Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Passive Freeze-Out of the Richtmyer-Meshkov Instability

J. Strucka1,2, D. M. Sterbentz3, B. Lukic4, K. Mughal1, Y. Yao1, K. Marrow1, W. J. Schill3, C. F. Jekel3, D. A. White3 et al.

N. Asmedianov5, R. Grikshtas5, O. Belozerov5, S. Efimov5, J. Skidmore6, A. Rack4, Ya. E. Krasik5, J. L. Belof3, J. P. Chittenden1, and S. N. Bland1

Phys. Rev. Lett. 136, 145102 – Published 10 April, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/3wgy-sgkz

Abstract

The Richtmyer-Meshkov instability (RMI) poses a major challenge in inertial confinement fusion (ICF) due to its role in mixing and performance degradation. We report the first experimental observation of passive freeze-out of RMI in a low-pressure surrogate regime, an instability stagnation effect induced without modifying the driving pressure pulse or the target surface geometry. Using additively manufactured subsurface voids in a sinusoidal target, we convert a single shock into a sequence of weaker shocks that suppress instability growth upstream of the surface by over 70%. High-speed x-ray imaging and hydrodynamic simulations suggest that this suppression arises primarily from temporal shaping, with lesser contributions from spatial curvature and shock weakening. Our results demonstrate a driver-independent pathway for controlling shock-driven hydrodynamic instabilities relevant to ICF and other high energy density systems.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (46)

  1. Y. Zhou, Rayleigh–Taylor and Richtmyer–Meshkov instability induced flow, turbulence, and mixing. I, Phys. Rep. 720–722, 1 (2017).
  2. Y. Zhou, Rayleigh–Taylor and Richtmyer–Meshkov instability induced flow, turbulence, and mixing. II, Phys. Rep. 723–725, 1 (2017).
  3. A. B. Zylstra et al., Burning plasma achieved in inertial fusion, Nature (London) 601, 542 (2022).
  4. B. D. Keenan, W. T. Taitano, A. N. Simakov, L. Chacón, and B. J. Albright, Shock-driven kinetic and diffusive mix in high-Z pusher ICF designs, Phys. Plasmas 27, 022704 (2020).
  5. D. S. Clark et al., Modeling ablator defects as a source of mix in high-performance implosions at the National Ignition Facility, Phys. Plasmas 31, 062706 (2024).
  6. K. O. Mikaelian, Richtmyer-Meshkov instabilities in stratified fluids, Phys. Rev. A 31, 410 (1985).
  7. T. Sano, K. Ishigure, and F. Cobos-Campos, Suppression of the Richtmyer-Meshkov instability due to a density transition layer at the interface, Phys. Rev. E 102, 013203 (2020).
  8. Y. Liang and X. Luo, Shock-induced dual-layer evolution, J. Fluid Mech. 929, R3 (2021).
  9. W. J. Schill, M. R. Armstrong, J. H. Nguyen, D. M. Sterbentz, D. A. White, L. X. Benedict, R. N. Rieben, A. Hoff, H. E. Lorenzana, J. L. Belof, B. M. La Lone, and M. D. Staska, Suppression of Richtmyer-Meshkov instability via special pairs of shocks and phase transitions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 024001 (2024).
  10. R. Samtaney, Suppression of the Richtmyer–Meshkov instability in the presence of a magnetic field, Phys. Fluids 15, L53 (2003).
  11. T. Sano, T. Inoue, and K. Nishihara, Critical magnetic field strength for suppression of the Richtmyer-Meshkov instability in plasmas, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 205001 (2013).
  12. C. M. Huntington et al., Ablative stabilization of Rayleigh-Taylor instabilities resulting from a laser-driven radiative shock, Phys. Plasmas 25, 052118 (2018).
  13. S. W. Haan et al., Point design targets, specifications, and requirements for the 2010 ignition campaign on the National Ignition Facility, Phys. Plasmas 18, 051001 (2011).
  14. R. B. Randolph, J. A. Oertel, D. W. Schmidt, M. N. Lee, B. M. Patterson, K. C. Henderson, and C. E. Hamilton, Process development and micro-machining of MARBLE foam-cored rexolite hemi-shell ablator capsules, Fusion Sci. Technol. 70, 230 (2016).
  15. R. E. Olson, T. J. Murphy, B. M. Haines, M. R. Douglas, B. J. Albright, M. A. Gunderson, Y. Kim, T. Cardenas, C. E. Hamilton, and R. B. Randolph, Development of the MARBLE experimental platform at the National Ignition Facility, Phys. Plasmas 27, 102703 (2020).
  16. N. N. Vazirani, R. Sacks, B. M. Haines, M. J. Grosskopf, D. J. Stark, and P. A. Bradley, Bayesian batch optimization for molybdenum versus tungsten inertial confinement fusion double shell target design, Stat. Anal. Data Min. 17, e11698 (2024).
  17. J. J. Kuczek and B. M. Haines, Simulated impact of fill tube geometry on recent high-yield implosions at the National Ignition Facility, Phys. Plasmas 30, 092706 (2023).
  18. B. M. Haines, W. S. Daughton, E. N. Loomis, E. C. Merritt, D. S. Montgomery, J. P. Sauppe, and J. L. Kline, Computational study of instability and fill tube mitigation strategies for double shell implosions, Phys. Plasmas 26, 102705 (2019).
  19. K. L. Baker et al., Fill tube dynamics in inertial confinement fusion implosions with high density carbon ablators, Phys. Plasmas 27, 112706 (2020).
  20. C. R. Weber et al., Mixing in ICF implosions on the National Ignition Facility caused by the fill-tube, Phys. Plasmas 27, 032703 (2020).
  21. C. Zulick, Y. Aglitskiy, M. Karasik, A. J. Schmitt, A. L. Velikovich, and S. P. Obenschain, Multimode hydrodynamic instability growth of preimposed isolated defects in ablatively driven foils, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 055001 (2020).
  22. I. V. Igumenshchev, V. N. Goncharov, W. T. Shmayda, D. R. Harding, T. C. Sangster, and D. D. Meyerhofer, Effects of local defect growth in direct-drive cryogenic implosions on omega, Phys. Plasmas 20, 082703 (2013).
  23. D. Eriksson, M. Pearce, J. R. Gardner, R. D. Turner, and M. Poloczek, Scalable global optimization via local Bayesian optimization, arXiv:1910.01739.
  24. D. M. Sterbentz, C. F. Jekel, D. A. White, S. Aubry, H. E. Lorenzana, and J. L. Belof, Design optimization for Richtmyer–Meshkov instability suppression at shock-compressed material interfaces, Phys. Fluids 34, 082109 (2022).
  25. Y. Aglitskiy, M. Karasik, A. L. Velikovich, V. Serlin, J. L. Weaver, T. J. Kessler, S. P. Nikitin, A. J. Schmitt, S. P. Obenschain, N. Metzler, and J. Oh, Observed transition from Richtmyer-Meshkov jet formation through feedout oscillations to Rayleigh-Taylor instability in a laser target, Phys. Plasmas 19, 102707 (2012).
  26. Y. Aglitskiy, A. L. Velikovich, M. Karasik, V. Serlin, C. J. Pawley, A. J. Schmitt, S. P. Obenschain, A. N. Mostovych, J. H. Gardner, and N. Metzler, Direct observation of mass oscillations due to ablative Richtmyer-Meshkov instability in plastic targets, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 265001 (2001).
  27. Y. Aglitskiy, A. L. Velikovich, M. Karasik, V. Serlin, C. J. Pawley, A. J. Schmitt, S. P. Obenschain, A. N. Mostovych, J. H. Gardner, and N. Metzler, Direct observation of mass oscillations due to ablative Richtmyer–Meshkov instability and feedout in planar plastic targets, Phys. Plasmas 9, 2264 (2002).
  28. F. Christ, G. Schaumann, N. Schott, J. Vetter, A. Blaeser, and M. Roth, Two-photon polymerization for inertial fusion energy target fabrication, Appl. Phys. A 131, 543 (2025).
  29. S. Pandolfi et al., Novel fabrication tools for dynamic compression targets with engineered voids using photolithography methods, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 93, 103502 (2022).
  30. C. Parisuaña et al., Shock propagation in aerogel and TPP foams for inertial fusion energy target design, Phys. Plasmas 32, 082707 (2025).
  31. D. S. Hodge et al., Single-shot in-line x-ray phase-contrast imaging of void-shockwave interactions in fusion energy materials, Phys. Plasmas 32, 083903 (2025).
  32. E. M. Escauriza, J. P. Duarte, D. J. Chapman, M. E. Rutherford, L. Farbaniec, J. C. Jonsson, L. C. Smith, M. P. Olbinado, J. Skidmore, P. Foster, T. Ringrose, A. Rack, and D. E. Eakins, Collapse dynamics of spherical cavities in a solid under shock loading, Sci. Rep. 10, 8455 (2020).
  33. D. Ranjan, J. Oakley, and R. Bonazza, Shock-bubble interactions, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 43, 117 (2011).
  34. D. Maler, O. Belozerov, A. Godinger, S. Efimov, J. Strucka, Y. Yao, K. Mughal, B. Lukic, A. Rack, S. N. Bland, and Y. E. Krasik, Multi frame radiography of supersonic water jets interacting with a foil target, J. Appl. Phys. 135, 045901 (2024).
  35. See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/3wgy-sgkz for plots of the electrical drive and resistive energy deposition and a figure showing the approximate experimental layout at ID19.
  36. V. I. Oreshkin and R. B. Baksht, Wire explosion in vacuum, IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. 48, 1214 (2020).
  37. G. T. Bokman, S. Fiorini, J. Strucka, B. Lukić, S. N. Bland, K. Mughal, S. Liu, A. Rack, and O. Supponen, Planar shock-induced bubble collapse and jetting in water captured via x-ray phase contrast imaging, Appl. Phys. Lett. 127, 014102 (2025).
  38. J. Strucka, B. Lukic, M. Koerner, J. W. D. Halliday, Y. Yao, K. Mughal, D. Maler, S. Efimov, J. Skidmore, A. Rack, Y. Krasik, J. Chittenden, and S. N. Bland, Synchrotron radiography of Richtmyer–Meshkov instability driven by exploding wire arrays, Phys. Fluids 35, 044108 (2023).
  39. M. P. Olbinado, X. Just, J.-L. Gelet, P. Lhuissier, M. Scheel, P. Vagovic, T. Sato, R. Graceffa, J. Schulz, A. Mancuso, J. Morse, and A. Rack, MHz frame rate hard x-ray phase-contrast imaging using synchrotron radiation, Opt. Express 25, 13857 (2017).
  40. M. P. Olbinado, V. Cantelli, O. Mathon, S. Pascarelli, J. Grenzer, A. Pelka, M. Roedel, I. Prencipe, A. L. Garcia, U. Helbig, D. Kraus, U. Schramm, T. Cowan, M. Scheel, P. Pradel, T. D. Resseguier, and A. Rack, Ultra high-speed x-ray imaging of laser-driven shock compression using synchrotron light, J. Phys. D 51, 055601 (2018).
  41. S. Bakhrakh, O. Drennov, and N. Kovalev, Hydrodynamic Instability in Strong Media (1997), https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/515973.
  42. R. Anderson et al., The multiphysics on advanced platforms project, Technical Report No. LLNL-TR-815869, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA, 2020.
  43. R. Rieben, Poster: The MARBL multi-physics code, in Exascale Computing Project Annual Meeting (2020).
  44. R. W. Anderson, V. A. Dobrev, T. V. Kolev, R. N. Rieben, and V. Z. Tomov, High-order multi-material ALE hydrodynamics, SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 40, B32 (2018).
  45. D. M. Sterbentz, C. F. Jekel, D. A. White, R. N. Rieben, and J. L. Belof, Linear shaped-charge jet optimization using machine learning methods, J. Appl. Phys. 134, 045102 (2023).
  46. G. Dimonte, G. Terrones, F. J. Cherne, T. C. Germann, V. Dupont, K. Kadau, W. T. Buttler, D. M. Oro, C. Morris, and D. L. Preston, Use of the Richtmyer–Meshkov instability to infer yield stress at high-energy densities, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 264502 (2011).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation