Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Modular-Invariant Random Matrix Theory and AdS3 Wormholes

Jan Boruch

Gabriele Di Ubaldo

Felix M. Haehl

Eric Perlmutter

Moshe Rozali

  • Leinweber Institute for Theoretical Physics and Department of Physics, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720, USA

  • Leinweber Institute for Theoretical Physics and Department of Physics, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720, USA; Interdisciplinary Theoretical and Mathematical Sciences Program (iTHEMS), RIKEN, Wako 351-0198, Japan; and Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS, CEA, Institut de Physique Théorique, 91191, Gif-sur-Yvette, France

Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 121602 – Published 18 September, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/4hhn-c6mp

Abstract

We develop a nonperturbative definition of RMT2: a generalization of random matrix theory that is compatible with the symmetries of two-dimensional conformal field theory. Given any random matrix ensemble, its n-point spectral correlations admit a prescribed modular-invariant lift to RMT2, which moreover reduce to the original random matrix correlators in a near-extremal limit. Central to the prescription is a presentation of random matrix theory in Mellin space, which lifts to two dimensions via the SL(2,Z) spectral decomposition employed in previous work. As a demonstration we perform the explicit RMT2 lift of two-point correlations of the GUE Airy model. We propose that in AdS3 pure gravity, semiclassical amplitudes for off-shell n-boundary torus wormholes with topology Σ0,n×S1 are given by the RMT2 lift of JT gravity wormhole amplitudes. For the three-boundary case, we identify a gravity calculation which matches the RMT2 result.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (35)

  1. J. S. Cotler, G. Gur-Ari, M. Hanada, J. Polchinski, P. Saad, S. H. Shenker, D. Stanford, A. Streicher, and M. Tezuka, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2017) 118; 09 (2018) 002.
  2. P. Saad, S. H. Shenker, and D. Stanford, arXiv:1903.11115.
  3. P. Saad, S. H. Shenker, and D. Stanford, arXiv:1806.06840.
  4. J. Cotler and K. Jensen, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2021) 033.
  5. G. Di Ubaldo and E. Perlmutter, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2023) 179.
  6. O. Bohigas, M. J. Giannoni, and C. Schmit, Phys. Rev. Lett. 52, 1 (1984).
  7. O. Bohigas, M. J. Giannoni, and C. Schmit, J. Phys. Lett. 45, 1015 (1984).
  8. H. Maxfield and G. J. Turiaci, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2021) 118.
  9. A. Belin, J. de Boer, D. L. Jafferis, P. Nayak, and J. Sonner, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2024) 163.
  10. D. L. Jafferis, L. Rozenberg, and G. Wong, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2025) 208.
  11. F. M. Haehl, C. Marteau, W. Reeves, and M. Rozali, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2023) 196.
  12. F. M. Haehl, W. Reeves, and M. Rozali, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2023) 161.
  13. F. M. Haehl, W. Reeves, and M. Rozali, Phys. Rev. D 108, L101902 (2023).
  14. J. Boruch, G. Di Ubaldo, F. M. Haehl, E. Perlmutter, and M. Rozali (to be published).
  15. S. Collier and E. Perlmutter, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2022) 195.
  16. N. Benjamin, S. Collier, A. L. Fitzpatrick, A. Maloney, and E. Perlmutter, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2021) 174.
  17. A. Ghosh, H. Maxfield, and G. J. Turiaci, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2020) 104.
  18. M. V. Berry, Proc. R. Soc. A 400, 229 (1985).
  19. P. Saad, D. Stanford, Z. Yang, and S. Yao, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2024) 033.
  20. A. Okounkov, Int. Math. Res. Not. 2002, 933 (2002).
  21. A. Blommaert, J. Kruthoff, and S. Yao, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2023) 048.
  22. T. G. Mertens, G. J. Turiaci, and H. L. Verlinde, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2017) 136.
  23. B. Eynard, T. Kimura, and S. Ribault, arXiv:1510.04430.
  24. D. Zagier, Appendix to E. Zeidler, Quantum Field Theory I: Basics in Mathematics and Physics. A Bridge Between Mathematicians and Physicists (2006).
  25. J. Penedones, J. A. Silva, and A. Zhiboedov, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2020) 031.
  26. S. Collier, J. Cotler, K. Jensen, and C. Yan (to be published).
  27. See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/4hhn-c6mp for more details on the bulk perspective on the three-boundary wormhole.
  28. S. Collier, L. Eberhardt, B. Mühlmann, and V. A. Rodriguez, SciPost Phys. 16, 057 (2024).
  29. J. Teschner, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 19S2, 459 (2004).
  30. L. A. Takhtajan, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 8, 3529 (1993).
  31. L. Hadasz, Z. Jaskolski, and M. Piatek, Nucl. Phys. B724, 529 (2005).
  32. S. M. Harrison, A. Maloney, and T. Numasawa, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2023) 227.
  33. K. Colville, S. M. Harrison, A. Maloney, and K. Namjou, arXiv:2312.00323.
  34. B. Post and I. Tsiares, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2025) 015.
  35. T. G. Mertens and G. J. Turiaci, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2021) 073.

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation