Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Spin-Disorder-Induced Angular Anisotropy in Polarized Magnetic Neutron Scattering

Ivan Titov1, Mathias Bersweiler1, Michael P. Adams1, Evelyn Pratami Sinaga1,*, Venus Rai1, Štefan Liščák1, Max Lahr1, Thomas L. Schmidt1, Vladyslav M. Kuchkin1 et al.

Andreas Haller1, Kiyonori Suzuki2, Nina-Juliane Steinke3, Diego Alba Venero4, Dirk Honecker4, Joachim Kohlbrecher5, Luis Fernández Barquín6, and Andreas Michels1,†

  • *Present address: Department of Physics, Matana University, Gading Serpong, Tangerang, Banten 15810, Indonesia.
  • †Contact author: andreas.michels@uni.lu

Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 196706 – Published 6 November, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/5yc2-pv4y

Abstract

We experimentally report a hitherto unseen angular anisotropy in the polarized small-angle neutron scattering (SANS) cross section of a magnetically strongly inhomogeneous material. Based on an analytical prediction using micromagnetic theory, the difference between the spin-up and spin-down SANS cross sections is expected to show a spin-disorder-induced anisotropy. The effect is particularly pronounced in inhomogeneous magnetic materials, such as nanoporous ferromagnets, magnetic nanocomposites, or steels, which exhibit large nanoscale jumps in the saturation magnetization at internal pore-matrix or particle-matrix interfaces. Analysis of the experimental neutron data constitutes a method for determining the exchange-stiffness constant. Our results for the nuclear-magnetic interference terms contained in the polarized magnetic neutron scattering cross section might also be of relevance to other neutron techniques.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (48)

  1. T. Chatterji, Neutron Scattering from Magnetic Materials (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2006).
  2. A. T. Boothroyd, Principles of Neutron Scattering from Condensed Matter (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2020).
  3. F. Bloch, On the magnetic scattering of neutrons, Phys. Rev. 50, 259 (1936).
  4. F. Bloch, On the magnetic scattering of neutrons. II, Phys. Rev. 51, 994 (1937).
  5. J. S. Schwinger, On the magnetic scattering of neutrons, Phys. Rev. 51, 544 (1937).
  6. O. Halpern and M. H. Johnson, On the magnetic scattering of neutrons, Phys. Rev. 55, 898 (1939).
  7. S. V. Maleev, V. G. Bar’yakhtar, and R. A. Suris, The scattering of slow neutrons by complex magnetic structures, Sov. Phys. Solid State 4, 2533 (1963).
  8. M. Blume, Polarization effects in the magnetic elastic scattering of slow neutrons, Phys. Rev. 130, 1670 (1963).
  9. C. G. Shull, E. O. Wollan, and W. C. Koehler, Neutron scattering and polarization by ferromagnetic materials, Phys. Rev. 84, 912 (1951).
  10. R. M. Moon, T. Riste, and W. C. Koehler, Polarization analysis of thermal-neutron scattering, Phys. Rev. 181, 920 (1969).
  11. M. Th. Rekveldt, Neutron depolarisation as a method to determine the magnetization, the mean domain size and the mean square components of the inner magnetization of ferromagnets, J. Phys. (Paris), Colloq. 32, C1 (1971).
  12. G. M. Drabkin, A. I. Okorokov, and V. V. Runov, Anisotroy of depolarization of a neutron beam, JETP Lett. 15, 324 (1972).
  13. A. I. Okorokov, V. V. Runov, and A. G. Gukasov, Three-dimensional neutron polarimeter and spin dynamics investigation, Nucl. Instrum. Methods 157, 487 (1978).
  14. F. Mezei, La nouvelle vague in polarized neutron scattering, Physica (Amsterdam) 137B, 295 (1986).
  15. O. Schärpf and H. Capellmann, The XYZ-difference method with polarized neutrons and the separation of coherent, spin incoherent, and magnetic scattering cross sections in a multidetector, Phys. Status Solidi A 135, 359 (1993).
  16. F. Tasset, Zero field neutron polarimetry, Physica (Amsterdam) 156–157B, 627 (1989).
  17. P. J. Brown, J. B. Forsyth, and F. Tasset, Neutron polarimetry, Proc. R. Soc. A 442, 147 (1993).
  18. F. Tasset, P. J. Brown, E. Lelièvre-Berna, T. Roberts, S. Pujol, J. Alibon, and E. Bourgeat-Lami, Spherical neutron polarimetry with Cryopad-II, Physica (Amsterdam) 267–268B, 69 (1999).
  19. A. I. Okorokov and V. V. Runov, Vector analysis of polarization at small-angle neutron scattering, Physica (Amsterdam) 297B, 239 (2001).
  20. W. G. Williams, Polarized Neutrons (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1988).
  21. S. W. Lovesey, Theory of Neutron Scattering from Condensed Matter, Vol. I and II (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1984).
  22. S. V. Maleev, Polarized neutron scattering in magnets, Phys. Usp. 45, 569 (2002).
  23. A. Michels, D. Mettus, D. Honecker, and K. L. Metlov, Effect of Dzyaloshinski-Moriya interaction on elastic small-angle neutron scattering, Phys. Rev. B 94, 054424 (2016).
  24. See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/5yc2-pv4y for further details on the analytical micromagnetic SANS theory and for some structural and magnetic properties of the studied samples.
  25. D. Michels, C. E. Krill III, and R. Birringer, Grain-size-dependent Curie transition in nanocrystalline Gd: The influence of interface stress, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 250, 203 (2002).
  26. A. Michels, M. Elmas, F. Döbrich, M. Ames, J. Markmann, M. Sharp, H. Eckerlebe, J. Kohlbrecher, and R. Birringer, Porosity-induced spin disorder in nanocrystalline inert-gas-condensed iron, Europhys. Lett. 85, 47003 (2009).
  27. C. E. Krill and R. Birringer, Estimating grain-size distributions in nanocrystalline materials from X-ray diffraction profile analysis, Philos. Mag. A 77, 621 (1998).
  28. J. C. H. Shih, L. Bourgeois, K. Suzuki, and J. S. Garitaonandia, Grain growth process of two-phase nanocrystalline soft magnetic materials, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 304, e693 (2006).
  29. G. Herzer, Nanocrystalline Soft magnetic alloys, in Handbook of Magnetic Materials, Vol. 10, edited by K. H. J. Buschow (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1997), pp. 415–462.
  30. G. Herzer, Modern soft magnets: Amorphous and nanocrystalline materials, Acta Mater. 61, 718 (2013).
  31. Z. Li, R. Parsons, B. Zang, H. Kishimoto, T. Shoji, A. Kato, J. Karel, and K. Suzuki, Dramatic grain refinement and magnetic softening induced by Ni addition in FeB based nanocrystalline soft magnetic alloys, Scr. Mater. 181, 82 (2020).
  32. F. Carmona, V. Madurga, and M. Vázquez, Approach to magnetic saturation in (Co0.95Fe0.05)75Si15B10 amorphous alloy, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 62, 68 (1986).
  33. A. Michels, C. Vecchini, O. Moze, K. Suzuki, J. M. Cadogan, P. K. Pranzas, and J. Weissmüller, Dipole-field-induced spin disorder in a nanocomposite soft magnet, Europhys. Lett. 72, 249 (2005).
  34. K. Suzuki, A. Makino, A. Inoue, and T. Masumoto, Low core losses of nanocrystalline Fe-M-B (M=Zr, Hf, or Nb) alloys, J. Appl. Phys. 74, 3316 (1993).
  35. A. Michels, R. N. Viswanath, and J. Weissmüller, Domain formation and long-range spin disorder in Vitroperm, Europhys. Lett. 64, 43 (2003).
  36. A. Michels, C. Vecchini, O. Moze, K. Suzuki, P. K. Pranzas, J. Kohlbrecher, and J. Weissmüller, Dipolar correlations in a nanocomposite: A neutron scattering study of Nanoperm Fe89Zr7B3Cu, Phys. Rev. B 74, 134407 (2006).
  37. F. Döbrich, J. Kohlbrecher, M. Sharp, H. Eckerlebe, R. Birringer, and A. Michels, Neutron scattering study of the magnetic microstructure of nanocrystalline gadolinium, Phys. Rev. B 85, 094411 (2012).
  38. M. Bersweiler, M. P. Adams, I. Peral, J. Kohlbrecher, K. Suzuki, and A. Michels, Unraveling the magnetic softness in Fe–Ni–B-based nanocrystalline material by magnetic small-angle neutron scattering, IUCrJ 9, 65 (2022).
  39. V. Rai, I. Titov, M. P. Adams, K. Suzuki, J. Kohlbrecher, and A. Michels, Magnetic microstructure of nanocrystalline Fe-Nb-B alloys as seen by small-angle neutron and x-ray scattering, Phys. Rev. B 110, 054437 (2024).
  40. C. D. Dewhurst, I. Grillo, D. Honecker, M. Bonnaud, M. Jacques, C. Amrouni, A. Perillo-Marcone, G. Manzin, and R. Cubitt, The small-angle neutron scattering instrument D33 at the Institut Laue-Langevin, J. Appl. Crystallogr. 49, 1 (2016).
  41. M. Bersweiler, M. P. Adams, D. Alba Venero, D. Honecker, A. Michels, S. Mühlbauer, E. Pratami Sinaga, N.-J. Steinke, and I. Titov, Novel angular anisotropy in polarized SANS, Proposal number: DIR-272, Institut Laue-Langevin (2023), 10.5291/ILL-DATA.DIR-272.
  42. M. Bersweiler, M. P. Adams, E. Pratami Sinaga, I. Titov, D. Alba Venero, D. Honecker, and A. Michels, Novel angular anisotropy in polarized SANS, STFC ISIS Neutron and Muon Source, 10.5286/ISIS.E.RB2220057-1.
  43. C. D. Dewhurst, Graphical reduction and analysis small-angle neutron scattering program: grasp, J. Appl. Crystallogr. 56, 1595 (2023).
  44. A. Michels, Magnetic Small-Angle Neutron Scattering: A Probe for Mesoscale Magnetism Analysis (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2021).
  45. This expression for M˜y follows from Eq. (25) in Ref. [23] by setting the Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction length equal to zero (lD=0), assuming the scattering geometry where the applied magnetic field is perpendicular to the incident neutron beam (qx=0), and noting that M˜z=MsI˜m, qyqz/q2=sinθcosθ, and qy2/q2=sin2θ (in the notation of Ref. [23]).

  46. Equation (2) is valid in the approach-to-saturation regime, when the governing micromagnetic expressions can be linearized. For a detailed derivation, see Ref. [23], which considers the effect of the Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction on the elastic magnetic SANS cross section and the chiral function.

  47. A statistically isotropic polycrystalline magnetic material may be characterized by random variations of the magnitude and direction of the magnetic anisotropy field, e.g., from one crystallite to another. In our experiment, a large external magnetic field is applied, which gives rise to a longitudinal (z) magnetization component that is close to the saturation value. For this scenario, the expectation values of the two transversal components of the anisotropy field vanish. Consequently, when averaging the N˜M˜y term in Eq. (1) [using Eq. (2)] over the directions of the anisotropy field, the N˜H˜py term vanishes, and only the averages over N˜M˜z remain.

  48. H. Kronmüller and M. Fähnle, Micromagnetism and the Microstructure of Ferromagnetic Solids (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2003).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation