Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Improved certification of Bell-operator correlations via optimization

Weikang Li1,2,3,*, Mengyao Hu2,3,4,*, Ke Wang5, Shibo Xu5, Zhide Lu6, Jiachen Chen5, Yaozu Wu5, Chuanyu Zhang5, Feitong Jin5 et al.

Xuhao Zhu5, Yu Gao5, Zhengyi Cui5, Aosai Zhang5, Ning Wang5, Yiren Zou5, Fanhao Shen5, Jiarun Zhong5, Zehang Bao5, Zitian Zhu5, Pengfei Zhang7, Hekang Li7, Qiujiang Guo7, Zhen Wang5,8, Dong-Ling Deng1,6,8, Chao Song5,8,†, H. Wang5,7,8, Patrick Emonts2,3,9,10,‡, and Jordi Tura2,3

  • 1Center for Quantum Information, IIIS, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
  • 2Instituut-Lorentz, Universiteit Leiden, P.O. Box 9506, 2300 RA Leiden, the Netherlands
  • 3Applied Quantum Algorithms, Leiden University, 2333 CA Leiden, the Netherlands
  • 4Centre for Quantum Technologies, National University of Singapore, 3 Science Drive 2, Singapore 117543, Singapore
  • 5Zhejiang Key Laboratory of Micro-nano Quantum Chips and Quantum Control, School of Physics, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310027, China
  • 6Shanghai Qi Zhi Institute, Shanghai 200232, China
  • 7ZJU-Hangzhou Global Scientific and Technological Innovation Center, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310027, China
  • 8Hefei National Laboratory, Hefei, Anhui 230088, China
  • 9Institute for Complex Quantum Systems, Ulm University, 89069 Ulm, Germany
  • 10Center for Integrated Quantum Science and Technology, Ulm-Stuttgart, Germany

  • *These authors contributed equally to this work.
  • †Contact author: chaosong@zju.edu.cn
  • ‡Contact author: patrick.emonts@uni-ulm.de

Phys. Rev. A 114, 042442 – Published 19 October, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/sglx-xq8z

Abstract

Bell nonlocality is an intrinsic feature of quantum mechanics, which can be detected via the violation of Bell inequalities. It is therefore a fundamental question to certify Bell nonlocality from experimental data. Here we present an optimization framework to detect Bell-operator correlations by exploring flexible mappings between Bell inequalities and Hamiltonians corresponding to the Bell operators. We show that several Hamiltonian models can be mapped to new inequalities with improved classical bounds compared to the original one, enabling a more robust certification of Bell-operator correlations. From the other direction, we investigate the mapping from fixed Bell inequalities to Hamiltonians, aiming to maximize quantum violations while considering experimental imperfections. As a practical application, we experimentally exploit this method in an XXZ-like honeycomb-lattice model utilizing over 70 superconducting qubits. The successful application of this technique, together with the combination of the two directions to form an optimization loop, may open new avenues for developing more practical and noise-resilient certification techniques for Bell-operator correlations and enable broader experimental explorations.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (54)

  1. A. Einstein, B. Podolsky, and N. Rosen, Can quantum-mechanical description of physical reality be considered complete? Phys. Rev. 47, 777 (1935).
  2. J. S. Bell, On the Einstein Podolsky Rosen paradox, Phys. Phys. Fiz. 1, 195 (1964).
  3. J. F. Clauser, M. A. Horne, A. Shimony, and R. A. Holt, Proposed experiment to test local hidden-variable theories, Phys. Rev. Lett. 23, 880 (1969).
  4. N. Brunner, D. Cavalcanti, S. Pironio, V. Scarani, and S. Wehner, Bell nonlocality, Rev. Mod. Phys. 86, 419 (2014).
  5. S. J. Freedman and J. F. Clauser, Experimental test of local hidden-variable theories, Phys. Rev. Lett. 28, 938 (1972).
  6. A. Aspect, P. Grangier, and G. Roger, Experimental tests of realistic local theories via Bell's theorem, Phys. Rev. Lett. 47, 460 (1981).
  7. G. Weihs, T. Jennewein, C. Simon, H. Weinfurter, and A. Zeilinger, Violation of Bell's inequality under strict Einstein locality conditions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 5039 (1998).
  8. M. A. Rowe, D. Kielpinski, V. Meyer, C. A. Sackett, W. M. Itano, C. Monroe, and D. J. Wineland, Experimental violation of a Bell's inequality with efficient detection, Nature (London) 409, 791 (2001).
  9. J.-Å. Larsson, Loopholes in Bell inequality tests of local realism, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 47, 424003 (2014).
  10. A. Aspect, Closing the door on Einstein and Bohr's quantum debate, Physics 8, 123 (2015).
  11. B. Hensen, H. Bernien, A. E. Dréau, A. Reiserer, N. Kalb, M. S. Blok, J. Ruitenberg, R. F. L. Vermeulen, R. N. Schouten, C. Abellán, W. Amaya, V. Pruneri, M. W. Mitchell, M. Markham, D. J. Twitchen, D. Elkouss, S. Wehner, T. H. Taminiau, and R. Hanson, Loophole-free Bell inequality violation using electron spins separated by 1.3 kilometres, Nature (London) 526, 682 (2015).
  12. M. Giustina, M. A. M. Versteegh, S. Wengerowsky, J. Handsteiner, A. Hochrainer, K. Phelan, F. Steinlechner, J. Kofler, J.-Å. Larsson, C. Abellán, W. Amaya, V. Pruneri, M. W. Mitchell, J. Beyer, T. Gerrits, A. E. Lita, L. K. Shalm, S. W. Nam, T. Scheidl, R. Ursin, et al., Significant-loophole-free test of Bell's theorem with entangled photons, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 250401 (2015).
  13. L. K. Shalm, E. Meyer-Scott, B. G. Christensen, P. Bierhorst, M. A. Wayne, M. J. Stevens, T. Gerrits, S. Glancy, D. R. Hamel, M. S. Allman, K. J. Coakley, S. D. Dyer, C. Hodge, A. E. Lita, V. B. Verma, C. Lambrocco, E. Tortorici, A. L. Migdall, Y. Zhang, D. R. Kumor, et al., Strong loophole-free test of local realism, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 250402 (2015).
  14. M.-H. Li, C. Wu, Y. Zhang, W.-Z. Liu, B. Bai, Y. Liu, W. Zhang, Q. Zhao, H. Li, Z. Wang, L. You, W. J. Munro, J. Yin, J. Zhang, C.-Z. Peng, X. Ma, Q. Zhang, J. Fan, and J.-W. Pan, Test of local realism into the past without detection and locality loopholes, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 080404 (2018).
  15. W. Rosenfeld, D. Burchardt, R. Garthoff, K. Redeker, N. Ortegel, M. Rau, and H. Weinfurter, Event-ready Bell test using entangled atoms simultaneously closing detection and locality loopholes, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 010402 (2017).
  16. S. Storz, J. Schär, A. Kulikov, P. Magnard, P. Kurpiers, J. Lütolf, T. Walter, A. Copetudo, K. Reuer, A. Akin, J.-C. Besse, M. Gabureac, G. J. Norris, A. Rosario, F. Martin, J. Martinez, W. Amaya, M. W. Mitchell, C. Abellan, J.-D. Bancal, et al., Loophole-free Bell inequality violation with superconducting circuits, Nature (London) 617, 265 (2023).
  17. A. Acín, N. Brunner, N. Gisin, S. Massar, S. Pironio, and V. Scarani, Device-independent security of quantum cryptography against collective attacks, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 230501 (2007).
  18. F. Xu, X. Ma, Q. Zhang, H.-K. Lo, and J.-W. Pan, Secure quantum key distribution with realistic devices, Rev. Mod. Phys. 92, 025002 (2020).
  19. S. Pirandola, U. L. Andersen, L. Banchi, M. Berta, D. Bunandar, R. Colbeck, D. Englund, T. Gehring, C. Lupo, C. Ottaviani, J. L. Pereira, M. Razavi, J. Shamsul Shaari, M. Tomamichel, V. C. Usenko, G. Vallone, P. Villoresi, and P. Wallden, Advances in quantum cryptography, Adv. Opt. Photon. 12, 1012 (2020).
  20. R. Colbeck and A. Kent, Private randomness expansion with untrusted devices, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 44, 095305 (2011).
  21. R. Colbeck and R. Renner, Free randomness can be amplified, Nat. Phys. 8, 450 (2012).
  22. R. Gallego, L. Masanes, G. De La Torre, C. Dhara, L. Aolita, and A. Acín, Full randomness from arbitrarily deterministic events, Nat. Commun. 4, 2654 (2013).
  23. I. Šupić and J. Bowles, Self-testing of quantum systems: A review, Quantum 4, 337 (2020).
  24. S. Bravyi, D. Gosset, and R. König, Quantum advantage with shallow circuits, Science 362, 308 (2018).
  25. F. Le Gall, in 34th Computational Complexity Conference, edited by A. Shpilka, Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics Vol. 137 (Schloss Dagstuhl–Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik, Dagstuhl, 2019), pp. 21:1–21:20.
  26. R. Schmied, J.-D. Bancal, B. Allard, M. Fadel, V. Scarani, P. Treutlein, and N. Sangouard, Bell correlations in a Bose-Einstein condensate, Science 352, 441 (2016).
  27. N. J. Engelsen, R. Krishnakumar, O. Hosten, and M. A. Kasevich, Bell correlations in spin-squeezed states of 500 000 atoms, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 140401 (2017).
  28. J. Tura, R. Augusiak, A. B. Sainz, T. Vértesi, M. Lewenstein, and A. Acín, Detecting nonlocality in many-body quantum states, Science 344, 1256 (2014).
  29. J. Tura, G. De las Cuevas, R. Augusiak, M. Lewenstein, A. Acín, and J. I. Cirac, Energy as a detector of nonlocality of many-body spin systems, Phys. Rev. X 7, 021005 (2017).
  30. Z. Wang, S. Singh, and M. Navascués, Entanglement and nonlocality in infinite 1D systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 230401 (2017).
  31. K. Wang, W. Li, S. Xu, M. Hu, J. Chen, Y. Wu, C. Zhang, F. Jin, X. Zhu, Y. Gao, Z. Tan, Z. Cui, A. Zhang, N. Wang, Y. Zou, T. Li, F. Shen, J. Zhong, Z. Bao, Z. Zhu, et al., Probing many-body Bell correlation depth with superconducting qubits, Phys. Rev. X 15, 021024 (2025).
  32. J. Guo, J. Tura, Q. He, and M. Fadel, Detecting Bell correlations in multipartite non-Gaussian spin states, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 070201 (2023).
  33. I. Frérot, M. Fadel, and M. Lewenstein, Probing quantum correlations in many-body systems: A review of scalable methods, Rep. Prog. Phys. 86, 114001 (2023).
  34. F. Bernards and O. Gühne, Bell inequalities for nonlocality depth, Phys. Rev. A 107, 022412 (2023).
  35. S. Gómez, D. Uzcátegui, I. Machuca, E. S. Gómez, S. P. Walborn, G. Lima, and D. Goyeneche, Optimal strategy to certify quantum nonlocality, Sci. Rep. 11, 20489 (2021).
  36. N. Gisin, in Quantum Reality, Relativistic Causality, and Closing the Epistemic Circle, edited by W. C. Myrvold and J. Christian, The Western Ontario Series in Philosophy of Science Vol. 73 (Springer, Dordrecht, 2009), pp. 125–138.
  37. P. Emonts, M. Hu, A. Aloy, and J. Tura, Effects of topological boundary conditions on Bell nonlocality, Phys. Rev. A 110, 032201 (2024).
  38. M. Froissart, Constructive generalization of Bell's inequalities, Nuovo Cimento B 64, 241 (1981).
  39. D. Collins and N. Gisin, A relevant two qubit Bell inequality inequivalent to the CHSH inequality, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 37, 1775 (2004).
  40. K. Mitarai, M. Negoro, M. Kitagawa, and K. Fujii, Quantum circuit learning, Phys. Rev. A 98, 032309 (2018).
  41. W. Ren, W. Li, S. Xu, K. Wang, W. Jiang, F. Jin, X. Zhu, J. Chen, Z. Song, P. Zhang, H. Dong, X. Zhang, J. Deng, Y. Gao, C. Zhang, Y. Wu, B. Zhang, Q. Guo, H. Li, Z. Wang, et al., Experimental quantum adversarial learning with programmable superconducting qubits, Nat. Comput. Sci. 2, 711 (2022).
  42. A. Fawzi, M. Balog, A. Huang, T. Hubert, B. Romera-Paredes, M. Barekatain, A. Novikov, F. J. R. Ruiz, J. Schrittwieser, G. Swirszcz, D. Silver, D. Hassabis, and P. Kohli, Discovering faster matrix multiplication algorithms with reinforcement learning, Nature (London) 610, 47 (2022).
  43. T. Cohen and M. Welling, in Proceedings of The 33rd International Conference on Machine Learning, New York, 2016, edited by M. F. Balcan and K. Q. Weinberger (PMLR, New York, 2016), Vol. 48, pp. 2990–2999.
  44. M. Cerezo, A. Arrasmith, R. Babbush, S. C. Benjamin, S. Endo, K. Fujii, J. R. McClean, K. Mitarai, X. Yuan, L. Cincio, and P. J. Coles, Variational quantum algorithms, Nat. Rev. Phys. 3, 625 (2021).
  45. J. Jesus and E. Zambrini Cruzeiro, Tight Bell inequalities from polytope slices, Phys. Rev. A 108, 052220 (2023).
  46. J.-F. Chen, M. Hu, and J. Tura, Optimizing quantum violation for multipartite facet Bell inequalities, arXiv:2511.07523.
  47. GitHub, https://github.com/LWKJJONAK/HamBell.
  48. F. Baccari, D. Cavalcanti, P. Wittek, and A. Acín, Efficient device-independent entanglement detection for multipartite systems, Phys. Rev. X 7, 021042 (2017).
  49. A. Tavakoli, A. Pozas-Kerstjens, M.-X. Luo, and M.-O. Renou, Bell nonlocality in networks, Rep. Prog. Phys. 85, 056001 (2022).
  50. M.-O. Renou, E. Bäumer, S. Boreiri, N. Brunner, N. Gisin, and S. Beigi, Genuine quantum nonlocality in the triangle network, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 140401 (2019).
  51. M. Hu and J. Tura, Tropical contraction of tensor networks as a Bell inequality optimization toolset, Phys. Rev. Lett. 136, 100202 (2026).
  52. M. Hu, E. Vallée, T. Seynnaeve, P. Emonts, F. Mohammadi, and J. Tura, Characterizing translation-invariant Bell inequalities using tropical algebra and graph polytopes, Phys. Rev. A 113, 032421 (2026).
  53. S. Xu, Z.-Z. Sun, K. Wang, L. Xiang, Z. Bao, Z. Zhu, F. Shen, Z. Song, P. Zhang, W. Ren, X. Zhang, H. Dong, J. Deng, J. Chen, Y. Wu, Z. Tan, Y. Gao, F. Jin, X. Zhu, C. Zhang, et al., Digital simulation of projective non-Abelian anyons with 68 superconducting qubits, Chin. Phys. Lett. 40, 060301 (2023).
  54. S. Xu, Z.-Z. Sun, K. Wang, H. Li, Z. Zhu, H. Dong, J. Deng, X. Zhang, J. Chen, Y. Wu, C. Zhang, F. Jin, X. Zhu, Y. Gao, A. Zhang, N. Wang, Y. Zou, Z. Tan, F. Shen, J. Zhong, et al., Non-Abelian braiding of Fibonacci anyons with a superconducting processor, Nat. Phys. 20, 1469 (2024).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation