Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Out-of-Equilibrium Selection Pressure Enhances Inference from Protein Sequence Data

Nicola Dietler, Cyril Malbranke, and Anne-Florence Bitbol*

  • *Contact author: anne-florence.bitbol@epfl.ch

Phys. Rev. Lett. 136, 108402 – Published 11 March, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/1ht9-njrr

Abstract

Homologous proteins have similar three-dimensional structures and biological functions that shape their sequences. The resulting coevolution-driven correlations underlie methods from Potts models to alphafold, which infer protein structure and function from sequences. Using a minimal model, we show that fluctuating selection strength and the onset of new selection pressures improve coevolution-based inference of structural contacts. Our conclusions extend to realistic synthetic data and to the inference of interaction partners. Out-of-equilibrium noise arising from ubiquitous variations in natural selection thus enhances, rather than hinders, the success of inference from protein sequences.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (55)

  1. S. D. Dunn, L. M. Wahl, and G. B. Gloor, Mutual information without the influence of phylogeny or entropy dramatically improves residue contact prediction, Bioinformatics 24, 333 (2008).
  2. M. Weigt, R. A. White, H. Szurmant, J. A. Hoch, and T. Hwa, Identification of direct residue contacts in protein-protein interaction by message passing, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 106, 67 (2009).
  3. F. Morcos, A. Pagnani, B. Lunt, A. Bertolino, D. S. Marks, C. Sander, R. Zecchina, J. N. Onuchic, T. Hwa, and M. Weigt, Direct-coupling analysis of residue coevolution captures native contacts across many protein families, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 108, E1293 (2011).
  4. D. S. Marks, L. J. Colwell, R. Sheridan, T. A. Hopf, A. Pagnani, R. Zecchina, and C. Sander, Protein 3D structure computed from evolutionary sequence variation, PLoS One 6, e28766 (2011).
  5. J. P. Barton, E. De Leonardis, A. Coucke, and S. Cocco, ACE: Adaptive cluster expansion for maximum entropy graphical model inference, Bioinformatics 32, 3089 (2016).
  6. R. M. Rao, J. Liu, R. Verkuil, J. Meier, J. Canny, P. Abbeel, T. Sercu, and A. Rives, MSA transformer, proceedings of the 38th International Conference on Machine Learning, Proc. Mach. Learn. Res. 139, 8844 (2021), https://proceedings.mlr.press/v139/rao21a.html.
  7. J. Jumper et al., Highly accurate protein structure prediction with alphafold, Nature (London) 596, 583 (2021).
  8. L. Burger and E. van Nimwegen, Accurate prediction of protein-protein interactions from sequence alignments using a Bayesian method, Mol. Syst. Biol. 4, 165 (2008).
  9. A.-F. Bitbol, R. S. Dwyer, L. J. Colwell, and N. S. Wingreen, Inferring interaction partners from protein sequences, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 113, 12180 (2016).
  10. A. F. Bitbol, Inferring interaction partners from protein sequences using mutual information, PLoS Comput. Biol. 14, e1006401 (2018).
  11. U. Lupo, D. Sgarbossa, and A.-F. Bitbol, Pairing interacting protein sequences using masked language modeling, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 121, e2311887121 (2024).
  12. N. Halabi, O. Rivoire, S. Leibler, and R. Ranganathan, Protein sectors: Evolutionary units of three-dimensional structure, Cell 138, 774 (2009).
  13. O. Rivoire, K. A. Reynolds, and R. Ranganathan, Evolution-based functional decomposition of proteins, PLoS Comput. Biol. 12, e1004817 (2016).
  14. S.-W. Wang, A.-F. Bitbol, and N. Wingreen, Revealing evolutionary constraints on proteins through sequence analysis, PLoS Comput. Biol. 15, e1007010 (2019).
  15. N. Dietler, A. Abbara, S. Choudhury, and A.-F. Bitbol, Impact of phylogeny on the inference of functional sectors from protein sequence data, PLoS Comput. Biol. 20, e1012091 (2024).
  16. J. A. de la Paz, C. M. Nartey, M. Yuvaraj, and F. Morcos, Epistatic contributions promote the unification of incompatible models of neutral molecular evolution, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 117, 5873 (2020).
  17. L. Di Bari, M. Bisardi, S. Cotogno, M. Weigt, and F. Zamponi, Emergent time scales of epistasis in protein evolution, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 121, e2406807121 (2024).
  18. M. De Leonardis, A. Pagnani, and P. Barrat-Charlaix, Reconstruction of ancestral protein sequences using autoregressive generative models, Mol. Biol. Evol. 42, msaf070 (2025).
  19. A. Biswas, I. Choudhuri, E. Arnold, D. Lyumkis, A. Haldane, and R. M. Levy, Kinetic coevolutionary models predict the temporal emergence of HIV-1 resistance mutations under drug selection pressure, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 121, e2316662121 (2024).
  20. J. Gizzio, A. Thakur, A. Haldane, C. B. Post, and R. M. Levy, Evolutionary sequence and structural basis for the distinct conformational landscapes of Tyr and Ser/Thr kinases, Nat. Commun. 15, 6545 (2024).
  21. S. Alvarez, C. M. Nartey, N. Mercado, J. A. de la Paz, T. Huseinbegovic, and F. Morcos, In vivo functional phenotypes from a computational epistatic model of evolution, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 121, e2308895121 (2024).
  22. V. Mustonen and M. Lässig, Molecular evolution under fitness fluctuations, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 108101 (2008).
  23. G. Bell, Fluctuating selection: the perpetual renewal of adaptation in variable environments, Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 365, 87 (2010).
  24. A. Melbinger and M. Vergassola, The impact of environmental fluctuations on evolutionary fitness functions, Sci. Rep. 5, 15211 (2015).
  25. K. Wienand, E. Frey, and M. Mobilia, Evolution of a fluctuating population in a randomly switching environment, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 158301 (2017).
  26. A. Taitelbaum, R. West, M. Assaf, and M. Mobilia, Population dynamics in a changing environment: Random versus periodic switching, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 048105 (2020).
  27. I. Meyer and N. M. Shnerb, Evolutionary dynamics in fluctuating environment, Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 023308 (2020).
  28. N. Dietler, U. Lupo, and A.-F. Bitbol, Impact of phylogeny on structural contact inference from protein sequence data, J. R. Soc. Interface 20, 20220707 (2023).
  29. See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/1ht9-njrr for additional analyses and figures, where Ref. [30] is cited.
  30. W. Krauth, Statistical Mechanics: Algorithms and Computations, Oxford Master Series in Physics (Oxford University Press, New York, 2006).
  31. M. Figliuzzi, P. Barrat-Charlaix, and M. Weigt, How pairwise coevolutionary models capture the collective residue variability in proteins?, Mol. Biol. Evol. 35, 1018 (2018).
  32. W. P. Russ, M. Figliuzzi, C. Stocker, P. Barrat-Charlaix, M. Socolich, P. Kast, D. Hilvert, R. Monasson, S. Cocco, M. Weigt, and R. Ranganathan, An evolution-based model for designing chorismate mutase enzymes, Science 369, 440 (2020).
  33. C. A. Gandarilla-Pérez, P. Mergny, M. Weigt, and A.-F. Bitbol, Statistical physics of interacting proteins: Impact of dataset size and quality assessed in synthetic sequences, Phys. Rev. E 101, 032413 (2020).
  34. V. Ngampruetikorn, V. Sachdeva, J. Torrence, J. Humplik, D. J. Schwab, and S. E. Palmer, Inferring couplings in networks across order-disorder phase transitions, Phys. Rev. Res. 4, 023240 (2022).
  35. S. Ovchinnikov, H. Kamisetty, and D. Baker, Robust and accurate prediction of residue-residue interactions across protein interfaces using evolutionary information, eLife 3, e02030 (2014).
  36. J. Mistry, S. Chuguransky, L. Williams, M. Qureshi, G. Salazar, E. L. L. Sonnhammer, S. C. E. Tosatto, L. Paladin, S. Raj, L. J. Richardson, R. D. Finn, and A. Bateman, Pfam: The protein families database in 2021, Nucleic Acids Res. 49, D412 (2020).
  37. U. Lupo, D. Sgarbossa, and A.-F. Bitbol, Protein language models trained on multiple sequence alignments learn phylogenetic relationships, Nat. Commun. 13, 6298 (2022).
  38. M. Ekeberg, C. Lovkvist, Y. Lan, M. Weigt, and E. Aurell, Improved contact prediction in proteins: Using pseudolikelihoods to infer Potts models, Phys. Rev. E 87, 012707 (2013).
  39. M. Ekeberg, T. Hartonen, and E. Aurell, Fast pseudolikelihood maximization for direct-coupling analysis of protein structure from many homologous amino-acid sequences, J. Comput. Phys. 276, 341 (2014).
  40. A. Gerardos, N. Dietler, and A. F. Bitbol, Correlations from structure and phylogeny combine constructively in the inference of protein partners from sequences, PLoS Comput. Biol. 18, e1010147 (2022).
  41. F. Morcos, N. P. Schafer, R. R. Cheng, J. N. Onuchic, and P. G. Wolynes, Coevolutionary information, protein folding landscapes, and the thermodynamics of natural selection, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 111, 12408 (2014).
  42. M. B. Zerihun, F. Pucci, E. K. Peter, and A. Schug, pydca v1.0: A comprehensive software for direct coupling analysis of RNA and protein sequences, Bioinformatics 36, 2264 (2019).
  43. F. H. Arnold, Directed evolution: Bringing new chemistry to life, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 57, 4106 (2018).
  44. M. Fantini, S. Lisi, P. De Los Rios, A. Cattaneo, and A. Pastore, Protein structural information and evolutionary landscape by In vitro evolution, Mol. Biol. Evol. 37, 1179 (2019).
  45. M. A. Stiffler, F. J. Poelwijk, K. P. Brock, R. R. Stein, A. Riesselman, J. Teyra, S. S. Sidhu, D. S. Marks, N. P. Gauthier, and C. Sander, Protein structure from experimental evolution, Cell Syst. 10, 15 (2020).
  46. M. Bisardi, J. Rodriguez-Rivas, F. Zamponi, and M. Weigt, Modeling sequence-space exploration and emergence of epistatic signals in protein evolution, Mol. Biol. Evol. 39, msab321 (2021).
  47. E. Schneidman, M. J. Berry, R. Segev, and W. Bialek, Weak pairwise correlations imply strongly correlated network states in a neural population, Nature (London) 440, 1007 (2006).
  48. L. Meshulam, J. L. Gauthier, C. D. Brody, D. W. Tank, and W. Bialek, Collective behavior of place and non-place neurons in the hippocampal network, Neuron 96, 1178 (2017).
  49. L. Meshulam and W. Bialek, Statistical mechanics for networks of real neurons, Rev. Mod. Phys. 97, 045002 (2025).
  50. J. Tyrcha, Y. Roudi, M. Marsili, and J. Hert, The effect of nonstationarity on models inferred from neural data, J. Stat. Mech. (2013) P03005.
  51. Y. Roudi, J. Tyrcha, and J. Hertz, Ising model for neural data: Model quality and approximate methods for extracting functional connectivity, Phys. Rev. E 79, 051915 (2009).
  52. D. J. Schwab, I. Nemenman, and P. Mehta, Zipf’s law and criticality in multivariate data without fine-tuning, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 068102 (2014).
  53. V. Ngampruetikorn, I. Nemenman, and D. J. Schwab, Extrinsic vs intrinsic criticality in systems with many components, Phys. Rev. Res. 7, 013188 (2025).
  54. T. Mora and W. Bialek, Are biological systems poised at criticality?, J. Stat. Phys. 144, 268 (2011).
  55. N. Dietler, C. Malbranke, and A.-F. Bitbol, https://github.com/Bitbol-Lab/OutOfEquilibrium-ProtSeq (2025).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation