- Physical Review Journals
All JournalsPhysics Magazine

Physical Review A

Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Isoenergetic model for optical down-conversion and error-specific limits of the parametric approximation

D. B. Horoshko1 and V. S. Shchesnovich2

PDF

Phys. Rev. A 112, 033706 – Published 8 September, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/wtcf-5pkh

Abstract

Optical down-conversion is widely used for generating photon pairs, squeezed and entangled states of light, making it an indispensable tool in quantum optics and quantum information. In the regime where the pump is much stronger than the generated field, the standard parametric approximation treats the pump amplitude as a fixed parameter of the model. This approximation has a limited domain of validity since it assumes a nondepleted and nonentangled pump. By finding an approximate solution to the Schrödinger equation of the down-conversion process, we obtain an improved analytical model beyond the parametric one, which accounts for pump depletion and pump-signal entanglement. Our model is advantageous, first, because it allows one to compute averages of field operators far beyond the domain of validity of the parametric approximation, and second, because it allows one to establish error-specific limits of the latter domain. For a given pump amplitude, we find a maximum squeezing parameter, up to which the approximation remains valid within a specified acceptable error. Our results confirm that recent experiments on Gaussian boson sampling, with a squeezing parameter of r≈1.8 and a coherent pump amplitude of α≈2×106, can still be accurately described by the standard parametric approximation. However, we observe a sharp decline in validity as the squeezing parameter increases. For pump amplitudes of α≈2×106, the parametric approximation breaks down when the squeezing parameter exceeds r≈4.5, whereas the new approximation remains valid up to r≈6 with an acceptable error of 1%.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (49)

  1. D. N. Klyshko, Photons and Nonlinear Optics (Gordon and Breach, New York, 1988).
  2. L. Mandel and E. Wolf, Optical Coherence and Quantum Optics (Cambridge University, Cambridge, 1995).
  3. J. L. O'Brien, A. Furusawa, and J. Vučković, Photonic quantum technologies, Nat. Photon. 3, 687 (2009).
  4. W. H. Louisell, A. Yariv, and A. E. Siegman, Quantum fluctuations and noise in parametric processes. I, Phys. Rev. 124, 1646 (1961).
  5. C. K. Hong and L. Mandel, Theory of parametric frequency down conversion of light, Phys. Rev. A 31, 2409 (1985).
  6. C. Fabre and N. Treps, Modes and states in quantum optics, Rev. Mod. Phys. 92, 035005 (2020).
  7. H. P. Yuen, Two-photon coherent states of the radiation field, Phys. Rev. A 13, 2226 (1976).
  8. R. Loudon and P. L. Knight, Squeezed light, J. Mod. Opt. 34, 709 (1987).
  9. C. Weedbrook, S. Pirandola, R. García-Patrón, N. J. Cerf, T. C. Ralph, J. H. Shapiro, and S. Lloyd, Gaussian quantum information, Rev. Mod. Phys. 84, 621 (2012).
  10. R. Schnabel, Squeezed states of light and their applications in laser interferometers, Phys. Rep. 684, 1 (2017).
  11. K. Hashimoto, D. B. Horoshko, M. I. Kolobov, Y. Michael, Z. Gefen, and M. V. Chekhova, Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy with undetected photons from high-gain spontaneous parametric down-conversion, Commun. Phys. 7, 217 (2024).
  12. M. V. Larsen, X. Guo, C. R. Breum, J. S. Neergaard-Nielsen, and U. L. Andersen, Deterministic generation of a two-dimensional cluster state, Science 366, 369 (2019).
  13. W. Asavanant, Y. Shiozawa, S. Yokoyama, B. Charoensombutamon, H. Emura, R. N. Alexander, S. Takeda, J.-i. Yoshikawa, N. C. Menicucci, H. Yonezawa et al., Generation of time-domain-multiplexed two-dimensional cluster state, Science 366, 373 (2019).
  14. S. Aaronson and A. Arkhipov, The computational complexity of linear optics, Theory of Computing 9, 143 (2013).
  15. A. P. Lund, A. Laing, S. Rahimi-Keshari, T. Rudolph, J. L. O'Brien, and T. C. Ralph, Boson sampling from a Gaussian state, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 100502 (2014).
  16. C. S. Hamilton, R. Kruse, L. Sansoni, S. Barkhofen, C. Silberhorn, and I. Jex, Gaussian boson sampling, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 170501 (2017).
  17. H.-S. Zhong, H. Wang, Y.-H. Deng, M.-C. Chen, L.-C. Peng, Y.-H. Luo, J. Qin, D. Wu, X. Ding, Y. Hu et al., Quantum computational advantage using photons, Science 370, 1460 (2020).
  18. H.-S. Zhong, Y.-H. Deng, J. Qin, H. Wang, M.-C. Chen, L.-C. Peng, Y.-H. Luo, D. Wu, S.-Q. Gong, H. Su, Y. Hu, P. Hu, X.-Y. Yang, W.-J. Zhang, H. Li, Y. Li, X. Jiang, L. Gan, G. Yang, L. You et al., Phase-programmable Gaussian boson sampling using stimulated squeezed light, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 180502 (2021).
  19. Y.-H. Deng, Y.-C. Gu, H.-L. Liu, S.-Q. Gong, H. Su, Z.-J. Zhang, H.-Y. Tang, M.-H. Jia, J.-M. Xu, M.-C. Chen, J. Qin, L.-C. Peng, J. Yan, Y. Hu, J. Huang, H. Li, Y. Li, Y. Chen, X. Jiang, L. Gan et al., Gaussian boson sampling with pseudo-photon-number-resolving detectors and quantum computational advantage, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 150601 (2023).
  20. L. S. Madsen, F. Laudenbach, M. F. Askarani, F. Rortais, T. Vincent, J. F. Bulmer, F. M. Miatto, L. Neuhaus, L. G. Helt, M. J. Collins et al., Quantum computational advantage with a programmable photonic processor, Nature (London) 606, 75 (2022).
  21. M. Hillery and M. S. Zubairy, Path-integral approach to the quantum theory of the degenerate parametric amplifier, Phys. Rev. A 29, 1275 (1984).
  22. H. Qi, D. J. Brod, N. Quesada, and R. García-Patrón, Regimes of classical simulability for noisy Gaussian boson sampling, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 100502 (2020).
  23. V. Shchesnovich, Distinguishability in quantum interference with multimode squeezed states, Phys. Rev. A 105, 063703 (2022).
  24. J. Shi and T. Byrnes, Effect of partial distinguishability on quantum supremacy in Gaussian boson sampling, npj Quantum Inf. 8, 54 (2022).
  25. R. Loudon, The Quantum Theory of Light (Oxford University, Oxford, 2000).
  26. B. Huttner, S. Serulnik, and Y. Ben-Aryeh, Quantum analysis of light propagation in a parametric amplifier, Phys. Rev. A 42, 5594 (1990).
  27. M. I. Kolobov, The spatial behavior of nonclassical light, Rev. Mod. Phys. 71, 1539 (1999).
  28. D. B. Horoshko, Generator of spatial evolution of the electromagnetic field, Phys. Rev. A 105, 013708 (2022).
  29. Y. R. Shen, Quantum statistics of nonlinear optics, Phys. Rev. 155, 921 (1967).
  30. C. M. Caves and D. D. Crouch, Quantum wideband traveling-wave analysis of a degenerate parametric amplifier, J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 4, 1535 (1987).
  31. D. Kopylov, T. Meier, and P. Sharapova, Theory of multimode squeezed light generation in lossy media, Quantum 9, 1621 (2025).
  32. R. W. Boyd, Nonlinear Optics (Academic, New York, 2020).
  33. T. Lipfert, D. B. Horoshko, G. Patera, and M. I. Kolobov, Bloch-Messiah decomposition and magnus expansion for parametric down-conversion with monochromatic pump, Phys. Rev. A 98, 013815 (2018).
  34. A. Christ, B. Brecht, W. Mauerer, and C. Silberhorn, Theory of quantum frequency conversion and type-II parametric down-conversion in the high-gain regime, New J. Phys. 15, 053038 (2013).
  35. N. Quesada and J. E. Sipe, Effects of time ordering in quantum nonlinear optics, Phys. Rev. A 90, 063840 (2014).
  36. A. I. Lvovsky, Squeezed light, Photonics: Scientific Foundations, Technology and Applications 1, 121 (2015).
  37. W. Hoeffding, Probability inequalities for sums of bounded random variables, J. American Statistical Association 58, 13 (1963).
  38. R. Yanagimoto, E. Ng, A. Yamamura, T. Onodera, L. G. Wright, M. Jankowski, M. Fejer, P. L. McMahon, and H. Mabuchi, Onset of non-Gaussian quantum physics in pulsed squeezing with mesoscopic fields, Optica 9, 379 (2022).
  39. D. D. Crouch and S. L. Braunstein, Limitations to squeezing in a parametric amplifier due to pump quantum fluctuations, Phys. Rev. A 38, 4696 (1988).
  40. W. Xing and T. C. Ralph, Pump depletion in optical parametric amplification, Phys. Rev. A 107, 023712 (2023).
  41. J. Flórez, J. S. Lundeen, and M. V. Chekhova, Pump depletion in parametric down-conversion with low pump energies, Opt. Lett. 45, 4264 (2020).
  42. F. W. J. Olver, Asymptotics and Special Functions (A K Peters, Natick, 1997).
  43. V. Shchesnovich, Exact solution for a class of quantum models of interacting bosons, J. Phys. A 58, 115204 (2025).
  44. V. Shchesnovich, Distinguishing noisy boson sampling from classical simulations, Quantum 5, 423 (2021).
  45. D. F. Walls and R. Barakat, Quantum-mechanical amplification and frequency conversion with a trilinear Hamiltonian, Phys. Rev. A 1, 446 (1970).
  46. A. Bandilla, G. Drobný, and I. Jex, Parametric down-conversion and maximal pump depletion, J. Opt. B 2, 265 (2000).
  47. K. Chinni and N. Quesada, Beyond the parametric approximation: Pump depletion, entanglement, and squeezing in macroscopic down-conversion, Phys. Rev. A 110, 013712 (2024).
  48. M. Jankowski, J. Mishra, and M. Fejer, Dispersion-engineered χ(2) nanophotonics: A flexible tool for nonclassical light, J. Phys. Photonics 3, 042005 (2021).
  49. C. Mortici, On Gospers formula for the Gamma function, J. Math. Inequal 5, 611 (2007).

Outline

Information

Phys. Rev. A 112, 033706– Published 8 September, 2025
  • Received 31 March 2025
  • Accepted 18 August 2025
Crossmark - Check for updates button
Creative Commons Logo

Published by the American Physical Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. Further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI.

Published by the American Physical Society

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation