Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Categorical Symmetries in Spin Models with Atom Arrays

Alison Warman1,*, Fan Yang2,3,†, Apoorv Tiwari4, Hannes Pichler2,3, and Sakura Schäfer-Nameki1

  • *Contact author: warman@maths.ox.ac.uk
  • †Contact author: F.Yang@uibk.ac.at

Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 206503 – Published 13 November, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/249m-m8wq

Abstract

Categorical symmetries have recently been shown to generalize the classification of phases of matter, significantly broadening the traditional Landau paradigm. To test these predictions, we propose a simple spin chain model that encompasses all gapped phases and second-order phase transitions governed by the categorical symmetry Rep(D8). This model not only captures the essential features of noninvertible phases but is also straightforward enough to enable practical realization. Specifically, we outline an implementation using neutral atoms trapped in optical tweezer arrays. Employing a dual-species setup and Rydberg blockade, we propose a digital simulation approach that can efficiently implement the many-body evolution in several nontrivial quantum phases.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (108)

  1. S. Schafer-Nameki, ICTP lectures on (non-)invertible generalized symmetries, Phys. Rep. 1063, 1 (2024).
  2. S.-H. Shao, What’s done cannot be undone: TASI lectures on noninvertible symmetry, arXiv:2308.00747.
  3. L. Bhardwaj and S. Schafer-Nameki, Generalized charges, part II: Noninvertible symmetries and the symmetry TFT, arXiv:2305.17159.
  4. L. Bhardwaj, L. E. Bottini, D. Pajer, and S. Schafer-Nameki, Categorical Landau paradigm for gapped phases, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 161601 (2024).
  5. L. Bhardwaj, L. E. Bottini, D. Pajer, and S. Schäfer-Nameki, Gapped phases with noninvertible symmetries: (1+1)d, SciPost Phys. 18, 032 (2025).
  6. L. Bhardwaj, L. E. Bottini, D. Pajer, and S. Schafer-Nameki, The club sandwich: Gapless phases and phase transitions with noninvertible symmetries, SciPost Phys. 18, 156 (2025).
  7. A. Chatterjee and X.-G. Wen, Holographic theory for continuous phase transitions: Emergence and symmetry protection of gaplessness, Phys. Rev. B 108, 075105 (2023).
  8. R. Wen and A. C. Potter, Classification of 1+1D gapless symmetry protected phases via topological holography, Phys. Rev. B 111, 115161 (2025).
  9. S.-J. Huang and M. Cheng, Topological holography, quantum criticality, and boundary states, SciPost Phys. 18, 213 (2025).
  10. L. Bhardwaj, D. Pajer, S. Schafer-Nameki, and A. Warman, Hasse diagrams for gapless SPT and SSB phases with non-invertible symmetries, SciPost Phys. 19, 113 (2025).
  11. W. Ji and X.-G. Wen, Categorical symmetry and noninvertible anomaly in symmetry-breaking and topological phase transitions, Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 033417 (2020).
  12. D. Gaiotto and J. Kulp, Orbifold groupoids, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2021) 132.
  13. F. Apruzzi, F. Bonetti, I. n. García Etxebarria, S. S. Hosseini, and S. Schafer-Nameki, Symmetry TFTs from string theory, Commun. Math. Phys. 402, 895 (2023).
  14. D. S. Freed, G. W. Moore, and C. Teleman, Topological symmetry in quantum field theory, arXiv:2209.07471.
  15. H. Moradi, S. F. Moosavian, and A. Tiwari, Topological holography: Towards a unification of Landau and beyond-Landau physics, SciPost Phys. Core 6, 066 (2023).
  16. For gapped phases, an alternative approach uses module categories in [17].

  17. R. Thorngren and Y. Wang, Fusion category symmetry. Part I. Anomaly in-flow and gapped phases, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2024) 132.
  18. T.-C. Huang, Y.-H. Lin, K. Ohmori, Y. Tachikawa, and M. Tezuka, Numerical evidence for a Haagerup conformal field theory, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 231603 (2022).
  19. R. Vanhove, L. Lootens, M. Van Damme, R. Wolf, T. J. Osborne, J. Haegeman, and F. Verstraete, Critical lattice model for a Haagerup conformal field theory, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 231602 (2022).
  20. L. E. Bottini and S. Schafer-Nameki, Construction of a gapless phase with Haagerup symmetry, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 191602 (2025).
  21. The input data that determines the Hilbert space is (C, M, ρ∈C), where C is a fusion category, M is a C-module category and S=CM* is the actual symmetry category.

  22. A. Feiguin, S. Trebst, A. W. W. Ludwig, M. Troyer, A. Kitaev, Z. Wang, and M. H. Freedman, Interacting anyons in topological quantum liquids: The golden chain, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 160409 (2007).
  23. D. Aasen, R. S. K. Mong, and P. Fendley, Topological defects on the lattice I: The Ising model, J. Phys. A 49, 354001 (2016).
  24. D. Aasen, P. Fendley, and R. S. K. Mong, Topological defects on the lattice: Dualities and degeneracies, arXiv:2008.08598.
  25. I. Cong, M. Cheng, and Z. Wang, Hamiltonian and algebraic theories of gapped boundaries in topological phases of matter, Commun. Math. Phys. 355, 645 (2017).
  26. M. Buican and A. Gromov, Anyonic chains, topological defects, and conformal field theory, Commun. Math. Phys. 356, 1017 (2017).
  27. K. Inamura, Topological field theories and symmetry protected topological phases with fusion category symmetries, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2021) 204.
  28. L. Lootens, C. Delcamp, G. Ortiz, and F. Verstraete, Dualities in one-dimensional quantum lattice models: Symmetric Hamiltonians and matrix product operator intertwiners, PRX Quantum 4, 020357 (2023).
  29. L. Bhardwaj, L. E. Bottini, S. Schafer-Nameki, and A. Tiwari, Lattice models for phases and transitions with noninvertible symmetries, arXiv:2405.05964.
  30. A. Browaeys and T. Lahaye, Many-body physics with individually controlled Rydberg atoms, Nat. Phys. 16, 132 (2020).
  31. X. Wu, X. Liang, Y. Tian, F. Yang, C. Chen, Y.-C. Liu, M. K. Tey, and L. You, A concise review of Rydberg atom based quantum computation and quantum simulation, Chin. Phys. B 30, 020305 (2021).
  32. A. M. Kaufman and K.-K. Ni, Quantum science with optical tweezer arrays of ultracold atoms and molecules, Nat. Phys. 17, 1324 (2021).
  33. M. Morgado and S. Whitlock, Quantum simulation and computing with Rydberg-interacting qubits, AVS Quantum Sci. 3, 023501 (2021).
  34. H. Bernien, S. Schwartz, A. Keesling, H. Levine, A. Omran, H. Pichler, S. Choi, A. S. Zibrov, M. Endres, M. Greiner et al., Probing many-body dynamics on a 51-atom quantum simulator, Nature (London) 551, 579 (2017).
  35. A. Keesling, A. Omran, H. Levine, H. Bernien, H. Pichler, S. Choi, R. Samajdar, S. Schwartz, P. Silvi, S. Sachdev, P. Zoller, M. Endres, M. Greiner, V. Vuletić, and M. D. Lukin, Quantum Kibble–Zurek mechanism and critical dynamics on a programmable Rydberg simulator, Nature (London) 568, 207 (2019).
  36. P. Scholl, M. Schuler, H. J. Williams, A. A. Eberharter, D. Barredo, K.-N. Schymik, V. Lienhard, L.-P. Henry, T. C. Lang, T. Lahaye, A. M. Läuchli, and A. Browaeys, Quantum simulation of 2d antiferromagnets with hundreds of Rydberg atoms, Nature (London) 595, 233 (2021).
  37. S. Ebadi, T. T. Wang, H. Levine, A. Keesling, G. Semeghini, A. Omran, D. Bluvstein, R. Samajdar, H. Pichler, W. W. Ho, S. Choi, S. Sachdev, M. Greiner, V. Vuletić, and M. D. Lukin, Quantum phases of matter on a 256-atom programmable quantum simulator, Nature (London) 595, 227 (2021).
  38. C. Chen, G. Bornet, M. Bintz, G. Emperauger, L. Leclerc, V. S. Liu, P. Scholl, D. Barredo, J. Hauschild, S. Chatterjee et al., Continuous symmetry breaking in a two-dimensional Rydberg array, Nature (London) 616, 691 (2023).
  39. G. Semeghini, H. Levine, A. Keesling, S. Ebadi, T. T. Wang, D. Bluvstein, R. Verresen, H. Pichler, M. Kalinowski, R. Samajdar, A. Omran, S. Sachdev, A. Vishwanath, M. Greiner, V. Vuletić, and M. D. Lukin, Probing topological spin liquids on a programmable quantum simulator, Science 374, 1242 (2021).
  40. K. Singh, C. E. Bradley, S. Anand, V. Ramesh, R. White, and H. Bernien, Mid-circuit correction of correlated phase errors using an array of spectator qubits, Science 380, 1265 (2023).
  41. S. Anand, C. E. Bradley, R. White, V. Ramesh, K. Singh, and H. Bernien, A dual-species Rydberg array, Nat. Phys. 20, 1744 (2024).
  42. S. Seifnashri and S.-H. Shao, Cluster state as a noninvertible symmetry-protected topological phase, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 116601 (2024).
  43. L. Li, R.-Z. Huang, and W. Cao, Noninvertible symmetry-enriched quantum critical point, Phys. Rev. B 112, L081113 (2025).
  44. C. Meng, X. Yang, T. Lan, and Z. Gu, Noninvertible SPTs: An on-site realization of (1+1)d anomaly-free fusion category symmetry, arXiv:2412.20546.
  45. For the expert reader, we choose the categorical input data, C=VecD8, M=Vec, ρ=⊕g∈D8g, so that the symmetry of the model is S=CM*=Rep(D8).

  46. H(F,β) is Hermitian as the projectors are and (Lβf)†=Lβf−1, (Rβf)†=Rβf−1, and we sum over f∈F where F is a group. One can write equivalent Hamiltonians by summing only over generators of F and their inverses.

  47. The operators Lg,Rg,ZΓ for dihedral groups presented as ZN⋊Z2 can be found in Appendix B of [48].

  48. V. V. Albert, D. Aasen, W. Xu, W. Ji, J. Alicea, and J. Preskill, Spin chains, defects, and quantum wires for the quantum-double edge, arXiv:2111.12096.
  49. See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/249m-m8wq for Rep(D8) symmetry multiplets, derivation of ground states of the Hamiltonians, further information on phase transitions, and details on the experimental scheme, which includes Ref. [50–62].
  50. D. Tambara and S. Yamagami, Tensor categories with fusion rules of self-duality for finite Abelian groups, J. Algebra 209, 692 (1998).
  51. V. Ostrik, Module categories over the Drinfeld double of a finite group, arXiv:math/0202130.
  52. M. Iqbal et al., Non-Abelian topological order and anyons on a trapped-ion processor, Nature (London) 626, 505 (2024).
  53. Y.-H. Lin, M. Okada, S. Seifnashri, and Y. Tachikawa, Asymptotic density of states in 2d CFTs with noninvertible symmetries, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2023) 094.
  54. L. Bhardwaj and S. Schafer-Nameki, Generalized charges, part I: Invertible symmetries and higher representations, SciPost Phys. 16, 093 (2024).
  55. L. Bhardwaj, L. E. Bottini, S. Schafer-Nameki, and A. Tiwari, Noninvertible symmetry webs, SciPost Phys. 15, 160 (2023).
  56. D. Pérez-García, M. M. Wolf, M. Sanz, F. Verstraete, and J. I. Cirac, String order and symmetries in quantum spin lattices, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 167202 (2008).
  57. F. Pollmann and A. M. Turner, Detection of symmetry-protected topological phases in one dimension, Phys. Rev. B 86, 125441 (2012).
  58. H. Moradi, O. M. Aksoy, J. H. Bardarson, and A. Tiwari, Symmetry fractionalization, mixed-anomalies and dualities in quantum spin models with generalized symmetries, SciPost Phys. 18, 097 (2025).
  59. T. Kennedy and H. Tasaki, Hidden Z2×Z2 symmetry breaking in haldane-gap antiferromagnets, Phys. Rev. B 45, 304 (1992).
  60. T. Kennedy and H. Tasaki, Hidden symmetry breaking and the haldane phase in s=1 quantum spin chains, Commun. Math. Phys. 147, 431 (1992).
  61. R. Trivedi, A. F. Rubio, and J. I. Cirac, Quantum advantage and stability to errors in analogue quantum simulators, Nat. Commun. 15, 6507 (2024).
  62. S. De Léséleuc, D. Barredo, V. Lienhard, A. Browaeys, and T. Lahaye, Analysis of imperfections in the coherent optical excitation of single atoms to Rydberg states, Phys. Rev. A 97, 053803 (2018).
  63. J. Zeiher, J.-y. Choi, A. Rubio-Abadal, T. Pohl, R. Van Bijnen, I. Bloch, and C. Gross, Coherent many-body spin dynamics in a long-range interacting Ising chain, Phys. Rev. X 7, 041063 (2017).
  64. P. Scholl, A. L. Shaw, R. B.-S. Tsai, R. Finkelstein, J. Choi, and M. Endres, Erasure conversion in a high-fidelity Rydberg quantum simulator, Nature (London) 622, 273 (2023).
  65. L.-M. Steinert, P. Osterholz, R. Eberhard, L. Festa, N. Lorenz, Z. Chen, A. Trautmann, and C. Gross, Spatially tunable spin interactions in neutral atom arrays, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 243001 (2023).
  66. K. Kim, F. Yang, K. Mølmer, and J. Ahn, Realization of an extremely anisotropic Heisenberg magnet in Rydberg atom arrays, Phys. Rev. X 14, 011025 (2024).
  67. H. Levine, A. Keesling, G. Semeghini, A. Omran, T. T. Wang, S. Ebadi, H. Bernien, M. Greiner, V. Vuletić, H. Pichler et al., Parallel implementation of high-fidelity multiqubit gates with neutral atoms, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 170503 (2019).
  68. S. Ma, G. Liu, P. Peng, B. Zhang, S. Jandura, J. Claes, A. P. Burgers, G. Pupillo, S. Puri, and J. D. Thompson, High-fidelity gates and mid-circuit erasure conversion in an atomic qubit, Nature (London) 622, 279 (2023).
  69. A. Cao, W. J. Eckner, T. Lukin Yelin, A. W. Young, S. Jandura, L. Yan, K. Kim, G. Pupillo, J. Ye, N. Darkwah Oppong et al., Multi-qubit gates and Schrödinger cat states in an optical clock, Nature (London) 634, 315 (2024).
  70. N. Maskara, S. Ostermann, J. Shee, M. Kalinowski, A. M. Gomez, R. A. Bravo, D. S. Wang, A. I. Krylov, N. Y. Yao, M. Head-Gordon et al., Programmable simulations of molecules and materials with reconfigurable quantum processors, arXiv:2312.02265.
  71. D. Jaksch, J. I. Cirac, P. Zoller, S. L. Rolston, R. Côté, and M. D. Lukin, Fast quantum gates for neutral atoms, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 2208 (2000).
  72. A. Omran, H. Levine, A. Keesling, G. Semeghini, T. T. Wang, S. Ebadi, H. Bernien, A. S. Zibrov, H. Pichler, S. Choi, J. Cui, M. Rossignolo, P. Rembold, S. Montangero, T. Calarco, M. Endres, M. Greiner, V. Vuletić, and M. D. Lukin, Generation and manipulation of Schrödinger cat states in Rydberg atom arrays, Science 365, 570 (2019).
  73. S. J. Evered, D. Bluvstein, M. Kalinowski, S. Ebadi, T. Manovitz, H. Zhou, S. H. Li, A. A. Geim, T. T. Wang, N. Maskara et al., High-fidelity parallel entangling gates on a neutral-atom quantum computer, Nature (London) 622, 268 (2023).
  74. D. Bluvstein, S. J. Evered, A. A. Geim, S. H. Li, H. Zhou, T. Manovitz, S. Ebadi, M. Cain, M. Kalinowski, D. Hangleiter et al., Logical quantum processor based on reconfigurable atom arrays, Nature (London) 626, 58 (2024).
  75. H. Weimer, M. Müller, I. Lesanovsky, P. Zoller, and H. P. Büchler, A Rydberg quantum simulator, Nat. Phys. 6, 382 (2010).
  76. H. Weimer, M. Müller, H. P. Büchler, and I. Lesanovsky, Digital quantum simulation with Rydberg atoms, Quantum Inf. Process. 10, 885 (2011).
  77. A. Bohrdt, A. Omran, E. Demler, S. Gazit, and F. Grusdt, Multiparticle interactions for ultracold atoms in optical tweezers: Cyclic ring-exchange terms, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 073601 (2020).
  78. J. L. Cardy, Effect of boundary conditions on the operator content of two-dimensional conformally invariant theories, Nucl. Phys. B 275, 200 (1986).
  79. M. Oshikawa, Universal finite-size gap scaling of the quantum Ising chain, arXiv:1910.06353.
  80. S. De Léséleuc, V. Lienhard, P. Scholl, D. Barredo, S. Weber, N. Lang, H. P. Büchler, T. Lahaye, and A. Browaeys, Observation of a symmetry-protected topological phase of interacting bosons with Rydberg atoms, Science 365, 775 (2019).
  81. The local and string order parameters here are given by Oloc=Σi⟨XIIXIII⟩i/L and Ostr=⟨XiIIXi+1III[Πk=1l−2(ZIIZIII)i+k]Xi+l−2IIXi+l−1III⟩. In the time-evolving block decimation simulation, we consider the string at the center of the system with a length l=6.

  82. There is 2 “relative Euler term” between Ising0 and each of Ising±, since E has quantum dimension 2, whereas the Ising noninvertible symmetry has quantum dimension 2.

  83. D. Barredo, S. Ravets, H. Labuhn, L. Béguin, A. Vernier, F. Nogrette, T. Lahaye, and A. Browaeys, Demonstration of a strong Rydberg blockade in three-atom systems with anisotropic interactions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 183002 (2014).
  84. J. T. Young, P. Bienias, R. Belyansky, A. M. Kaufman, and A. V. Gorshkov, Asymmetric blockade and multiqubit gates via dipole-dipole interactions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 120501 (2021).
  85. S. Jandura and G. Pupillo, Time-optimal two-and three-qubit gates for Rydberg atoms, Quantum 6, 712 (2022).
  86. C. Fromonteil, R. Tricarico, F. Cesa, and H. Pichler, Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman equations for Rydberg-blockade processes, Phys. Rev. Res. 6, 033333 (2024).
  87. D. Bluvstein, H. Levine, G. Semeghini, T. T. Wang, S. Ebadi, M. Kalinowski, A. Keesling, N. Maskara, H. Pichler, M. Greiner et al., A quantum processor based on coherent transport of entangled atom arrays, Nature (London) 604, 451 (2022).
  88. C. Dlaska, K. Ender, G. B. Mbeng, A. Kruckenhauser, W. Lechner, and R. van Bijnen, Quantum optimization via four-body Rydberg gates, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 120503 (2022).
  89. L. Eck and P. Fendley, Critical lines and ordered phases in a Rydberg-blockade ladder, Phys. Rev. B 108, 125135 (2023).
  90. L. Bhardwaj, L. E. Bottini, S. Schafer-Nameki, and A. Tiwari, Illustrating the categorical Landau paradigm in lattice models, Phys. Rev. B 111, 054432 (2025).
  91. A. Chatterjee, Ö. M. Aksoy, and X.-G. Wen, Quantum phases and transitions in spin chains with noninvertible symmetries, SciPost Phys. 17, 115 (2024).
  92. J. Kaidi, K. Ohmori, and Y. Zheng, Kramers-Wannier-like duality defects in (3+1)D gauge theories, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 111601 (2022).
  93. Y. Choi, C. Cordova, P.-S. Hsin, H. T. Lam, and S.-H. Shao, Noninvertible duality defects in 3+1 dimensions, Phys. Rev. D 105, 125016 (2022).
  94. L. Bhardwaj, L. E. Bottini, S. Schafer-Nameki, and A. Tiwari, Noninvertible higher-categorical symmetries, SciPost Phys. 14, 007 (2023).
  95. C. Delcamp and A. Tiwari, Higher categorical symmetries and gauging in two-dimensional spin systems, SciPost Phys. 16, 110 (2024).
  96. K. Inamura and K. Ohmori, Fusion surface models: 2+1d lattice models from fusion 2-categories, SciPost Phys. 16, 143 (2024).
  97. L. Eck and P. Fendley, Generalizations of Kitaev’s honeycomb model from braided fusion categories, SciPost Phys. 18, 170 (2025).
  98. P. Gorantla, S.-H. Shao, and N. Tantivasadakarn, Tensor networks for noninvertible symmetries in 3+1d and beyond, Phys. Rev. X 15, 041006 (2025).
  99. K. Inamura, S.-J. Huang, A. Tiwari, and S. Schafer-Nameki, (2+1)d lattice models and tensor networks for gapped phases with categorical symmetry, arXiv:2506.09177.
  100. A. Antinucci, C. Copetti, and S. Schafer-Nameki, SymTFT for (3+1)d gapless SPTs and obstructions to confinement, SciPost Phys. 18, 114 (2025).
  101. L. Bhardwaj, D. Pajer, S. Schäfer-Nameki, A. Tiwari, A. Warman, and J. Wu, Gapped phases in (2+1)d with noninvertible symmetries: Part I, SciPost Phys. 19, 056 (2025).
  102. R. Wen, String condensation and topological holography for 2+1D gapless SPT, arXiv:2408.05801.
  103. Y. Choi, Y. Sanghavi, S.-H. Shao, and Y. Zheng, Noninvertible and higher-form symmetries in 2+1d lattice gauge theories, SciPost Phys. 18, 008 (2025).
  104. L. Bhardwaj, S. Schafer-Nameki, A. Tiwari, and A. Warman, Gapped phases in (2+1)d with noninvertible symmetries: Part II, arXiv:2502.20440.
  105. L. Bhardwaj, Y. Gai, S.-J. Huang, K. Inamura, S. Schafer-Nameki, A. Tiwari, and A. Warman, Gapless phases in (2+1)d with noninvertible symmetries, arXiv:2503.12699.
  106. H.-L. Huang, D. Wu, D. Fan, and X. Zhu, Superconducting quantum computing: A review, Sci. China Inf. Sci. 63, 1 (2020).
  107. C. Monroe, W. C. Campbell, L.-M. Duan, Z.-X. Gong, A. V. Gorshkov, P. W. Hess, R. Islam, K. Kim, N. M. Linke, G. Pagano et al., Programmable quantum simulations of spin systems with trapped ions, Rev. Mod. Phys. 93, 025001 (2021).
  108. A. Warman and F. Yang, Dataset for categorical symmetries in spin models with atom arrays, 10.5281/zenodo.16963608 (2025).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation