- Physical Review Journals
All JournalsPhysics Magazine

Physical Review Accelerators and Beams

Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Editors' Suggestion
  • Open Access

Investigation of sputtering and erosion phenomena in radio-frequency quadrupoles

Emmanouil Trachanas1,2,*, Luca Bellan3, Gyula Nagy4, Antonio Palmieri3, Andrea Bignami1, Richard Arthur Wilhelm4, Francesco Grespan3, and Nikolaos Gazis1

  • *Contact author: Emmanouil.Trachanas@ess.eu
PDF

Phys. Rev. Accel. Beams 28, 104501 – Published 27 October, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/fxry-781s

Abstract

The performance and stability of radio-frequency quadrupoles (RFQs) depend critically on the structural integrity of their electrodes (vanes or rods), which are subjected to high-intensity ion beam exposure during accelerator operation. This study investigates the sputtering induced vane erosion on the European Spallation Source (ESS) RFQ, a critical component of the ESS linear accelerator. Particle tracking simulations for the determination of RFQ beam loss profiles were coupled to sdtrimsp software (static-dynamic transport of ions in matter sequential-parallel processing) modeling to estimate the sputtering yield distribution and the resulting erosion rates under nominal operating conditions. Methodology validation and benchmarking was performed using quartz crystal microbalance (QCM) measurements employing proton (2, 6 keV) and argon (Ar+ 2 keV, Ar6+ 36 keV) ion beams with incident angles of 0°–70°. The QCM experiments were used to benchmark sdtrimsp software simulation parameters for the calculation of sputtering yields and total electrode erosion rates across the energy and angular ranges relevant to the ESS RFQ. The results and conclusions are extended to RFQs employed for heavy-ion acceleration providing insights into long-term stability and performance degradation. The results indicate that heavy-ion irradiation leads to significantly higher sputtering yields and erosion rates compared to protons. It is estimated that the increased erosion rates result in critical frequency perturbations in RFQ cavities especially in high current or cw configurations that need to be effectively compensated.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (73)

  1. R. Garoby et al., The European Spallation Source design, Phys. Scr. 93, 014001 (2017).
  2. T. P. Wangler, RF Linear Accelerators, 2nd ed. (Wiley-VCH, New York, 2008), 10.1002/9783527623426.
  3. N. Gazis et al., Mechanical engineering, design and structural health monitoring at the ESS facility to enable science, Int. J. Mod. Phys. Conf. Ser. 50, 2060006 (2020).
  4. G. S. Was, Fundamentals of Radiation Materials Science: Metals and Alloys, 1st ed. (Springer, New York, 2007), 10.1007/978-3-540-49472-0.
  5. A. Pisent, RFQ for cw applications, in Proceedings of the Linear Accelerator Conference (LINAC-2010), Tsukuba, Japan (JACoW, Geneva, Switzerland, 2010), https://proceedings.jacow.org/LINAC2010/papers/tu301.pdf.
  6. Y. He et al., High-power radiofrequency quadrupoles: Review of recent developments, common problems, and solutions, Phys. Rev. Accel. Beams 28, 064801 (2025).
  7. A. Lopez-Cazalilla et al., Effect of surface orientation on blistering of copper under high fluence keV hydrogen ion irradiation, Acta. Mater. 266, 119699 (2024).
  8. C. Serafim et al., Effects of H− low beam irradiation and high field pulsing tests in different metals, Phys. Rev. Accel. Beams 28, 013101 (2025).
  9. E. Trachanas et al., Thermal diffusivity variation assessment on radio-frequency quadrupole Cu-OF copper due to proton irradiation, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. B 539, 179 (2023).
  10. G. Moreno et al., Study of manufacturing errors in 750 MHz RFQ using electromagnetic simulations, in Proceedings of the LINAC-2024, 32nd International Linear Accelerator Conference (JACoW, Geneva, Switzerland, 2024), pp. 71–74, 10.18429/JACoW-LINAC2024-MOPB017.
  11. K. R. Shin, Y. W. Kang, S. H. Kim, and A. E. Fathy, Investigation of electromagnetic field perturbation with respect to mechanical imperfections in radio-frequency quadrupole (RFQ) structure, IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 59, 2428 (2012).
  12. A. Palmieri, F. Grespan, and A. Pisent, Perturbation analysis on a four-vane RFQ, in Proceedings of the 1st International Particle Accelerator Conference (IPAC, 10), Kyoto, Japan (JACoW, Geneva, Switzerland, 2010), pp. 606–608, https://accelconf.web.cern.ch/IPAC10/papers/mopec062.pdf.
  13. A. Camelin et al., Experimental analysis of subsurface integrity during fine turning of OFE copper for radiofrequency cavity manufacturing, J. Mater. Process. Technol. 302, 117483 (2022).
  14. P. Sigmund, Recollections of fifty years with sputtering, Thin Solid Films 520, 6031 (2012).
  15. P. Sigmund, Theory of sputtering. I. Sputtering yield of amorphous and polycrystalline targets, Phys. Rev. 184, 383 (1969).
  16. J. F. Ziegler, J. P. Biersack, and U. Littmark, srim tutorial No. 2—Target mixing and sputtering, https://www.srim.org/SRIM/Tutorials/SRIM%20Tutorial%202%20-%20Mixing%20and%20Sputtering.pdf (2013).
  17. R. A. Baragiola, Principles and mechanisms of ion induced electron emission, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. B 78, 223 (1993).
  18. A. Mutzke, R. Schneider, W. Eckstein, R. Dohmen, K. Schmid, U. von Toussaint, and G. Bandelow, sdtrimsp version 6.00, Max-Planck-Institut für Plasmaphysik, Garching, Germany, Technical Report No. IPP 2019-02, 2019, https://scispace.com/pdf/sdtrimsp-version-6-00-34bn0d00uz.pdf.
  19. R. Ferdinand, R. Duperrier, N. Pichoff, and J.-M. Lagniel, toutatis, the CEA/Saclay RFQ code, in Proceedings of the LINAC’00, Monterey, CA, USA, 2002), pp. 839–841, arXiv:physics/0008121.
  20. D. Uriot and N. Pichoff, tracewin beam dynamics simulation code, CEA Saclay, DSM/IRFU/SACM, https://www.dacm-logiciels.fr/tracewin (2013).
  21. A. M. Lombardi, Overview of linacs, in Proceedings of the CAS–CERN Accelerator School on Accelerators for Medical Applications, Vösendorf, Austria, CERN Accelerator School: Yellow Report Vol. 1 (CERN, Geneva, Switzerland, 2017), 10.23730/CYRSP-2017-001.79.
  22. R. Stadlmayr et al., A high temperature dual-mode quartz crystal microbalance technique for erosion and thermal desorption spectroscopy measurements, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 91, 125104 (2020).
  23. G. Sauerbrey, Verwendung von schwingquarzen zur Wägung dünner schichten und zur mikrowägung, Z. Phys. 155, 206 (1959).
  24. G. Hayderer et al., A highly sensitive quartz-crystal microbalance for sputtering investigations in slow ion–surface collisions, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 70, 3696 (1999).
  25. R. Stadlmayr et al., Fluence dependent changes of surface morphology and sputtering yield of iron: Comparison of experiments with sdtrimsp-2d, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. B 430, 42 (2018).
  26. K. Dobes et al., Interaction of nitrogen ions with beryllium surfaces, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. B 340, 34 (2014).
  27. R. Stadlmayr et al., Erosion of iron-tungsten model films by deuterium ion irradiation: A benchmark for tri3dyn, Phys. Scr. T171, 014021 (2020).
  28. C. Cupak et al., Sputter yields of rough surfaces: Importance of the mean surface inclination angle from nano- to microscopic rough regimes, Appl. Surf. Sci. 570, 151204 (2021).
  29. E. Galutschek et al., Compact 14.5 GHz all-permanent magnet ECRIS for experiments with slow multicharged ions, J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 58, 395 (2007).
  30. P. S. Szabo et al., Graphical user interface for sdtrimsp to simulate sputtering, ion implantation and the dynamic effects of ion irradiation, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. B 522, 47 (2022).
  31. E. Kaxiras, Atomic and Electronic Structure of Solids (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 2003), 10.1017/CBO9780511755545.
  32. W. D. Wilson, L. G. Haggmark, and J. P. Biersack, Calculations of nuclear stopping, ranges, and straggling in the low-energy region, Phys. Rev. B 15, 2458 (1977).
  33. Z. Kopal, Numerical Analysis (Chapman and Hall, London, 1961), https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/proceedings-of-the-edinburgh-mathematical-society/article/z-kopal-numerical-analysis-chapman-hall-london-1955-570-pp-63s/9185C73F6FB211C01421C22BBAFC3C72.
  34. Q. Wei, K.-D. Li, J. Lian, and L. Wang, Angular dependence of sputtering yield of amorphous and polycrystalline materials, J. Phys. D 41, 172002 (2008).
  35. R. Behrisch and W. Eckstein, Sputtering by Particle Bombardment: Experiments and Computer Calculations from Threshold to MeV Energies, Springer Series in Materials Science Vol. 110 (Springer, New York, 2007), 10.1007/978-3-540-44502-9.
  36. H. Oechsner, Sputtering—A review of some recent experimental and theoretical aspects, Appl. Phys. 8, 185 (1975).
  37. O. Almén and G. Bruce, Collection and sputtering experiments with noble gas ions, Nucl. Instrum. Methods 11, 257 (1961).
  38. P. K. Rol, J. M. Fluit, and J. Kistemaker, Sputtering of copper by bombardment with ions of 5–25 keV, Physica (Amsterdam) 26, 1000 (1960).
  39. K. B. Cheney and E. T. Pitkin, Sputtering at acute incidence, J. Appl. Phys. 36, 3542 (1965).
  40. H. Oechsner, Untersuchungen zur festkörperzerstäubung bei schiefwinkligem ionenbeschuß polykristalliner metalloberflächen im energiebereich um 1 keV, Z. Phys. 261, 37 (1973).
  41. W. Eckstein and R. Preuss, New fit formulae for the sputtering yield, J. Nucl. Mater. 320, 209 (2003).
  42. J. Bohdansky et al., Light ion sputtering for H, D and He in the energy range of 25 keV to 100 keV, J. Nucl. Mater. 111–112, 717 (1982).
  43. J. Bohdansky, Important sputtering yield data for tokamaks. A comparison of measurements and estimates, J. Nucl. Mater. 93–94, 44 (1980).
  44. W. Eckstein, C. García-Rosales, J. Roth, and W. Ottenberger, Sputtering data, Technical Report No. IPP 9/82, Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics (MPG), Garching, 1993, https://pure.mpg.de/rest/items/item_2131245_1/component/file_2131244/content.
  45. C. E. KenKnight and G. K. Wehner, Sputtering of metals by hydrogen ions, J. Appl. Phys. 35, 322 (1964).
  46. O. C. Yonts, C. E. Normand, and D. E. Harrison, Jr., High‐energy sputtering, J. Appl. Phys. 31, 447 (1960).
  47. A. Mutzke, G. Bandelow, and R. Schneider, Sputtering of mixed materials of beryllium and tungsten by hydrogen and helium, J. Nucl. Mater. 467, 413 (2015).
  48. V. Bencini, H. W. Pommerenke, A. Grudiev, and A. M. Lombardi, 750 MHz radio frequency quadrupole with trapezoidal vanes for carbon ion therapy, Phys. Rev. Accel. Beams 23, 122003 (2020).
  49. J. Klabunde, The high charge state injector for GSI, in Proceedings of the Linear Accelerator Conference (LINAC-1992), Ottawa, Canada (JACoW, Geneva, Switzerland, 1992), pp. 570–574, https://proceedings.jacow.org/l92/papers/th1-02.pdf.
  50. Z. Zhang et al., Design of a radio frequency quadrupole for a high intensity heavy-ion accelerator facility, Phys. Rev. Accel. Beams 25, 080102 (2022).
  51. A. Palmieri, Preserving beam quality in long RFQs on the rf side: Voltage stabilization and tuning, in Proceedings of the 54th ICFA Advanced Beam Dynamics Workshop on High-Intensity and High-Brightness Hadron Beams (JACoW, Geneva, Switzerland, 2015), https://proceedings.jacow.org/HB2014/talks/tho1ab04_talk.pdf.
  52. K. Halbach and R. F. Holsinger, superfish—A computer program for evaluation of rf cavities with cylindrical symmetry, Part. Accel. 7, 213 (1976), https://cds.cern.ch/record/700607/files/p213.pdf.
  53. D. Schrage et al., CW RFQ fabrication and engineering, in Proceedings of the LINAC-1998, Chicago, IL (JACoW, Geneva, Switzerland, 1998), WE1003, pp. 679–683, http://accelconf.web.cern.ch/accelconf/l98/papers/we1003.pdf.
  54. P.-Y. Beauvais . Recent evolutions in the design of the French high intensity proton injector (IPHI), in Proceedings of the EPAC-2004, Lucerne, Switzerland (JACoW, Geneva, Switzerland, 2004), pp. 1273–1275, http://accelconf.web.cern.ch/accelconf/e04/papers/tuplt053.pdf.
  55. G. Bezzon et al., Construction and commissioning of the RFQ for the CERN lead-ion facility, in Proceedings of the LINAC-1994, Tsukuba, Japan (JACoW, Geneva, Switzerland, 1994), pp. 722–724, http://accelconf.web.cern.ch/AccelConf/l94/papers/th-12.pdf.
  56. L. H. Podlech et al., Electrodynamic calculations of the 4-rod-RFQ resonator for the Heidelberg high current injector, in Proceedings of the PAC-2001, Chicago, IL (JACoW, Geneva, Switzerland, 2001), pp. 3069–3071, http://accelconf.web.cern.ch/p01/papers/rpah096.pdf.
  57. P. Gerhard et al., Commissioning of a new cw radio frequency quadrupole at GSI, in Proceedings of the IPAC-2010, Kyoto, Japan (JACoW, Geneva, Switzerland, 2010), pp. 741–743, http://accelconf.web.cern.ch/accelconf/ipac10/papers/mopd028.pdf.
  58. E. Fagotti et al., Beam commissioning of the IFMIF EVEDA very high power RFQ, in Proceedings of the IPAC-2018, Vancouver (JACoW, Geneva, Switzerland, 2018), pp. 2902–2907, http://accelconf.web.cern.ch/ipac2018/papers/thxgbf2.pdf.
  59. A. France et al., Advanced RF design and tuning methods of RFQ for high intensity proton linacs, in Proceedings of the IPAC-2014, Dresden, Germany (JACoW, Geneva, Switzerland, 2014), pp. 34–38, 10.18429/JACoW-IPAC2014-MOZA02.
  60. K. S. Schlueter et al., Absence of a crystal direction regime in which sputtering corresponds to amorphous material, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 225502 (2020).
  61. K. Nordlund, F. Djurabekova, and G. Hobler, Large fraction of crystal directions leads to ion channeling, Phys. Rev. B 94, 214109 (2016).
  62. H. Windawi, Effect of temperature on the sputtering yield of copper, Surf. Sci. 55, 573 (1976).
  63. G. K. Wehner, Sputtering by ion bombardment, Adv. Electron. Electron Phys. 7, 239 (1955).
  64. E.Trachanas et al., Study of thermal diffusivity degradation on Cu-OFE copper due to proton and self-ion irradiation using in situ transient grating spectroscopy, J. Nucl. Mater. 607, 155674 (2025).
  65. M. Küstner, W. Eckstein, V. Dose, and J. Roth, The influence of surface roughness on the angular dependence of the sputter yield, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. B 145, 320 (1998).
  66. R. Arredondo et al., Angle-dependent sputter yield measurements of keV D ions on W and Fe and comparison with sdtrimsp and sdtrimsp-3d, Nucl. Mater. Energy 18, 72 (2019).
  67. J.-L. Munoz et al., Development of the radio frequency quadrupole proton linac for ESS-Bilbao, EPJ Web Conf. 231, 02001 (2020).
  68. M. Sznajder, U. Geppert, and M. R. Dudek, Hydrogen blistering under extreme radiation conditions, npj Mater. Degrad. 2, 3 (2018).
  69. W. Möller and W. Eckstein, tridyn—A trim simulation code including dynamic composition changes, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. B 2, 814 (1984).
  70. U. von Toussaint, A. Mutzke, and A. Manhard, Sputtering of rough surfaces: A 3D simulation study, Phys. Scr. T170, 014056 (2017).
  71. R.Stadlmayr et al., Sputtering of nanostructured tungsten and comparison to modelling with tri3dyn, J. Nucl. Mater. 532, 152019 (2020).
  72. R. Behrisch and W. Eckstein, Sputtering yield increase with target temperature for Ag, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. B 82, 255 (1993).
  73. N. Misiara et al., Recent RF and mechanical developments for the ESS RFQ, in Proceedings of the 28th International Linear Accelerator Conference, East Lansing (2016), THPLR054, https://inspirehep.net/files/1f1b0b1806d4acb3095bf1715c806e04.

Outline

Information

Phys. Rev. Accel. Beams 28, 104501– Published 27 October, 2025
  • Received 3 July 2025
  • Accepted 8 October 2025
Crossmark - Check for updates button
Creative Commons Logo

Published by the American Physical Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. Further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the published article’s title, journal citation, and DOI.

Published by the American Physical Society

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation