- Open Access
Complete Next-to-Leading-Order Standard-Model-Effective-Field-Theory Electroweak Corrections to Higgs Decays
Phys. Rev. Lett. 136, 051801 – Published 4 February, 2026
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/2wqp-5zfm
Abstract
Precise predictions for Higgs decays are a crucial ingredient of the search for beyond the standard model physics and the standard model effective field theory (SMEFT) is a valuable tool for quantifying deviations from the standard model. We present the complete set of predictions for the two- and three-body Higgs decays at next-to-leading order, considering QCD and electroweak corrections and including all contributions from the dimension-6 SMEFT operators and with an arbitrary flavor structure. Including the next-to-leading-order SMEFT results for Higgs decays greatly increases the sensitivity to beyond the standard model physics of the process at FCC-ee, as compared with that obtained using only the total cross section.
Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)
Article Text
Supplemental Material
References (44)
- I. Brivio and M. Trott, Phys. Rep. 793, 1 (2019).
- J. de Blas, A. Goncalves, V. Miralles, L. Reina, L. Silvestrini, and M. Valli, arXiv:2507.06191.
- E. Celada, T. Giani, J. ter Hoeve, L. Mantani, J. Rojo, A. N. Rossia, M. O. A. Thomas, and E. Vryonidou, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2024) 091.
- J. Ellis, M. Madigan, K. Mimasu, V. Sanz, and T. You, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2021) 279.
- J. de Blas, Y. Du, C. Grojean, J. Gu, V. Miralles, M. E. Peskin, J. Tian, M. Vos, and E. Vryonidou, in Snowmass 2021 (2022), arXiv:2206.08326.
- C. Degrande, G. Durieux, F. Maltoni, K. Mimasu, E. Vryonidou, and C. Zhang, Phys. Rev. D 103, 096024 (2021).
- I. Brivio, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2021) 073.
- S. Dawson and P. P. Giardino, Phys. Rev. D 101, 013001 (2020).
- L. Bellafronte, S. Dawson, and P. P. Giardino, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2023) 208.
- G. Bernardi et al., arXiv:2203.06520.
- M. Benedikt et al. (FCC Collaboration), 10.17181/CERN.9DKX.TDH9 (2025).
- H. Cheng et al. (CEPC Physics Study Group), in Snowmass 2021 (2022), arXiv:2205.08553.
- K. Asteriadis, S. Dawson, P. P. Giardino, and R. Szafron, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 231801 (2024).
- K. Asteriadis, S. Dawson, P. P. Giardino, and R. Szafron, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2025) 162.
- B. Grzadkowski, M. Iskrzynski, M. Misiak, and J. Rosiek, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2010) 085.
- J. M. Cullen and B. D. Pecjak, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2020) 079.
- J. M. Cullen, B. D. Pecjak, and D. J. Scott, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2019) 173.
- R. Gauld, B. D. Pecjak, and D. J. Scott, Phys. Rev. D 94, 074045 (2016).
- S. Dawson, M. Forslund, and P. P. Giardino, Phys. Rev. D 111, 015016 (2025).
- S. Dawson and P. P. Giardino, Phys. Rev. D 98, 095005 (2018).
- A. Dedes, M. Paraskevas, J. Rosiek, K. Suxho, and L. Trifyllis, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2018) 103.
- C. Hartmann and M. Trott, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 191801 (2015).
- S. Dawson and P. P. Giardino, Phys. Rev. D 97, 093003 (2018).
- A. Dedes, K. Suxho, and L. Trifyllis, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2019) 115.
- A. Martin and M. Trott, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2024) 170.
- T. Corbett, A. Martin, and M. Trott, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2021) 147.
- A. Rossia, M. Thomas, and E. Vryonidou, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2023) 132.
- E. E. Jenkins, A. V. Manohar, and M. Trott, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2013) 087.
- E. E. Jenkins, A. V. Manohar, and M. Trott, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2014) 035.
- R. Alonso, E. E. Jenkins, A. V. Manohar, and M. Trott, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2014) 159.
- A. Denner and S. Dittmaier, Phys. Rep. 864, 1 (2020).
- A. Biekötter and B. D. Pecjak, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2025) 134.
- A. Freitas, Q. Song, and K. Xie, Phys. Rev. D 108, 053006 (2023).
- D. Y. Bardin, A. Leike, T. Riemann, and M. Sachwitz, Phys. Lett. B 206, 539 (1988).
In the SMEFT, the real corrections to include a diagram with a -boson propagator that can go on shell. We avoid the resulting divergence by consistently incorporating the width through the complex-mass scheme.
- I. Brivio, T. Corbett, and M. Trott, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2019) 056.
- See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/2wqp-5zfm for the expression for the total Higgs width without any flavour assumptions or neglected coefficients.
- J. Altmann et al., ECFA Higgs, electroweak, and top factory study, arXiv:2506.15390.
Since in Ref. [38] the uncertainty on is given considering only the hadronic decay channels of the boson, we use to denote the sum of the hadronic decays, i.e., , , and we sum over the charge of the bosons.
- M. McCullough, Phys. Rev. D 90, 015001 (2014); 92, 039903(E) (2015).
- V. Maura, B. A. Stefanek, and T. You, arXiv:2503.13719.
- J. ter Hoeve, L. Mantani, J. Rojo, A. N. Rossia, and E. Vryonidou, Phys. Rev. D 112, 013008 (2025).
- G. Degrassi, P. P. Giardino, F. Maltoni, and D. Pagani, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2016) 080.
- L. Bellafronte, S. Dawson, C. Del Pio, M. Forslund, and P. P. Giardino, NEWiSH results, GitLab, GitLab repositoryhttps://gitlab.com/mforslund/newish/-/tree/main/results (2025).