- Physical Review Journals
All JournalsPhysics Magazine

Physical Review A

Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Single-photon superradiance and subradiance in helical collectives of quantum emitters

Hamza Patwa and Philip Kurian*

  • *Contact author: pkurian@howard.edu
PDF

Phys. Rev. A 113, 043708 – Published 7 April, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/t828-mh95

Abstract

Collective emission of light from distributions of two-level systems was first predicted in 1954 by Robert Dicke, who showed that when N quantum emitters absorb photons, their collective radiative decay rate can be significantly enhanced (superradiance) or suppressed (subradiance) relative to the single-emitter decay rate. In this work, we derive analytical expressions for the collective decay rates and collective Lamb shifts for the coherent interaction of a single photon with topologically one-dimensional, continuous distributions of quantum two-level systems: an infinite line and an infinite helix. We compare our solution with arrangements where the distribution of transition dipole vector emitters is discrete rather than continuous, and when short- (1/r3), intermediate- (1/r2), and long-range (1/r) interaction terms are included. We conduct a detailed comparison of our results averaging out polarization effects, with eigensolutions of similar systems maintaining the dot product between transition dipole vectors and the electric field, finding that the thermally averaged collective decay rate is enhanced in both approaches. Our analytical solution for the helix is then used to make order-of-magnitude estimates of the maximally superradiant state, thermally averaged collective decay rate, and percentage of trapped states in helical architectures of molecular quantum emitters in protein fibers. Given the inclusion of short- and intermediate-range interaction terms in our numerical models for realistic protein fiber architectures and the averaging out of polarization effects in our analytical solution, these results show excellent agreement for sparse arrangements of emitters. Our work thus bridges the theoretical gap between different formalisms for treating superradiant matter distributions, aids the engineering of helical devices to harness quantum optical effects for computing with superradiant error correction and subradiant memories, and motivates the discovery and creation of flexible platforms for quantum information processing using the intrinsic helical geometries of biomatter.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (33)

  1. R. H. Dicke, Coherence in spontaneous radiation processes, Phys. Rev. 93, 99 (1954).
  2. A. Asenjo-Garcia, M. Moreno-Cardoner, A. Albrecht, H. J. Kimble, and D. E. Chang, Exponential improvement in photon storage fidelities using subradiance and “selective radiance” in atomic arrays, Phys. Rev. X 7, 031024 (2017).
  3. H. Patwa, N. S. Babcock, and P. Kurian, Quantum-enhanced photoprotection in neuroprotein architectures emerges from collective light-matter interactions, Front. Phys. 12, 1387271 (2024).
  4. N. S. Babcock, G. Montes-Cabrera, K. E. Oberhofer, M. Chergui, G. L. Celardo, and P. Kurian, Ultraviolet superradiance from mega-networks of tryptophan in biological architectures, J. Phys. Chem. B 128, 4035 (2024).
  5. A. A. Svidzinsky, F. Li, H. Li, X. Zhang, C. H. R. Ooi, and M. O. Scully, Single-photon superradiance and radiation trapping by atomic shells, Phys. Rev. A 93, 043830 (2016).
  6. G. L. Celardo, M. Angeli, T. J. A. Craddock, and P. Kurian, On the existence of superradiant excitonic states in microtubules, New J. Phys. 21, 023005 (2019).
  7. E. Ressayre and A. Tallet, Quantum theory for superradiance, Phys. Rev. A 15, 2410 (1977).
  8. F. Mattiotti, M. Sarovar, G. G. Giusteri, F. Borgonovi, and G. L. Celardo, Efficient light harvesting and photon sensing via engineered cooperative effects, New J. Phys. 24, 013027 (2022).
  9. If the values of κ and Ω are such that the argument of the Bessel function is a root for each term in the sum, that state will be trapped. These values of κ, however, form a set of measure 0, while the other condition discussed, namely Ω>2, forms a set of measure 1.
  10. A. Juan-Delgado, G. Giedke, J. Aizpurua, and R. Esteban, Generation of polarization-entangled photon pairs from two interacting quantum emitters, Phys. Rev. A 112, 052434 (2025).
  11. The emitting, excited transition state in the tryptophan molecule is known as the La1 transition [3, 4, 12, 13]. There is also a Lb1 excited transition state in tryptophan, but it quickly relaxes on the order of tens of femtoseconds in aqueous environments to the La1 state, which emits on the timescale of nanoseconds for the single molecule in solution, thus sufficiently separating the timescales to consider tryptophan as a two-level system.
  12. P. R. Callis, [7] La1 and Lb1 transitions of tryptophan: Applications of theory and experimental observations to fluorescence of proteins, in Flourescence Spectroscopy, Vol. 278, Methods Enzymology (Academic Press, San Diego, California, 1997), pp. 113–150.
  13. S. Schenkl, F. van Mourik, G. van der Zwan, S. Haacke, and M. Chergui, Probing the ultrafast charge translocation of photoexcited retinal in bacteriorhodopsin, Science 309, 917 (2005).
  14. J. Löwe, H. Li, K. Downing, and E. Nogales, Refined structure of αβ-tubulin at 3.5 Å resolution, J. Mol. Biol. 313, 1045 (2001).
  15. F. Liberta, S. Loerch, M. Rennegarbe, A. Schierhorn, P. Westermark, G. T. Westermark, B. P. Hazenberg, N. Grigorieff, M. Fändrich, and M. Schmidt, Cryo-EM fibril structures from systemic AA amyloidosis reveal the species complementarity of pathological amyloids, Nat. Commun. 10, 1104 (2019).
  16. P. S. Gurel, L. Y. Kim, P. V. Ruijgrok, T. Omabegho, Z. Bryant, and G. M. Alushin, Cryo-EM structures reveal specialization at the myosin VI-actin interface and a mechanism of force sensitivity, eLife 6, e31125 (2017).
  17. We calculate the percent difference between two values v1 and v2 as %diff=|v1−v2|/v¯, where v¯=(1/2)(v1+v2).
  18. S. Bajpai, M. Aono, and P. Kurian, Tracking and distinguishing slime mold solutions to the traveling salesman problem through synchronized amplification in the non-equilibrium steady state, arXiv:2504.03492.
  19. H. H. Jen, Phase-imprinted multiphoton subradiant states, Phys. Rev. A 96, 023814 (2017).
  20. M. O. Scully, Collective Lamb shift in single photon Dicke superradiance, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 143601 (2009).
  21. A. A. Svidzinsky and M. O. Scully, Evolution of collective N atom states in single photon superradiance: Effect of virtual Lamb shift processes, Opt. Commun. 282, 2894 (2009).
  22. M. O. Scully, Single photon subradiance: Quantum control of spontaneous emission and ultrafast readout, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 243602 (2015).
  23. C. Mi, K. S. Nawaz, L. Chen, P. Wang, H. Cai, D.-W. Wang, S.-Y. Zhu, and J. Zhang, Time-resolved interplay between superradiant and subradiant states in superradiance lattices of Bose-Einstein condensates, Phys. Rev. A 104, 043326 (2021).
  24. J. S. Peter, S. Ostermann, and S. F. Yelin, Chirality dependent photon transport and helical superradiance, Phys. Rev. Res. 6, 023200 (2024).
  25. P. Kurian, Computational capacity of life in relation to the universe, Sci. Adv. 11, eadt4623 (2025).
  26. J. N. Tinsley, M. I. Molodtsov, R. Prevedel, D. Wartmann, J. Espigulé-Pons, M. Lauwers, and A. Vaziri, Direct detection of a single photon by humans, Nat. Commun. 7, 12172 (2016).
  27. S. Hecht, S. Shlaer, and M. H. Pirenne, Energy, quanta, and vision, J. Gen. Physiol. 25, 819 (1942).
  28. H. B. Barlow, Retinal noise and absolute threshold, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 46, 634 (1956).
  29. H. Okawa and A. P. Sampath, Optimization of single-photon response transmission at the rod-to-rod bipolar synapse, Physiology (Bethesda) 22, 279 (2007).
  30. G. D. Field, A. P. Sampath, and F. Rieke, Retinal processing near absolute threshold: From behavior to mechanism, Annu. Rev. Physiol. 67, 491 (2005).
  31. N. Brunner, C. Branciard, and N. Gisin, Possible entanglement detection with the naked eye, Phys. Rev. A 78, 052110 (2008).
  32. S. Yao and Z. Wang, Edge states and topological invariants of non-Hermitian systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 086803 (2018).
  33. F. Song, S. Yao, and Z. Wang, Non-Hermitian topological invariants in real space, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 246801 (2019).

Outline

Information

Phys. Rev. A 113, 043708– Published 7 April, 2026
  • Received 19 October 2025
  • Accepted 26 February 2026
Crossmark - Check for updates button
Creative Commons Logo

Published by the American Physical Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. Further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI.

Published by the American Physical Society

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation