Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Selected momentum correction using induction-voltage modulator for low-flux ion beams

Takashi Kikuchi*

Takeshi Katayama

Kazuhiko Horioka

Shigeo Kawata

  • Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Utsunomiya University, Yohtoh 7-1-2, Utsunomiya 321-8585, Japan

  • Center for Nuclear Study, Graduate School of Science, University of Tokyo, Wako-Branch at RIKEN, 2-1 Hirosawa, Wako, Saitama, 351-0198, Japan

  • Department of Energy Sciences, Interdisciplinary Graduate School of Science and Engineering, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Nagatsuta 4259, Midori-ku, Yokohama, 226-8502, Japan

  • Department of Energy and Environmental Science, Utsunomiya University, Yohtoh 7-1-2, Utsunomiya 321-8585, Japan

  • *Electronic address: tkikuchi@cc.utsunomiya-u.ac.jp

Phys. Rev. ST Accel. Beams 8, 080402 – Published 30 August, 2005

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTAB.8.080402

Abstract

A method for direct momentum correction of a selected beam particle using a controllable induction-voltage modulator is proposed for a low-flux ion beam. The corrected ion beam has a small momentum error restricted by a detection error at a kinetic energy analyzer and a voltage fluctuation at the induction-voltage modulator. Numerical simulations indicate that the scheme using a multiturn correction in a storage ring can considerably reduce the requirement of the amplitude and the tolerance level of the correction voltage. The results also show the final momentum error of the order of 10−5 can be rapidly achieved at total flight time of 30   μs when repetitive correction voltages are applied during the revolutions in the ring.

View figure in article

Article Text

References (23)

  1. I. Tanihata, H. Hamagaki, O. Hashimoto, Y. Shida, N. Yoshikawa, K. Sugimoto, O. Yamakawa, T. Kobayashi, and N. Takahashi, Phys. Rev. Lett. 55, 2676 (1985).
  2. P. Schmor, in Proceedings of the 2003 Particle Accelerator Conference, Oregon (IEEE, Piscataway, NJ, 2003), p. 6.
  3. H.-J. Kluge, K. Blaum, and C. Scheidenberger, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 532, 48 (2004).
  4. B. Franzke, P. Beller, K. Beckert, A. Dolinskii, P. Hulsmann, F. Nolden, C. Peschke, and M. Steck, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 532, 97 (2004).
  5. T. Radon et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 4701 (1997).
  6. J. Stadlmann et al., Phys. Lett. B 586, 27 (2004).
  7. Y. Yano, A. Goto, M. Kase, and T. Katayama, in Proceedings of the 2001 Particle Accelerator Conference, Chicago (IEEE, Piscataway, NJ, 2001), p. 575.
  8. T. Kubo, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. B 204, 97 (2003).
  9. I. Meshkov, W. Mitting, P. Roussel-Chomaz, A. Sidorin, A. Smirnov, and E. Syresin, Report No. GANIL-R-2002-04, 2002.
  10. I. Meshkov, W. Mitting, P. Roussel-Chomaz, A. Sidorin, A. Smirnov, and E. Syresin, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 523, 262 (2004).
  11. I. N. Meshkov, A. O. Sidorin, A. V. Smirnov, E. M. Syresin, I. V. Titkova, W. Mittig, and P. Roussel-Chomaz, At. Energ. 94, 18 (2003).
  12. N. Inabe, K. Yoshida, M. Wakasugi, and T. Katayama, in Proceedings of the 6th European Particle Accelerator Conference, Stockholm (Institute of Physics, Bristol, 1998), p. 1037.
  13. M. Beutelspacher, H. Fadil, T. Furukawa, M. Grieser, A. Noda, K. Noda, D. Schwalm, T. Shirai, and A. Wolf, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 532, 123 (2004).
  14. K. Horioka et al., Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 415, 291 (1998).
  15. T. C. Sangstar et al., Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 415, 310 (1998).
  16. K. Takayama, J. Kishiro, M. Sakuda, Y. Shimosaki, and M. Wake, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 144801 (2002).
  17. Y. Shimosaki, E. Nakamura, K. Takayama, K. Torikai, M. Watanabe, M. Nakajima, and K. Horioka, Phys. Rev. ST Accel. Beams 7, 014201 (2004).
  18. M. Watanabe, M. Nakajima, M. Shiho, K. Horioka, K. Takayama, and J. Kishiro, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 73, 1756 (2002).
  19. K. Horioka, M. Nakajima, M. Watanabe, M. Honda, E. Hotta, M. Shiho, M. Ogawa, J. Hasegawa, J. Kishiro, and K. Takayama, Laser Part. Beams 20, 609 (2002).
  20. H. Kumagai, A. Ozawa, N. Fukuda, K. Summerer, and I. Tanihata, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 470, 562 (2001).
  21. M. Matsumoto and T. Nishimura, ACM Trans. Model. Comput. Simul. 8, 3 (1998).
  22. C. H. Kim and L. Smith, Part. Accel. 18, 101 (1985).
  23. W. R. Meier, J. J. Barnard, and R. O. Bangerter, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 464, 433 (2001).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation