- Physical Review Journals
All JournalsPhysics Magazine

Physical Review Accelerators and Beams

Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Simulation studies of a high-repetition-rate electron-driven surface muon beamline at SHINE

Fangchao Liu1,*, Yusuke Takeuchi1,*, Si Chen2, Siyuan Chen1, Kim Siang Khaw1,†, Meng Lyu1, Ziwen Pan3, Dong Wang2, Jiangtao Wang1 et al.

Liang Wang1 and Wenzhen Xu2

  • *These authors contributed equally to this work.
  • †Contact author: kimsiang84@sjtu.edu.cn
PDF

Phys. Rev. Accel. Beams 28, 083401 – Published 18 August, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/t2d3-xqnp

Abstract

A high-repetition-rate pulsed muon source operating at approximately 50 kHz holds the potential to improve the sensitivity of various particle physics and materials science experiments involving muons. In this article, we propose utilizing the high-repetition-rate pulsed electron beam at the SHINE facility to generate a surface muon beam. Our simulation studies indicate that an 8 GeV, 100 pC charge pulsed electron beam impinging on a copper target can produce up to 2×103 muons per pulse. Beamline optimization results demonstrate that approximately 60 surface muons per electron bunch can be efficiently transported to the end of the beamline. This translates to a surface muon rate of 3×106  μ+/s when the pulsed electron beam is operated at 50 kHz, which is comparable to existing muon facilities. This high-repetition-rate pulsed muon beam, with its ideal time structure, represents a unique and pioneering effort once constructed. It serves as a model for building cost-effective muon sources at existing electron machines with GeV electron energies. In addition to the typical challenges encountered in conventional muon beamlines, such as the installation and construction of the target station and beamline, the removal of substantial quantities of positrons is also a major challenge. A potential solution to this issue is also discussed.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (50)

  1. T. P. Gorringe and D. W. Hertzog, Precision muon physics, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 84, 73 (2015).
  2. A. D. Hillier, S. J. Blundell, I. McKenzie, I. Umegaki, L. Shu, J. A. Wright, T. Prokscha, F. Bert, K. Shimomura, A. Berlie, H. Alberto, and I. Watanabe, Muon spin spectroscopy, Nat. Rev. Methods Primers 2, 4 (2022).
  3. J. Grillenberger, C. Baumgarten, and M. Seidel, The high intensity proton accelerator facility, SciPost Phys. Proc. 5, 002 (2021).
  4. S. Cook et al., Delivering the world’s most intense muon beam, Phys. Rev. Accel. Beams 20, 030101 (2017).
  5. N. Kawamura et al., New concept for a large-acceptance general-purpose muon beamline, Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2018, 113G01 (2018).
  6. R. Cywinski et al., Towards a dedicated high-intensity muon facility, Phys. B Condens. Matter 404, 1024 (2009).
  7. A. Adelmann, K. Kirch, C. J. G. Onderwater, and T. Schietinger, Compact storage ring to search for the muon electric dipole moment, J. Phys. G 37, 085001 (2010).
  8. L. Willmann and K. Jungmann, Muonium-antimuonium conversion, SciPost Phys. Proc. 5, 009 (2021).
  9. S. Kanda, Toward a high-precision measurement of the muon lifetime with an intense pulsed muon beam at J-PARC, Proc. Sci. NuFact2021 (2022) 215.
  10. Y. Ema, T. Gao, and M. Pospelov, Muon spin force, arXiv:2308.01356.
  11. Y. Kuno, Physics opportunities of a very intense low-momentum muon source, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 451, 233 (2000).
  12. M. Seidel, Cyclotrons and fixed field alternating gradient accelerators, arXiv:2105.04477.
  13. Y. Liu, A. Rakhman, C. D. Long, Y. Liu, and T. J. Williams, Laser-assisted high-energy proton pulse extraction for feasibility study of co-located muon source at the SNS, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 962, 163706 (2020).
  14. L. Bartoszek, Mu2e technical design report, arXiv:1501.05241.
  15. K. Nagamine, H. Miyadera, A. Jason, and R. Seki, Compact muon source with electron accelerator for a mobile μSR facility, Phys. B Condens. Matter 404, 1020 (2009).
  16. A. I. Titov, B. Kampfer, and H. Takabe, Dimuon production by laser-wakefield accelerated electrons, Phys. Rev. ST Accel. Beams 12, 111301 (2009).
  17. W. Dreesen, J. A. Green, M. Browder, J. Wood, D. Schwellenbach, T. Ditmire, G. Tiwari, and C. Wagner, Detection of petawatt laser-induced muon source for rapid high-Z material detection, in Proceedings of the 2014 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference (NSS/MIC) (IEEE, Seattle, WA, 2014), pp. 1–6, 10.1109/NSSMIC.2014.7431088.
  18. B. S. Rao, J. H. Jeon, H. T. Kim, and C. H. Nam, Bright muon source driven by GeV electron beams from a compact laser wakefield accelerator, Plasma Phys. Controlled Fusion 60, 095002 (2018).
  19. L. Calvin, P. Tomassini, D. Doria, D. Martello, R. M. Deas, and G. Sarri, Laser-driven muon production for material inspection and imaging, Front. Phys. 11, 1177486 (2023).
  20. F. Zhang et al., First proof of principle experiment for muon production with ultrashort high intensity laser, Nat. Phys. 21, 1050 (2024).
  21. D. Terzani et al., Measurement of directional muon beams generated at the Berkeley Lab Laser Accelerator, arXiv:2411.02321.
  22. Z. Zhao, D. Wang, Z.-H. Yang, and L. Yin, SCLF: An 8-GeV CW SCRF linac-based X-ray FEL facility in Shanghai, in Proceedings of the 38th International Free-Electron Laser Conference (JACoW, Geneva, Switzerland, 2018), pp. 182–184, 10.18429/JACoW-FEL2017-MOP055.
  23. T. Liu, S. Chen, H. Deng, Z. Gao, N. Huang, B. Liu, and Z. Qi, Layout of the undulator-to-dump line at the SHINE, in Proceedings of 67th ICFA Advanced Beam Dynamics Workshop Future Light Sources (FLS’23) (JACoW, Geneva, Switzerland, 2024), pp. 177–180, 10.18429/JACoW-FLS2023-WE4P14.
  24. M. Lv, J. Wang, and K. S. Khaw, A pulsed muon source based on a high-repetition-rate electron accelerator, in Proceedings of 14th International Particle Accelerator Conference (IPAC’23) (JACoW, Geneva, Switzerland, 2023), pp. 1522–1525, 10.18429/JACoW-IPAC2023-TUPA087.
  25. T. J. Roberts and D. M. Kaplan, g4beamline simulation program for matter dominated beamlines, IEEE Nucl. Sci. Symp. Conf. Rec. 070625, 3468 (2007).
  26. F. Berg et al., Target studies for surface muon production, Phys. Rev. Accel. Beams 19, 024701 (2016).
  27. C. Chen, Y. Bao, and N. Vassilopoulos, Design of the surface muon beamline of MELODY, J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2462, 012027 (2023).
  28. A. Ferrari, P. R. Sala, A. Fasso, and J. Ranft, fluka: A multi-particle transport code (Program version 2005), CERN Yellow Reports: Monographs (2005), 10.5170/CERN-2005-010.

  29. The typical electron beam spot from the SHINE superconducting linac is about O (10  μm). However, at this small beam size, it will produce excessively high power density. At a repetition rate of 50 kHz, the copper target may not endure the thermal load. The 2 mm beam spot assumed here is based on a recent SHINE beam dump study [30], and this number will be optimized with a more focused study based on the target’s thermal engineering design. To achieve a millimeter-sized beam spot, a beam spoiler system can be utilized. Such a spoiler system is commonly employed at the end of the SLAC linac to degrade the beam at the A-line and ESA [31].

  30. X. Yuhai, W. Guanghong, L. Zhefu, X. Wenzhen, Z. Bintuan, L. Jiongjun, Y. Fubin, and X. Xiaobin, Design of beam dump for the commissioning at SHINE facility, Radiat. Prot. 40, 510 (2020), http://222.198.130.40:81/Qikan/Article/Detail?id=7103802243.
  31. Y. Nosochkov, C. Hast, T. Markiewicz, L. Nicolas, T. Raubenheimer, and M. Santana-Leitner, Simulations of beam shaping for dark matter experiments at LCLS-II, in Proceedings of the 10th International Particle Accelerator Conference (IPAC’19) (JACoW Publishing, Geneva, Switzerland, 2019), pp. 2443–2446, 10.18429/JACoW-IPAC2019-WEPMP049.
  32. R. Khasanov, Perspective on muon-spin rotation/relaxation under hydrostatic pressure, J. Appl. Phys. 132, 190903 (2022).
  33. F. Tuomisto and I. Makkonen, Defect identification in semiconductors with positron annihilation: Experiment and theory, Rev. Mod. Phys. 85, 1583 (2013).
  34. F. Selim, Positron annihilation spectroscopy of defects in nuclear and irradiated materials—A review, Mater. Charact. 174, 110952 (2021).
  35. G. D. Maso et al., Future facilities at PSI, the high-intensity muon beams (HIMB) project, EPJ Web Conf. 282, 01012 (2023).
  36. K. Pak, J. Park, J. Y. Jeong, J. C. Kim, K. Kim, Y. H. Kim, J. Son, J. H. Lee, W. Lee, and Y. K. Kim, Beam line design and beam transport calculation for the μsr facility at RAON, Nucl. Eng. Technol. 53, 3344 (2021).
  37. L.-P. Zhou, X.-J. Ni, Z. Salman, A. Suter, J.-Y. Tang, V. Vrankovic, and T. Prokscha, Simulation studies for upgrading a high-intensity surface muon beamline at Paul Scherrer Institute, Phys. Rev. Accel. Beams 25, 051601 (2022).
  38. D. Gu, Z. Wang, and M. Zhang, Physics design and beam dynamics optimization of the SHINE accelerator, in Proceedings of 67th ICFA Advanced Beam Dynamics Workshop Future Light Sources (FLS’23) (JACoW, Geneva, Switzerland, 2024), pp. 174–176, 10.18429/JACoW-FLS2023-WE4P13.
  39. Y. Ikedo et al., Positron separators in superomega muon beamline at J-PARC, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 317, 365 (2013); XVIth international conference on electromagnetic isotope separators and techniques related to their applications, 2012 at Matsue, Japan, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. B 317, 179 (2013).
  40. Y.-F. Liu, R.-P. Wang, J. Tong, B. Zhang, S. Chen, Q.-B. Yuan, H.-X. Deng, M. Gu, and B. Liu, Development of a high-repetition-rate lumped-inductance kicker magnet prototype for the beam switchyard of SHINE, Nucl. Sci. Tech. 35, 37 (2024).
  41. F. Obier et al., Fast kicker system for european XFEL beam distribution, in Proceedings of the 39th International Free-Electron Laser Conference (JACoW Publishing, Geneva, Switzerland, 2019), pp. 353–356, 10.18429/JACoW-FEL2019-WEP013.
  42. Q. Li, Z. Pan, Y. Bao, T. Yang, H. Cheng, Y. Li, H. Hu, H. Liang, and B. Ye, Design of the first μSR spectrometer at China spallation neutron source, J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2462, 012022 (2023).
  43. A. Adelmann et al., Search for a muon EDM using the frozen-spin technique, arXiv:2102.08838.
  44. A. Adelmann et al., A compact frozen-spin trap for the search for the electric dipole moment of the muon, Eur. Phys. J. C 85, 622 (2025).
  45. C. Han, D. Huang, J. Tang, and Y. Zhang, Probing the doubly charged Higgs boson with a muonium to antimuonium conversion experiment, Phys. Rev. D 103, 055023 (2021).
  46. A.-Y. Bai et al., Snowmass2021 whitepaper: Muonium to antimuonium conversion, in Snowmass 2021 (2021), arXiv:2203.11406.
  47. A.-Y. Bai et al., Conceptual design of the muonium-to-antimuonium conversion experiment (MACE), arXiv:2410.18817.
  48. Y. Bao et al., Progress report on muon source project at CSNS, J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2462, 012034 (2023).
  49. H.-J. Cai et al., Towards a high-intensity muon source, Phys. Rev. Accel. Beams 27, 023403 (2024).
  50. Y. Xu et al., Feasibility study of the GeV-energy muon source based on the high intensity heavy-ion accelerator facility, Phys. Rev. Accel. Beams 28, 053401 (2025).

Outline

Information

Phys. Rev. Accel. Beams 28, 083401– Published 18 August, 2025
  • Received 19 March 2025
  • Accepted 16 July 2025
Crossmark - Check for updates button
Creative Commons Logo

Published by the American Physical Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. Further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the published article’s title, journal citation, and DOI.

Published by the American Physical Society

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation