P. Schnyder, D. F. Agterberg, and P. M. R. Brydon, Inflated nodes and surface states in superconducting half-Heusler compounds, Phys. Rev. B 96, 094526 (2017).
  99. We note that σ¯(k˜,eV=0) given by 2σ¯N0 and σ¯N2 originates due to perfect resonance of Andreev reflections [55, 60, 101] and Andreev reflection without resonance [60, 100].

  100. C. W. J. Beenakker, Random-matrix theory of quantum transport, Rev. Mod. Phys. 69, 731 (1997).
  101. Y. Tanaka and S. Kashiwaya, Theory of tunneling spectroscopy of d-wave superconductors, Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 3451 (1995).
  102. S. Kashiwaya, H. Kashiwaya, H. Kambara, T. Furuta, H. Yaguchi, Y. Tanaka, and Y. Maeno, Edge states of Sr2RuO4 detected by in-plane tunneling spectroscopy, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 077003 (2011).
  103. Y. Tanaka, Y. Tanuma, K. Kuroki, and S. Kashiwaya, Theory of magnetotunneling spectroscopy in spin triplet p-wave superconductors, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 71, 2102 (2002).
  104. Y. Tanuma, K. Kuroki, Y. Tanaka, R. Arita, S. Kashiwaya, and H. Aoki, Determination of pairing symmetry from magnetotunneling spectroscopy: A case study for quasi-one-dimensional organic superconductors, Phys. Rev. B 66, 094507 (2002).
  105. Y. Tanuma, Y. Tanaka, K. Kuroki, and S. Kashiwaya, Magnetotunneling spectroscopy as a probe for pairing symmetry determination in quasi-two-dimensional anisotropic superconductors, Phys. Rev. B 66, 174502 (2002).
  106. Y. Tanaka, K. Kuroki, Y. Tanuma, and S. Kashiwaya, Possible anomalous Doppler shift effect in superconductor Sr2RuO4, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 72, 2157 (2003).
  107. A. Damascelli, Z. Hussain, and Z.-X. Shen, Angle-resolved photoemission studies of the cuprate superconductors, Rev. Mod. Phys. 75, 473 (2003).
  108. J. A. Sobota, Y. He, and Z.-X. Shen, Angle-resolved photoemission studies of quantum materials, Rev. Mod. Phys. 93, 025006 (2021).
  109. H. Zhang, T. Pincelli, C. Jozwiak, T. Kondo, R. Ernstorfer, T. Sato, and S. Zhou, Angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy, Nat. Rev. Methods Primers 2, 54 (2022).
  110. F. Boschini, M. Zonno, and A. Damascelli, Time-resolved ARPES studies of quantum materials, Rev. Mod. Phys. 96, 015003 (2024).
  111. M. P. Allan, A. W. Rost, A. Mackenzie, Y. Xie, J. Davis, K. Kihou, C.-H. Lee, A. Iyo, H. Eisaki, and T.-M. Chuang, Anisotropic energy gaps of iron-based superconductivity from intraband quasiparticle interference in lifeas, Science 336, 563 (2012).
  112. M. P. Allan, F. Massee, D. Morr, J. Van Dyke, A. W. Rost, A. Mackenzie, C. Petrovic, and J. C. Davis, Imaging cooper pairing of heavy fermions in cecoin5, Nat. Phys. 9, 468 (2013).
  113. C. Marques, M. Bahramy, C. Trainer, I. Marković, M. D. Watson, F. Mazzola, A. Rajan, T. D. Raub, P. King, and P. Wahl, Tomographic mapping of the hidden dimension in quasi-particle interference, Nat. Commun. 12, 6739 (2021).
  114. S. Wang, K. Zhussupbekov, J. P. Carroll, B. Hu, X. Liu, E. Pangburn, A. Crepieux, C. Pepin, C. Broyles, S. Ran et al., Odd-parity quasiparticle interference in the superconductive surface state of UTe2, Nat. Phys. 21, 1555 (2025).
  115. M. Long, T. I. Weinberger, Z. Wu, M. F. Hansen, R. Tao, M. Shrestha, D. Graf, Y. Skourski, F. M. Grosche, and A. G. Eaton, 3d bulk-resolved g-wave magnetic order parameter symmetry in the metallic altermagnet CrSb, arXiv:2601.14526.
  116. R. Bisset, L. C. Rhodes, H. Decitre, M. J. Neat, A. Maldonado, A. Huxley, C. A. Marques, and P. Wahl, Determining the superconducting order parameter of UPt3 using scanning tunneling microscopy, arXiv:2512.15845.

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation