Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Novel Approach to Investigate ATOMKI Anomaly Using Coherent CAPTAIN-Mills Detectors

Bhaskar Dutta1,*, Bai-Shan Hu2,3,†, Wei-Chih Huang1,‡, and Richard G. Van de Water4,§

  • *Contact author: dutta@physics.tamu.edu
  • †Contact author: baishan@tamu.edu
  • ‡Contact author: s104021230@tamu.edu
  • §Contact author: vdwater@lanl.gov

Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 011801 – Published 1 July, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/34pk-53tf

Abstract

ATOMKI nuclear anomaly has suggested a new BSM (beyond the standard model) boson with mass ∼17  MeV emitted from excited nuclei and quickly decays into a pair of e+e−. In order to search for the new particle, we propose a new approach that utilizes the ongoing coherent CAPTAIN-Mills (CCM) ten-ton LAr (liquid argon) detectors. The neutrons from the Lujan target can scatter inelastically, but the PMT glass in the CCM detector can produce the new boson which solves the ATOMKI anomaly. The new boson can be detected from its decay to a e+e− pair. We find that CCM probes a large area of the anomaly-allowable parameter space. We also show the prediction for a 100-ton LAr detector and five-ton EOS water detector.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (37)

  1. J. L. Feng, B. Fornal, I. Galon, S. Gardner, J. Smolinsky, T. M. P. Tait, and P. Tanedo, Protophobic fifth-force interpretation of the observed anomaly in Be8 nuclear transitions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 071803 (2016).
  2. E. Cartlidge, Has a Hungarian physics lab found a fifth force of nature?, Nature (London), 10.1038/nature.2016.19957 (2016).
  3. A. J. Krasznahorkay et al., Observation of anomalous internal pair creation in Be8: A possible indication of a light, neutral boson, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 042501 (2016).
  4. A. J. Krasznahorkay, M. Csatlos, L. Csige, Z. Gacsi, J. Gulyas, A. Nagy, N. Sas, J. Timar, T. G. Tornyi, I. Vajda, and A. J. Krasznahorkay, New results on the Be8 anomaly, J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 1056, 012028 (2018).
  5. A. J. Krasznahorkay, M. Csatlós, L. Csige, J. Gulyás, A. Krasznahorkay, B. M. Nyakó, I. Rajta, J. Timár, I. Vajda, and N. J. Sas, New anomaly observed in He4 supports the existence of the hypothetical X17 particle, Phys. Rev. C 104, 044003 (2021).
  6. A. J. Krasznahorkay et al., New evidence supporting the existence of the hypothetic X17 particle, arXiv:1910.10459.
  7. A. J. Krasznahorkay et al., New anomaly observed in C12 supports the existence and the vector character of the hypothetical X17 boson, Phys. Rev. C 106, L061601 (2022).
  8. D. Barducci and C. Toni, An updated view on the ATOMKI nuclear anomalies, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2023) 154; 07 (2023) 168(E).
  9. J. L. Feng, B. Fornal, I. Galon, S. Gardner, J. Smolinsky, T. M. P. Tait, and P. Tanedo, Particle physics models for the 17 MeV anomaly in beryllium nuclear decays, Phys. Rev. D 95, 035017 (2017).
  10. J. L. Feng, T. M. P. Tait, and C. B. Verhaaren, Dynamical evidence for a fifth force explanation of the ATOMKI nuclear anomalies, Phys. Rev. D 102, 036016 (2020).
  11. J. Kozaczuk, D. E. Morrissey, and S. R. Stroberg, Light axial vector bosons, nuclear transitions, and the Be8 anomaly, Phys. Rev. D 95, 115024 (2017).
  12. W. Abdallah, R. Gandhi, T. Ghosh, N. Khan, S. Roy, and S. Roy, A 17 MeV pseudoscalar and the LSND, MiniBooNE and ATOMKI anomalies, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2024) 086.
  13. A. A. Aguilar-Arevalo et al. (CCM Collaboration), First dark matter search results from coherent captain-mills, Phys. Rev. D 106, 012001 (2022).
  14. A. A. Aguilar-Arevalo et al. (CCM Collaboration), First leptophobic dark matter search from the coherent–CAPTAIN-Mills liquid argon detector, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 021801 (2022).
  15. A. A. Aguilar-Arevalo et al. (CCM Collaboration), Prospects for detecting axionlike particles at the Coherent CAPTAIN-Mills experiment, Phys. Rev. D 107, 095036 (2023).
  16. A. A. Aguilar-Arevalo et al., Testing meson portal dark sector solutions to the MiniBooNE anomaly at the Coherent CAPTAIN Mills experiment, Phys. Rev. D 109, 095017 (2024).
  17. M. Toups et al., PIP2-BD: GeV proton beam dump at Fermilab’s PIP-II linac, in Snowmass 2021 (2022), arXiv:2203.08079.
  18. T. Anderson et al., Eos: Conceptual design for a demonstrator of hybrid optical detector technology, J. Instrum. 18, P02009 (2023).
  19. K. Afanaciev et al. (MEG II Collaboration), Search for the X17 particle in Li7(p,e+e−)Be8 processes with the MEG II detector, arXiv:2411.07994.
  20. X. Zhang and G. A. Miller, Can a protophobic vector boson explain the ATOMKI anomaly?, Phys. Lett. B 813, 136061 (2021).
  21. R. Van De Water, Probing the dark sector with accelerators: New opportunities!, https://www.int.washington.edu/sites/default/files/schedule_session_files/VanDeWater_R.pdf (2023); Talk at Seattle: Interplay of Nuclear, Neutrino and BSM Physics at Low-Energies https://www.int.washington.edu/program/schedule/1205.
  22. Hamamatsu r5912, https://hep.hamamatsu.com/eu/en/products/R5912.html.
  23. D. Tilley, H. Weller, and C. Cheves, Energy levels of light nuclei a = 16–17, Nucl. Phys. A564, 1 (1993).
  24. W. Pellico, C. Bhat, J. Eldred, C. Johnstone, J. Johnstone, K. Seiya, C.-Y. Tan, M. Toups, P. deNiverville, and R. Van De Water, FNAL PIP-II accumulator ring, arXiv:2203.07339.
  25. A. A. Aguilar-Arevalo et al., Physics opportunities at a beam dump facility at PIP-II at Fermilab and beyond, arXiv:2311.09915.
  26. J. Kelley, J. Purcell, and C. Sheu, Energy levels of light nuclei a=12, Nucl. Phys. A968, 71 (2017).
  27. C. W. Johnson, W. E. Ormand, K. S. McElvain, and H. Shan, bigstick: A flexible configuration-interaction shell-model code, arXiv:1801.08432.
  28. C. W. Johnson, W. E. Ormand, and P. G. Krastev, Factorization in large-scale many-body calculations, Comput. Phys. Commun. 184, 2761 (2013).
  29. E. K. Warburton and B. A. Brown, Effective interactions for the 0p1s0d nuclear shell-model space, Phys. Rev. C 46, 923 (1992).
  30. C. Yuan, T. Suzuki, T. Otsuka, F. Xu, and N. Tsunoda, Shell-model study of boron, carbon, nitrogen, and oxygen isotopes with a monopole-based universal interaction, Phys. Rev. C 85, 064324 (2012).
  31. N. Michel and M. Płoszajczak, Gamow Shell Model: The Unified Theory of Nuclear Structure and Reactions (Springer International Publishing, New York, 2021).
  32. N. Michel, J. G. Li, L. H. Ru, and W. Zuo, Calculation of the Thomas-Ehrman shift in F16 and O15(p,p) cross sections within the Gamow shell model, Phys. Rev. C 106, L011301 (2022).
  33. H. Furutani, H. Horiuchi, and R. Tamagaki, Cluster-model study of the T=1 states in A=4 system: He3+p scattering, Prog. Theor. Phys. 62, 981 (1979).
  34. H. Furutani, H. Kanada, T. Kaneko, S. Nagata, H. Nishioka, S. Okabe, S. Saito, T. Sakuda, and M. Seya, Chapter III. Study of non-alpha-nuclei based on the viewpoint of cluster correlations, Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl. 68, 193 (1980).
  35. Y. Jaganathen, R. M. I. Betan, N. Michel, W. Nazarewicz, and M. Płoszajczak, Quantified Gamow shell model interaction for psd-shell nuclei, Phys. Rev. C 96, 054316 (2017).
  36. J. G. Li (private communication).
  37. D. Newmark, Cherenkov light identification at coherent CAPTAIN-Mills experiment, https://indico.global/event/805/contributions/23562/attachments/11187/16552/MayDPF2024 (2024); DPF-PHENO (to be published).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation