Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Physical Mechanism behind the Early Onset of the Ultimate State in Supergravitational Centrifugal Thermal Convection

Lei Ren1, Jun Zhong1, Rushi Lai2, and Chao Sun1,2,*

  • 1New Cornerstone Science Laboratory, Center for Combustion Energy, Key Laboratory for Thermal Science and Power Engineering of MoE, Department of Energy and Power Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
  • 2Department of Engineering Mechanics, School of Aerospace Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China

  • *Contact author: chaosun@tsinghua.edu.cn

Phys. Rev. Lett. 136, 214002 – Published 28 May, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/36c8-2jy3

Abstract

We present a combined experimental and numerical investigation of the transition from the classical to the ultimate regime of thermal turbulence in a supergravitational centrifugal convection system. The transition is found to be robust, with the critical Rayleigh number decreasing systematically as the Froude number, defined as the ratio of centrifugal to Earth’s gravity, decreases, highlighting the effect of residual gravity. Once the Rayleigh number reaches the transition threshold, the Stewartson layer induced by residual Earth gravity becomes comparable in thickness to the viscous boundary layer, and their interaction results in a coupled flow that distorts the viscous boundary layer, triggering its transition from laminar to turbulent flow and leading to a sharp increase in heat transport. These findings demonstrate the key role of the Stewartson layer induced by residual gravity in facilitating the transition to the ultimate regime in supergravitational centrifugal thermal convection.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (48)

  1. D. P. Mckenzie, J. M. Roberts, and N. O. Weiss, Convection in the earth’s mantle: Towards a numerical simulation, J. Fluid Mech. 62, 465 (1974).
  2. J. C. Wyngaard, Atmospheric turbulence, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 24, 205 (1992).
  3. J. M. Owen and C. A. Long, Review of buoyancy-induced flow in rotating cavities, J. Turbomach. 137, 111001 (2015).
  4. G. Ahlers, S. Grossmann, and D. Lohse, Heat transfer and large scale dynamics in turbulent Rayleigh-Bénard convection, Rev. Mod. Phys. 81, 503 (2009).
  5. D. Lohse and K.-Q. Xia, Small-scale properties of turbulent Rayleigh-Bénard convection, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 42, 335 (2010).
  6. F. Chilla and J. Schumacher, New perspectives in turbulent Rayleigh-Bénard convection, Eur. Phys. J. E 35, 58 (2012).
  7. D. Lohse and O. Shishkina, Ultimate Rayleigh-Bénard turbulence, Rev. Mod. Phys. 96, 035001 (2024).
  8. R. H. Kraichnan, Turbulent thermal convection at arbitrary Prandtl number, Phys. Fluids 5, 1374 (1962).
  9. O. Shishkina and D. Lohse, Ultimate regime of Rayleigh-Bénard turbulence: Subregimes and their scaling relations for the Nusselt vs Rayleigh and Prandtl numbers, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 144001 (2024).
  10. W. V. R. Malkus, The heat transport and spectrum of thermal turbulence, Proc. R. Soc. A 225, 196 (1954).
  11. B. Castaing, G. Gunaratne, F. Heslot, L. Kadanoff, A. Libchaber, S. Thomae, X.-Z. Wu, S. Zaleski, and G. Zanetti, Scaling of hard thermal turbulence in Rayleigh-Bénard convection, J. Fluid Mech. 204, 1 (1989).
  12. B. I. Shraiman and E. D. Siggia, Heat transport in high-Rayleigh-number convection, Phys. Rev. A 42, 3650 (1990).
  13. X. Chavanne, F. Chillà, B. Castaing, B. Hébral, B. Chabaud, and J. Chaussy, Observation of the ultimate regime in Rayleigh-Bénard convection, Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 3648 (1997).
  14. S. Grossmann and D. Lohse, Multiple scaling in the ultimate regime of thermal convection, Phys. Fluids 23, 045108 (2011).
  15. S. Grossmann and D. Lohse, Logarithmic temperature profiles in the ultimate regime of thermal convection, Phys. Fluids 24, 125103 (2012).
  16. F. Heslot, B. Castaing, and A. Libchaber, Transitions to turbulence in helium gas, Phys. Rev. A 36, 5870 (1987).
  17. J. A. Glazier, T. Segawa, A. Naert, and M. Sano, Evidence against ’ultrahard’ thermal turbulence at very high Rayleigh numbers, Nature (London) 398, 307 (1999).
  18. J. J. Niemela, L. Skrbek, K. R. Sreenivasan, and R. J. Donnelly, Turbulent convection at very high Rayleigh numbers, Nature (London) 404, 837 (2000).
  19. G. Ahlers, D. Funfschilling, and E. Bodenschatz, Transitions in heat transport by turbulent convection at Rayleigh numbers up to 1015, New J. Phys. 11, 123001 (2009).
  20. D. Funfschilling, E. Bodenschatz, and G. Ahlers, Search for the ‘ultimate state’ in turbulent Rayleigh-Bénard convection, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 014503 (2009).
  21. X. He, D. Funfschilling, H. Nobach, E. Bodenschatz, and G. Ahlers, Transition to the ultimate state of turbulent Rayleigh-Bénard convection, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 024502 (2012).
  22. H. Jiang, X. Zhu, D. Wang, S. G. Huisman, and C. Sun, Supergravitational turbulent thermal convection, Sci. Adv. 6, eabb8676 (2020).
  23. H. Jiang, D. Wang, S. Liu, and C. Sun, Experimental evidence for the existence of the ultimate regime in rapidly rotating turbulent thermal convection, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 204502 (2022).
  24. X. Liao, K. Zhang, and Y. Chang, On boundary-layer convection in a rotating fluid layer, J. Fluid Mech. 549, 375 (2006).
  25. E. M. King, S. Stellmach, J. Noir, U. Hansen, and J. M. Aurnou, Boundary layer control of rotating convection systems, Nature (London) 457, 301 (2009).
  26. J.-Q. Zhong, R. J. A. M. Stevens, H. J. H. Clercx, R. Verzicco, D. Lohse, and G. Ahlers, Prandtl-, Rayleigh-, and Rossby-number dependence of heat transport in turbulent rotating Rayleigh-Bénard convection, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 044502 (2009).
  27. R. P. J. Kunnen, R. J. A. M. Stevens, J. Overkamp, C. Sun, G. F. van Heijst, and H. J. H. Clercx, The role of Stewartson and Ekman layers in turbulent rotating Rayleigh-Bénard convection, J. Fluid Mech. 688, 422 (2011).
  28. R. P. J. Kunnen, H. J. H. Clercx, and G. J. F. van Heijst, The structure of sidewall boundary layers in confined rotating Rayleigh-Bénard convection, J. Fluid Mech. 727, 509 (2013).
  29. E. M. King and J. M. Aurnou, Turbulent convection in liquid metal with and without rotation, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 110, 6688 (2013).
  30. J. S. Cheng, J. M. Aurnou, K. Julien, and R. P. J. Kunnen, A heuristic framework for next-generation models of geostrophic convective turbulence, Geophys. Astrophys. Fluid Dyn. 112, 277 (2018).
  31. X. Zhang, D. P. M. van Gils, S. Horn, M. Wedi, L. Zwirner, G. Ahlers, R. E. Ecke, S. Weiss, E. Bodenschatz, and O. Shishkina, Boundary zonal flow in rotating turbulent Rayleigh-Bénard convection, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 084505 (2020).
  32. M. Wedi, D. P. M. van Gils, E. Bodenschatz, and S. Weiss, Rotating turbulent thermal convection at very large Rayleigh numbers, J. Fluid Mech. 912, A30 (2021).
  33. R. E. Ecke, X. Zhang, and O. Shishkina, Connecting wall modes and boundary zonal flows in rotating Rayleigh-Bénard convection, Phys. Rev. Fluids 7, L011501 (2022).
  34. R. E. Ecke and O. Shishkina, Turbulent rotating Rayleigh-Bénard convection, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 55, 603 (2023).
  35. Z. Yao, M. S. Emran, A. Teimurazov, and O. Shishkina, Direct numerical simulations of centrifugal convection: From gravitational to centrifugal buoyancy dominance, Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 236, 126314 (2025).
  36. R. Lai, J. Zhong, and C. Sun, Gravity drives the flow within the Stewartson layer in centrifugal convection, J. Fluid Mech. 1022, A43 (2025).
  37. K. Stewartson, On almost rigid rotations, J. Fluid Mech. 3, 17 (1957).
  38. K. Stewartson, On almost rigid rotations. Part 2, J. Fluid Mech. 26, 131 (1966).
  39. P. E. Roche, The ultimate state of convection: A unifying picture of very high Rayleigh numbers experiments, New J. Phys. 22, 073056 (2020).
  40. D. Lohse and O. Shishkina, Ultimate turbulent thermal convection, Phys. Today 76, 26 (2023).
  41. L. Ren, J. Zhong, R. Lai, and C. Sun, 10.5281/zenodo.19675706.
  42. R. Verzicco and P. Orlandi, A finite-difference scheme for three-dimensional incompressible flows in cylindrical coordinates, J. Comput. Phys. 123, 402 (1996).
  43. E. P. van der Poel, R. Ostilla-Mónico, J. Donners, and R. Verzicco, A pencil distributed finite difference code for strongly turbulent wall-bounded flows, Comput. Fluids 116, 10 (2015).
  44. X. Zhu, E. Phillips, V. Spandan, J. Donners, G. Ruetsch, J. Romero, R. Ostilla-Mónico, Y. Yang, D. Lohse, R. Verzicco, M. Fatica, and R. J. A. M. Stevens, AFiD-GPU: A versatile Navier–Stokes solver for wall-bounded turbulent flows on GPU clusters, Comput. Phys. Commun. 229, 199 (2018).
  45. R. Courant, K. Friedrichs, and H. Lewy, Über die partiellen differenzengleichungen der mathematischen physik, Math. Ann. 100, 32 (1928).
  46. D. Wang, H. Jiang, S. Liu, X. Zhu, and C. Sun, Effects of radius ratio on annular centrifugal Rayleigh-Bénard convection, J. Fluid Mech. 930, A19 (2022).
  47. G. Ahlers, E. Brown, F. F. Araujo, D. Funfschilling, S. Grossmann, and D. Lohse, Non-Oberbeck–Boussinesq effects in strongly turbulent Rayleigh-Bénard convection, J. Fluid Mech. 569, 409 (2006).
  48. S. Weiss, M. S. Emran, and O. Shishkina, What Rayleigh numbers are achievable under Oberbeck–Boussinesq conditions?, J. Fluid Mech. 986, R2 (2024).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation