Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Thermodynamic Constraints in Dynamic Random-Access Memory Cells: Experimental Verification of Energy Efficiency Limits in Information Erasure

Takase Shimizu*, Kensaku Chida, Gento Yamahata, and Katsuhiko Nishiguchi

  • *Contact author: takase.shimizu@ntt.com

Phys. Rev. Lett. 136, 117103 – Published 20 March, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/1sgm-dhys

Abstract

We measured the energy efficiency of information erasure using silicon DRAM cells capable of counting charges on capacitors at the single-electron level. Our measurements revealed that the efficiency decreased as the erasure error probability decreased, and notably, the Landauer limit was not achieved, even under effectively infinite-time bit erasure. By comparing the measured efficiency with the Landauer limit, we identified a thermodynamic constraint that prevents DRAM from reaching this limit: the inability to prepare the initial state in thermal equilibrium, which in turn, prohibits quasistatic operations. This finding has broad implications for DRAM cells and for many electronic circuits sharing similar structures. Furthermore, it validates our experimental approach to discovering thermodynamic constraints that impose tighter, practically relevant limits, opening a new direction in information thermodynamics research.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (44)

  1. R. Landauer, Irreversibility and heat generation in the computing process, IBM J. Res. Dev. 5, 183 (1961).
  2. C. H. Bennett, The thermodynamics of computation—a review, Int. J. Theor. Phys. 21, 905 (1982).
  3. U. Seifert, Stochastic thermodynamics, fluctuation theorems and molecular machines, Rep. Prog. Phys. 75, 126001 (2012).
  4. J. M. R. Parrondo, J. M. Horowitz, and T. Sagawa, Thermodynamics of information, Nat. Phys. 11, 131 (2015).
  5. T. Sagawa, Thermodynamics of information processing in small systems, Prog. Theor. Phys. 127, 1 (2012).
  6. D. H. Wolpert, The stochastic thermodynamics of computation, J. Phys. A 52, 193001 (2019).
  7. A. Bérut, A. Arakelyan, A. Petrosyan, S. Ciliberto, R. Dillenschneider, and E. Lutz, Experimental verification of Landauer’s principle linking information and thermodynamics, Nature (London) 483, 187 (2012).
  8. Y. Jun, M. c. v. Gavrilov, and J. Bechhoefer, High-precision test of Landauer’s principle in a feedback trap, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 190601 (2014).
  9. J. Hong, B. Lambson, S. Dhuey, and J. Bokor, Experimental test of Landauer’s principle in single-bit operations on nanomagnetic memory bits, Sci. Adv. 2, e1501492 (2016).
  10. L. L. Yan, T. P. Xiong, K. Rehan, F. Zhou, D. F. Liang, L. Chen, J. Q. Zhang, W. L. Yang, Z. H. Ma, and M. Feng, Single-atom demonstration of the quantum landauer principle, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 210601 (2018).
  11. K. Proesmans, J. Ehrich, and J. Bechhoefer, Finite-time Landauer principle, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 100602 (2020).
  12. J. S. Lee, S. Lee, H. Kwon, and H. Park, Speed limit for a highly irreversible process and tight finite-time Landauer’s bound, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 120603 (2022).
  13. T. Van Vu and K. Saito, Thermodynamic unification of optimal transport: Thermodynamic uncertainty relation, minimum dissipation, and thermodynamic speed limits, Phys. Rev. X 13, 011013 (2023).
  14. M. Scandi, D. Barker, S. Lehmann, K. A. Dick, V. F. Maisi, and M. Perarnau-Llobet, Minimally dissipative information erasure in a quantum dot via thermodynamic length, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 270601 (2022).
  15. Y.-Z. Zhen, D. Egloff, K. Modi, and O. Dahlsten, Universal bound on energy cost of bit reset in finite time, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 190602 (2021).
  16. S. Oikawa, Y. Nakayama, S. Ito, T. Sagawa, and S. Toyabe, Experimentally achieving minimal dissipation via thermodynamically optimal transport, Nat. Commun. 16, 10424 (2025).
  17. A. Kolchinsky and D. H. Wolpert, Work, entropy production, and thermodynamics of information under protocol constraints, Phys. Rev. X 11, 041024 (2021).
  18. J. P. Pekola and O.-P. Saira, Work, free energy and dissipation in voltage driven single-electron transitions, J. Low Temp. Phys. 169, 70 (2012).
  19. N. Freitas, J.-C. Delvenne, and M. Esposito, Stochastic and quantum thermodynamics of driven RLC networks, Phys. Rev. X 10, 031005 (2020).
  20. N. Freitas, J.-C. Delvenne, and M. Esposito, Stochastic thermodynamics of nonlinear electronic circuits: A realistic framework for computing around kT, Phys. Rev. X 11, 031064 (2021).
  21. N. Freitas and M. Esposito, Information flows in macroscopic Maxwell’s demons, Phys. Rev. E 107, 014136 (2023).
  22. N. Freitas, K. Proesmans, and M. Esposito, Reliability and entropy production in nonequilibrium electronic memories, Phys. Rev. E 105, 034107 (2022).
  23. N. Freitas and M. Esposito, Maxwell demon that can work at macroscopic scales, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 120602 (2022).
  24. A. Gopal, M. Esposito, and N. Freitas, Thermodynamic cost of precise timekeeping in an electronic underdamped clock, Phys. Rev. B 109, 085421 (2024).
  25. A. Gopal, M. Esposito, and N. Freitas, Large deviations theory for noisy nonlinear electronics: CMOS inverter as a case study, Phys. Rev. B 106, 155303 (2022).
  26. J. N. Freitas and M. Esposito, Emergent second law for non-equilibrium steady states, Nat. Commun. 13, 5084 (2022).
  27. A. Yadav, M. Yousef, and D. Wolpert, Minimal thermodynamic cost of computing with circuits, arXiv:2504.04031.
  28. D. H. Wolpert and A. Kolchinsky, Thermodynamics of computing with circuits, New J. Phys. 22, 063047 (2020).
  29. D. Yoshino and Y. Tokura, Thermodynamics of computation for CMOS NAND gate, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 92, 124004 (2023).
  30. D. H. Wolpert, J. Korbel, C. W. Lynn, F. Tasnim, J. A. Grochow, G. Kardeş, J. B. Aimone, V. Balasubramanian, E. D. Giuli, D. Doty, N. Freitas, M. Marsili, T. E. Ouldridge, A. W. Richa, P. Riechers, Édgar Roldán, B. Rubenstein, Z. Toroczkai, and J. Paradiso, Is stochastic thermodynamics the key to understanding the energy costs of computation?, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 121, e2321112121 (2024).
  31. V. Zhirnov, R. Cavin, and L. Gammaitoni, Minimum energy of computing, fundamental considerations, in ICT—Energy—Concepts Towards Zero, edited by G. Fagas, L. Gammaitoni, D. Paul, and G. A. Berini (IntechOpen, Rijeka, 2014), Chap. 7, 10.5772/57346.
  32. A. Spessot and H. Oh, 1T-1C dynamic random access memory status, challenges, and prospects, IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 67, 1382 (2020).
  33. T. Vogelsang, Understanding the energy consumption of dynamic random access memories, in Proceedings of the 2010 43rd Annual IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Microarchitecture (2010), pp. 363–374, 10.1109/MICRO.2010.42.
  34. S. Ghose, A. G. Yaglikçi, R. Gupta, D. Lee, K. Kudrolli, W. X. Liu, H. Hassan, K. K. Chang, N. Chatterjee, A. Agrawal, M. O’Connor, and O. Mutlu, What your DRAM power models are not telling you: Lessons from a detailed experimental study, Proc. ACM Meas. Anal. Comput. Syst. 2, 1 (2018).
  35. L. Van Brandt and J.-C. Delvenne, The non-Landauer bound for the dissipation of bit writing operation, in Proceedings of the 2023 IEEE 23rd International Conference on Nanotechnology (NANO) (2023), pp. 726–731.
  36. L. Van Brandt and J.-C. Delvenne, Noise–dissipation relation for nonlinear electronic circuits, Appl. Phys. Lett. 122, 263507 (2023).
  37. A. O. Orlov, C. S. Lent, C. C. Thorpe, G. P. Boechler, and G. L. Snider, Experimental test of Landauer’s principle at the sub-kBT level, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 51, 06FE10 (2012).
  38. C. Lent, A. Orlov, W. Porod, and G. Snider, Energy Limits in Computation: A Review of Landauer’s Principle, Theory and Experiments (Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2018), 10.1007/978-3-319-93458-7.
  39. K. Nishiguchi, C. Koechlin, Y. Ono, A. Fujiwara, H. Inokawa, and H. Yamaguchi, Single-electron-resolution electrometer based on field-effect transistor, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 47, 8305 (2008).
  40. See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/1sgm-dhys for details on the device structure and fabrication process; details of the measurement method; the derivation of the state function Ψ(q); time evolution of S, ΔS, and Qcum during the erasure process; comparison between the DRAM cells and two-level systems; and a discussion on the readout cost of the charge sensor.
  41. V. Wadhia, F. Meier, F. Fedele, R. Silva, N. Nurgalieva, D. L. Craig, D. Jirovec, J. Saez-Mollejo, A. Ballabio, D. Chrastina, G. Isella, M. Huber, M. T. Mitchison, P. Erker, and N. Ares, Entropic costs of extracting classical ticks from a quantum clock, Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 200407 (2025).
  42. K. Chida, A. Fujiwara, and K. Nishiguchi, Seebeck effect in a nanometer-scale dot in a Si nanowire observed with electron counting statistics, Appl. Phys. Lett. 121, 183501 (2022).
  43. K. Nishiguchi, Y. Ono, and A. Fujiwara, Single-electron thermal noise, Nanotechnology 25, 275201 (2014).
  44. K. Nishiguchi, A. Fujiwara, Y. Ono, H. Inokawa, and Y. Takahashi, Room-temperature-operating data processing circuit based on single-electron transfer and detection with metal-oxide-semiconductor field-effect transistor technology, Appl. Phys. Lett. 88, 183101 (2006).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation