- Physical Review Journals
All JournalsPhysics Magazine

Physical Review A

Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Separation estimation of two freely rotating dipole emitters near the quantum limit

Sheng Liu1,2,*, Sujeet Pani1,3, Sajjad A. Khan1,4, Francisco E. Becerra1,3, and Keith A. Lidke1

  • *Contact author: shengl@clemson.edu
PDF

Phys. Rev. A 113, 032425 – Published 13 March, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/nwrq-4fqv

Abstract

According to Rayleigh's criterion, two incoherent emitters with a separation below the diffraction limit are not resolvable with a conventional fluorescence microscope. One method of superresolution microscopy (SRM) circumvents the diffraction-limited resolution by precisely estimating the position of spatiotemporally independent emitters. However, these methods of SRM techniques are not optimal for estimating the separation of two simultaneously excited emitters. Recently, a number of detection methods based on modal imaging have been developed to achieve the quantum Cramér-Rao lower bound (QCRB) to estimate the separations between two nearby emitters. The QCRB determines the minimum achievable precision for all possible detection methods. Current modal imaging techniques assume a scalar field generated from a point source, such as a distant source from an optical fiber or a pinhole. However, for fluorescently labeled samples, point emitters are single fluorophores that are modeled as dipole emitters and, in practice, are often freely rotating. Dipole radiation must be described by vectorial theory, and the assumption of a scalar field no longer holds. Here, we present a method to numerically calculate the QCRB for measuring the separation of two dipole emitters, incorporating the vectorial theory. Furthermore, we propose a near-quantum optimal detection scheme based on one of the modal imaging techniques, superlocalization by image inversion interferometry (SLIVER), for estimating the separation of two freely rotating dipoles. In the proposed method, we introduce a vortex wave plate before the SLIVER detection to separate the radial and azimuthal components of the dipole radiation. With numerical simulations, we demonstrated that our method achieves nondivergent precision at any separation between two dipole emitters. We investigated several practical effects relevant to experimental measurements in superresolution microscopy, including numerical aperture, detection bandwidth, number of estimation parameters, background, and misalignment on separation estimation. Our proposed measurement provides a near-quantum-limited detection scheme for measuring the separation of two freely rotating dipole emitters, such as fluorescently tagged molecules, which are commonly used in superresolution microscopy.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (64)

  1. L. Rayleigh, Investigations in optics, with special reference to the spectroscope, London, Edinburgh, Dublin Philos. Mag. J. Sci. 8, 261 (1879).
  2. J. W. Goodman, Introduction to Fourier Optics, 3rd ed. (Roberts and Company Publishers, Greenwood Village, 2005).
  3. S. M. Kay, Fundamentals of Statistical Signal Processing: Estimation Theory (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, 1993).
  4. C. R. Rao, Linear Statistical Inference and its Applications: Second editon, Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics (Wiley, New York, 1973).
  5. R. J. Ober, S. Ram, and E. S. Ward, Localization accuracy in single-molecule microscopy, Biophys. J. 86, 1185 (2004).
  6. C. V. Middendorff, A. Egner, C. Geisler, S. W. Hell, and A. Schönle, Isotropic 3D nanoscopy based on single emitter switching, Opt. Express 16, 20774 (2008).
  7. C. S. Smith, N. Joseph, B. Rieger, and K. A. Lidke, Fast, single-molecule localization that achieves theoretically minimum uncertainty, Nat. Methods 7, 373 (2010).
  8. Y. Shechtman, S. J. Sahl, A. S. Backer, and W. E. Moerner, Optimal point spread function design for 3D imaging, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 133902 (2014).
  9. S. Liu and F. Huang, Enhanced 4Pi single-molecule localization microscopy with coherent pupil based localization, Commun. Biol. 3, 220 (2020).
  10. Y. Li, W. Shi, S. Liu, I. Cavka, Y.-L. Wu, U. Matti, D. Wu, S. Koehler, and J. Ries, Global fitting for high-accuracy multi-channel single-molecule localization, Nat. Commun. 13, 3133 (2022).
  11. P. Zhang, S. Liu, A. Chaurasia, D. Ma, M. J. Mlodzianoski, E. Culurciello, and F. Huang, Analyzing complex single-molecule emission patterns with deep learning, Nat. Methods 15, 913 (2018).
  12. M. Tsang, R. Nair, and X.-M. Lu, Quantum theory of superresolution for two incoherent optical point sources, Phys. Rev. X 6, 031033 (2016).
  13. F. Huang, S. L. Schwartz, J. M. Byars, and K. A. Lidke, Simultaneous multiple-emitter fitting for single molecule super-resolution imaging, Biomed. Opt. Express 2, 1377 (2011).
  14. C. W. Helstrom, Quantum detection and estimation theory, J. Stat. Phys. 1, 231 (1969).
  15. S. L. Braunstein and C. M. Caves, Statistical distance and the geometry of quantum states, Phys. Rev. Lett. 72, 3439 (1994).
  16. M. P. Backlund, Y. Shechtman, and R. L. Walsworth, Fundamental precision bounds for three-dimensional optical localization microscopy with poisson statistics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 023904 (2018).
  17. O. Zhang and M. D. Lew, Quantum limits for precisely estimating the orientation and wobble of dipole emitters, Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 033114 (2020).
  18. V. Giovannetti, S. Lloyd, and L. Maccone, Advances in quantum metrology, Nat. Photonics 5, 222 (2011).
  19. G. Tóth and I. Apellaniz, Quantum metrology from a quantum information science perspective, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 47, 424006 (2014).
  20. M. Tsang, Subdiffraction incoherent optical imaging via spatial-mode demultiplexing, New J. Phys. 19, 023054 (2017).
  21. M. Tsang, Subdiffraction incoherent optical imaging via spatial-mode demultiplexing: Semiclassical treatment, Phys. Rev. A 97, 023830 (2018).
  22. N. K. Fontaine, R. Ryf, H. Chen, D. T. Neilson, K. Kim, and J. Carpenter, Laguerre-Gaussian mode sorter, Nat. Commun. 10, 1865 (2019).
  23. P. Boucher, C. Fabre, G. Labroille, and N. Treps, Spatial optical mode demultiplexing as a practical tool for optimal transverse distance estimation, Optica 7, 1621 (2020).
  24. W.-K. Tham, H. Ferretti, and A. M. Steinberg, Beating Rayleigh's curse by imaging using phase information, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 070801 (2017).
  25. R. Nair and M. Tsang, Interferometric superlocalization of two incoherent optical point sources, Opt. Express 24, 3684 (2016).
  26. Z. S. Tang, K. Durak, and A. Ling, Fault-tolerant and finite-error localization for point emitters within the diffraction limit, Opt. Express 24, 22004 (2016).
  27. M. Böhmer and J. Enderlein, Orientation imaging of single molecules by wide-field epifluorescence microscopy, J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 20, 554 (2003).
  28. J. Enderlein, E. Toprak, and P. R. Selvin, Polarization effect on position accuracy of fluorophore localization, Opt. Express 14, 8111 (2006).
  29. S. Stallinga and B. Rieger, Accuracy of the Gaussian point spread function model in 2D localization microscopy, Opt. Express 18, 24461 (2010).
  30. K. I. Mortensen, L. S. Churchman, J. A. Spudich, and H. Flyvbjerg, Optimized localization analysis for single-molecule tracking and super-resolution microscopy, Nat. Methods 7, 377 (2010).
  31. M. P. Backlund, M. D. Lew, A. S. Backer, S. J. Sahl, and W. E. Moerner, The role of molecular dipole orientation in single-molecule fluorescence microscopy and implications for super-resolution imaging, ChemPhysChem 15, 587 (2014).
  32. K. I. Mortensen, J. Sung, H. Flyvbjerg, and J. A. Spudich, Optimized measurements of separations and angles between intra-molecular fluorescent markers, Nat. Commun. 6, 8621 (2015).
  33. C. N. Hulleman, R. O. Thorsen, E. Kim, C. Dekker, S. Stallinga, and B. Rieger, Simultaneous orientation and 3D localization microscopy with a Vortex point spread function, Nat. Commun. 12, 5934 (2021).
  34. T. Wu, J. Lu, and M. D. Lew, pixOL: Pixel-wise dipole-spread function engineering for simultaneously measuring the 3D orientation and 3D localization of dipole-like emitters, Microscopy Microanalysis 27, 858 (2021).
  35. S. Liu, J. Chen, J. Hellgoth, L.-R. Müller, B. Ferdman, C. Karras, D. Xiao, K. A. Lidke, R. Heintzmann, Y. Shechtman, Y. Li, and J. Ries, Universal inverse modeling of point spread functions for SMLM localization and microscope characterization, Nat. Methods 21, 1082 (2024).
  36. S. Pani, S. Khan, S. Liu, D. S. Lidke, K. A. Lidke, and F. E. Becerra, Investigation of inversion interferometry for quantum-inspired superresolution of point sources in optical microscopy, in Optica Quantum 2.0 Conference and Exhibition (Optica Publishing Group, Denver, 2023), p. QTh3A.3.
  37. See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/nwrq-4fqv for detailed derivations of PSF models and Fisher information.
  38. H. Weyl, Ausbreitung elektromagnetischer Wellen über einem ebenen Leiter, Ann. Phys. 365, 481 (1919).
  39. S. Liu, Development of Optical Systems and Imaging Analyses for Hyperspectral Microscopy and 3D Super-Resolution Imaging (The University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, 2014).
  40. M. Fazel, K. S. Grussmayer, B. Ferdman, A. Radenovic, Y. Shechtman, J. Enderlein, and S. Pressé, Fluorescence microscopy: A statistics-optics perspective, Rev. Mod. Phys. 96, 025003 (2024).
  41. J. D. Jackson, Classical Electrodynamics, 3rd ed. (Wiley, New York, 1999).
  42. D. Axelrod, Fluorescence excitation and imaging of single molecules near dielectric-coated and bare surfaces: a theoretical study, J. Microsc. 247, 147 (2012).
  43. A. Rubano, F. Cardano, B. Piccirillo, and L. Marrucci, Q-plate technology: a progress review [Invited], J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 36, D70 (2019).
  44. W.-H. Kuan, K.-H. Lin, C.-W. Wang, and N.-H. Hung, Generalized jones calculus for vortex, vector, and vortex-vector beam transformations, arXiv:2103.13779.
  45. L. Yan, P. Gregg, E. Karimi, A. Rubano, L. Marrucci, R. Boyd, and S. Ramachandran, Q-plate enabled spectrally diverse orbital-angular-momentum conversion for stimulated emission depletion microscopy, Optica 2, 900 (2015).
  46. M. P. Backlund, A. Arbabi, P. N. Petrov, E. Arbabi, S. Saurabh, A. Faraon, and W. E. Moerner, Removing orientation-induced localization biases in single-molecule microscopy using a broadband metasurface mask, Nat. Photonics 10, 459 (2016).
  47. S. Liu, E. B. Kromann, W. D. Krueger, J. Bewersdorf, and K. A. Lidke, Three dimensional single molecule localization using a phase retrieved pupil function, Opt. Express 21, 29462 (2013).
  48. J. Liu, H. Yuan, X.-M. Lu, and X. Wang, Quantum Fisher information matrix and multiparameter estimation, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 53, 023001 (2020).
  49. D. J. Schodt, P. J. Cutler, F. E. Becerra, and K. A. Lidke, Tolerance to aberration and misalignment in a two-point-resolving image inversion interferometer, Opt. Express 31, 16393 (2023).
  50. J. Řehaček, Z. Hradil, B. Stoklasa, M. Paúr, J. Grover, A. Krzic, and L. L. Sánchez-Soto, Multiparameter quantum metrology of incoherent point sources: Towards realistic superresolution, Phys. Rev. A 96, 062107 (2017).
  51. A. Dasgupta, J. Deschamps, U. Matti, U. Hübner, J. Becker, S. Strauss, R. Jungmann, R. Heintzmann, and J. Ries, Direct supercritical angle localization microscopy for nanometer 3D superresolution, Nat. Commun. 12, 1180 (2021).
  52. S. A. Khan, K. A. Lidke, and S. Liu, Enhanced supercritical angle localization microscopy through point spread function modeling, Biomed. Opt. Express 16, 3139 (2025).
  53. Y. Shen, X. Wang, Z. Xie, C. Min, X. Fu, Q. Liu, M. Gong, and X. Yuan, Optical vortices 30 years on: OAM manipulation from topological charge to multiple singularities, Light: Sci. Appl. 8, 90 (2019).
  54. R. C. Devlin, A. Ambrosio, N. A. Rubin, J. P. B. Mueller, and F. Capasso, Arbitrary spin-to-orbital angular momentum conversion of light, Science 358, 896 (2017).
  55. A. A. Freschi and J. Frejlich, Adjustable phase control in stabilized interferometry, Opt. Lett. 20, 635 (1995).
  56. D. Grassani, M. Galli, and D. Bajoni, Active stabilization of a Michelson interferometer at an arbitrary phase with subnanometer resolution, Opt. Lett. 39, 2530 (2014).
  57. E. Bisketzi, D. Branford, and A. Datta, Quantum limits of localisation microscopy, New J. Phys. 21, 123032 (2019).
  58. C. F. Dunkl and Y. Xu, Orthogonal Polynomials of Several Variables (Cambridge University, Cambridge, 2014).
  59. S. Zhou and L. Jiang, Modern description of Rayleigh's criterion, Phys. Rev. A 99, 013808 (2019).
  60. M. Tsang, Quantum limit to subdiffraction incoherent optical imaging, Phys. Rev. A 99, 012305 (2019).
  61. X.-J. Tan and M. Tsang, Quantum limit to subdiffraction incoherent optical imaging. III. Numerical analysis, Phys. Rev. A 108, 052416 (2023).
  62. R. B. Sekar and A. Periasamy, Fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) microscopy imaging of live cell protein localizations, J. Cell Biol. 160, 629 (2003).
  63. A. Joshi, A. Walimbe, S. Sarkar, L. Arora, G. Kaur, P. Jhandai, D. Chatterjee, I. Banerjee, and S. Mukhopadhyay, Intermolecular energy migration via homoFRET captures the modulation in the material property of phase-separated biomolecular condensates, Nat. Commun. 15, 9215 (2024).
  64. S. Liu, S. Pani, S. A. Khan, F. E. Becerra, and K. A. Lidke, Data for Figs.  2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 (2026), doi:10.5281/zenodo.18674589.

Outline

Information

Phys. Rev. A 113, 032425– Published 13 March, 2026
  • Received 30 October 2025
  • Accepted 13 February 2026
Crossmark - Check for updates button
Creative Commons Logo

Published by the American Physical Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. Further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI.

Published by the American Physical Society

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation