Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Implementation and deployment of an injection tuning tool using Bayesian optimization at the SuperKEKB accelerator

Shinnosuke Kato*

Gaku Mitsuka

  • KEK, Oho, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-0801, Japan, and SOKENDAI, Shonan Village, Hayama, Kanagawa 240-0193, Japan

  • *Contact author: s-kato@hep.phys.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp

Phys. Rev. Accel. Beams 29, 105103 – Published 7 October, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/g523-xdgf

Abstract

As of July 2025, the SuperKEKB accelerator, which collides 7 GeV electrons with 4 GeV positrons to abundantly produce particles such as B mesons and τ leptons, holds the world record for the highest instantaneous luminosity. Continuous operation and upgrades are underway to achieve even higher luminosities. Maintaining a high instantaneous luminosity requires sustaining high beam currents in the storage rings, which in turn demands efficient beam injection from the injector. In particular, a high injection efficiency, defined as the ratio of the beam current successfully accumulated in the ring to the current delivered from the beam transport line, must be ensured. In the present study, we developed a tool to automate the injection tuning process using Bayesian optimization, a machine-learning-based technique, in order to improve the injection efficiency. During test operations conducted in November-December 2024, this tool successfully enhanced the injection efficiency by up to 32%.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (19)

  1. SuperKEKB Collaboration, Superkekb design report, overview, https://kds.kek.jp/event/15914/contributions/28484/attachments/23456/28028/2_Overview.pdf (2019).
  2. J. A. Nelder and R. Mead, A simplex method for function minimization, Comput. J. 7, 308 (1965).
  3. T. Natsui, SuperKEKB positron beam tuning using machine learning, in EPJ Web of Conferences, International Workshop on Future Linear Colliders (LCWS2024), Tokyo, Japan (EDP Sciences, Les Ulis, France, 2024), Vol. 315, p. 02004.
  4. SuperKEKB Collaboration, Superkekb design report, beam transport, https://kds.kek.jp/event/15914/contributions/28479/attachments/136391/166653/BT_Revised2020_10_20.pdf (2020).
  5. T. Suwada, N. Kamikubota, H. Fukuma, N. Akasaka, and H. Kobayashi, Stripline-type beam-position-monitor system for single-bunch electron/positron beams, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 440, 307 (2000).
  6. SuperKEKB Collaboration, Superkekb design report, beam instrumentation, https://kds.kek.jp/event/15914/contributions/28491/attachments/136900/166652/BeamInstrumentation2020_10_19s.pdf (2020).
  7. J. Mockus, V. Tiesis, A. Zilinskas, L. C. W. Dixon, and G. P. Szego, The application of Bayesian methods for seeking the extremum, Towards Global Optimization, edited by L. C. W. Dixon and G. P. Szego (Elsevier, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 1978). Vol. 2, pp. 117–129.
  8. J. Mockus, Bayesian Approach to Global Optimization: Theory and Applications (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, Netherlands, 1989).
  9. C. E. Rasmussen and C. K. I. Williams, Gaussian Processes for Machine Learning (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 2006).
  10. G. Mitsuka, S. Kato, N. Iida, T. Natsui, and M. Satoh, Machine-learning approach for operating electron beam at KEK electron/positron injector linac, Phys. Rev. Accel. Beams 27, 084601 (2024).
  11. J. Bergstra, R. Bardenet, Y. Bengio, B. Kégl, J. Shawe-Taylor, R. Zemel, P. Bartlett, F. Pereira, and K. Q. Weinberger, Algorithms for hyper-parameter optimization, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (Curran Associates, Inc., Red Hook, NY, USA, 2011). Vol. 24.
  12. N. Hansen, The CMA evolution strategy: A tutorial (2023), 10.48550/arXiv.1604.00772.
  13. R. Roussel and A. Edelen, Proximal biasing for Bayesian optimization and characterization of physical systems, in NeurIPS Workshop on Machine Learning and the Physical Sciences (Neural Information Processing Systems Foundation, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA, 2021).
  14. R. Roussel et al., Bayesian optimization algorithms for accelerator physics, Phys. Rev. Accel. Beams 27, 084801 (2024).
  15. D. Eriksson, M. Pearce, J. Gardner, R. D. Turner, and M. Poloczek, Scalable global optimization via local Bayesian optimization, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (2019), Vol. 32.
  16. S. M. Lundberg and S.-I. Lee, A unified approach to interpreting model predictions, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (Curran Associates, Inc., Red Hook, NY, USA, 2017), Vol. 30.
  17. FCC-ee: A. Abada et al. (FCC Collaboration, FCC-ee: The Lepton Collider: Future circular collider conceptual design report Volume 2, Eur. Phys. J. Special Topics 228, 261 (2019). 10.1140/epjst/e2019-900045-4, Report No. CERN-ACC-2018-0057.
  18. CEPC: CEPC Study Group, CEPC conceptual design report: Volume 1—Accelerator, Reports No. IHEP-CEPC-DR-2018-01 and No. IHEP-AC-2018-01 (2018), arXiv:1809.00285.
  19. S. Kato, Bayesian Optimization for SuperKEKB Injection Tuning, Version 1.1.1, Zenodo (2026), 10.5281/zenodo.22744072.

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation