Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Precise charge-state distribution of projectile ions through solid targets

Manpreet Kaur1, Sanjeev Kumar1, and T. Nandi2,*,†

  • *Contact author: nanditapan@gmail.com
  • †Formerly at Inter-University Accelerator Center, JNU New Campus, Aruna Asaf Ali Marg, New Delhi-110067, India.

Phys. Rev. Accel. Beams 28, 120101 – Published 5 December, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/jlcc-f5dy

Abstract

The charge-state distribution (CSD) of the projectile ions through solid targets in the intermediate energy range (1  MeV/u<E<4  MeV/u) has a major impact on the collision of the ion atom and accelerator physics. We explore the mean charge states taken from the empirical formula [G. Schiwietz et al., Femtosecond dynamics–snapshots of the early ion-track evolution, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. B 225, 4 (2004)] are only good for projectile ions with Z1≤16. To solve this issue, we develop a model in which instead of a single formula, if we employ four formulas, the comparative picture between experimental and empirical data becomes impressive. Furthermore, the CSDs obatained using the mean charge state and the Gaussian distribution function having distribution width as given by Novikov and Teplove [Methods of estimation of equilibrium charge distribution of ions in solid and gaseous media, Phys. Lett. A 378, 1286 (2014)] show good agreement with the experimentally measured CSDs for the entire range of projectile ions. We believe that accurate CSDs will be highly useful for both ion-atom collision and accelerator physics.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (23)

  1. P. Sharma and T. Nandi, Disentangling the bulk and exit surface contribution on projectile-charge-state evolution, Phys. Rev. Accel. Beams 22, 034501 (2019).
  2. S. Chatterjee, S. Kumar, S. Kumar, M. Oswal, B. Mohanty, D. Mehta, D. Mitra, A. Mendez, D. Mitnik, C. Montanari et al., Understanding the mechanisms of L-shell x-ray emission from s atoms bombarded by 4–6 MeV/u fluorine ion, Phys. Scr. 97, 045405 (2022).
  3. S. Chatterjee, P. Sharma, S. Singh, M. Oswal, S. Kumar, C. C. Montanari, D. Mitra, and T. Nandi, Significance of the high charge state of projectile ions inside the target and its role in electron capture leading to target-ionization phenomena, Phys. Rev. A 104, 022810 (2021).
  4. M. Kaur, S. Kumar, and T. Nandi, Understanding the electron capture mechanisms during heavy-ion collisions, Phys. Rev. A 108, 052817 (2023).
  5. P. Sharma and T. Nandi, Experimental evidence of beam-foil plasma creation during ion-solid interaction, Phys. Plasmas 23, 083102 (2016).
  6. V. Z. Maidikov, N. T. Surovitskaya, N. K. Skobelev, and W. Neubert, A spectrometer for measuring heavy reaction products, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. 192, 295 (1982).
  7. D. Swami and T. Nandi, Present status of theoretical understanding of charge changing processes at low beam energies, Radiat Phys. Chem. 153, 120 (2018).
  8. H.-D. BETZ, Charge states and charge-changing cross sections of fast heavy ions penetrating through gaseous and solid media, Rev. Mod. Phys. 44, 465 (1972).
  9. G. Schiwietz, K. Czerski, M. Roth, F. Staufenbiel, and P. Grande, Femtosecond dynamics–snapshots of the early ion-track evolution, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. B 225, 4 (2004).
  10. G. Schiwietz and P. L. Grande, Improved charge-state formulas, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. B 175–177, 125 (2001).
  11. K. Shima, T. Ishihara, and T. Mikumo, Empirical formula for the average equilibrium charge-state of heavy ions behind various foils, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. 200, 605 (1982).
  12. K. Shima, N. Kuno, M. Yamanouchi, and H. Tawara, Equilibrium charge fractions of ions of Z=4−92 emerging from a carbon foil, At. Data Nucl. Data Tables 51, 173 (1992).
  13. K. Shima, T. Mikumo, and H. Tawara, Equilibrium charge state distributions of ions (Z1≥4) after passage through foils: Compilation of data after 1972, At. Data Nucl. Data Tables 34, 357 (1986).
  14. J. P. Rozet, A. Chetioui, P. Piquemal, D. Vernhet, K. Wohrer, C. Stephan, and L. Tassan-Got, Charge-state distributions of few-electron ions deduced from atomic cross sections, J. Phys. B 22, 33 (1989).
  15. E. Lamour, P. D. Fainstein, M. Galassi, C. Prigent, C. A. Ramirez, R. D. Rivarola, J.-P. Rozet, M. Trassinelli, and D. Vernhet, Extension of charge-state-distribution calculations for ion-solid collisions towards low velocities and many-electron ions, Phys. Rev. A 92, 042703 (2015).
  16. J. P. Rozet, C. Stéphan, and D. Vernhet, etacha: A program for calculating charge states at GANIL energies, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. B 107, 67 (1996).
  17. C. Scheidenberger, T. Stöhlker, W. E. Meyerhof, H. Geissel, P. H. Mokler, and B. Blank, Charge states of relativistic heavy ions in matter, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. B 142, 441 (1998).
  18. H. D. Betz and L. Grodzins, Charge states and excitation of fast heavy ions passing through solids: A new model for the density effect, Phys. Rev. Lett. 25, 211 (1970).
  19. V. S. Nikolaev and I. S. Dmitriev, On the equilibrium charge distribution in heavy element ion beams, Phys. Lett. A 28, 277 (1968).
  20. N. V. Novikov and Y. A. Teplova, Methods of estimation of equilibrium charge distribution of ions in solid and gaseous media, Phys. Lett. A 378, 1286 (2014).
  21. G. C. Ball, T. K. Alexander, H. R. Andrews, W. G. Davies, and J. S. Forster, Charge-state measurements for Cu63, Zr90, Ag107, In115, I127 and Au197 in carbon for energies below 1 MeV/u, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. B 48, 125 (1990).
  22. J. F. Ziegler, M. D. Ziegler, and J. P. Biersack, srim–The stopping and range of ions in matter, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. B 268, 1818 (2010).
  23. M. Imai, M. Sataka, K. Kawatsura, K. Takahiro, K. Komaki, H. Shibata, H. Sugai, and K. Nishio, Equilibrium and non-equilibrium charge-state distributions of 2 MeV/u sulfur ions passing through carbon foils, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. B 267, 2675 (2009).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation