Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Physical design of a high-charge beam injector for the on-axis swap-out injection scheme in an electron-positron collider

Tongning Hu*,†, Hao Hu†, Yan Wang, Yifeng Zeng, Di Lu, Kaifeng Liu, and Lanyang Zhang

Duan Gu and Xuan Li

Ailin Zhang

Youjin Yuan

Jingyu Tang‡

  • *Contact author: tongningHu@hust.edu.cn
  • †These authors contributed equally to this work.
  • ‡Contact author: jytang@ustc.edu.cn

Phys. Rev. Accel. Beams 29, 113701 – Published 6 November, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/89k9-j8qk

Abstract

The Super Tau-Charm Facility (STCF), a next-generation electron-positron collider, adopts an on-axis swap-out injection scheme that demands high-charge electron bunches with exceptionally low emittance and minimal energy spread. This work presents a comprehensive and systematic beam dynamics design for the STCF electron injector. The bunching system, based on subharmonic bunchers and a traveling-wave buncher, is optimized using the nondominated sorting genetic algorithm III to efficiently explore the high-dimensional parameter space. Start-to-end simulations incorporating space-charge forces, wakefield effects, and alignment errors are performed, with beam-based alignment (BBA) applied to correct orbit deviations. The optimized injector delivers 8.5 nC bunches at 3.5 GeV with a normalized transverse emittance below 70  mm mrad and an rms energy spread below 0.5%, satisfying the stringent STCF requirements. The high transport efficiency achieved in simulations alleviates the design pressure on the electron source, while the excellent beam quality inherently suppresses beam halo effects. By integrating systematic multiobjective optimization with high-fidelity simulations, the proposed design overcomes the intrinsic limitations of thermionic cathodes while capitalizing on their proven stability, robustness, and cost-effectiveness, offering an efficient engineering solution for high-charge beam delivery in next-generation colliders.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (38)

  1. M. Ablikim et al., BESIII Collaboration, Observation of a state X(2600) in the π+π−η′ system in the process J J/ψ→γπ+π−η′, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 042001 (2022).
  2. M. Ablikim et al., Observation of charged κ in J/ψ→K*(892)∓KSπ±,K*(892)∓→KSπ∓ at BESII, Phys. Lett. B 698, 183 (2011).
  3. M. Ablikim et al., BESIII, Observation of α00(980)−f0(980) mixing, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 022001 (2018).
  4. T. Xiang, X.-D. Shi, D.-Y. Wang, and X.-R. Zhou, Sensitivity study of the charged lepton flavor violating process τ→γμ at STCF, Eur. Phys. J. C 83, 908 (2023).
  5. J. Z. Bai et al., Measurement of the mass of the tau lepton, Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 3021 (1992).
  6. G. S. Abrams et al., The mark-II detector for the SLC, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 281, 55 (1989).
  7. D. Bernstein et al., The mark-III spectrometer, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 226, 301 (1984).
  8. Y. U. Jeong, K.-H. Jang, S. Bae, V. Pathania, J. Mun, and K. Lee, Prospects of a terahertz free-electron laser for field application, J. Korean Phys. Soc. 80, 367 (2022).
  9. M. Achasov et al., STCF conceptual design report (Volume 1): Physics & detector, Front. Phys. 19, 14701 (2024).
  10. J. Tang, Accelerator design and R&D efforts for Super Tau-Charm Facility, in Proceedings of the 42nd International Conference on High Energy Physics, PoS(ICHEP2024)810, Prague, Czech Republic (2024), https://indico.cern.ch/event/1291157/contributions/5889969/.
  11. J. M. Gibson, R. B. Fenner, G. Long, M. Borland, and G. Decker, APS Science 2006 (Report No. ANL-06/23). Argonne National Laboratory, Advanced Photon Source (2007), 10.2172/962874.
  12. Y. Jiao, G. Xu, X.-H. Cui, Z. Duan, Y.-Y. Guo, P. He, D.-H. Ji, J.-Y. Li, X.-Y. Li, C. Meng, Y.-M. Peng, S.-K. Tian, J.-Q. Wang, N. Wang, Y.-Y. Wei, H.-S. Xu, F. Yan, C.-H. Yu, Y.-L. Zhao, and Q. Qin, The HEPS project, J. Synchrotron Radiat. 25, 1611 (2018).
  13. H. Takaki, N. Nakamura, Y. Kobayashi, K. Harada, T. Miyajima, A. Ueda, S. Nagahashi, M. Shimada, T. Obina, and T. Honda, Beam injection with a pulsed sextupole magnet in an electron storage ring, Phys. Rev. ST Accel. Beams 13, 020705 (2010).
  14. A. Abada et al., FCC-Ee: The Lepton Collider, Eur. Phys. J. ST 228, 261 (2019).
  15. C. Gough and M. Mailand, Septum and kicker systems for the SLS, in Proceedings of the Particle Accelerator Conference, Chicago, IL, 2001 (IEEE, New York, 2001), p. 3741.
  16. M. Aiba, M. Böge, F. Marcellini, Á Saá Hernández, and A. Streun, Longitudinal injection scheme using short pulse kicker for small aperture electron storage rings, Phys. Rev. Accel. Beams 18, 020701 (2015).
  17. SLAC Linear Collider Design Group, SLAC Linear Collider Conceptual Design Report, Stanford Linear Accelerator Center, Menlo Park (1980), https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc1056595/.
  18. J. T. Seeman, The Stanford Linear Collider, in Proceedings of the Linear Accelerator Conference (JaCoW, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA, 1990), https://proceedings.jacow.org/l90/papers/mo101.pdf.
  19. SuperKEKB Design Group, SuperKEKB design report, High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK), Tsukuba, Japan (2020), https://www-linac.kek.jp/linac-com/report/skb-tdr/.
  20. J. Gao, CEPC technical design report: Accelerator, Radiat. Detect. Technol. Methods 8, 1 (2024).
  21. A. Zhang, D. Gu, T. Hu, G. Pei, J. Tang, and Y. Yuan, STCF injector and positron source design, in Proceedings of the 70th ICFA Advanced Beam Dynamics Workshop on High Luminosity Circular e+e— Colliders, JACoW(eeFACT2025 TUB04), Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan (2025), https://indico.jacow.org/event/75/contributions/6733/.
  22. T.-N. Hu, H.-M. Wang, Y.-F. Zeng, H.-J. Xu, L. Chen, G.-Y. Feng, and Y.-J. Pei, Fault locating for traveling-wave accelerators based on transmission line theory, Nucl. Sci. Tech. 34, 116 (2023).
  23. Y.-F. Zeng, H. Hu, and T.-N. Hu, Improvement and correction for transverse emittance diagnosis based on Q-scanning techniques, Nucl. Sci. Tech. 36, 38 (2025).
  24. S. Hajari, S. H. Shaker, and S. Doebert, Sub-harmonic bunching system of CLIC drive beam injector, ICFA Beam Dyn. Newslett. 62, 28 (2013).
  25. W. Liu and E. Wang, Optimization of an electron injector for operating high-intensity polarized electron beam, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 37, 2250068 (2022).
  26. T. Hu, J. Li, K. Peng, H. Xu, and J. Yang, Study of longitudinal phase space for typical beam injector via analytical method, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 1045, 167628 (2023).
  27. H. Wiedemann, Particle Accelerator Physics, 4th edn. (Springer, New York, 2015), pp. 634–636.
  28. T. Asaka, T. Inagaki, T. Magome, N. Nishimori, Y. Otake, T. Taniuchi, K. Yanagida, and H. Tanaka, Low-emittance radio-frequency electron gun using a gridded thermionic cathode, Phys. Rev. Accel. Beams 23, 063401 (2020).
  29. X.-Y. Peng, H. Hu, T.-N. Hu, J. Pang, J.-J. Deng, and G.-Y. Feng, Emittance optimization of gridded thermionic-cathode electron gun for high-quality beam injectors, Nucl. Sci. Tech. 37, 19 (2026).
  30. H.-X. Yin, J.-B. Guan, S.-Q. Tian, and J.-K. Wang, Design and optimization of diffraction-limited storage ring lattices based on many-objective evolutionary algorithms, Nucl. Sci. Tech. 34, 147 (2023).
  31. Z.-Y. Dai, Y.-C. Nie, Z. Hui, L.-X. Liu, Z.-S. Liu, J.-H. Zhong, J.-B. Guan, J.-K. Wang, Y. Chen, Y. Zou, H.-H. Li, and J.-H. He, Design of S-band photoinjector with high bunch charge and low emittance based on multi-objective genetic algorithm, Nucl. Sci. Tech. 34, 41 (2023).
  32. S.-C. Wang, D.-Y. He, C. Meng, J.-Y. Li, Z.-S. Zhou, and J.-D. Liu, Development and simulation of a gridded thermionic cathode electron gun for a high-energy photon source, Nucl. Sci. Tech. 34, 39 (2023).
  33. H.-M. Wang, Y.-F. Zeng, H. Hu, J.-Y. Li, and T.-N. Hu, Design and optimization of a compact high-energy electron source applied to on-site non-destructive testing for electrical equipment, Nucl. Sci. Tech. 37, 63 (2026).
  34. L. M. Young, “PARMELA,” Los Alamos National Laboratory report, LA-UR-96-1835, Los Alamos National Laboratory (2003).
  35. Z. Martí, G. Benedetti, U. Iriso, and A. Franchi, Beam-based alignment using ac excitations, Phys. Rev. Accel. Beams 23, 012802 (2020).
  36. Z. Man-Zhou, L. Hao-Hu, J. Bo-Cheng, L. Gui-Min, and L. De-Ming, Beam-based alignment of the SSRF storage ring, Chinese Phys. C 33, 301.
  37. I. Zagorodnov, https://echo4d.de/.
  38. M. Borland, Elegant: A flexible SDDS-compliant code for accelerator simulation., Advanced photon source LS-287 (2000).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation