- Editors' Suggestion
- Open Access
Homogenized harmonic balance finite element method for nonlinear eddy current simulations of fast corrector magnets
Phys. Rev. Accel. Beams 28, 104601 – Published 6 October, 2025
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/9mnn-w7lj
Abstract
This paper develops a homogenized harmonic balance finite element method (HomHBFEM) to predict the dynamic behavior of magnets with fast excitation cycles, including eddy current and skin effects. A homogenization technique for laminated yokes avoids resolving the individual laminates and the skin depth in the finite element (FE) mesh. Instead, the yoke is represented by a bulk surrogate material with frequency-dependent parameters. The ferromagnetic saturation of the yoke at higher excitation currents is tackled by a harmonic balance method, which accounts for a coupled set of frequency components. Thereby, a computationally expensive time stepping of the eddy-current field problem and a convolution of the homogenized yoke model are avoided. The HomHBFEM enables, for the first time, nonlinear simulations of fast corrector magnets, which are embedded in a fast orbit feedback system to counteract orbit disturbances over a broad frequency spectrum, and thus guarantee stable light-source operation. The results show the impact of the nonlinearity on the phase lag and the field attenuation, as well as the eddy current losses at frequencies up to several tens of kilohertz. The numerical validation for a C-dipole magnet example shows that the HomHBFEM achieves a sufficient accuracy at an affordable computational effort, with simulation times of a few hours. In comparison, standard three-dimensional transient FE simulations need to resolve the lamination thickness and the skin depth in space and the largest relevant frequency in time, which leads to a 2 to 3 orders of magnitude larger mesh and prohibitive computational effort, with simulation times of a few weeks on a contemporary computer server.
Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)
Corrections
21 November, 2025
Correction: Minor typographical errors in Eqs. (20a), (20b), (21a), and (21b) were introduced during the production process and have been fixed.
31 December, 2025
Second Correction: Minor errors in Eqs. (21a), (22a), and (22b) that were not implemented during the processing of the first Correction have now been rectified.
Article Text
References (61)
- S. Shin, New era of synchrotron radiation: Fourth-generation storage ring, AAPPS Bull. 31, 21 (2021).
- D. Einfeld, J. Schaper, and M. Plesko, Design of a diffraction limited light source (DIFL), in Proceedings of the 1995 Particle Accelerator Conference, Dallas, TX (IEEE, New York, NY, 1995), Vol. 1, pp. 177–179.
- C. G. Schroer, PETRA IV: Upgrade of PETRA III to the ultimate 3D x-ray microscope, Conceptual Design Report, DESY, 2019, 10.3204/PUBDB-2019-03613.
- S. Mirza, B. Dursun, H. Duhme, S. Pfeiffer, S. Jablonski, and H. Schlarb, Lattice-based simulations for the fast orbit feedback system of PETRA IV, in Proceedings of the 14th International Particle Accelerator Conference, Venice, Italy (JACoW, Geneva, Switzerland, 2023), pp. 3989–3991.
- H. Winick, Fourth generation light sources, in Proceedings of the 1997 Particle Accelerator Conference, Vancouver, BC, Canada (IEEE, New York, NY, 1997), Vol. 1, pp. 37–41.
- Y. Tian, K. Ha, L. Yu, W. Cheng, J. DeLong, L. Dalesio, and W. Levine, NSLS-II fast orbit feedback system, in Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Accelerator and Large Experimental Physics Control Systems, Melbourne, Australia (JACoW, Geneva, Switzerland, 2015).
- P. Chiu, Y. Cheng, K. Hsu, K. Hu, and C. Huang, Beam commissioning of TPS fast orbit feedback system, in Proceedings of the 5th International Beam Instrumentation Conference, Barcelona, Spain (JACoW, Geneva, Switzerland, 2016), pp. 59–62.
- I. Uzun, R. Bartolini, G. Rehm, J. Dobbing, M. Heron, and J. Rowland, Initial design of the fast orbit feedback system for DIAMOND light source, in Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Accelerator and Large Experimental Physics Control Systems, Geneva, Switzerland (JACoW, Geneva, Switzerland, 2005).
- J. Gyselinck, P. Dular, L. Krähenbühl, and R. V. Sabariego, Finite-element homogenization of laminated iron cores with inclusion of net circulating currents due to imperfect insulation, IEEE Trans. Magn. 52, 1 (2015).
- R. Sabariego and J. Gyselinck, Time-domain homogenisation of laminated ferromagnetic cores in finite-element models, Int. Compumag Soc. Newsl. 27, 1 (2020), https://lirias.kuleuven.be/retrieve/606199.
- P. Dular, J. Gyselinck, C. Geuzaine, N. Sadowski, and J. Bastos, A 3-D magnetic vector potential formulation taking eddy currents in lamination stacks into account, IEEE Trans. Magn. 39, 1424 (2003).
- J. Christmann, H. De Gersem, M. von Tresckow, A. Aloev, S. H. Mirza, S. Pfeiffer, and H. Schlarb, Finite element simulation of fast corrector magnets for PETRA IV, J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2687, 082010 (2024).
- J. Christmann, L. A. M. D’Angelo, H. De Gersem, A. Aloev, S. H. Mirza, S. Pfeiffer, H. Schlarb, and M. Thede, Findings of simulation studies for the fast corrector magnets of PETRA IV, in Proceedings of the 15th International Particle Accelerator Conference, Nashville, TN (JACoW, Geneva, Switzerland, 2024), pp. 1544–1547.
- I. Niyonzima, R. Sabariego, P. Dular, F. Henrotte, and C. Geuzaine, Computational homogenization for laminated ferromagnetic cores in magnetodynamics, IEEE Trans. Magn. 49, 2049 (2013).
- I. Niyonzima, C. Geuzaine, and S. Schöps, Waveform relaxation for the computational homogenization of multiscale magnetoquasistatic problems, J. Comput. Phys. 327, 416 (2016).
- P. Dular, A time-domain homogenization technique for lamination stacks in dual finite element formulations, J. Comput. Appl. Math. 215, 390 (2008).
- K. Hollaus, A MSFEM to simulate the eddy current problem in laminated iron cores in 3D, COMPEL 38, 1667 (2019).
- S. Yamada and K. Bessho, Harmonic field calculation by the combination of finite element analysis and harmonic balance method, IEEE Trans. Magn. 24, 2588 (1988).
- Dassault Systèmes, cst studio suite, 2024, https://www.3ds.com/products-services/simulia/products/cst-studio-suite.
- C. Emson and J. Simkin, An optimal method for 3-D eddy currents, IEEE Trans. Magn. 19, 2450 (1983).
- G. Meunier, The Finite Element Method for Electromagnetic Modeling (John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ, 2008).
- S. Koch, H. De Gersem, T. Weiland, E. Fischer, and G. Moritz, Transient 3D finite element simulations of the SIS100 magnet considering anisotropic, nonlinear material models for the ferromagnetic yoke, IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond. 18, 1601 (2008).
- H. De Gersem, S. Vanaverbeke, and G. Samaey, Three-dimensional-two-dimensional coupled model for eddy currents in laminated iron cores, IEEE Trans. Magn. 48, 815 (2012).
- V. C. Silva, G. Meunier, and A. Foggia, A 3-D finite-element computation of eddy currents and losses in laminated iron cores allowing for electric and magnetic anisotropy, IEEE Trans. Magn. 31, 2139 (1995).
- H. Kaimori, A. Kameari, and K. Fujiwara, FEM computation of magnetic field and iron loss in laminated iron core using homogenization method, IEEE Trans. Magn. 43, 1405 (2007).
- P. Handgruber, A. Stermecki, O. Bíró, and G. Ofnery, Evaluation of interlaminar eddy currents in induction machines, in Proceedings of the 39th Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society, Vienna, Austria (IEEE, New York, NY, 2013), pp. 2792–2797.
- M. Marion-Pera, A. Kedous-Lebouc, T. Waeckerle, and B. Cornut, Characterization of SiFe sheet insulation, IEEE Trans. Magn. 31, 2408 (1995).
- J. Wang, H. Lin, Y. Huang, and X. Sun, A new formulation of anisotropic equivalent conductivity in laminations, IEEE Trans. Magn. 47, 1378 (2011).
- J. Gyselinck, L. Vandevelde, J. Melkebeek, P. Dular, F. Henrotte, and W. Legros, Calculation of eddy currents and associated losses in electrical steel laminations, IEEE Trans. Magn. 35, 1191 (1999).
- P. Hahne, R. Dietz, B. Rieth, and T. Weiland, Determination of anisotropic equivalent conductivity of laminated cores for numerical computation, IEEE Trans. Magn. 32, 1184 (1996).
- P. Deuflhard, Newton Methods for Nonlinear Problems: Affine Invariance and Adaptive Algorithms (Springer Science + Business Media, Luxembourg, 2006).
- C. Hayashi, Nonlinear Oscillations in Physical Systems (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1986).
- S. Yamada, K. Bessho, and J. Lu, Harmonic balance finite element method applied to nonlinear AC magnetic analysis, IEEE Trans. Magn. 25, 2971 (1989).
- S. Yamada, P. Biringer, and K. Bessho, Calculation of nonlinear eddy-current problems by the harmonic balance finite element method, IEEE Trans. Magn. 27, 4122 (1991).
- X. Zhao, J. Lu, L. Li, Z. Cheng, and T. Lu, Analysis of the DC bias phenomenon by the harmonic balance finite-element method, IEEE Trans. Power Delivery 26, 475 (2011).
- A. V. Oppenheim and A. S. Willsky, Signals and Systems (Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, 1982).
- R. Bracewell, The Fourier Transform and Its Applications (McGraw-Hill, New York, NY, 1986).
- K. Roppert, F. Toth, and M. Kaltenbacher, Simulating induction heating processes using harmonic balance FEM, COMPEL 38, 1562 (2019).
- F. Bachinger, U. Langer, and J. Schöberl, Numerical analysis of nonlinear multiharmonic eddy current problems, Numer. Math. 100, 593 (2005).
- H. De Gersem, H. Vande Sande, and K. Hameyer, Strong coupled multi-harmonic finite element simulation package, COMPEL 20, 535 (2001).
- D. Lederer, H. Igarashi, and A. Kost, The Newton-Raphson method for complex equation systems, Appl. Comput. Electromagn. Soc. J. 12, 113 (1997), https://journals.riverpublishers.com/index.php/ACES/article/view/17359.
- H. De Gersem, S. Vandewalle, and K. Hameyer, Krylov subspace methods for harmonic balanced finite element methods, in Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on Scientific Computing in Electrical Engineering, Warmemünde, Germany (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, Germany, 2001), pp. 387–396.
- F. Bachinger, U. Langer, and J. Schöberl, Efficient solvers for nonlinear time-periodic eddy current problems, Comput. Visualization Sci. 9, 197 (2006).
- Y. Saad, Iterative Methods for Sparse Linear Systems, 2nd ed. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 2003).
- W. Yao, J.-M. Jin, and P. T. Krein, A 3D finite element analysis of large-scale nonlinear dynamic electromagnetic problems by harmonic balancing and domain decomposition, Int. J. Numer. Model. 29, 166 (2016).
- J. O. Smith, Mathematics of the Discrete Fourier Transform (DFT) (W3K Publishing, 2007), http://www.w3k.org/.
- P. Dular, C. Geuzaine, A. Genon, and W. Legros, An evolutive software environment for teaching finite element methods in electromagnetism, IEEE Trans. Magn. 35, 1682 (1999).
- J. Brauer, Simple equations for the magnetization and reluctivity curves of steel, IEEE Trans. Magn. 11, 81 (1975).
- T. Hülsmann, A. Bartel, S. Schöps, and H. De Gersem, Extended Brauer model for ferromagnetic materials: Analysis and computation, COMPEL 33, 1251 (2014).
- G. Paoli and O. Bíró, Time harmonic eddy currents in non-linear media, COMPEL 17, 567 (1998).
- N. Demerdash and D. Gillott, A new approach for determination of eddy current and flux penetration in nonlinear ferromagnetic materials, IEEE Trans. Magn. 10, 682 (1974).
- H. Hedia, J.-F. Remacle, P. Dular, A. Nicolet, A. Genon, and W. Legros, A sinusoidal magnetic field computation in nonlinear materials, IEEE Trans. Magn. 31, 3527 (1995).
- D. Labridis and P. Dokopoulos, Calculation of eddy current losses in nonlinear ferromagnetic materials, IEEE Trans. Magn. 25, 2665 (1989).
- J. Lammeraner and M. Štafl, Eddy Currents (Iliffe Books Ltd., London, England, 1966).
- R. L. Stoll, The Analysis of Eddy Currents (Clarendon Press, Oxford, England, 1974).
- C. Kaehler and G. Henneberger, Transient 3-D FEM computation of eddy-current losses in the rotor of a claw-pole alternator, IEEE Trans. Magn. 40, 1362 (2004).
- N. Nikolarea, P. Tzouganakis, V. Gakos, C. Papalexis, A. Tsolakis, and V. Spitas, Detailed investigation of the eddy current and core losses in coaxial magnetic gears through a two-dimensional analytical model, Math. Comput. Appl. 29, 38 (2024).
- F. De Paola, R. Faussete, A. Jain, M. Jaski, S. Sharma, and C. Spataro, Mechanical design challenges building a prototype 8-pole corrector magnet, in Proceedings of the 10th Mechanical Engineering Design of Synchrotron Radiation Equipment and Instrumentation Conference, Paris, France (JACoW, Geneva, Switzerland, 2018), pp. 50–52.
- A. Giachero, G. Bruno, L. Russo, and D. Tavares, Fast orbit corrector power supply in MTCA. 4 form factor for Sirius light source, in Proceedings of the 12th International Particle Accelerator Conference, Campinas, SP, Brazil (JACoW, Geneva, Switzerland, 2021).
- X. Huang, P. Liu, X. Sun, F. Chen, F. Long, Y. Jiao, Y. Wei, and H. Li, Characterization of the fast corrector dynamic response at the HEPS, in Proceedings of the 14th International Particle Accelerator Conference, Venice, Italy (JACoW, Geneva, Switzerland, 2023), pp. 3619–3620.
- B. D. Cullity and C. D. Graham, Introduction to Magnetic Materials, 2nd ed. (John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ, 2008).