Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Time-Dependent Density Functional Theory Description of U238(n,f), Pu240,242(n,f), and Np237(n,f) Reactions

Aurel Bulgac1, Ibrahim Abdurrahman2, Matthew Kafker1, and Ionel Stetcu2

Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 062501 – Published 5 August, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/2k8k-vpng

Abstract

In nuclei with an odd nucleon number the nonvanishing spin number density is the source of a pseudomagnetic field, which favors the splitting of the nucleon Cooper pairs. Such a pseudomagnetic field is generated always in the dynamics of any nucleus, but its effects on Cooper pairs are significantly enhanced in the dynamic evolution of nuclei with an odd number of nucleons. We present for the first time a microscopic study of the induced fission of the odd neutron compound nuclei U239, Pu241,243, and the odd proton, odd neutron compound nucleus Np238, performed within the time-dependent density functional theory extended to superfluid fermion systems, without any simplifying assumptions, with controlled numerical approximations, and for a very large number of initial conditions. Because of the presence of the unpaired odd nucleon(s), the time-reversal symmetry of the fission compound nucleus is spontaneously broken, an aspect routinely neglected in the most advanced microscopic approaches of the past. The emerging fission fragment properties are quite similar to the properties of fission fragments of neighboring even-even nuclei. The time from saddle-to-scission is often significantly longer in odd-odd or odd-mass nuclei than for even-even nuclei, since systems with unpaired nucleons are easier to excite and the potential energy surfaces of these nuclei have more structure, often resembling a very complicated obstacle course, rather than a more direct evolution of the nuclear shape from the top of the outer fission barrier to the scission configuration. The Pauli blocking approximation, often invoked in the literature, expected to inhibit the fission of nuclei with unpaired nucleons, is surprisingly strongly violated during the fission dynamics.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (58)

  1. M. Born and R. Oppenheimer, Zur Quantentheorie der Molekeln, Ann. Phys. (Berlin) 389, 457 (1927).
  2. J. C. Tully, Molecular dynamics with electronic transitions, J. Chem. Phys. 93, 1061 (1990).
  3. A. Bulgac, S. Jin, and I. Stetcu, Nuclear fission dynamics: Past, present, needs, and future, Front. Phys. 8, 63 (2020).
  4. H. A. Bethe, An attempt to calculate the number of energy levels of a heavy nucleus, Phys. Rev. 50, 332 (1936).
  5. A. Bohr and B. R. Mottelson, Nuclear Structure (Benjamin Inc., New York, 1969), Vol. I.
  6. R. Vandenbosch and J. R. Huizenga, Nuclear Fission (Academic Press, New York, 1973).
  7. N. Bohr and J. A. Wheeler, The mechanism of nuclear fission, Phys. Rev. 56, 426 (1939).
  8. D. L. Hill and J. A. Wheeler, Nuclear constitution and the interpretation of fission phenomena, Phys. Rev. 89, 1102 (1953).
  9. C. Wagemans, ed., The Nuclear Fission Process (CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 1991).
  10. M. Bender, P.-H. Heenen, and P.-G. Reinhard, Self-consistent mean-field models for nuclear structure, Rev. Mod. Phys. 75, 121 (2003).
  11. A. Bulgac, P. Magierski, K. J. Roche, and I. Stetcu, Induced fission of Pu240 within a real-time microscopic framework, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 122504 (2016).
  12. A. Bulgac, S. Jin, K. J. Roche, N. Schunck, and I. Stetcu, Fission dynamics of Pu240 from saddle to scission and beyond, Phys. Rev. C 100, 034615 (2019).
  13. S. Jin, K. J. Roche, I. Stetcu, I. Abdurrahman, and A. Bulgac, The lise package: Solvers for static and time-dependent superfluid local density approximation equations in three dimentions, Comput. Phys. Commun. 269, 108130 (2021).
  14. A. O Caldeira and A. J Leggett, Quantum tunnelling in a dissipative system, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 149, 374 (1983).
  15. D. E. Lyubashevsky, J. D. Shcherbina, and S. G. Kadmensky, Quantum nature of p-even t-odd asymmetries in differential cross sections of fission reactions of unpolarized target nuclei by cold polarized neutrons with escape of prescission and evaporation of light particles, Phys. Rev. C 111, 024609 (2025).
  16. A. Bohr, B. R. Mottelson, and D. Pines, Possible analogy between the excitation spectra of nuclei and those of the superconducting metallic state, Phys. Rev. 110, 936 (1958).
  17. A. Bulgac, M. Kafker, I. Abdurrahman, and I. Stetcu, Non-Markovian character and irreversibility of real-time quantum many-body dynamics, Phys. Rev. C 109, 064617 (2024).
  18. See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/2k8k-vpng for additional technical details, an extensive table of the results of our simulations, and a zip file of data used to generate the figures in the main text.
  19. M. Bender et al., Future of nuclear fission theory, J. Phys. G 47, 113002 (2020).
  20. G. Bertsch, The nuclear density of states in the space of nuclear shapes, Phys. Lett. 95B, 157 (1980).
  21. F. Barranco, R. A. Broglia, and G. F. Bertsch, Exotic radioactivity as a superfluid tunneling phenomenon, Phys. Rev. Lett. 60, 507 (1988).
  22. F. Barranco, G. F. Bertsch, R. A. Broglia, and E. Vigezzi, Large-amplitude motion in superfluid Fermi droplets, Nucl. Phys. A512, 253 (1990).
  23. G. Bertsch and H. Flocard, Pairing effects in nuclear collective motion: Generator coordinate method, Phys. Rev. C 43, 2200 (1991).
  24. G. F. Bertsch, Large amplitude collective motion, Nucl. Phys. A574, 169 (1994).
  25. G. F. Bertsch and A. Bulgac, Comment on “Spontaneous fission: A kinetic approach”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 3539 (1997).
  26. P. Ring and P. Schuck, The Nuclear Many-Body Problem, 1st ed. (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, 2004).
  27. Sara Perez-Martin and L. M. Robledo, Microscopic justification of the equal filling approximation, Phys. Rev. C 78, 014304 (2008).
  28. N. Schunck, M. Verriere, G. Potel Aguilar, R. C. Malone, J. A. Silano, A. P. D. Ramirez, and A. P. Tonchev, Microscopic calculation of fission product yields for odd-mass nuclei, Phys. Rev. C 107, 044312 (2023).
  29. J. L. Pore, W. Younes, J. M. Gates, L. M. Robledo, F. H. Garcia, R. Orford, H. L. Crawford, P. Fallon, J. A. Gooding, M. Kireeff Covo, M. McCarthy, and M. A. Stoyer, Spontaneous fission of the odd-Z isotope Db255, Phys. Rev. C 110, L041301 (2024).
  30. A. Bulgac, Time-dependent density functional theory and the real-time dynamics of fermi superfluids, Annu. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 63, 97 (2013).
  31. A. Bulgac, Time-dependent density functional theory for fermionic superfluids: From cold atomic gases, to nuclei and neutron star crust, Phys. Status Solidi B 256, 1800592 (2019).
  32. G. Bertsch, J. Dobaczewski, W. Nazarewicz, and J. Pei, Hartree-Fock-Bogoliubov theory of polarized fermi systems, Phys. Rev. A 79, 043602 (2009).
  33. J. Bardeen, L. N. Cooper, and J. R. Schrieffer, Theory of superconductivity, Phys. Rev. 108, 1175 (1957).
  34. A. Bulgac, Hartree-Fock-Bogoliubov approximation for finite systems, arXiv:nucl-th/9907088.
  35. S. Tan, Large momentum part of a strongly correlated Fermi gas, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 323, 2971 (2008).
  36. W. Zwerger, ed., The BCS–BEC Crossover and the Unitary Fermi Gas, Lecture Notes in Physics Vol. 836 (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2012).
  37. J. Dobaczewski, H. Flocard, and J. Treiner, Hartree-Fock-Bogolyubov description of nuclei near the neutron-drip line, Nucl. Phys. A422, 103 (1984).
  38. S. T. Belyaev, A. V. Smirnov, S. V. Tolokonnikov, and S. A. Fayans, Pairing in nuclei in the coordinate representation, Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 45, 783 (1987), https://www.researchgate.net/profile/A_Smirnov7/publication/239864233_Pairing_in_nuclei_in_the_coordinate_representation/links/59ee0e884585154350e7fff9/Pairing-in-nuclei-in-the-coordinate-representation.pdf.
  39. J. Dobaczewski, W. Nazarewicz, T. R. Werner, J. F. Berger, C. R. Chinn, and J. Dechargé, Mean-field description of ground-state properties of drip-line nuclei: Pairing and continuum effects, Phys. Rev. C 53, 2809 (1996).
  40. I. Abdurrahman, M. Kafker, A. Bulgac, and I. Stetcu, Neck rupture and scission neutrons in nuclear fission, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 242501 (2024).
  41. A. Bulgac, Michael McNeil Forbes, S. Jin, R. N. Perez, and N. Schunck, Minimal nuclear energy density functional, Phys. Rev. C 97, 044313 (2018).
  42. P. Marević, N. Schunck, E. M. Ney, R. Navarro Pérez, M. Verriere, and J. O’Neal, Axially-deformed solution of the Skyrme-Hartree-Fock-Bogoliubov equations using the transformed harmonic oscillator basis (IV) HFBTHO (v4.0): A new version of the program, Comput. Phys. Commun. 276, 108367 (2022).
  43. G. Scamps, D. Lacroix, G. F. Bertsch, and K. Washiyama, Pairing dynamics in particle transport, Phys. Rev. C 85, 034328 (2012).
  44. Z. X. Ren, J. Zhao, D. Vretenar, T. Nikšić, P. W. Zhao, and J. Meng, Microscopic analysis of induced nuclear fission dynamics, Phys. Rev. C 105, 044313 (2022).
  45. Z. X. Ren, D. Vretenar, T. Nikšić, P. W. Zhao, J. Zhao, and J. Meng, Dynamical synthesis of He4 in the scission phase of nuclear fission, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 172501 (2022).
  46. L. Tong and S. Yan, Microscopic investigations into fission dynamics beyond the saddle point, Phys. Rev. C 106, 044611 (2022).
  47. A. Bulgac, M. Kafker, I. Abdurrahman, and G. Wlazłowski, Quantum turbulence, superfluidity, non-Markovian dynamics, and wave function thermalization, Phys. Rev. Res. 6, L042003 (2024).
  48. R. P. Feynman, Application of quantum mechanics to liquid helium II, Prog. Low Temp. Phys. 1, 17 (1955).
  49. Aurel Bulgac, Pre-equilibrium neutron emission in fission or fragmentation, Phys. Rev. C 102, 034612 (2020).
  50. A. Bulgac, I. Abdurrahman, S. Jin, K. Godbey, N. Schunck, and I. Stetcu, Fission fragment intrinsic spins and their correlations, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 142502 (2021).
  51. G. Scamps, I. Abdurrahman, M. Kafker, A. Bulgac, and I. Stetcu, Spatial orientation of the fission fragment intrinsic spins and their correlations, Phys. Rev. C 108, L061602 (2023).
  52. L. Zurek, S. K. Bogner, R. J. Furnstahl, R. Navarro Pérez, N. Schunck, and A. Schwenk, Optimized nuclear energy density functionals including long-range pion contributions, Phys. Rev. C 109, 014319 (2024).
  53. G. Grams, W. Ryssens, G. Scamps, S. Goriely, and N. Chamel, Skyrme-Hartree-Fock-Bogoliubov mass models on a 3D mesh: III. From atomic nuclei to neutron stars, Eur. Phys. J. A 59, 270 (2023).
  54. A. Bulgac, I. Abdurrahman, K. Godbey, and I. Stetcu, Fragment intrinsic spins and fragments’ relative orbital angular momentum in nuclear fission, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 022501 (2022).
  55. D. G. Madland, Total prompt energy release in the neutron-induced fission of 235U, 238U, and 239Pu, Nucl. Phys. A772, 113 (2006).
  56. P. Talou, I. Stetcu, P. Jaffke, M. E. Rising, A. E. Lovell, and T. Kawano, Fission fragment decay simulations with the CGMF code, Comput. Phys. Commun. 269, 108087 (2021).
  57. A. Bulgac, S. Jin, and I. Stetcu, Unitary evolution with fluctuations and dissipation, Phys. Rev. C 100, 014615 (2019).
  58. A. Bulgac, M. Kafker, and I. Abdurrahman, Measures of complexity and entanglement in many-fermion systems, Phys. Rev. C 107, 044318 (2023).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation