Abstract
The previous Comment neglects an existence condition for convergence of the integral in question which was previously demonstrated Weber, Schafheitlin, Dixon, and Ferrar, and detailed by Watson. The reason for this is traced to the fact that the result quoted in the Comment relies on a misprint of this condition in the ‘‘integral table’’ quoted. The true integral is nonconvergent and the previous conclusions of Brown and Ciftan are incorrect.
- Received 1 December 1989
DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.41.3244
©1990 American Physical Society

