- Open Access
Modular-Invariant Random Matrix Theory and Wormholes
Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 121602 – Published 18 September, 2025
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/4hhn-c6mp
Abstract
We develop a nonperturbative definition of : a generalization of random matrix theory that is compatible with the symmetries of two-dimensional conformal field theory. Given any random matrix ensemble, its -point spectral correlations admit a prescribed modular-invariant lift to , which moreover reduce to the original random matrix correlators in a near-extremal limit. Central to the prescription is a presentation of random matrix theory in Mellin space, which lifts to two dimensions via the spectral decomposition employed in previous work. As a demonstration we perform the explicit lift of two-point correlations of the GUE Airy model. We propose that in pure gravity, semiclassical amplitudes for off-shell -boundary torus wormholes with topology are given by the lift of JT gravity wormhole amplitudes. For the three-boundary case, we identify a gravity calculation which matches the result.
Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)
Article Text
Supplemental Material
References (35)
- J. S. Cotler, G. Gur-Ari, M. Hanada, J. Polchinski, P. Saad, S. H. Shenker, D. Stanford, A. Streicher, and M. Tezuka, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2017) 118; 09 (2018) 002.
- P. Saad, S. H. Shenker, and D. Stanford, arXiv:1903.11115.
- P. Saad, S. H. Shenker, and D. Stanford, arXiv:1806.06840.
- J. Cotler and K. Jensen, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2021) 033.
- G. Di Ubaldo and E. Perlmutter, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2023) 179.
- O. Bohigas, M. J. Giannoni, and C. Schmit, Phys. Rev. Lett. 52, 1 (1984).
- O. Bohigas, M. J. Giannoni, and C. Schmit, J. Phys. Lett. 45, 1015 (1984).
- H. Maxfield and G. J. Turiaci, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2021) 118.
- A. Belin, J. de Boer, D. L. Jafferis, P. Nayak, and J. Sonner, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2024) 163.
- D. L. Jafferis, L. Rozenberg, and G. Wong, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2025) 208.
- F. M. Haehl, C. Marteau, W. Reeves, and M. Rozali, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2023) 196.
- F. M. Haehl, W. Reeves, and M. Rozali, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2023) 161.
- F. M. Haehl, W. Reeves, and M. Rozali, Phys. Rev. D 108, L101902 (2023).
- J. Boruch, G. Di Ubaldo, F. M. Haehl, E. Perlmutter, and M. Rozali (to be published).
- S. Collier and E. Perlmutter, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2022) 195.
- N. Benjamin, S. Collier, A. L. Fitzpatrick, A. Maloney, and E. Perlmutter, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2021) 174.
- A. Ghosh, H. Maxfield, and G. J. Turiaci, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2020) 104.
- M. V. Berry, Proc. R. Soc. A 400, 229 (1985).
- P. Saad, D. Stanford, Z. Yang, and S. Yao, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2024) 033.
- A. Okounkov, Int. Math. Res. Not. 2002, 933 (2002).
- A. Blommaert, J. Kruthoff, and S. Yao, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2023) 048.
- T. G. Mertens, G. J. Turiaci, and H. L. Verlinde, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2017) 136.
- B. Eynard, T. Kimura, and S. Ribault, arXiv:1510.04430.
- D. Zagier, Appendix to E. Zeidler, Quantum Field Theory I: Basics in Mathematics and Physics. A Bridge Between Mathematicians and Physicists (2006).
- J. Penedones, J. A. Silva, and A. Zhiboedov, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2020) 031.
- S. Collier, J. Cotler, K. Jensen, and C. Yan (to be published).
- See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/4hhn-c6mp for more details on the bulk perspective on the three-boundary wormhole.
- S. Collier, L. Eberhardt, B. Mühlmann, and V. A. Rodriguez, SciPost Phys. 16, 057 (2024).
- J. Teschner, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 19S2, 459 (2004).
- L. A. Takhtajan, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 8, 3529 (1993).
- L. Hadasz, Z. Jaskolski, and M. Piatek, Nucl. Phys. B724, 529 (2005).
- S. M. Harrison, A. Maloney, and T. Numasawa, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2023) 227.
- K. Colville, S. M. Harrison, A. Maloney, and K. Namjou, arXiv:2312.00323.
- B. Post and I. Tsiares, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2025) 015.
- T. G. Mertens and G. J. Turiaci, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2021) 073.