Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Toward a Robust Confirmation or Refutation of the Sterile-Neutrino Explanation of Short-Baseline Anomalies

Ohana Benevides Rodrigues1,*, Matheus Hostert2,†, Kevin J. Kelly3,‡, Bryce Littlejohn1,§, Pedro A. N. Machado4,∥, Ibrahim Safa5,¶, and Tao Zhou3,**

  • 1Department of Physics, Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago, Illinois 60616, USA
  • 2Department of Physics and Laboratory for Particle Physics and Cosmology, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138, USA
  • 3Department of Physics and Astronomy, Mitchell Institute for Fundamental Physics and Astronomy, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas 77843, USA
  • 4Theoretical Physics Department, Fermilab, P.O. Box 500, Batavia, Illinois 60510, USA
  • 5Columbia University, New York, New York 10027, USA

  • *Contact author: obenevidesrodrigues@iit.edu
  • †Contact author: mhostert@g.harvard.edu
  • ‡Contact author: kjkelly@tamu.edu
  • §Contact author: blittlej@iit.edu
  • ∥Contact author: pmachado@fnal.gov
  • Contact author: isafa94@gmail.com
  • **Contact author: taozhou@tamu.edu

Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 081801 – Published 19 August, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/4fn7-svnh

Abstract

The sterile neutrino interpretation of the LSND and MiniBooNE neutrino anomalies is currently being tested at three liquid argon detectors: MicroBooNE, SBND, and ICARUS. It has been argued that a degeneracy between νμ→νe and νe→νe oscillations significantly degrades their sensitivity to sterile neutrinos. Through an independent study, we show two methods to eliminate this concern. First, we resolve this degeneracy by including external constraints on νe disappearance from the PROSPECT reactor experiment. Second, by properly analyzing the full three-dimensional parameter space, we demonstrate that the stronger-than-sensitivity exclusion from MicroBooNE alone already covers the entire 2σ preferred regions of MiniBooNE at the level of 2−3σ. We show that upcoming searches at SBND and ICARUS can improve on this beyond the 4σ level, thereby providing a rigorous test of short-baseline anomalies.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (51)

  1. A. A. Aguilar-Arevalo et al. (MiniBooNE Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 103, 052002 (2021).
  2. R. J. Hill, Phys. Rev. D 81, 013008 (2010).
  3. R. J. Hill, Phys. Rev. D 84, 017501 (2011).
  4. V. Brdar and J. Kopp, Phys. Rev. D 105, 115024 (2022).
  5. K. J. Kelly and J. Kopp, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2023) 113.
  6. M. A. Acero et al., J. Phys. G 51, 120501 (2024).
  7. A. Aguilar et al. (LSND Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 64, 112007 (2001).
  8. M. Dentler, A. Hernández-Cabezudo, J. Kopp, P. A. N. Machado, M. Maltoni, I. Martinez-Soler, and T. Schwetz, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2018) 010.
  9. A. Diaz, C. A. Argüelles, G. H. Collin, J. M. Conrad, and M. H. Shaevitz, Phys. Rep. 884, 1 (2020).
  10. S. Böser, C. Buck, C. Giunti, J. Lesgourgues, L. Ludhova, S. Mertens, A. Schukraft, and M. Wurm, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 111, 103736 (2020).
  11. R. Acciarri et al. (MicroBooNE, LAr1-ND, ICARUS-WA104 Collaborations), arXiv:1503.01520.
  12. P. Abratenko et al. (MicroBooNE Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 111801 (2022).
  13. P. Abratenko et al. (MicroBooNE Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 241801 (2022).
  14. P. Abratenko et al. (MicroBooNE Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 105, 112005 (2022).
  15. P. Abratenko et al. (MicroBooNE Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 105, 112003 (2022).
  16. P. Abratenko et al. (MicroBooNE Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 105, 112004 (2022).
  17. E. Wang, L. Alvarez-Ruso, and J. Nieves, Phys. Lett. B 740, 16 (2015).
  18. C. A. Argüelles, I. Esteban, M. Hostert, K. J. Kelly, J. Kopp, P. A. N. Machado, I. Martinez-Soler, and Y. F. Perez-Gonzalez, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 241802 (2022).
  19. P. B. Denton, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 061801 (2022).
  20. P. Abratenko et al. (MicroBooNE Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 011801 (2023).
  21. MicroBooNE Collaboration, Updates to the NuMI flux simulation at MicroBooNE, Technical Report MICROBOONE-NOTE-1129-PUB, MicroBooNE, 2024.
  22. MicroBooNE Collaboration, Search for a sterile neutrino in a 3+1 framework using wire-cell inclusive charged-current νe selection with the BNB and NuMI beamlines in MicroBooNE, Technical Report MICROBOONE-NOTE-1132-PUB, MicroBooNE, 2024.
  23. P. Adamson et al. (MiniBooNE, MINOS Collaborations), Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 211801 (2009).
  24. M. Aker et al. (KATRIN Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 091803 (2021).
  25. M. Aker et al. (KATRIN Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 105, 072004 (2022).
  26. H. Acharya et al. (KATRIN Collaboration), arXiv:2503.18667.
  27. P. Adamson et al. (MINOS + Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 091803 (2019).
  28. M. A. Acero et al. (NOvA Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 081804 (2025).
  29. P. Abratenko et al. (ICARUS Collaboration), Eur. Phys. J. C 83, 467 (2023).
  30. P. Abratenko et al. (SBND Collaboration), Eur. Phys. J. C 84, 1046 (2024).
  31. M. Andriamirado et al. (PROSPECT Collaboration), J. Phys. G 49, 070501 (2022).
  32. This may, however, be driven by the fluctuations present in μB data relative to its expectations.

  33. K. Goldhagen, M. Maltoni, S. E. Reichard, and T. Schwetz, Eur. Phys. J. C 82, 116 (2022).
  34. F. P. An et al. (Daya Bay Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 141802 (2014).
  35. J. M. Berryman and P. Huber, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2021) 167.
  36. C. Giunti, Y. F. Li, C. A. Ternes, and Z. Xin, Phys. Lett. B 829, 137054 (2022).
  37. V. V. Barinov et al., Phys. Rev. C 105, 065502 (2022).
  38. J. N. Abdurashitov et al. (SAGE Collaboration), Phys. Rev. C 59, 2246 (1999).
  39. J. N. Abdurashitov et al., Phys. Rev. C 73, 045805 (2006).
  40. M. Altmann et al. (GNO Collaboration), Phys. Lett. B 616, 174 (2005).
  41. F. Kaether, W. Hampel, G. Heusser, J. Kiko, and T. Kirsten, Phys. Lett. B 685, 47 (2010).
  42. GitHub repository: https://github.com/kjkellyphys/muB_oscillation (2025).
  43. A. A. Aguilar-Arevalo et al. (MiniBooNE Collaboration), arXiv:2110.15055.
  44. M. Hostert, K. J. Kelly, and T. Zhou, Phys. Rev. D 110, 075002 (2024).
  45. J. Ashenfelter et al. (PROSPECT Collaboration), Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 922, 287 (2019).
  46. M. Andriamirado et al. (PROSPECT Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 103, 032001 (2021).
  47. M. Andriamirado et al. (PROSPECT Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 021802 (2023).
  48. M. Andriamirado et al. (PROSPECT Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 151802 (2025).
  49. D. Cianci, A. Furmanski, G. Karagiorgi, and M. Ross-Lonergan, Phys. Rev. D 96, 055001 (2017).
  50. P. A. Machado, O. Palamara, and D. W. Schmitz, Annu. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 69, 363 (2019).
  51. The addition of PROSPECT data for improving this exclusion is only modest: μB + PROSPECT excludes MB’s entire 2.4σ (98.5% CL) at greater than the same CL. By contrast, the Asimov-expected exclusion of μB + PROSPECT was 1.7σ (91.3% CL).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation