- Physical Review Journals
All JournalsPhysics Magazine

Physical Review Accelerators and Beams

Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

RF controls based on carrier suppression detection with attosecond resolution

F. Ludwig*, J. Branlard, M. Hoffmann, U. Mavrič, H. Pryschelski, L. Springer, and H. Schlarb

  • *Contact author: frank.ludwig@desy.de
PDF

Phys. Rev. Accel. Beams 28, 072803 – Published 31 July, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/jhc3-dtzw

Abstract

This paper presents a radio frequency (rf) control system with attosecond resolution based on a carrier suppression interferometer operating a superconducting cavity at the Cryo Module Test Bench (CMTB). This novel application of the carrier suppression detector extends conventional heterodyne methods and improves the residual jitter of the regulated rf field in the cavity by more than one order of magnitude. The cavity operated at 1.3 GHz with a gradient of 8  MV/m and a loaded quality factor of 107. The setup achieved out-of-loop phase noise detection values of L=−180 dBc/Hz at 10 kHz and L=−165 dBc/Hz at 100 Hz with a time resolution of 189 as within an offset frequency range from 10 Hz to 1 MHz. The phase noise budget of subcomponents such as in-loop and out-of-loop detectors, high-power drive, microphonics, and the reference source is reported. The facility rf reference phase noise in the offset frequency range from 1 to 100 kHz is identified as the key noise contributor. Furthermore, the narrow-band cavity reduces the phase jitter experienced by the beam to just 116 as. The presented research combining conventional receivers with carrier suppression detectors in continuous wave operation is a key milestone toward attosecond resolution, in particular relevant for pump-probe experiments in free-electron laser facilities.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (27)

  1. H. Schlarb et al., Next generation synchronization system for the VUV-FEL at DESY, in Proceedings of the FEL’05 (JACoW, Geneva, Switzerland, 2005), MOPP036, pp. 118–121, https://jacow.org/f05/papers/MOPP036.pdf.
  2. E. Rubiola, Phase Noise and Frequency Stability in Oscillators (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 2009), 10.1017/CBO9780511812798.
  3. F. Ludwig et al., Phase stability of the next generation RF field control for VUV- and x-ray free electron laser, in Proceedings of the EPAC’06, Series and Number European Particle Accelerator Conference No. 10 (JACoW, Geneva, Switzerland, 2006), pp. 1453–1455.
  4. S. Simrock and Z. Geng, Low-Level Radio Frequency Systems (Springer, New York, 2022), pp. 226–229.
  5. S. Simrock and Z. Geng, Low-Level Radio Frequency Systems (Springer, New York, 2022), pp. 240–242.
  6. F. Ludwig et al., RF controls towards femtosecond and attosecond precision, in Proceedings of the IPAC’19 (JACoW, Geneva, Switzerland, 2019), pp. 3414–3418.
  7. L. Doolittle et al., Digital low-level rf control using non-IQ sampling, in Proceedings of LINAC 2006, Knoxville, Tennessee (JACoW Publishing, Geneva, Switzerland, 2006), pp. 568–570, https://jacow.org/l06/papers/THP004.pdf.
  8. O. Troeng and L. Doolittle, Low-latency digital downconversion for control applications, 10.48550/arXiv.2102.05906 (2021).
  9. L. Springer et al., Phase noise measurements for L-band applications at attosecond resolution, IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas. 71, 1 (2022).
  10. E. Ivanov, M. Tobar, and R. Woode, Microwave interferometry: Application to precision measurements and noise reduction techniques, IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Control 45, 1526 (1998).
  11. E. Rubiola and V. Giordano, A low-flicker scheme for the real-time measurement of phase noise, IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Control 49, 501 (2002).
  12. E. Rubiola and V. Giordano, Advanced interferometric phase and amplitude noise measurements, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 73, 2445 (2002).
  13. , LNA-40-01000200-07-10P, https://www.nardamiteq.com/docs/LNA-40-01000200-07-10P.PDF.
  14. H. Ma, M. Champion, M. Crofford, K.-U. Kasemir, M. Piller, L. Doolittle, and A. Ratti, Low-level rf control of spallation neutron source: System and characterization, Phys. Rev. ST Accel. Beams 9, 032001 (2006).
  15. J. Branlard et al., The European XFEL LLRF system, in Proceedings of the IPAC’12 (JACoW, Geneva, Switzerland, 2012), pp. 55–57.
  16. A. Bellandi et al., LLRF R&D towards cw operation of the European XFEL, in Proceedings of the LINAC’18, Series and Number Linear Accelerator Conference No. 29 (JACoW, Geneva, Switzerland, 2019), pp. 223–226.
  17. J. Branlard et al., Status of cryomodule testing at CMTB for cw R&D, in Proceedings of the SRF’19 (JACoW, Geneva, Switzerland, 2019), pp. 1129–1132.
  18. J. Branlard et al., MTCA.4 LLRF system for the European XFEL, in Proceedings of the 20th International Conference Mixed Design of Integrated Circuits and Systems—MIXDES 2013 (IEEE, New York, 2013), pp. 109–112, https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/6613323.
  19. KVG Quarz Crystal Technology GmbH, Main oscillator, https://kvg-gmbh.de/product/main-oscillator/ (2024).
  20. Rohde & Schwarz GmbH & Co.KG, FSWP, https://www.rohde-schwarz.com/de/produkte/messtechnik/phasenrauschmessplaetze/rs-fswp-phasenrausch-und-vco-messplatz_63493-120512.html.
  21. N. Shtin, S. Ojha, and A. Chenakin, Residual noise characterization using interferometric measurement technique, Anritsu Tech. Bull. 97, 70 (2022), https://dl.cdn-anritsu.com/ja-jp/test-measurement/reffiles/About-Anritsu/R_D/Technical/97/97-10.pdf.
  22. MathWorks, Inc., matlab, https://www.mathworks.com/products/matlab.html.
  23. T. Powers et al., Microphonics testing of LCLS II cryomodules AT JLAB, in Proceedings of the SRF 2019 (JACoW, Geneva, Switzerland, 2019), pp. 493–497.
  24. A. Bellandi et al., Narrow bandwidth active noise control for microphonics rejection in superconducting cavities at lLCLS-II, in Proceedings of the 31st International Linear Accelerator Conference (LINAC’22) (2022), pp. 785–788, 10.18429/JACoW-LINAC2022-THPOPA21.
  25. G. Davs et al., Microphonics testing of the CEBAF upgrade 7-cell cavity, in Proceedings of the PAC-2001 (IEEE, New York, 2001).
  26. C. Serrano et al., RF controls for high-QL cavities for the LCLS-II, in Proceedings of the IPAC’18 (JACoW, Geneva, Switzerland, 2018), pp. 2929–2933.
  27. K. Zenker et al., MicroTCA.4-based low-level rf for continuous wave mode operation at the ELEB accelerator, IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 68, 2326 (2021).

Outline

Information

Phys. Rev. Accel. Beams 28, 072803– Published 31 July, 2025
  • Received 9 December 2024
  • Accepted 16 July 2025
Crossmark - Check for updates button
Creative Commons Logo

Published by the American Physical Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. Further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the published article’s title, journal citation, and DOI.

Published by the American Physical Society

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation