Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Editors' Suggestion
  • Open Access

Entangling Ions with Engineered Light Gradients

Tommaso Faorlin1,*, Lorenz Panzl1, Phoebe Grosser1, Pablo Viñas2, Alan Kahan2, Walter Joseph Hörmann1, Yannick Weiser1, Giovanni Cerchiari1,3, Thomas Feldker4 et al.

Alexander Erhard4, Georg Jacob4, Juris Ulmanis4, Rainer Blatt1,4,5, Alejandro Bermudez2, and Thomas Monz1,4

  • *Contact author: tommaso.faorlin@uibk.ac.at

Phys. Rev. Lett. 137, 170601 – Published 23 October, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/4smy-6w2n

Abstract

Spectral crowding of collective motional modes limits the fidelity of entangling interactions in trapped-ion quantum processors by inducing off-resonant coupling to spectator modes. We introduce a geometric-phase entangling interaction driven by a transverse, time-dependent structured-light force. By applying the force in a plane orthogonal to the optical propagation direction, we reduce the effects of spectral crowding while preserving single-ion addressing. The scheme is compatible with arbitrary qubit encodings, provided that the qubit states experience a differential AC Stark shift. We experimentally realize high-fidelity two-qubit gates with error rates below 5×10−3 in ion crystals containing up to 12 ions confined within a single potential well. These results establish gradient-field light-shift gates as a scalable approach to high-fidelity entanglement generation in spectrally crowded trapped-ion systems.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (46)

  1. D. M. Zajac, A. J. Sigillito, M. Russ, F. Borjans, J. M. Taylor, G. Burkard, and J. R. Petta, Science 359, 439 (2018).
  2. C. E. Bradley, J. Randall, M. H. Abobeih, R. C. Berrevoets, M. J. Degen, M. A. Bakker, M. Markham, D. J. Twitchen, and T. H. Taminiau, Phys. Rev. X 9, 031045 (2019).
  3. M. Malekakhlagh, E. Magesan, and D. C. McKay, Phys. Rev. A 102, 042605 (2020).
  4. T.-Q. Cai, X.-Y. Han, Y.-K. Wu, Y.-L. Ma, J.-H. Wang, Z.-L. Wang, H.-Y. Zhang, H.-Y. Wang, Y.-P. Song, and L.-M. Duan, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 060505 (2021).
  5. A. Rahman, D. J. Egger, and C. Arenz, Phys. Rev. Appl. 22, 054074 (2024).
  6. E. L. Hahn, Phys. Rev. 80, 580 (1950).
  7. F. Kofler, Modulated gates for improved ion control, Master’s thesis, Universität Innsbruck, 2025.
  8. L. Cheng, S.-C. Liu, L. Geng, Y.-K. Fang, and L.-Y. Peng, Phys. Rev. A 107, 042617 (2023).
  9. A. R. Milne, C. L. Edmunds, C. Hempel, F. Roy, S. Mavadia, and M. J. Biercuk, Phys. Rev. Appl. 13, 024022 (2020).
  10. M. Kang, Q. Liang, B. Zhang, S. Huang, Y. Wang, C. Fang, J. Kim, and K. R. Brown, Phys. Rev. Appl. 16, 024039 (2021).
  11. N. Ezzell, B. Pokharel, L. Tewala, G. Quiroz, and D. A. Lidar, Phys. Rev. Appl. 20, 064027 (2023).
  12. C. R. Clark, H. N. Tinkey, B. C. Sawyer, A. M. Meier, K. A. Burkhardt, C. M. Seck, C. M. Shappert, N. D. Guise, C. E. Volin, S. D. Fallek, H. T. Hayden, W. G. Rellergert, and K. R. Brown, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 130505 (2021).
  13. C. H. Baldwin, B. J. Bjork, M. Foss-Feig, J. P. Gaebler, D. Hayes, M. G. Kokish, C. Langer, J. A. Sedlacek, D. Stack, and G. Vittorini, Phys. Rev. A 103, 012603 (2021).
  14. D. Leibfried, B. DeMarco, V. Meyer, D. Lucas, M. Barrett, J. Britton, W. M. Itano, B. Jelenković, C. Langer, T. Rosenband, and D. J. Wineland, Nature (London) 422, 412 (2003).
  15. K. Kim, C. F. Roos, L. Aolita, H. Häffner, V. Nebendahl, and R. Blatt, Phys. Rev. A 77, 050303(R) (2008).
  16. B. C. Sawyer and K. R. Brown, Phys. Rev. A 103, 022427 (2021).
  17. P. Murali, D. M. Debroy, K. R. Brown, and M. Martonosi, Commun. ACM 65, 101 (2022).
  18. D. F. V. James, Appl. Phys. B 66, 181 (1998).
  19. A. Erhard, T. Feldker, and G. Jacob, Transverse state-dependent force for trapped ion entanglement (2026), Application No. 19/102,679, filed August 4, 2023.
  20. D. T. C. Allcock, W. C. Campbell, J. Chiaverini, I. L. Chuang, E. R. Hudson, I. D. Moore, A. Ransford, C. Roman, J. M. Sage, and D. J. Wineland, Appl. Phys. Lett. 119, 214002 (2021).
  21. J.-M. Cui, Y. Chen, Y.-F. Zhou, Q. Long, E.-T. An, R. He, Y.-F. Huang, C.-F. Li, and G.-C. Guo, Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 260604 (2025).
  22. M. Mazzanti, R. Gerritsma, R. J. C. Spreeuw, and A. Safavi-Naini, Phys. Rev. Res. 5, 033036 (2023).
  23. A. D. West, R. Putnam, W. C. Campbell, and P. Hamilton, Quantum Sci. Technol. 6, 024003 (2021).
  24. X. Mai, L. Zhang, Q. Yu, J. Zhang, and Y. Lu, arXiv:2506.19535.
  25. F. Stopp, M. Verde, M. Katz, M. Drechsler, C. T. Schmiegelow, and F. Schmidt-Kaler, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 263603 (2022).
  26. M. Foss-Feig, G. Pagano, A. C. Potter, and N. Y. Yao, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 16, 145 (2025).
  27. R. Ozeri, Contemp. Phys. 52, 531 (2011).
  28. A. Sørensen and K. Mølmer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 1971 (1999).
  29. I. Pogorelov, T. Feldker, C. D. Marciniak, L. Postler, G. Jacob, O. Krieglsteiner, V. Podlesnic, M. Meth, V. Negnevitsky, M. Stadler, B. Höfer, C. Wächter, K. Lakhmanskiy, R. Blatt, P. Schindler, and T. Monz, PRX Quantum 2, 020343 (2021).
  30. Holoor Hermite-Gauss mode converter PE202-Q-Y-A.

  31. C. J. Ballance, T. P. Harty, N. M. Linke, M. A. Sepiol, and D. M. Lucas, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 060504 (2016).
  32. P. Hrmo, B. Wilhelm, L. Gerster, M. W. van Mourik, M. Huber, R. Blatt, P. Schindler, T. Monz, and M. Ringbauer, Nat. Commun. 14, 2242 (2023).
  33. R. Barends et al., Nature (London) 508, 500 (2014).
  34. M. Ye and N. Delfosse, Quantum 9, 1920 (2025).
  35. The contribution of these incoherent error sources is estimated separately and added to the error budget linearly, which assumes that we are in the high-fidelity regime.

  36. M. Brownnutt, M. Kumph, P. Rabl, and R. Blatt, Rev. Mod. Phys. 87, 1419 (2015).
  37. R. Ozeri, W. M. Itano, R. B. Blakestad, J. Britton, J. Chiaverini, J. D. Jost, C. Langer, D. Leibfried, R. Reichle, S. Seidelin, J. H. Wesenberg, and D. J. Wineland, Phys. Rev. A 75, 042329 (2007).
  38. I. D. Moore, W. C. Campbell, E. R. Hudson, M. J. Boguslawski, D. J. Wineland, and D. T. C. Allcock, Phys. Rev. A 107, 032413 (2023).
  39. See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/4smy-6w2n for scaling considerations to longer ion chains, an error budget achievable with calcium ions, and implications of this work for quantum error correction, which includes [40–43].
  40. C. Bowers, D. Palani, J. Barta, T. Guglielmo, S. Libby, D. Leibfried, and D. Slichter, Robust two-qubit geometric phase gates using amplitude and frequency ramping (2026).
  41. C. Ryan-Anderson et al., Science 385, 1327 (2024).
  42. J. Jiang, Y. Ma, X. Wang, C.-Z. Dong, and Z. W. Wu, Phys. Rev. A 103, 032803 (2021).
  43. T. Choi, S. Debnath, T. A. Manning, C. Figgatt, Z.-X. Gong, L.-M. Duan, and C. Monroe, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 190502 (2014).
  44. C. Benito, A. R. Vasquez, J. Home, K. K. Mehta, T. Monz, M. Müller, and A. Bermudez, arXiv:2512.20435.
  45. E. Tham, M. L. Goldman, S. Debnath, A. N. Patel, J. Saraladevi, J. Nguyen, E. Nielsen, N. Pisenti, K. Wright, J. Gamble, and N. Delfosse, arXiv:2606.06455.
  46. B. Badawi, P. C. Holz, M. Raffetseder, N. Jungwirth, J. Ulmanis, H.-J. Quenzer, D. Kähler, T. Monz, and P. Schindler, arXiv:2512.02645.

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation