Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Editors' Suggestion
  • Open Access

Light Dark Matter Search with 7.8 Tonne-Year of Ionization-Only Data in XENONnT

E. Aprile1, J. Aalbers2, K. Abe3, M. Adrover4, S. Ahmed Maouloud5, L. Althueser6, B. Andrieu5, E. Angelino7, D. Antón Martin8 et al. (XENON Collaboration)

D. Antón Martin8, S. R. Armbruster9, F. Arneodo10, L. Baudis4, M. Bazyk11, V. Beligotti7, L. Bellagamba12, R. Biondi7, A. Bismark4, K. Boese9, R. M. Braun6, G. Bruni12, G. Bruno11, R. Budnik13, C. Cai14, C. Capelli4, J. M. R. Cardoso15, A. P. Cimental Chávez4, A. P. Colijn16, J. Conrad17, J. J. Cuenca-García4, V. D’Andrea7,*, L. C. Daniel Garcia11, M. P. Decowski16, A. Deisting18, C. Di Donato19,7, P. Di Gangi12, S. Diglio11, K. Eitel20, S. el Morabit16, R. Elleboro19, A. Elykov20, A. D. Ferella19,7, C. Ferrari7, H. Fischer21, T. Flehmke17, M. Flierman16, R. Frankel13, D. Fuchs17, W. Fulgione22,7, C. Fuselli16, F. Gao14, R. Giacomobono23, F. Girard5, R. Glade-Beucke21, L. Grandi8, J. Grigat21, H. Guan24, M. Guida9, P. Gyorgy18, R. Hammann9, C. Hils18, L. Hoetzsch4, N. F. Hood25, M. Iacovacci23, Y. Itow26, J. Jakob6, F. Joerg4, Y. Kaminaga3, M. Kara20, S. Kazama26, P. Kharbanda16, M. Kobayashi26, D. Koke6, K. Kooshkjalali18, A. Kopec25,†, H. Landsman13, R. F. Lang24, L. Levinson13, A. Li25, I. Li27, S. Li28, S. Liang27, Z. Liang28, Y.-T. Lin9,6, S. Lindemann21, M. Lindner9, K. Liu14, M. Liu1, F. Lombardi18, J. A. M. Lopes15,‡, G. M. Lucchetti12, T. Luce21, Y. Ma25, C. Macolino19,7, G. C. Madduri21, J. Mahlstedt17, F. Marignetti23, T. Marrodán Undagoitia9, K. Martens3, J. Masbou11, S. Mastroianni23, V. Mazza12, A. Melchiorre19,7, J. Merz18, M. Messina7, A. Michel20, K. Miuchi29, A. Molinario22, S. Moriyama3, M. Murra1, J. Müller21, K. Ni25, C. T. Oba Ishikawa3, U. Oberlack18, S. Ouahada4, B. Paetsch13, Y. Pan5,§, Q. Pellegrini5, R. Peres4, J. Pienaar13, M. Pierre16, G. Plante1, T. R. Pollmann16, F. Pompa11, A. Prajapati19, L. Principe11, J. Qin27, D. Ramírez García4, A. Ravindran11, A. Razeto7, R. Singh24, L. Sanchez27, J. M. F. dos Santos15, I. Sarnoff10, G. Sartorelli12, J. Schreiner9, P. Schulte6, H. Schulze Eißing6, M. Schumann21, L. Scotto Lavina5, M. Selvi12, F. Semeria12, F. N. Semler21, P. Shagin18, S. Shi1,∥, H. Simgen9, Z. Song30, A. Stevens21, C. Szyszka18, A. Takeda3, Y. Takeuchi29, P.-L. Tan1, D. Thers11, G. Trinchero22, C. D. Tunnell27, K. Valerius20, S. Vecchi31, S. Vetter20, G. Volta9, B. von Krosigk32, C. Weinheimer6, M. Weiss13, D. Wenz6, C. Wittweg4, V. H. S. Wu20, Y. Xing5, D. Xu1, Z. Xu1, M. Yamashita3, J. Yang28, L. Yang25, J. Ye30, M. Yoshida3, L. Yuan8, G. Zavattini31, Y. Zhao14, M. Zhong25, and T. Zhu3 (XENON Collaboration)

  • 1Physics Department, Columbia University, New York, New York 10027, USA
  • 2Nikhef and The University of Groningen, Van Swinderen Institute, 9747AG Groningen, Netherlands
  • 3Kamioka Observatory, Institute for Cosmic Ray Research, and Kavli Institute for the Physics and Mathematics of the Universe (WPI), University of Tokyo, Higashi-Mozumi, Kamioka, Hida, Gifu 506-1205, Japan
  • 4Physik-Institut, University of Zürich, 8057 Zürich, Switzerland
  • 5LPNHE, Sorbonne Université, CNRS/IN2P3, 75005 Paris, France
  • 6Institut für Kernphysik, University of Münster, 48149 Münster, Germany
  • 7INFN-Laboratori Nazionali del Gran Sasso and Gran Sasso Science Institute, 67100 L’Aquila, Italy
  • 8Department of Physics, Enrico Fermi Institute and Kavli Institute for Cosmological Physics, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637, USA
  • 9Max-Planck-Institut für Kernphysik, 69117 Heidelberg, Germany
  • 10New York University Abu Dhabi—Center for Astro, Particle and Planetary Physics, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates
  • 11SUBATECH, IMT Atlantique, CNRS/IN2P3, Nantes Université, Nantes 44307, France
  • 12Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Bologna and INFN-Bologna, 40126 Bologna, Italy
  • 13Department of Particle Physics and Astrophysics, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot 7610001, Israel
  • 14Department of Physics and Center for High Energy Physics, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, People’s Republic of China
  • 15LIBPhys, Department of Physics, University of Coimbra, 3004-516 Coimbra, Portugal
  • 16Nikhef and the University of Amsterdam, Science Park, 1098XG Amsterdam, Netherlands
  • 17Oskar Klein Centre, Department of Physics, Stockholm University, AlbaNova, Stockholm SE-10691, Sweden
  • 18Institut für Physik and Exzellenzcluster PRISMA+, Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz, 55099 Mainz, Germany
  • 19Department of Physics and Chemistry, University of L’Aquila, 67100 L’Aquila, Italy
  • 20Institute for Astroparticle Physics, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, 76021 Karlsruhe, Germany
  • 21Physikalisches Institut, Universität Freiburg, 79104 Freiburg, Germany
  • 22INAF-Astrophysical Observatory of Torino, Department of Physics, University of Torino and INFN-Torino, 10125 Torino, Italy
  • 23Department of Physics “Ettore Pancini,” University of Napoli and INFN-Napoli, 80126 Napoli, Italy
  • 24Department of Physics and Astronomy, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana 47907, USA
  • 25Department of Physics, University of California–San Diego, La Jolla, California 92093, USA
  • 26Kobayashi-Maskawa Institute for the Origin of Particles and the Universe, and Institute for Space-Earth Environmental Research, Nagoya University, Furo-cho, Chikusa-ku, Nagoya, Aichi 464-8602, Japan
  • 27Department of Physics and Astronomy, Rice University, Houston, Texas 77005, USA
  • 28Department of Physics, School of Science, Westlake University, Hangzhou 310030, People’s Republic of China
  • 29Department of Physics, Kobe University, Kobe, Hyogo 657-8501, Japan
  • 30School of Science and Engineering, The Chinese University of Hong Kong (Shenzhen), Shenzhen, Guangdong, 518172, People’s Republic of China
  • 31INFN-Ferrara and Dipartimento di Fisica e Scienze della Terra, Università di Ferrara, 44122 Ferrara, Italy
  • 32Kirchhoff-Institute for Physics, Heidelberg University, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany

  • *Also at INFN-Roma Tre, 00146 Roma, Italy.
  • †Present address: Department of Physics and Astronomy, Bucknell University, Lewisburg, Pennsylvania, USA.
  • ‡Also at Coimbra Polytechnic—ISEC, 3030-199 Coimbra, Portugal.
  • §Contact author: yongyu.pan@lpnhe.in2p3.fr
  • ∥Contact author: shenyang.shi@columbia.edu
  • Contact author: xenon@lngs.infn.it

Phys. Rev. Lett. 137, 051003 – Published 30 July, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/2lrq-f6bk

Abstract

We report on a blinded search for dark matter (DM) using ionization-only (S2-only) signals in XENONnT with a total exposure of 7.83  Tonne-year over 579 days in three science runs. Dedicated background suppression techniques and the first complete S2-only background model in XENONnT provide sensitivity to nuclear recoils of [0.5,5.0]  keVnr and electronic recoils of [0.04,0.7]  keVee. No significant excess over the expected background is observed, and we set 90% confidence level upper limits on spin-independent DM-nucleon and spin-dependent DM-neutron scattering for DM masses between 3 and 8  GeV/c2, as well as on DM-electron scattering, axionlike particles, and dark photons, improving on previous constraints. For spin-independent DM-nucleon scattering, we exclude cross sections above 6.0×10−45  cm2 at a DM mass of 5  GeV/c2, pushing the XENONnT sensitivity closer to the region where coherent elastic neutrino-nucleus scattering becomes an irreducible background.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (72)

  1. E. Aprile et al. (XENON Collaboration), The XENONnT dark matter experiment, Eur. Phys. J. C 84, 784 (2024).
  2. L. Roszkowski, E. M. Sessolo, and S. Trojanowski, WIMP dark matter candidates and searches—Current status and future prospects, Rep. Prog. Phys. 81, 066201 (2018).
  3. G. Jungman, M. Kamionkowski, and K. Griest, Supersymmetric dark matter, Phys. Rep. 267, 195 (1996).
  4. G. Bertone and D. Hooper, History of dark matter, Rev. Mod. Phys. 90, 045002 (2018).
  5. E. Aprile et al. (XENON Collaboration), WIMP dark matter search using a 3.1 tonne-year exposure of the XENONnT experiment, Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 221003 (2025).
  6. E. Aprile et al. (XENON Collaboration), First search for light dark matter in the neutrino fog with XENONnT, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 111802 (2025).
  7. E. Aprile et al. (XENON Collaboration), First indication of solar B8 neutrinos via coherent elastic neutrino-nucleus scattering with XENONnT, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 191002 (2024).
  8. E. Aprile et al. (XENON Collaboration), Light dark matter search with ionization signals in XENON1T, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 251801 (2019).
  9. E. Aprile et al. (XENON Collaboration), Emission of single and few electrons in XENON1T and limits on light dark matter, Phys. Rev. D 106, 022001 (2022); 110, 109903(E) (2024).
  10. E. Aprile et al. (XENON Collaboration), Search for light dark matter in low-energy ionization signals from XENONnT, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 161004 (2025).
  11. M. Zhang et al. (PandaX Collaboration), Search for light dark matter with 259 days of data in PandaX-4T, Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 211001 (2025).
  12. S. Li et al. (PandaX Collaboration), Search for light dark matter with ionization signals in the PandaX-4T experiment, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 261001 (2023).
  13. E. Aprile and T. Doke, Liquid xenon detectors for particle physics and astrophysics, Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 2053 (2010).
  14. G. Plante, E. Aprile, J. Howlett, and Y. Zhang, Liquid-phase purification for multi-tonne xenon detectors, Eur. Phys. J. C 82, 860 (2022).
  15. C. M. B. Monteiro, L. M. P. Fernandes, J. A. M. Lopes, L. C. C. Coelho, J. F. C. A. Veloso, J. M. F. d. Santos, K. Giboni, and E. Aprile, Secondary scintillation yield in pure xenon, J. Instrum. 2, P05001 (2007).
  16. E. Aprile et al. (XENON Collaboration), XENONnT WIMP search: Signal and background modeling and statistical inference, Phys. Rev. D 111, 103040 (2025).
  17. M. Szydagis et al., A review of NEST models for liquid xenon and an exhaustive comparison with other approaches, Front. Detect. Sci. Tech. 2, 1480975 (2024).
  18. E. Aprile et al. (XENON Collaboration), The triggerless data acquisition system of the XENONnT experiment, J. Instrum. 18, P07054 (2023).
  19. E. Aprile et al. (XENON100 Collaboration), Observation and applications of single-electron charge signals in the XENON100 experiment, J. Phys. G 41, 035201 (2014).
  20. D. S. Akerib et al. (LZ, LUX Collaborations), Low-energy radon backgrounds from electrode grids in dual-phase xenon TPCs, arXiv:2602.21177.
  21. D. S. Akerib et al. (LZ Collaboration), Study of few-electron backgrounds in the LUX-ZEPLIN detector, Phys. Rev. D 113, 072018 (2026).
  22. E. Aprile et al. (XENON Collaboration), XENONnT analysis: Signal reconstruction, calibration, and event selection, Phys. Rev. D 111, 062006 (2025).
  23. J. D. Lewin and P. F. Smith, Review of mathematics, numerical factors, and corrections for dark matter experiments based on elastic nuclear recoil, Astropart. Phys. 6, 87 (1996).
  24. J. Menendez, D. Gazit, and A. Schwenk, Spin-dependent WIMP scattering off nuclei, Phys. Rev. D 86, 103511 (2012).
  25. D. Baxter et al., Recommended conventions for reporting results from direct dark matter searches, Eur. Phys. J. C 81, 907 (2021).
  26. M. Hoferichter, J. Menéndez, and A. Schwenk, Coherent elastic neutrino-nucleus scattering: EFT analysis and nuclear responses, Phys. Rev. D 102, 074018 (2020).
  27. E. Del Nobile, M. Kaplinghat, and H.-B. Yu, Direct detection signatures of self-interacting dark matter with a light mediator, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 10 (2015) 055.
  28. N. Fornengo, P. Panci, and M. Regis, Long-range forces in direct dark matter searches, Phys. Rev. D 84, 115002 (2011).
  29. R. Essig, A. Manalaysay, J. Mardon, P. Sorensen, and T. Volansky, First direct detection limits on sub-GeV dark matter from XENON10, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 021301 (2012).
  30. R. Essig, T. Volansky, and T.-T. Yu, New constraints and prospects for sub-GeV dark matter scattering off electrons in xenon, Phys. Rev. D 96, 043017 (2017).
  31. A. R. Caddell, V. V. Flambaum, and B. M. Roberts, Accurate electron-recoil ionization factors for dark matter direct detection in xenon, krypton, and argon, Phys. Rev. D 108, 083030 (2023).
  32. J. Aalbers, B. Pelssers, J. R. Angevaare, and K. D. Morå, JelleAalbers/wimprates: v0.5.0, Zenodo (2023), 10.5281/zenodo.7636982.
  33. M. Pospelov, A. Ritz, and M. B. Voloshin, Bosonic super-WIMPs as keV-scale dark matter, Phys. Rev. D 78, 115012 (2008).
  34. I. M. Bloch, R. Essig, K. Tobioka, T. Volansky, and T.-T. Yu, Searching for dark absorption with direct detection experiments, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2017) 087.
  35. B. L. Henke, E. M. Gullikson, and J. C. Davis, X-ray interactions: Photoabsorption, scattering, transmission, and reflection at E=50–30,00  eV, Z=1–92  Atom, Data Nucl. Data Tables 54, 181 (1993).
  36. E. Aprile et al. (XENON Collaboration), Low-energy nuclear recoil calibration of XENONnT with a YBe88 photoneutron source, arXiv:2412.10451.
  37. J. I. Collar, Applications of an Y88/Be photo-neutron calibration source to dark matter and neutrino experiments, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 211101 (2013).
  38. XENONnT Collaboration, xenon-fuse: Framework for unified simulations of events (version 1.6.0), available from https://github.com/XENONnT/fuse (2025).
  39. J. Aalbers et al., AxFoundation/strax: Stream analysis for xenon TPCs, 10.5281/zenodo.11355772 (2024).
  40. XENONnT Collaboration, XENONnT/straxen: Streaming analysis for xenon, 10.5281/zenodo.12608732 (2024).
  41. E. Aprile et al. (XENON Collaboration), XENONnT analysis: Signal reconstruction, calibration and event selection, Phys. Rev. D 111, 062006 (2025).
  42. E. Aprile et al. (XENON Collaboration), Intrinsic backgrounds from Rn and Kr in the XENON100 experiment, Eur. Phys. J. C 78, 132 (2018).
  43. R. E. Linehan, High voltage electrode development and the LZ experiment’s WIMP search, Ph.D. thesis, Stanford University, 2022.
  44. P. Sorensen, Anisotropic diffusion of electrons in liquid xenon with application to improving the sensitivity of direct dark matter searches, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 635, 41 (2011).
  45. E. Aprile et al. (XENON Collaboration), Material radiopurity control in the XENONnT experiment, Eur. Phys. J. C 82, 599 (2022).
  46. D. S. Akerib et al. (LUX Collaboration), Investigation of background electron emission in the LUX detector, Phys. Rev. D 102, 092004 (2020).
  47. G. Papamakarios, E. Nalisnick, D. J. Rezende, S. Mohamed, and B. Lakshminarayanan, Normalizing flows for probabilistic modeling and inference, J. Mach. Learn. Res. 22, 1 (2021) [arXiv:1912.02762].
  48. A. Paszke, S. Gross, F. Massa, A. Lerer, J. Bradbury, G. Chanan, T. Killeen, Z. Lin, N. Gimelshein, L. Antiga, A. Desmaison, A. Köpf, E. Z. Yang, Z. DeVito, M. Raison, A. Tejani, S. Chilamkurthy, B. Steiner, L. Fang, J. Bai, and S. Chintala, pytorch: An imperative style, high-performance deep learning library, arXiv:1912.01703.
  49. C. Durkan, A. Bekasov, I. Murray, and G. Papamakarios, nflows: Normalizing flows in pytorch, 10.5281/zenodo.4296287 (2020).
  50. M. Abadi et al., tensorflow: Large-scale machine learning on heterogeneous systems, software available from https://www.tensorflow.org/ (2015).
  51. E. Aprile et al. (XENON Collaboration), Low-energy calibration of XENON1T with an internal Ar37 source, Eur. Phys. J. C 83, 542 (2023).
  52. F. Jörg, S. Li, J. Schreiner, H. Simgen, and R. F. Lang, Characterization of a Rn220 source for low-energy electronic recoil calibration of the XENONnT detector, J. Instrum. 18, P11009 (2023).
  53. E. Aprile et al. (XENON Collaboration), Spectral measurement of the Bi214 beta-decay to the Po214 ground state with XENONnT, Phys. Rev. C 113, 044303 (2026).
  54. F. Jörg, G. Eurin, and H. Simgen, Production and characterization of a Rn222-emanating stainless steel source, Appl. Radiat. Isot. 194, 110666 (2023).
  55. C. Krause and D. Shih, Fast and accurate simulations of calorimeter showers with normalizing flows, Phys. Rev. D 107, 113003 (2023).
  56. Z. Bo et al. (PandaX Collaboration), First indication of solar B8 neutrinos through coherent elastic neutrino-nucleus scattering in PandaX-4T, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 191001 (2024).
  57. B. Aharmim et al. (SNO Collaboration), Combined analysis of all three phases of solar neutrino data from the Sudbury Neutrino Observatory, Phys. Rev. C 88, 025501 (2013).
  58. XENONnT Collaboration, XENONnT/alea: v0.3.4 (2025), 10.5281/zenodo.18840642.
  59. G. J. Feldman and R. D. Cousins, A unified approach to the classical statistical analysis of small signals, Phys. Rev. D 57, 3873 (1998).
  60. G. Cowan, K. Cranmer, E. Gross, and O. Vitells, Power-constrained limits, arXiv:1105.3166.
  61. J. Angle et al. (XENON10 Collaboration), A search for light dark matter in XENON10 data, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 051301 (2011); 110, 249901(E) (2013).
  62. E. Aprile et al. (XENON Collaboration), Search for new physics in electronic recoil data from XENONnT, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 161805 (2022).
  63. J. Aalbers et al. (LZ Collaboration), Search for new physics in low-energy electron recoils from the first LZ exposure, Phys. Rev. D 108, 072006 (2023).
  64. P. Agnes et al. (DarkSide-50 Collaboration), Search for low-mass dark matter WIMPs with 12 ton-day exposure of DarkSide-50, Phys. Rev. D 107, 063001 (2023).
  65. P. Agnes et al. (DarkSide Collaboration), Search for dark matter particle interactions with electron final states with DarkSide-50, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 101002 (2023).
  66. T. Aralis et al. (SuperCDMS Collaboration), Constraints on dark photons and axionlike particles from the SuperCDMS Soudan experiment, Phys. Rev. D 101, 052008 (2020); 103, 039901(E) (2021).
  67. C. A. J. O’Hare, New definition of the neutrino floor for direct dark matter searches, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 251802 (2021).
  68. D. Baxter, R. Essig, Y. Hochberg, M. Kaznacheeva, B. von Krosigk, F. Reindl, R. K. Romani, and F. Wagner, Low-energy backgrounds in solid-state phonon and charge detectors, Annu. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 75, 301 (2025).
  69. J. Aalbers et al. (XLZD Collaboration), The XLZD design book: Towards the next-generation liquid xenon observatory for dark matter and neutrino physics, Eur. Phys. J. C 85, 1192 (2025).
  70. A. Abdukerim et al. (PandaX Collaboration), PandaX-xT—A deep underground multi-ten-tonne liquid xenon observatory, Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron. 68, 221011 (2025).
  71. D. S. Akerib et al. (LZ Collaboration), Searches for light dark matter and evidence of coherent elastic neutrino-nucleus scattering of solar neutrinos with the LUX-ZEPLIN (LZ) experiment, arXiv:2512.08065.
  72. XENON Collaboration, XENONnT S2-only data release, 10.5281/zenodo.19687011 (2026).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation