Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Estimate of multishot laser-induced polarization for high energy electrons

Katherine D. Ranjbar, Emily Snyder, and Alice Snyder

V. H. Ranjbar*

  • Earl L. Vandermeulen High School, 350 Old Post Road, Port Jefferson, New York 11777, USA

  • *Contact author: vranjbar@bnl.gov

Phys. Rev. Accel. Beams 29, 093502 – Published 25 September, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/vsvm-ld57

Abstract

The use of an intense ultrashort laser pulse to induce electron polarization has been proposed previously in the literature. We used Python to reproduce the local constant crossed-field approximation to calculate the transverse polarization obtained from repeated laser interactions, starting from nonzero initial polarization, as well as the associated energy kicks. We also studied how the collision-geometry affects both the magnitude of χe and the effective field asymmetry experienced by the electrons, identifying several possible ways to generate useful asymmetry even when the laser wavelength does not admit pulse lengths that directly reach the plane-wave optimum. We show that, over multiple laser shots, lower values of the quantum efficiency parameter χe are associated with higher transverse polarization output but require a greater number of shots to reach saturation. We also show that the mean energy loss scales approximately linearly with χe. Based on this framework, we developed a preliminary Better MAD (methodical accelerator design) (BMAD) laser module to simulate the full 6D dynamics in a proposed Future Circular Collider Z pole lattice and to identify the threshold χe value above which particle losses begin to occur.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (21)

  1. Z. Duan, T. Chen, J. Gao, D. Ji, X. Li, D. Wang, J. Wang, Y. Wang, and W. Xia, Longitudinally polarized colliding beams at the CEPC, in JACoW eeFACT2022 (JACoW Publishing, Geneva, Switzerland, 2023), pp. 97–102.
  2. A. Blondel and E. Gianfelice, The challenges of beam polarization and keV-scale centre-of-mass energy calibration at the FCC-ee, Eur. Phys. J. Plus 136, 1103 (2021).
  3. J. Keintzel, M. Benedikt, A. Blondel, I. Koop, R. Tomas, J. Wenninger, G. Wilkinson, and F. Zimmermann, FCC-ee energy calibration and polarization, in PoS ICHEP 2022 (SISSA Medialab Srl, Trieste, Italy, 2022), p. 048. 10.22323/1.414.0048
  4. V. H. Ranjbar, M. Blaskiewicz, F. Méot, C. Montag, S. Tepikian, S. Brooks, H. Witte, I. Marneris, V. Ptitsyn, and F. J. Willeke, Spin resonance free electron ring injector, Phys. Rev. Accel. Beams 21, 111003 (2018).
  5. Y. K. Semertzidis, S. Lee, M. J. Lee, S. Park, and S. Haciomeroglu, Conceptual design of a polarized electron ion collider at Brookhaven National Laboratory, in PoS PSTP2017 (SISSA Medialab Srl, Trieste, Italy, 2018), p. 015.10.22323/1.324.0015
  6. A. A. Sokolov and I. M. Ternov, On the spin and polarization effects in the theory of synchrotron radiation, in 4th International Conference on High-Energy Accelerators (National Technical Information Service (NTIS), Oak Ridge, TN, USA, 1963), pp. 1271–1275.
  7. Y. S. Derbenev, A. M. Kondratenko, and E. L. Saldin, Polarization of electrons in storage rings by circularly polarized electromagnetic waves, Nucl. Instrum. Methods 165, 201 (1979).
  8. D. Del Sorbo, D. Seipt, T. G. Blackburn, A. G. R. Thomas, C. D. Murphy, J. G. Kirk, and C. P. Ridgers, Spin polarization of electrons by ultraintense lasers, Phys. Rev. A 96, 043407 (2017).
  9. D. Seipt, Volkov states and non-linear compton scattering in short and intense laser pulses, arXiv:1701.03692.
  10. D. Seipt, D. Del Sorbo, C. P. Ridgers, and A. G. R. Thomas, Theory of radiative electron polarization in strong laser fields, Phys. Rev. A 98, 023417 (2018).
  11. V. N. Baier and V. M. Katkov, Radiative polarization of electrons in a magnetic field, Sov. Phys. JETP 25, 1422 (1966).
  12. D. Sagan, Bmad: A relativistic charged particle simulation library, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 558, 356 (2006).
  13. K. M. Nowak, Y. Kurosawa, T. Suganuma, Y. Kawasuji, H. Nakarai, T. Saito, J. Fujimoto, and H. Mizoguchi, Synthesis of arbitrary pulse waveforms in QCL-seeded ns-pulse CO2 laser for optimization of an LPP EUV source, Opt. Lett. 41, 3118 (2016).
  14. N. Hurst and S. S. Harilal, Pulse shaping of transversely excited atmospheric CO2 laser using a simple plasma shutter, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 80, 035101 (2009).
  15. E. Snyder, EIC laser simulation (2023). https://github.com/UnregisteredData/EIC-Laser.
  16. T. Eichner, M. Jiang, J. B. Gonzalez-Diaz, T. Hülsenbusch, C. Braun, J. Thesinga, C. Werle, L. Winkelmann, A. Yousefi, M. Pergament, W. P. Leemans, A. R. Maier, and G. Palmer, Cryogenic 750-mJ Ti: Sapphire amplifier for laser plasma acceleration at a 100-Hz repetition rate, Opt. Lett. 50, 4890 (2025).
  17. C. Herkommer, P. Krötz, R. Jung, S. Klingebiel, C. Wandt, R. Bessing, P. Walch, T. Produit, K. Michel, D. Bauer, R. Kienberger, and T. Metzger, Ultrafast thin-disk multipass amplifier with 720 mJ operating at kilohertz repetition rate for applications in atmospheric research, Opt. Express 28, 30164 (2020).
  18. Y. Wang, H. Chi, C. Baumgarten, K. Dehne, A. R. Meadows, A. Davenport, G. Murray, B. A. Reagan, C. S. Menoni, and J. J. Rocca, 1.1 j Yb:Yag picosecond laser at 1 kHz repetition rate, Opt. Lett. 45, 6615 (2020).
  19. R. Budriūnas, T. Stanislauskas, J. Adamonis, A. Aleknavičius, G. Veitas, D. Gadonas, S. Balickas, A. Michailovas, and A. Varanavičius, 53 W average power cep-stabilized OPCPA system delivering 5.5 Tw few cycle pulses at 1 kHz repetition rate, Opt. Express 25, 5797 (2017).
  20. P. Dey, L. Ehrentraut, J. Tümmler, M. Schnürer, and S. Eisebitt, Above-mJ optical parametric chirped pulse amplifier at 3  μm for laser-driven coherent soft X-ray generation beyond the water window, APL Photonics 10, 040807 (2025).
  21. M. Polyanskiy, I. Pogorelsky, M. Babzien, R. Kupfer, N. Vafaei-Najafabadi, and M. Palmer, High-peak-power long-wave infrared lasers with CO2 amplifiers, Photonics 8, 101 (2021).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation