Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Quantum imaging with positronium-decay-emitted gamma rays

Alayna Schneider*,†

Ryan Mahon‡, Justin Goodrich§, and Joseph Hanrahan

Sean Stoll∥

Cinzia Da Via¶,**

  • *Contact author: arschnei@umich.edu
  • †Also at National Synchrotron Light Source II, Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, NY 11973, USA.
  • ‡Contact author: rmahon@bnl.gov
  • §Contact author: jgoodrich@bnl.gov
  • ∥Contact author: stoll@bnl.gov
  • Contact author: cinzia.davia@stonybrook.edu
  • **Also at Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, England, UK.

Phys. Rev. A 113, 013715 – Published 9 January, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/srl4-t5hl

Abstract

The use of entangled gamma rays from positronium decay for quantum-enhanced imaging of dense materials is demonstrated. Quantum ghost images, where only one of the entangled 511-keV photons interacts with the object, are obtained for tantalum samples of varying density using a 210-ps time-resolution dual detector system and a Na-22 positron source. An analysis comparing both classical and quantum imaging modalities is employed to isolate true 511-keV events from background noise. Image quality is quantitatively assessed using transmission ratios and the Michelson contrast. Quantum-correlated images are found to exhibit superior (up to approximately 1.7x, from 0.49 to 0.83 in the thickest sample measured) contrast compared to classical methods and align well with theoretical expectations. These results suggest that quantum ghost imaging with positronium-based entangled gamma rays could significantly enhance noninvasive imaging of high-density objects, with potential applications in areas such as cargo inspection and security screening.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (19)

  1. D. J. Bohm and B. J. Hiley, Nonlocality and polarization correlations of annihilation quanta, Nuovo Cim B 35, 137 (1976).
  2. A. Ivashkin, D. Abdurashitov, A. Baranov, F. Guber, S. Morozov, S. Musin, A. Strizhak, and I. Tkachev, Testing entanglement of annihilation photons, Sci. Rep. 13, 7559 (2023).
  3. D. P. Watts, J. Bordes, J. R. Brown, A. Cherlin, R. Newton, J. Allison, M. Bashkanov, N. Efthimiou, and N. A. Zachariou, Photon quantum entanglement in the MeV regime and its application in PET imaging, Nat. Commun. 12, 2646 (2021).
  4. P. Moskal, K. Dulski, N. Chug, C. Curceanu, E. Czerwiński, M. Dadgar, J. Gajewski, A. Gajos, G. Grudzień, B. C. Hiesmayr, et al., Sci. Adv. 7, eabh4394 (2021).
  5. J. Bae, S. Chatzidakis, and R. Ughade, Gamma-Ray and Cosmic Ray Muon Modalities for Cargo Inspection (Springer, New York, 2024), pp. 207–238.
  6. J. Bordes, J. R. Brown, D. P. Watts, M. Bashkanov, K. Gibson, R. Newton, and N. Zachariou, First detailed study of the quantum decoherence of entangled gamma photons, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 132502 (2024).
  7. R. W. Boyd, Quantum imaging, in Foundations of Quantum Theory, Proceedings of the International School of Physics “Enrico Fermi”, Vol. 197 (IOS Press, 2019), pp. 285–300.
  8. Y. Shih, The physics of ghost imaging, in Advances in Lasers and Electro Optics, edited by N. Costa and A. Cartaxo (IntechOpen, London, 2010).
  9. S. Ujeniuc and R. Suvaila, Towards quantum technologies with gamma photons, EPJ Quantum Technology 11, 39 (2024).
  10. A. Stolin, G. Jaliparthi, R. R. Raylman, J. Brefczynski-Lewis, S. Majewski, J. Qi, K. Gong, and S. Dolinsky, Evaluation of Hamamatsu PET imaging modules for dedicated TOF-capable scanners, IEEE Trans. Radiat. Plasma Med. Sci. 3, 634 (2019).
  11. H. Photonics, MPPC module for PET, https://www.hamamatsu.com/content/dam/hamamatsu-photonics/sites/documents/99_SALES_LIBRARY/ssd/pet_module_kacc0011e.pdf, accessed: 2025-05-21.
  12. NIST, XCOM: Photon cross sections database, https://physics. nist.gov/PhysRefData/Xcom/html/xcom1.html, accessed: 2025-05-21.
  13. T. Gregory, P.-A. Moreau, E. Toninelli, and M. J. Padgett, Imaging through noise with quantum illumination, Sci. Adv. 6, eaay2652 (2020).
  14. P. A. Morris, R. S. Aspden, J. E. Bell, R. W. Boyd, and M. J. Padgett, Imaging with a small number of photons, Nat. Commun. 6, 5913 (2015).
  15. A. Ganesan and H. Batelaan, Quantified advantage of ghost imaging over regular imaging, arXiv:2212.01709.
  16. G. Romanchek, G. Shoop, K. Gholami, E. Enlow, and S. Abbaszadeh, Quantum entanglement filtering: A PET feasibility study in imaging dual-positron and prompt gamma emission via Monte Carlo simulation, IEEE Trans. Radiat. Plasma Med. Sci. 8, 916 (2024).
  17. J. Y. Park, J. Mun, J. H. Lee, Y.-H. Yeon, M. Chae, M. Lee, and N.-H. Lee, Development of a dual-modality gamma-ray/fast neutron imaging system for air cargo inspection, Appl. Sci. 12, 9775 (2022).
  18. E. A. Miller, J. A. Caggiano, R. C. Runkle, T. A. White, and A. M. Bevill, Scatter in cargo radiography, Appl. Radiat. Isot. 69, 594 (2011).
  19. A. Schneider, R. Mahon, J. Goodrich, S. Stoll, and C. Da Via, Quantum imaging with positronium decay emitted gamma rays [Dataset], Zenodo (2025), https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17782977.

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation