Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Observation and simulation of space-charge effects in a radio-frequency photoinjector using a transverse multibeamlet distribution

M. Rihaoui1,2, P. Piot1,3, J. G. Power2, Z. Yusof2, and W. Gai2

  • 1Northern Illinois Center for Accelerator & Detector Development and Department of Physics, Northern Illinois University, DeKalb, Illinois 60115, USA
  • 2High Energy Physics Division, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, Illinois 60439, USA
  • 3Accelerator Physics Center, Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, Batavia, Illinois 60510, USA

Phys. Rev. ST Accel. Beams 12, 124201 – Published 29 December, 2009

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTAB.12.124201

Abstract

We report on an experimental study of space-charge effects in a radio-frequency (rf) photoinjector. A 5 MeV electron bunch, consisting of a number of beamlets separated transversely, was generated in an rf photocathode gun and propagated in the succeeding drift space. The collective interaction of these beamlets was studied for different experimental conditions. The experiment allowed the exploration of space-charge effects and its comparison with 3D particle-in-cell simulations. Our observations also suggest the possible use of a multibeam configuration to tailor the transverse distribution of an electron beam.

View figure in article

Article Text

References (37)

  1. See, for instance, J. Arthur et al., LCLS Conceptual Design Report, Report No. SLAC-R-593/UC-414, 2002; TESLA Technical Design Report Imprint No. DESY 2001-011 or ECFA 2001-209, edited by R. Brinkmann , 2001.
  2. See the web site http://www.linearcollider.org.
  3. W. Gai, P. Schoessow, B. Cole, R. Konecny, J. Norem, J. Rosenzweig, and J. Simpson, Phys. Rev. Lett. 61, 2756 (1988).
  4. R. L. Gluckstern, Phys. Rev. Lett. 73, 1247 (1994).
  5. S. Bernal, R. A. Kishek, and M. Reiser, in Proceedings of the 18th Particle Accelerator Conference, New York, 1999 (IEEE, New York, 1999), p. 1749.
  6. J. S. Fraser, R. L. Scheffield, E. R. Gray, and G. W. Rodenz, in Proceedings of the 1985 IEEE Particle Accelerator Conference (IEEE, Vancouver, BC, 1985), p. 1791.
  7. F. Zhou, I. Ben-Zvi, M. Babzien, X. Y. Chang, A. Doyuran, R. Malone, X. J. Wang, and V. Yakimenko, Phys. Rev. ST Accel. Beams 5, 094203 (2002).
  8. C. Lejeune and J. Aubert, Adv. Electron. Electron Phys. Suppl. A 13, 159 (1980).
  9. F. R. Sacherer, IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 18, 1105 (1971).
  10. M. Reiser et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 61, 2933 (1988).
  11. I. Haber et al., Phys. Rev. A 44, 5194 (1991).
  12. D. Stratakis, R. A. Kishek, I. Haber, S. Bernal, M. Reiser, and P. G. O’Shea, Phys. Rev. ST Accel. Beams 12, 064201 (2009).
  13. V. Shiltsev, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 374, 137 (1996).
  14. V. Shiltsev et al., Phys. Rev. ST Accel. Beams 11, 103501 (2008).
  15. C. M. Celata et al., Phys. Plasmas 10, 2064 (2003).
  16. T. Kondoh, et al., in Proceedings of the 11th European Particle Accelerator Conference, Genoa, 2008 (EPS-AG, Genoa, Italy, 2008), p. 1809.
  17. Information on the Argonne Wakefield Facility is available at the web site http://gate.hep.anl.gov/awa.
  18. The Ce:YAG screens were procured from Crytur Ltd.; see the web site http://www.crytur.cz/.
  19. The ICT is manufactured by Bergoz Instrumentation; see the web site http://www.bergoz.com/.
  20. J. G. Power, H. Wang, M. E. Conde, W. Gai, R. Konecny, W. Liu, and Z. Yusof, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 546, 345 (2005).
  21. N. Brown and M. Reiser, Phys. Rev. Lett. 71, 2911 (1993); see also Ref. [24], Sec. 4.4.5.
  22. J. H. Billen and L. M. Young, in Proceedings of the 1993 Particle Accelerator Conference, Washington, DC (IEEE, Piscataway, NJ, 1993), p. 790.
  23. I. N. Meshkov, Transport of the Charged Particles (Budker INP, Novosibirsk, 1989) (in Russian).
  24. M. Reiser, The Theory and Design of Charged Particle Beams, Wiley Series in Beam Physics and Accelerator Technology (Wiley, New York, 1994); see Eq. 3.59, p. 74.
  25. J. Qiang, S. Lidia, R. D. Ryne, and C. Limborg-Deprey, Phys. Rev. ST Accel. Beams 9, 044204 (2006).
  26. H. Shang and M. Borland, in Proceedings of the 21st Particle Accelerator Conference, Knoxville, 2005 (IEEE, Piscataway, NJ, 2005), p. 4230.
  27. M. Rihaoui, W. Gai, P. Piot, J. Power, and Z. Yusof, Proceedings of the 2009 Particle Accelerator Conference, Vancouver, BC (to be published).
  28. B. E. Carlsten, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 285, 313 (1989).
  29. L. Serafini and J. B. Rosenzweig, Phys. Rev. E 55, 7565 (1997).
  30. C.-x. Wang, Phys. Rev. E 74, 046502 (2006).
  31. G. Geloni, E. Saldin, E. Schneidmiller, and M. Yurkov, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 554, 20 (2005).
  32. J. Wu, Z. Huang, and P. Emma, Phys. Rev. ST Accel. Beams 11, 040701 (2008).
  33. J. Qiang et al., Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 457, 1 (2001).
  34. See, for instance, R. W. Howckney and J. W. Eastwood, Computer Simulation Using Particles (Adam Higler, Bristol and New York, 1989).
  35. B. E. Carlsten, Part. Accel. 49, 34 (1995).
  36. W. H. Press, Brian P. Flannery, S. A. Teukolsky, and W. T. Vetterling, Numerical Recipes in C (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1992), 2nd ed.
  37. G. E. P. Box and M. E. Muller, Ann. Math. Stat. 29, 610 (1958).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation