- Open Access
Toward a Robust Confirmation or Refutation of the Sterile-Neutrino Explanation of Short-Baseline Anomalies
Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 081801 – Published 19 August, 2025
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/4fn7-svnh
Abstract
The sterile neutrino interpretation of the LSND and MiniBooNE neutrino anomalies is currently being tested at three liquid argon detectors: MicroBooNE, SBND, and ICARUS. It has been argued that a degeneracy between and oscillations significantly degrades their sensitivity to sterile neutrinos. Through an independent study, we show two methods to eliminate this concern. First, we resolve this degeneracy by including external constraints on disappearance from the PROSPECT reactor experiment. Second, by properly analyzing the full three-dimensional parameter space, we demonstrate that the stronger-than-sensitivity exclusion from MicroBooNE alone already covers the entire preferred regions of MiniBooNE at the level of . We show that upcoming searches at SBND and ICARUS can improve on this beyond the level, thereby providing a rigorous test of short-baseline anomalies.
Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)
Article Text
References (51)
- A. A. Aguilar-Arevalo et al. (MiniBooNE Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 103, 052002 (2021).
- R. J. Hill, Phys. Rev. D 81, 013008 (2010).
- R. J. Hill, Phys. Rev. D 84, 017501 (2011).
- V. Brdar and J. Kopp, Phys. Rev. D 105, 115024 (2022).
- K. J. Kelly and J. Kopp, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2023) 113.
- M. A. Acero et al., J. Phys. G 51, 120501 (2024).
- A. Aguilar et al. (LSND Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 64, 112007 (2001).
- M. Dentler, A. Hernández-Cabezudo, J. Kopp, P. A. N. Machado, M. Maltoni, I. Martinez-Soler, and T. Schwetz, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2018) 010.
- A. Diaz, C. A. Argüelles, G. H. Collin, J. M. Conrad, and M. H. Shaevitz, Phys. Rep. 884, 1 (2020).
- S. Böser, C. Buck, C. Giunti, J. Lesgourgues, L. Ludhova, S. Mertens, A. Schukraft, and M. Wurm, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 111, 103736 (2020).
- R. Acciarri et al. (MicroBooNE, LAr1-ND, ICARUS-WA104 Collaborations), arXiv:1503.01520.
- P. Abratenko et al. (MicroBooNE Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 111801 (2022).
- P. Abratenko et al. (MicroBooNE Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 241801 (2022).
- P. Abratenko et al. (MicroBooNE Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 105, 112005 (2022).
- P. Abratenko et al. (MicroBooNE Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 105, 112003 (2022).
- P. Abratenko et al. (MicroBooNE Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 105, 112004 (2022).
- E. Wang, L. Alvarez-Ruso, and J. Nieves, Phys. Lett. B 740, 16 (2015).
- C. A. Argüelles, I. Esteban, M. Hostert, K. J. Kelly, J. Kopp, P. A. N. Machado, I. Martinez-Soler, and Y. F. Perez-Gonzalez, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 241802 (2022).
- P. B. Denton, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 061801 (2022).
- P. Abratenko et al. (MicroBooNE Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 011801 (2023).
- MicroBooNE Collaboration, Updates to the NuMI flux simulation at MicroBooNE, Technical Report MICROBOONE-NOTE-1129-PUB, MicroBooNE, 2024.
- MicroBooNE Collaboration, Search for a sterile neutrino in a framework using wire-cell inclusive charged-current selection with the BNB and NuMI beamlines in MicroBooNE, Technical Report MICROBOONE-NOTE-1132-PUB, MicroBooNE, 2024.
- P. Adamson et al. (MiniBooNE, MINOS Collaborations), Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 211801 (2009).
- M. Aker et al. (KATRIN Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 091803 (2021).
- M. Aker et al. (KATRIN Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 105, 072004 (2022).
- H. Acharya et al. (KATRIN Collaboration), arXiv:2503.18667.
- P. Adamson et al. (MINOS + Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 091803 (2019).
- M. A. Acero et al. (NOvA Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 081804 (2025).
- P. Abratenko et al. (ICARUS Collaboration), Eur. Phys. J. C 83, 467 (2023).
- P. Abratenko et al. (SBND Collaboration), Eur. Phys. J. C 84, 1046 (2024).
- M. Andriamirado et al. (PROSPECT Collaboration), J. Phys. G 49, 070501 (2022).
This may, however, be driven by the fluctuations present in data relative to its expectations.
- K. Goldhagen, M. Maltoni, S. E. Reichard, and T. Schwetz, Eur. Phys. J. C 82, 116 (2022).
- F. P. An et al. (Daya Bay Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 141802 (2014).
- J. M. Berryman and P. Huber, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2021) 167.
- C. Giunti, Y. F. Li, C. A. Ternes, and Z. Xin, Phys. Lett. B 829, 137054 (2022).
- V. V. Barinov et al., Phys. Rev. C 105, 065502 (2022).
- J. N. Abdurashitov et al. (SAGE Collaboration), Phys. Rev. C 59, 2246 (1999).
- J. N. Abdurashitov et al., Phys. Rev. C 73, 045805 (2006).
- M. Altmann et al. (GNO Collaboration), Phys. Lett. B 616, 174 (2005).
- F. Kaether, W. Hampel, G. Heusser, J. Kiko, and T. Kirsten, Phys. Lett. B 685, 47 (2010).
- GitHub repository: https://github.com/kjkellyphys/muB_oscillation (2025).
- A. A. Aguilar-Arevalo et al. (MiniBooNE Collaboration), arXiv:2110.15055.
- M. Hostert, K. J. Kelly, and T. Zhou, Phys. Rev. D 110, 075002 (2024).
- J. Ashenfelter et al. (PROSPECT Collaboration), Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 922, 287 (2019).
- M. Andriamirado et al. (PROSPECT Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 103, 032001 (2021).
- M. Andriamirado et al. (PROSPECT Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 021802 (2023).
- M. Andriamirado et al. (PROSPECT Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 151802 (2025).
- D. Cianci, A. Furmanski, G. Karagiorgi, and M. Ross-Lonergan, Phys. Rev. D 96, 055001 (2017).
- P. A. Machado, O. Palamara, and D. W. Schmitz, Annu. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 69, 363 (2019).
The addition of PROSPECT data for improving this exclusion is only modest: PROSPECT excludes MB’s entire (98.5% CL) at greater than the same CL. By contrast, the Asimov-expected exclusion of PROSPECT was (91.3% CL).